Divided EU weighs action against Israel over Gaza war
The measures range from suspending the entire accord or curbing trade ties to sanctioning Israeli ministers, imposing an arms embargo and halting visa-free travel.
But despite growing anger over the devastation in Gaza, EU states remain divided over how to tackle Israel and diplomats say there appears to be no critical mass for any move.
"I was asked to give the inventory of the options that could be taken and it's up to the member states to discuss what do we do with these options," Kallas said Monday.
The tone of discussions will be shaped strongly by how Israel is implementing a promise to the EU to improve humanitarian access to Gaza.
Kallas said Thursday she had struck a deal with her Israeli counterpart, Gideon Saar, to open more entry points and allow in more food.
Gaza's two million residents are facing dire humanitarian conditions as Israel has severely limited aid during its devastating war with Palestinian militant group Hamas.
"We see some good signs of more trucks getting in," Kallas said Monday.
"But of course we know that this is not enough and we need to push more (so) that the implementation of what we have agreed also happens on the ground."
At a meeting of EU and neighbouring countries in Brussels on Monday, Jordanian foreign minister Ayman Safadi said the situation in Gaza remained "catastrophic".
'No justification'
Israel's Saar, speaking at the same meeting, sounded confident his country would avoid further EU action.
"I'm sure not any of them will be adopted by the EU member states," said the foreign minister. "There's no justification whatsoever."
While the EU appears unable for now to take any further moves against Israel, just getting to this stage has been a considerable step.
The bloc only agreed to review the cooperation deal after Israel relaunched its devastating operation in Gaza following the collapse of a ceasefire in March.
Until then deep divisions between countries backing Israel and those more favourable to the Palestinians had hamstrung any move.
The war was sparked by Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, which led to 1,219 deaths, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
Of the 251 people taken hostage by militants that day, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead.
Hamas-run Gaza's health ministry says that at least 58,386 Palestinians, most of them civilians, have been killed in Israel's retaliatory campaign. The UN considers those figures reliable.
© 2025 AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
3 minutes ago
- France 24
UN demands justice in any Ukraine peace talks, as civilian deaths spike
The call from UN rights chief Volker Turk came the day after US President Donald Trump told Moscow to end the war within 50 days or face massive new economic sanctions. Trump also laid out plans for infusions of weaponry for Kyiv via NATO. In recent weeks, Trump has shown increasing frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin, with Moscow stepping up attacks rather than stopping them. "An immediate ceasefire is needed now to end this unbearable suffering," Liz Throssell, a spokeswoman for Turk's office, told a media briefing. "Work on a lasting peace, in line with international law, must intensify -- a peace that ensures accountability for gross violations of international human rights law and serious violations of international humanitarian law." Rather than being sidelined or overlooked, "any move towards ceasefire, towards peace -- accountability must be at its heart", she added. Surging civilian casualties Throssell said Turk wanted any negotiations to focus in the immediate term on ending attacks that affect civilians and protecting the rights of people in occupied territory. They should also seek to return forcibly transferred or deported children, establish humanitarian corridors across the line of control and an bring end to the torture and ill treatment of prisoners of war and other detainees, she said. Russia launched the full-scale invasion of its neighbour in February 2022. Moscow has unleashed record waves of drone and missile attacks over the past few weeks, with the number of Ukrainian civilians killed or wounded in June hitting a three-year high, according to UN figures, with 232 people killed and 1,343 injured. "July has brought no respite for civilians in Ukraine," said Throssell. So far this month at least 139 civilians have reportedly been killed and 791 wounded, she said, citing the "intense and successive waves of missile and drone strikes" launched by Russian forces. "Intense and sustained attacks using explosive weapons with wide area effects in populated areas are likely to have indiscriminate impacts and as such raise serious concerns as to their compliance with international humanitarian law," said Throssell. The UN human rights office has so far been able to verify and document at least 13,580 civilians killed and 34,115 wounded since the Russian invasion began but acknowledges that the full figures will be far higher. Attacks on healthcare Meanwhile Jarno Habicht, the World Health Organization's representative in Ukraine, said civilian casualties "almost doubled" in the second quarter of 2025 compared to the first. He said the WHO had recorded 2,504 attacks on healthcare since the start of the war, involving 212 deaths and 768 injuries. The WHO records attacks but does not attribute blame as it is not a criminal investigations body. "That means that healthcare is not a safe place for the patients and healthcare workers -- and it's a violation of humanitarian law," said Habicht. He also sounded an alarm on "problem" behaviours growing during the war -- heavy drinking among adults, and new tobacco products used by youths.
Euronews
6 minutes ago
- Euronews
European Commission takes no position on Kosovo-Telekom Serbia dispute
Kosovo's Prime Minister Albin Kurti has launched a renewed attack on Serbia's largest telecom operator, Telekom Serbia, accusing it of waging what he called 'a hybrid war' against Kosovo, with the company responding by saying it has been a frequent target for the authorities in Pristina. A false bomb alert triggered the evacuation of the Kosovo parliament in Pristina last week, prompting Kurti to share a Facebook post by Interior Minister Xhelal Sveçla, who claimed that the phone number behind the threat was registered in Serbia and belonged to Telekom Serbia's mobile operator MTS. Kurti praised the Kosovan authorities for their 'prompt response' in the investigation and repeated his past claims that the incident reaffirmed the existence of Serbia's ongoing hybrid war against Kosovo. The company's management stated that it has been subjected to repeated attacks and pressure from Kosovo leaders in recent times. Vladimir Lučić, CEO of Telekom Serbia, strongly rejected the bomb threat incident accusations in a statement to Euronews Serbia, describing them as 'an absurd and shameful attack on a company that has long been a thorn in the side of the Pristina authorities for two years." He said the attacks are taking place almost daily as a form of wider political pressure, including a failed attempt to shut down its presence in Kosovo two years ago, which was stopped after the international community's intervention. Lučić added that Telekom Serbia operates in accordance with the law and international agreements, including the Brussels Agreement, according to which the company has 28 base stations in areas where ethnic Serbs live in Kosovo, while its headquarters and technical infrastructure are located in Belgrade. Brussels chooses not to step in A former province of Serbia, Kosovo declared independence in 2008, which Belgrade has so far refused to recognise. More than 100 countries have recognised its independence — but not the likes of Russia, China and five EU member states. Since 2011, Brussels has facilitated a dialogue between the two countries designed to decrease tensions and resolve bilateral issues — which is also one of the requirements for both countries' progress along their path toward full-fledged EU membership. However, the two leaders — Kurti and Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić — have failed to participate in trilateral meetings with EU representatives since May 2023, casting doubt on the effectiveness of the Brussels dialogue as a means to find solutions to outstanding issues. When asked by Euronews for a reaction to the Kosovo leader's statements on Telekom Serbia and the operator's claims of repeated attacks, the European Commission chose not to address the developing political implications but instead referred to the technical framework. "Compliance with the Kosovo regulatory framework is the responsibility of the independent regulatory authority for electronic and postal communications," the European Commission said in a statement to Euronews. Anouar El Anouni, a spokesperson for the European External Action Service (EEAS), said that the matter falls under the jurisdiction of Kosovo's national authorities and that telecommunications compliance is the exclusive responsibility of Kosovo's independent regulatory authority. El Anouni also recalled that under the EU-facilitated dialogue, agreements on telecommunications were reached in 2013 and 2015 to normalise operations. These agreements enabled MTS to operate legally in Kosovo. Big hopes from Washington Meanwhile, the CEO of Telekom Serbia is counting on US support to obtain a third 5G licence in Kosovo, which was agreed upon by Pristina as part of an international deal but was then repeatedly refused. Serbia has been hoping that US President Donald Trump can decrease regional friction by promoting economic cooperation and growth — something Serbian Foreign Minister Marko Đurić said last week officials in Pristina have failed to adopt. At the same time, Kosovo President Vjosa Osmani praised Trump for his role in de-escalating tensions between Kosovo and Serbia in recent times. "We have the continued support of the United States, and President Trump was very clear that he was the person who stopped Serbia from continuing its efforts," she said at a recent event at Johns Hopkins University in Washington. "I am very convinced that (war) has been stopped thanks to America's role and its direct involvement in preserving and protecting peace," Osmani added. Meanwhile, these and other similar statements have sparked a reaction from Richard Grenell, the former US special envoy for Serbia and Kosovo negotiations, who said Osmani was misinterpreting Trump's remarks, making it seem as though Serbia was about to go on an offensive against Kosovo. "Shame on Vjosa Osmani for manipulating President Donald Trump's words," Grenell said in a post on X.
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
German court rejects Yemenis' claim over US strikes
Plaintiffs Ahmed and Khalid bin Ali Jaber first brought their case to court in 2014 after losing members of their family in the strike on the village of Khashamir. The case has since been through several German courts. But the Constitutional Court on Tuesday ultimately ruled that Berlin is not required to take action against such attacks, which were not judged to be in breach of international law. Washington has for years launched drone strikes targeting suspected Al-Qaeda militants in Yemen, an impoverished country that has been torn by fierce fighting between its beleaguered Saudi-backed government and Iran-backed rebels. The two Yemeni men, supported by the Berlin-based European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR), had argued that Germany was partly responsible for the attack because the strike was aided by signals relayed via the Ramstein base in western Germany. "Without the data that flows through Ramstein, the US cannot fly its combat drones in Yemen," the group said. The ECCHR's Andreas Schueller argued that "the German government must put an end to the use of this base -- otherwise the government is making itself complicit in the deaths of innocent civilians". 'Complaint unfounded' The court found that Germany "does have a general duty to protect fundamental human rights and the core norms of international humanitarian law, even in cases involving foreign countries". However, in order for this duty to be binding, there must be "a serious risk of systematic violation of applicable international law". "Measured against these standards, the constitutional complaint is unfounded," the court said. The ECCHR said the ruling had "failed to send a strong signal" and meant that "instead, individual legal protection remains a theoretical possibility without practical consequences". However, Schueller said the verdict "leaves the door open for future cases". "Violations of international law can be subject to judicial review, even if the court imposes high hurdles. This is an important statement by the Constitutional Court in these times," he said. 'Margin of discretion' According to the ECCHR, the two Yemeni men were having dinner ahead of the wedding of a male family member in 2012 when they heard the buzz of a drone and then the boom of missile attacks that claimed multiple lives. Their case against Germany was initially thrown out, before the higher administrative court in Muenster ruled in their favour in 2019. However, the government appealed and a higher court overturned the decision in 2020, arguing that German diplomatic efforts were enough to ensure Washington was adhering to international law. In a statement shared by the ECCHR, the two men called the ruling "dangerous and disturbing". "(It) suggests countries that provide assistance to the US assassination programme bear no responsibility when civilians are killed. Our hearts are broken, and our faith in international law is shaken," they said. The German government welcomed the ruling, which it said showed that Berlin had "a wide margin of discretion in assessing whether the actions of third states comply with international law". "According to the ruling, the government has no fundamental duty to protect foreigners abroad who are affected by military action by third states if, in the government's assessment, these attacks are within the bounds of what is permissible under international law," the defence and foreign ministries said in a statement.
