logo
After six failed attempts, 13th-seeded Latin Academy boys' tennis breaks through to reach Division 3 semifinals

After six failed attempts, 13th-seeded Latin Academy boys' tennis breaks through to reach Division 3 semifinals

Boston Globe07-06-2025
The comebacks lifted the 13th-seeded Dragons (15-6) to an upset victory over No. 5 Medfield (14-3) in the Division 3 quarterfinals at Wimbledon Metrowest Tennis & Pickleball Club in Walpole. Latin Academy faces top-seeded Bedford in a semifinal matchup next week.
Advertisement
'They are smart players, and they make the most of their talents,' Crane said. 'This was a really tight match that could have gone either way, but just really proud of our doubles guys. To both be down one set and come back, that shows a lot.'
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Senior captain Hewitt Ngo gave the Dragons a strong start, cruising to a 6-2, 6-3 win at second singles. It was the second-straight match Latin needed every point, having survived No. 4 Apponequet by a 3-2 margin just three days earlier.
'We have the depth that we haven't had in the past,' Crane said. 'And it took a while for the team to come together. Our record was good, but we weren't playing our best tennis until we got to the playoffs.'
Advertisement
For Crane, whose roster draws from schools across the city, the achievement resonated as a milestone in the program's sustained period of success.
'This is a no-cut team with about 35 kids this year. We take all comers and teach even new players a game that they'll play forever,' Crane said. 'And so there's a lot of excitement across the board here about what this team accomplished.'
Matty Wasserman can be reached at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NRL news: Major blow for Panthers as Dragons confirm signing of highly-rated brothers from Penrith
NRL news: Major blow for Panthers as Dragons confirm signing of highly-rated brothers from Penrith

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

NRL news: Major blow for Panthers as Dragons confirm signing of highly-rated brothers from Penrith

Ivan Cleary has previously called for NRL clubs to be compensated when their junior ranks are raided. The Dragons have confirmed the signings of twin 16-year-olds Alexander and Cornelius Pupualii in a major retention blow for the Penrith Panthers. The Pupualii twins are Panthers juniors, and highly-rated prospects. Cornelius is a 193cm-tall centre weighing in at 100kg, who the Dragons view as a long-term member of their back-line. Alexander is a 119kg second-rower, who has unfortunately missed all junior footy this season due to an ACL injury. Cornelius has been carving up in the Panthers' Harold Matthews Cup team (Under-17s). The twins are set to turn 17 later this year, and the Dragons believe they will be part of their first-grade squad for years to come. Ivan Cleary (L) and the Panthers have lost a talented duo to Shane Flanagan (R) and the Dragons. Image: Getty "The Dragons are pleased to confirm that talented teenagers Alexander and Cornelius Pupualii have agreed to deals with the club," St George Illawarra said in a statement on Tuesday. "The two will be contracted to the club until at least the end of the 2027 season." ADVERTISEMENT The Pupualii brothers grew up in Mount Druitt and played their junior rugby league with the St Marys Saints - in the heartland of Panthers territory. But Penrith had a fight on their hands to retain them, with the Raiders, Rabbitohs, Tigers, Sharks and Cowboys all expressing interest. But the Dragons ultimately won out after the twins and their parents met with coach Shane Flanagan. 'I'm grateful. I just want to give back to my family. I'm ready to work hard and I'm ready to pull on this jersey,' Alexander said via the Dragons website. Cornelius added: 'I have faith in this club's coaching staff and players. There is so much history here. We're both for the fans and can't wait to represent them.' Alexander and Cornelius Pupualii at Dragons headquarters. Hope for Dragons fans amid finals drought The Dragons are set to play the Pupualii twins at SG Ball Cup level (Under-19s) in 2026. Their signing is a massive boost for a struggling club, with the Dragons currently sitting 11th and little chance to play finals footy. ADVERTISEMENT The Red V haven't played finals footy since 2018, with Flanagan likely to miss the playoffs in his second year at the helm. However the Dragons have a good crop of youngsters coming through in the likes of Dylan Egan, Hamish Stewart, Lyhkan King-Togia, Loko Pasifiki Tonga and Jacob Halangahu. The Pupualii brothers will only strengthen their young core and give Red V fans plenty of hope. RELATED: Ivan Cleary wants compensation for Penrith juniors leaving As for the Panthers, it remains to be seen how highly they rated the twins. The Panthers have one of the best junior pathways systems in the NRL, which inevitably results in rival clubs poaching some of their best young talent. ADVERTISEMENT Speaking last year, coach Ivan Cleary called for the NRL to introduce a compensation system for when clubs have their junior ranks raided. "I think we should get dispensation, probably more in a development sense," Cleary said. "We develop a lot of players here that end up elsewhere, so I feel like we should get looked after more by the NRL in that space, apart from the salary cap and how it all works, it's hard to argue with. But I do think we should be compensated in some way for the amount of players we've developed and the status they've become throughout the league."

NRL's response to Shane Flanagan ref spray questioned as 'precedent' singled out
NRL's response to Shane Flanagan ref spray questioned as 'precedent' singled out

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

NRL's response to Shane Flanagan ref spray questioned as 'precedent' singled out

Rugby League great Greg Alexander has questioned why the NRL has decided not to fine Shane Flanagan for his blow-up at officials after the Dragons' 20-18 loss to Canterbury last weekend. An enraged Flanagan singled out a couple of refereeing decisions that he said were 'wrong' and potentially cost his side a chance to play finals footy this season. The Dragons coach took aim at two controversial calls during the final minutes of the two-point defeat. He accused Jacob Kiraz of planting the ball before he got to his feet and described the ensuing penalty against Luciano Leilua for ruck interference as 'outrageous'. The Dragons coach also claimed that Viliame Kikau knocked the ball forward into Tyrell Sloan when attempting a bat-on pass moments later, and was furious that the Dogs were allowed to play on. It proved costly as Lachlan Galvin set up the match-winning try with a superb cut-out ball to Jethro Rinakama that denied the Dragons a win and left them six points out of finals contention with just seven games left to play. "The Luciano Leilua decision was outrageous," Flanagan fumed in his post-match press conference. "He's got to get to his feet before he plants the ball. You can't be falling sideways. You can't ball-plant... but tonight we ball-planted and we lost the game because of it." And about the decision not to pull up Kikau for a knock-on, he added: "Kikau passes the ball, hit Sloan and goes forward, so in the collision that's a knock-on. Ever since 100 years, that's a knock-on and that was at the 78-minute mark... They're a good side the Bulldogs, they compete hard, but it was some decisions tonight that cost us two competition points and could cost us an opportunity to play semi-finals." NRL backs officials, decides not to fine Shane Flanagan However, the NRL backed their officials over both calls, citing footage that showed Leilua denied Kiraz an opportunity to play the ball correctly by grabbing the winger's arm before his foot dislodged the ball. The NRL also ruled there was insufficient evidence to prove that Kikau knocked the ball forward into Sloan. Both were viewed as 50/50 calls that could have gone either way and it's for that very reason that Alexander believes Flanagan wasn't fined for his outburst. The Penrith great pointed out that the NRL announced a blanket ban on coaches questioning refereeing decisions at the start of the year and suggested league bosses erred on their tough stance by not fining Flanagan. 'The precedent had been set and there was a directive from the NRL that you can't question decisions,' Alexander said on SEN 1170 Breakfast. 'I thought Flanagan was in control of what he was saying. He didn't lose it but there's no doubt he was questioning the decision. 'He even said the decisions were outrageous. The NRL are hedging their bets. Normally, they would've fined a coach and they have fined coaches this year for questioning referee decisions." But Alexander insists coaches 'should be allowed to' air their grievances in the manner Flanagan did, without being sanctioned. RELATED: Scary Panthers detail that backs up legend's huge premiership call Tigers star linked with switch to rival clubs as medical detail emerges Broncos' cap squeeze could claim another star as 'formal' offers touted '(The NRL made the decision) not to fine him because it was a 50/50 call and it could've easily gone the way of the Dragons," he added. "Is that off-putting to some? Why can't a coach say that? As long as a coach handles themselves in the way that Shane Flanagan did. He wasn't saying that they'd been robbed. He said it in a matter which I believe coaches should be allowed to do.' However, the situation appears to fly in the face of what NRL head of football operations Graham Annesley said earlier in the year, when clarifying what coaches are not allowed to say about the referees. "They can't make derogatory comments about match officials, they can't attack their performance or integrity," he told Wide World of Sports. "They can't do anything that brings into question the integrity or the performance of the referee but they can disagree with individual decisions."

Ugly truth for Storm and Dragons fans amid claims they were both 'robbed'
Ugly truth for Storm and Dragons fans amid claims they were both 'robbed'

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

Ugly truth for Storm and Dragons fans amid claims they were both 'robbed'

OPINION Dragons and Storm fans were both left crying foul on Saturday night amid claims they were 'robbed' by contentious calls in their NRL losses to the Bulldogs and Sea Eagles. For the Dragons it was what Shane Flanagan described as an 'outrageous' penalty given to the Bulldogs that allowed them to march downfield and score the match-winning try at the death. And it was also a penalty awarded to Manly that had Melbourne fans up in arms. But in both instances, one could make a very good argument they both had themselves to blame. I'm a diehard Dragons fan, and I completely agree the Bunker got it wrong when Luciano Leilua was deemed to have crowded the ruck and caused Jacob Kiraz to lose the ball with five minutes to play. Leilua was simply standing up rather than "moving his foot forward" as the Bunker official claimed, and Kiraz should have paid the price for showing no care for the ball while trying to play it quickly. It also looked like Kiraz didn't get to his feet properly before trying to play it. Kiraz is on his knees and tries to play the ball I thought that wasn't allowed ?#NRLBulldogsDragons — ClippersSeason (@FunnyCants) July 19, 2025 What should have been a knock-on and Dragons ball in good field position was instead a Bulldogs penalty that allowed them to go downfield and score the winner. But the truth of the matter is the Dragons still should have won if not for a couple of diabolical decisions they made. Corey Allan inexplicably dived back into his own in-goal with three minutes remaining to force a line drop-out, rather than diving forward into the field of play to retain possession. Captain Clint Gutherson then made a questionable decision to attempt a short drop-out rather than pump it long - gifting the Bulldogs the ball just 10m out when it didn't go the distance. Why on earth Gutherson didn't go for a long drop-out and make the Bulldogs try and score from long-range is anyone's guess. Not to mention Tyrell Sloan rushing in from his wing and leaving Jethro Rinakama unmarked to score the match-winning try. Jethro Rinakama scores the match-winner! 🤯Telstra Moment of the Match — NRL (@NRL) July 19, 2025 Dragons' poor decision-making late in games The penalty call on the Kiraz dropped ball was a shocker, but the Dragons shot themselves in the foot with how they responded. They've lost three games by a single point this season, and another by two points. At times they've been desperately unlucky, but their decision-making late in games hasn't been good enough. They were certifiably robbed in Round 18 against Canberra when a try was disallowed for a forward pass that was nowhere near forward, which saw the touch-judge axed for the remainder of the season. But Saturday night's loss to the Bulldogs wasn't the same. Damien Cook also questioned a try that was disallowed for Sloan pushing Rinakama in the back. But the Dragons winger has gotten away with the same act multiple times this season, and it caught up with him on Saturday night. Bunker got it exactly right to penalise Harry Grant As for the Storm, the Bunker official got it exactly right when he pinged Harry Grant for running through the kicking leg of Luke Brooks on an attempted field-goal. The ensuing penalty allowed the Sea Eagles to kick two points for a 20-18 victory. Storm fans claimed it was a soft penalty and questioned the rule, but Lachlan Ilias' broken leg last year shows why it's needed. And once again the Storm only had themselves to blame. Nelson Asofa-Solomona's elbow to the head of Jake Simpkin proved a game-changing moment when a try for Grant was overturned because of it. If Asofa-Solomona hadn't lashed out, the Storm would have reduced the deficit and gone on to win. Melbourne coach Craig Bellamy admitted his side's ill-discipline was a bigger factor than any refereeing decision. 'You just see the error rate, at half-time our completions was 65 per cent and theirs was 92 per cent or something, so it's hard to be competitive if you're completing at that and the opposition is completing at that high rate,' Bellamy said. 'I don't know whether we were looking for a soft performance, but having said that, you've got to give a lot of credit to Manly too. How we started, it's like we were looking for short cuts straight away." On the Grant penalty late in the game, the Storm coach said: "I suppose, within what the rules say, that's what it was."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store