South Korean markets sink as Trump slaps 25% tariff on exports
The South Korean won sank as much as 1.1% to 1,378 per dollar — its weakest level in two weeks — immediately after Trump posted the tariff announcement on social media.
US President Donald Trump announced on Monday (July 7) that his administration will impose a 25 percent tariff on all imports from South Korea, citing long-standing trade imbalances and what he described as unfair tariff and non-tariff barriers. The tariffs are set to take effect from August 1, 2025.
In a letter to South Korean President Lee Jae-myung, Trump said the United States had shown 'great commitment' by continuing trade relations with both countries despite 'significant' deficits.
'We have decided to move forward with you, but only with more balanced, and fair, TRADE,' Trump wrote in the letter released by the White House.
Trump made it clear that if South Korea responds by raising its own tariffs on US goods, the US would increase its new 25% levy proportionally.
'If for any reason you decide to raise your Tariffs, then, whatever the number you choose to raise them by, will be added onto the 25% that we charge,' he warned.
Trump emphasised that the persistent trade deficit with South Korea was 'a major threat to our Economy and, indeed, our National Security.'
He criticised 'Tariff and Non Tariff Policies and Trade Barriers', arguing they have resulted in 'unsustainable trade deficits' for the US.
The president offered a path for South Korean companies to avoid the tariffs: move manufacturing to the United States.
'There will be no Tariff if [you] decide to build or manufacture product within the United States,' Trump wrote. He promised expedited approvals, 'in a matter of weeks.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Can US President Donald Trump win the Nobel Peace Prize?
The Nobel Peace Prize is one of the most prestigious honours that can be awarded to individuals and organisations internationally. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has nominated US President Donald Trump for the prize. If Trump wins, he will be the fifth US president on the list after Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Jimmy Carter, and Barack Obama. Here is a look at how the award works: Who can win? According to the will of Swedish industrialist Alfred Nobel, the inventor of dynamite, the prize should go to the person 'who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.' In an introduction on the Nobel website, Chair of the Peace Prize Committee Jorgen Watne Frydnes says 'in practice anyone can be the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize. The history of the prize shows clearly it's given to people from all layers of society from all over the world.' Who can nominate? Thousands of people can propose names: members of governments and parliaments; current heads of state; university professors of history, social sciences, law, and philosophy; and former Nobel Peace Prize laureates, among others. You cannot nominate yourself. Nominee lists are kept secret for 50 years, though there is nothing to stop those who make nominations from disclosing their choices. Who decides? The Norwegian Nobel Committee, which consists of five individuals appointed by the Norwegian parliament, is the arbiter. Members are often retired politicians, but not always. The current committee is led by the head of the Norwegian branch of PEN International, a group defending freedom of expression. They are all put forward by Norwegian political parties and their appointments reflect the balance of power in Norway's parliament. How do they decide? Nominations close on January 31, meaning Netanyahu's nomination of Trump would not be considered this year. Members of the committee can make their own nominations no later than the first meeting of the committee in February. They make a shortlist, and each nominee is then assessed by a group of permanent advisers and other experts. The committee aims for unanimity but can decide by majority vote. A final decision is often only made a few days before the prize is announced. Controversies The Nobel Peace Prize has often been seen as having a political message. The Nobel website says some recipients have been 'highly controversial political actors,' while the prize has also increased public focus on international or national conflicts. Obama won the award just a few months after taking office. Two members of the committee stepped down over the decision in 1973 to award the Peace Prize to U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Vietnamese politician Le Duc Tho for negotiating an end to the Vietnam War. One member quit in 1994 when Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat shared the prize with Israel's Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin. What does the laureate get? A medal, a diploma, 11 million Swedish crowns ($1.15 million), and immediate global attention, if they are not already famous. When are the announcement and the ceremony? The announcement of this year's prize will be made on October 10 at the Norwegian Nobel Institute in Oslo. The ceremony will take place at the Oslo City Hall on December 10, the anniversary of Alfred Nobel's death.
News18
12 minutes ago
- News18
Asia's Most Atheist Nation? Why South Koreans Are Turning Away From Religion
South Korea, known for tech giants and luxury cars, is becoming one of the world's most irreligious societies, with nearly 60% unaffiliated due to modernisation and disillusionment In the heart of Asia, a country known for its global tech giants, luxury car brands, and record-breaking internet speeds is quietly leading another revolution, i.e. a mass departure from religion. South Korea, one of the most economically advanced nations, is emerging as one of the world's most irreligious societies, with nearly 60% of its population now unaffiliated with any religion, according to data available up to 2024. This dramatic shift didn't happen overnight. Decades of modernisation, disillusionment with religious institutions, and a generational change in values have slowly but firmly eroded the influence of organised religion in South Korean society. South Korea's religious landscape has undergone a seismic transformation. Once a society deeply shaped by Buddhism and later Christianity, the country has seen a steady decline in religious affiliation. Today, only about 31% of South Koreans identify as Christians, with Protestants making up 20% and Catholics 11%, while around 17% practice Buddhism. The rest, a clear majority, declare no religious ties whatsoever. What sets South Korea apart is not just the percentage of non-believers, but the voluntary and conscious nature of their choice. Religious disinterest isn't a product of government repression, as in North Korea, where all forms of open worship are effectively banned. Instead, it reflects a broad societal shift driven by complex cultural, political, and economic factors. The roots of South Korea's religious decline lie in its meteoric economic rise. Over the past five decades, the country has transformed from a war-torn economy to a high-tech powerhouse. That rapid industrialisation brought with it sweeping urbanisation, weakening the grip of traditional institutions, including religious ones. In modern South Korea, the youth are hyper-focused on education, careers, and navigating one of the most competitive societies in the world. Long working hours, high academic pressure, and a digital-first lifestyle have made religious rituals feel outdated and impractical. Many young South Koreans now identify as 'spiritual but not religious," open to metaphysical ideas but skeptical of organised religion. Adding to the disillusionment is the credibility crisis facing South Korea's religious leaders. Scandals involving high-profile churches, especially among Protestant megachurches, have shaken public trust. Accusations of tax evasion, embezzlement, and even sexual abuse have emerged repeatedly in recent decades. One major turning point was the Covid-19 outbreak in 2020, when the secretive Shincheonji Church of Jesus was linked to a massive coronavirus cluster. The group was accused of withholding information from authorities, fuelling nationwide outrage and further deepening public suspicion toward religious organisations. Buddhism, too, has struggled to maintain relevance. Though historically significant, the number of its followers has been shrinking since the early 2000s, and the rise of commercialised 'temple tourism" has further diluted its spiritual core in the public eye. Religion's role in politics has also contributed to its waning influence. During the 1980s and 1990s, after South Korea transitioned to democracy, several Christian leaders gained prominence, including Protestant Kim Young-sam and Catholic Kim Dae-jung. Large churches began aligning with political parties, funding campaigns and lobbying for influence. However, this entanglement backfired. Instead of gaining power, religious institutions lost credibility. Their perceived interference in governance and their own internal scandals turned voters away. Attempts by political parties to build religious vote banks were met with resistance by a population increasingly wary of mixing faith with statecraft. Now, South Korean democracy is marked by a clear separation between religion and politics, a separation that citizens seem determined to preserve. South Korea's secular surge is unique in Asia, where most countries still have strong religious traditions. Even neighbouring Japan, which is often viewed as secular, still retains large pockets of religious and spiritual practices blended into daily life. North Korea, by contrast, enforces atheism through authoritarian rule, punishing religious activity with harsh penalties. Yet, South Korea's atheism is not imposed; it's chosen. Much like nations such as Sweden or the Netherlands, where religion has gradually faded into the cultural background, South Korea is moving toward a similar future. First Published: July 08, 2025, 20:49 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Brands Him a ‘THUGGISH LUNK' Who FEARS The Truth!
In a blistering new take, Mary Trump, clinical psychologist and Donald Trump's niece, labels the former president's leadership as a 'reign of terror, confusion, chaos, and idiocy.' She goes further, accusing him of being a 'thuggish lunk' who 'denies Americans access to any truths' and mocks his mounting mental decline, highlighting sharp memory lapses like being unable to 'tie his own shoes.' For Mary, this isn't just personal. She describes Trump as blending 'cognitive decline with narcissism', a dangerous mix she ranks as 'a 10 out of 10' in its impact. WATCH Read More
