
Boeing and FAA Blamed for Alaska Airlines Incident: NTSB Findings, ET Infra
Advt
Advt
Boeing's failure to provide adequate training to manufacturing staff was a driving factor in a near-catastrophic Alaska Airlines mid-flight blowout , US investigators said Tuesday.In its analysis of the January 2024 incident, the National Transportation Safety Board said faulty Boeing staff guidance and procedures -- along with ineffective federal oversight -- were a probable cause for the mishap, in which a fusealge panel on a 737 MAX broke free from the jetliner shortly after takeoff.There were no serious injuries and pilots managed to fly the plane back to Portland, Oregon and land it safely.But the drama plunged Boeing back into crisis mode, leading to a brief grounding of the 737 MAX models involved in the incident and prompting federal officials to cap the MAX's monthly production. This hit Boeing's profitability.During a public meeting to present their findings, NTSB officials said they believed the problem stemmed from an action by Boeing staff to remove the left mid-exit door of the plane during maintenance. They said this step was not ordered or overseen with proper protocols.Investigators found no work order for the activity or evidence that the door was reinstalled properly. NTSB officials said previously that four bolts securing the panel went missing.The NTSB said the "probable cause" was due to "Boeing Commercial Airplanes' failure to provide adequate training, guidance and oversight necessary to ensure that manufacturing personnel could consistently and correctly comply with its parts removal process." This was contained in a draft finding approved by board members at the meeting.Boeing has revamped quality systems following the Alaska Airlines incident , redoubling training efforts and reducing work performed outside of sequence that can lead to production defects.The company last year replaced its CEO with former Rockwell Collins CEO Kelly Ortberg, who has said that improving Boeing's corporate culture will take time.Boeing said it was reviewing the report.The NTSB directed recommendations at the US Federal Aviation Administration."Contributing to the accident was the Federal Aviation Administration's ineffective compliance enforcement surveillance and audit planning activities, which failed to adequately identify and ensure that Boeing addressed the repetitive and systemic nonconformance issues associated with tis parts removal process," the investigation concluded.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
a day ago
- India Today
Are U.S. Presidents selling war for profit?
Behind the pomp of presidential summits and NATO handshakes lies an uncomfortable truth—America's foreign policy isn't driven by diplomacy, but by the defence lobby's bottom line. From Obama's Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech to Trump's brash missile marketing, every US president has doubled as the world's most powerful arms dealer. The numbers don't lie. Defence giants like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Raytheon pump over 80 million annually into lobbying, with nearly 280 million flowing to political campaigns since 1990. This isn't charity—it's investment in influence. Every dollar spent returns tenfold in government contracts and overseas sales NATO's latest pledge makes this crystal clear. By 2035, member states must spend 5% of GDP on "defence"—a windfall wrapped in security rhetoric. Buried in the fine print: 3.5% goes directly to military kit, much of it stamped "Made in USA." European taxpayers will fund American factories whilst their own public services face the revolving door spins faster than a Chinook's rotors. Pentagon officials become corporate executives, senators join defence boards, and generals turn consultant. This ensures continuity regardless of election results—the real winners remain never bothered with subtlety, openly flogging Patriot missiles at NATO summits like a market trader hawking knockoff watches. Biden played the statesman whilst quietly expediting record arms transfers to Ukraine. Obama collected his peace prize then approved 135 billion in weapons sales. Different styles, identical tragedy became America's opportunity. Every HIMARS rocket fired was a billboard for US firepower. Every Patriot battery deployed was a sales demonstration. Zelensky's desperate pleas for seven more systems weren't just about survival—they were free advertising for American defence human cost is staggering, but so is the opportunity cost. Half of America's discretionary budget feeds the military machine whilst schools crumble and hospitals close. NATO's spending spree threatens similar austerity across isn't foreign policy—it's product placement with geopolitical consequences. When the next crisis erupts, remember: someone dies, but someone else gets rich. In America's war economy, that's not a bug—it's the entire bloody point.- Ends
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
2 days ago
- Business Standard
India must protect farmers, digital ecosystem in trade pact with US: GTRI
Any trade agreement with the US must not be politically driven or one-sided and India should protect its farmers, digital ecosystem, and policy space, economic think tank GTRI said on Friday. With India's chief trade negotiator in Washington DC and the clock ticking, the next few days could determine whether India and the US settle for a limited mini-deal or walk away from the negotiating table - at least for now, the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said. The two sides are looking at finalising an interim trade pact before July 9, as it marks the end of US President Donald Trump's 90-day suspension of the country-specific tariffs, originally announced on April 2. "The more likely outcome is a limited trade pact - styled after the US-UK mini trade deal announced on May 8," GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava said, adding, "any trade deal with the US must not be politically driven or one-sided, it must protect our farmers, our digital ecosystem, and our sovereign regulatory space." Under a mini or interim deal, according to the think tank, India is expected to cut tariffs on a wide range of industrial goods, including automobiles, a persistent demand from Washington. In agriculture, India may offer limited market access through tariff reductions and tariff-rate quotas (TRQs) on select US products such as ethanol, almonds, walnuts, apples, raisins, avocados, olive oil, spirits, and wine, it added. Beyond tariffs, the US is expected to press India for large-scale commercial purchases, including oil and LNG, civilian and military aircraft from Boeing, helicopters, and nuclear reactors, it said. "There may also be pressure on India to ease FDI restrictions in multi-brand retail, potentially benefiting firms like Amazon and Walmart and to liberalise rules on remanufactured goods, currently subject to stringent import norms," Srivastava said. Agricultural goods account for less than 5 per cent of US exports to India. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)


India.com
3 days ago
- India.com
Days after Air India crash, N. Chandrasekaran takes charge as..., to work with...
Days after Air India crash, N. Chandrasekaran takes charge as..., to work with... Air India Crisis: After the recent Tata India plane crash near Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in Ahmedabad, the airline company is going through the most challenging phase at this time. Dealing with the situation created after the plane crash has become the biggest challenge for Air India at this time. In such a situation, Tata Group Chairman N. Chandrasekhar himself has taken the responsibility of the daily operations of Air India. N Chandrasekhar is currently working on security review, sensitive government relations, flight maintenance as well as the welfare of employees. History is a witness that whenever a crisis situation has arisen, the Tata chairman has handled it himself. For example, in 1989, when Tata Steel caught fire, J.R.D. Tata himself took charge and led the entire situation. Tata Chairman takes charge Whether it was the attack on Taj Hotel in Mumbai on 26 November or the scam in Tata Finance, Ratan Tata always came forward as the Tata Chairman. While working in TCS, N. Chandrasekaran is also known for taking the right decision to overcome the crisis. According to reports, Air India CEO Campbell is now working with N. Chandrasekaran on regulatory matters and strategic plans. Given his experience with Tata, Chandrasekaran can handle the kind of immediate action that is needed at the present time. Air India needs special focus Group officials believe that Air India needs special attention at this time. They say that N. Chandrasekaran has previously worked from the airline headquarters. In such a situation, the kind of focus and immediate action that is needed on the aviation company, only the group chairman can do this work. Officials believe that there is a great need at this time to rebuild Air India's reputation and win the trust of the people. It is worth noting that on June 12, Air India's Boeing plane crashed in Ahmedabad. In this incident, 241 out of 242 passengers died. These included 12 crew members as well. Air India had announced to give Rs 1 crore each to the families of all the deceased.