Air India Crash: Engines Shut Down Seconds After Takeoff, Report Finds
Skift's coverage of the Air India crash is offered free to all readers.
An unexplained fuel supply cutoff caused both engines of Air India Flight AI117 to shut down seconds after takeoff, according to a preliminary report released Saturday by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB).
The 15-page document reveals that just 32 seconds into the June 12 flight, the Boeing 787 Dreamliner lost all engine power. The aircraft, en route from Ahmedabad to London, crashed less than a nautical mile from the runway, killing 241 of the 242 people on board.
'At about 08:08:42 UTC and immediately thereafter, the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another with a time gap of 01 sec. The Engine N1 and N2 began to decrease from their take-off values as the fuel supply to the engines was cut off,' the report stated.
As per the conversation captured in cockpit voice recorder, 'One of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff. The other pilot responded that he did not do so,' the report states
The report indicates the fuel switches were turned back on mid-air. At that point, the engines' Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) system attempted auto-restart. This triggered the igniters and slowly reintroduced fuel to restore thrust. Engine 1 showed some signs of recovery. Engine 2 did not.
Emergency Power Kicks In
Airport CCTV footage confirmed the deployment of the Ram Air Turbine (RAT), a small emergency device that provides power when the main engines and generators fail. With systems now running on emergency backup, the pilots attempted multiple engine restarts.
'No significant bird activity is observed in the vicinity of the flight path. The aircraft started to lose altitude before crossing the airport perimeter wall,' the report noted.
The Air India flight crashed into the BJ Medical College hostel compound, destroying several buildings and catching fire on impact.
'The aircraft was destroyed due to impact with the buildings on the ground and subsequent fire,' the report said.
No Immediate Action Recommended for Boeing or GE
The AAIB said it is not recommending changes for Boeing or GE Aerospace at this stage of the investigation.
'At this stage of investigation, there are no recommended actions to B787-8 and/or GE GEnx-1B engine operators and manufacturers.'
The AAIB is leading the investigation with technical assistance from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board, the U.K.'s Air Accidents Investigation Branch, Boeing, and GE Aerospace.
The investigation is still on and AAIB has said the investigation team will review and examine additional evidence, records and information that is being sought from stakeholders.
Acknowledging the receipt of the preliminary report, an Air India spokesperson said, "Air India is working closely with stakeholders, including regulators. We continue to fully cooperate with the AAIB and other authorities as their investigation progresses. Given the active nature of the investigation, we are unable to comment on specific details and refer all such enquiries to the AAIB."
FAA Advisory Raised Fuel Switch Concerns in 2018
A 2018 Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB) issued by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) warned airlines about a design concern in fuel control switches. The switches, which regulate fuel flow to engines, are supposed to have a locking feature to prevent accidental shutoff. The FAA noted that on some aircraft, the locking mechanism could malfunction.
Though the advisory primarily targeted Boeing 737s, the same switch type is used in the 787 fleet.
The FAA did not mandate corrective action, and Air India said it did not inspect the fuel switches on this aircraft because the SAIB was advisory in nature. Maintenance logs show that throttle components were replaced in 2019 and again in 2023, but no known issues were flagged with the fuel cutoff switches.
There have been no prior reports of problems with the switch on this particular aircraft since 2023.
Parallel Investigations and Official Response
India's Ministry of Civil Aviation has formed a separate committee to submit findings within three months. Civil Aviation Minister Ram Mohan Naidu has pledged full transparency.
'Any information that is going around this crash, any theory… everything will be analyzed,' Naidu said during a press briefing after the crash.
Air India CEO Campbell Wilson also urged restraint and accuracy in public commentary.
'We will cooperate in all possible ways,' Wilson said in a statement. He visited the crash site the following day, alongside more than 30 technical experts from Air India.
What Happened on June 12?
Flight AI117 had originated in Paris, making scheduled stops in Delhi and Ahmedabad before departing for London at 1:39 p.m. local time on June 12. The aircraft reached approximately 650 feet before losing altitude.
A mayday call was issued seconds after takeoff, but officials say there was 'no response' following the call. The aircraft crashed about two kilometers from the airport into a medical college hostel. No abnormalities had been reported during the earlier legs of the journey.
Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, a senior pilot with over 8,200 hours on the 787, was in command. His co-pilot had logged roughly 1,100 hours.
Investigators recovered the cockpit voice and flight data recorder, also known as the Digital Voice Data Recorder (DVDR), within 28 hours of the crash.
Regulatory Fallout
The crash has triggered regulatory action. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has ordered extended safety checks for all Boeing 787s in Indian fleets. So far, no mechanical or technical defects have been confirmed.
The DGCA said its review of Air India's maintenance protocols found the airline to be in compliance with current safety standards.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Air India crash report points to chip malfunction, says analyst
STORY: :: This video contains content some people may find distressing :: June 13, 2025 A preliminary report into last month's fatal Air India crash depicted confusion in the cockpit after the plane's engine fuel cutoff switches flipped almost simultaneously and starved the engines of fuel. :: June 12, 2025 The Boeing 787 Dreamliner began to lose thrust and sink shortly after takeoff. :: Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau The report from Indian accident investigators did not say how the switches could have flipped to the cutoff position during the flight. CHAN: "From reading the findings..." Former pilot and senior lecturer at Buckinghamshire New University Marco Chan says he believes it was a chip malfunction rather than human error that led to the crash. He points to a previously issued service bulletin from the engine manufacturer advising maintenance of a flawed chip to prevent signal loss. :: Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau 'I believe the FAA has - together with GE, General Electric, the engine manufacturer - has issued a service bulletin, i.e. I believe it was about 11,000 cycles, they will have to replace the chip. And if it is not replaced or maintenance isn't done correctly, it could lead to intermittent loss of signal. Once you have a loss of signal, the fuel isn't commanded i.e. in the cut off position, then there's no fuel going to the engine.' Chan says it would be a challenge for pilots to accidentally move the switches into the cutoff position. 'You have to physically sort of - not pull the pin - but if you have to pull the toggle out, then it can move to a different position. So, you do have to do it on purpose, not accidental knocking it to the wrong position. Very rarely that can happen, or close to zero.' :: June 12, 2025 At the crash site, both fuel switches were found in the run position and there had been indications of both engines relighting before the low-altitude crash, the report showed. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner was bound for London from India's Ahmedabad. The crash killed 260 people, making it the world's deadliest aviation accident in a decade.
CNN
3 hours ago
- CNN
Air India crash report answers one question – and raises many more
An official report on the world's deadliest aviation accident in a decade has answered one key question – but raised others. Air India flight AI171 had barely left the runway last month when it lost momentum and crashed in a densely populated area of India's western city of Ahmedabad, killing all but one of the 242 people on board and 19 others on the ground. Now, a preliminary report by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has revealed that fuel supply to both engines was cut in the crucial minutes as the aircraft was ascending. The plane's 'black box,' its flight data recorder, showed that the aircraft had reached an airspeed of 180 knots when both engines' fuel switches were 'transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one,' the report says. The switches were flipped within a second of each other, halting the flow of fuel. On an audio recording from the black box, mentioned in the report, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why he flipped the switches. The other pilot responds that he did not do so. The report does not specify who was the pilot and who was the co-pilot in the dialogue. Seconds later, the switches on the Boeing 787 Dreamliner were flipped the other way to turn the fuel supply back on. Both engines were able to relight, and one began to 'progress to recovery,' the report said, but it was too late to stop the plane's gut-wrenching descent. The report reveals the fundamental reason why the jet crashed, but much remains unexplained. Prev Next The findings do not make clear how the fuel switches were flipped to the cutoff position during the flight, whether it was deliberate, accidental or if a technical fault was responsible. On Boeing's 787 Dreamliners, the fuel switches are between the two pilots' seats, immediately behind the plane's throttle levers. They are protected on the sides by a metal bar. The switches require an operator to physically lift the switch handle up and over a detent – a catch – as they are deliberately designed so they can't be knocked accidentally. Geoffrey Dell, an air safety specialist who has conducted numerous aircraft accident investigations, finds it hard to see how both switches could have been flipped in error. 'It's at least a two-action process for each one,' he told CNN. 'You've got to pull the switch out towards you and then push it down. It's not the sort of thing you can do inadvertently.' According to Dell, it would be 'bizarre' for a pilot to deliberately cut fuel to both engines immediately after take-off. There is 'no scenario on the planet where you'd do that immediately after lift-off,' he said. Pointing to the fact that both engine switches were flipped within a second of each other, Dell noted: 'That's the sort of thing you do when you park the airplane at the end of the flight… You plug into the terminal and shut the engines down.' One possibility the report raises relates to an information bulletin issued by the US Federal Aviation Administration in 2018 about 'the potential disengagement of the fuel control switch locking feature.' But, given that this was not considered an unsafe condition, Air India did not carry out inspections. Dell said an aircraft's flight data recorder should help explain how the fuel switches were flipped in each case. However, India's AAIB has not released a full transcript of the conversation between the two pilots. Without it, Dell says it's difficult to understand what happened. Former pilot Ehsan Khalid also believes that the report's findings raised questions over the position of the vital engine fuel switches, which, he said, should be clarified by the investigators. Speaking to Reuters, Khalid warned against pinning the blame on the pilots. 'The AAIB report to me is only conclusive to say that the accident happened because both engines lost power.' He added: 'The pilots were aware that the aircraft engine power has been lost, and pilots also were aware that they did not do any action to cause this.' A full report is not due for months and India's Civil Aviation Minister, Ram Mohan Naidu, said: 'Let's not jump to any conclusions at this stage.' The Air India jet took off from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in India's western state of Gujarat on June 12, bound for London Gatwick. Air India had said 242 passengers and crew members were on board. That included 169 Indian nationals, 53 Britons, seven Portuguese and one Canadian. Everyone on board was killed, except for one passenger. The 19 people on the ground were killed when the plane crashed into the BJ Medical College and Hospital hostel. Air India has acknowledged that it has received the report and said it will continue cooperating with authorities in the investigation. CNN's Alexandra Skores, Aaron Cooper and Hira Humayun contributed reporting.
CNN
3 hours ago
- CNN
Air India crash report answers one question – and raises many more
An official report on the world's deadliest aviation accident in a decade, seen by CNN, has answered one key question – but raised others. Air India flight AI171 had barely left the runway last month when it lost momentum and crashed in a densely populated area of India's western city of Ahmedabad, killing all but one of the 242 people on board and 19 others on the ground. Now, a preliminary report by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has revealed that fuel supply to both engines was cut in the crucial minutes as the aircraft was ascending. The plane's 'black box,' its flight data recorder, showed that the aircraft had reached an airspeed of 180 knots when both engines' fuel switches were 'transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one,' the report says. The switches were flipped within a second of each other, halting the flow of fuel. On an audio recording from the black box, mentioned in the report, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why he flipped the switches. The other pilot responds that he did not do so. The report does not specify who was the pilot and who was the co-pilot in the dialogue. Seconds later, the switches on the Boeing 787 Dreamliner were flipped the other way to turn the fuel supply back on. Both engines were able to relight, and one began to 'progress to recovery,' the report said, but it was too late to stop the plane's gut-wrenching descent. The report reveals the fundamental reason why the jet crashed, but much remains unexplained. Prev Next The findings do not make clear how the fuel switches were flipped to the cutoff position during the flight, whether it was deliberate, accidental or if a technical fault was responsible. On Boeing's 787 Dreamliners, the fuel switches are between the two pilots' seats, immediately behind the plane's throttle levers. They are protected on the sides by a metal bar. The switches require an operator to physically lift the switch handle up and over a detent – a catch – as they are deliberately designed so they can't be knocked accidentally. Geoffrey Dell, an air safety specialist who has conducted numerous aircraft accident investigations, finds it hard to see how both switches could have been flipped in error. 'It's at least a two-action process for each one,' he told CNN. 'You've got to pull the switch out towards you and then push it down. It's not the sort of thing you can do inadvertently.' According to Dell, it would be 'bizarre' for a pilot to deliberately cut fuel to both engines immediately after take-off. There is 'no scenario on the planet where you'd do that immediately after lift-off,' he said. Pointing to the fact that both engine switches were flipped within a second of each other, Dell noted: 'That's the sort of thing you do when you park the airplane at the end of the flight… You plug into the terminal and shut the engines down.' One possibility the report raises relates to an information bulletin issued by the US Federal Aviation Administration in 2018 about 'the potential disengagement of the fuel control switch locking feature.' But, given that this was not considered an unsafe condition, Air India did not carry out inspections. Dell said an aircraft's flight data recorder should help explain how the fuel switches were flipped in each case. However, India's AAIB has not released a full transcript of the conversation between the two pilots. Without it, Dell says it's difficult to understand what happened. Former pilot Ehsan Khalid also believes that the report's findings raised questions over the position of the vital engine fuel switches, which, he said, should be clarified by the investigators. Speaking to Reuters, Khalid warned against pinning the blame on the pilots. 'The AAIB report to me is only conclusive to say that the accident happened because both engines lost power.' He added: 'The pilots were aware that the aircraft engine power has been lost, and pilots also were aware that they did not do any action to cause this.' A full report is not due for months and India's Civil Aviation Minister, Ram Mohan Naidu, said: 'Let's not jump to any conclusions at this stage.' The Air India jet took off from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in India's western state of Gujarat on June 12, bound for London Gatwick. Air India had said 242 passengers and crew members were on board. That included 169 Indian nationals, 53 Britons, seven Portuguese and one Canadian. Everyone on board was killed, except for one passenger. The 19 people on the ground were killed when the plane crashed into the BJ Medical College and Hospital hostel. Air India has acknowledged that it has received the report and said it will continue cooperating with authorities in the investigation. CNN's Alexandra Skores, Aaron Cooper and Hira Humayun contributed reporting.
