Green Card Replacement Processing Time Surges Nearly 1,000 Percent
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The processing time for I-90 forms, the applications used to either renew or replace permanent resident cards, increased by nearly 1,000 percent in the second quarter of FY2025, according to data from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).
Newsweek reached out to USCIS for comment via email.
Why It Matters
The immigration system in the United States is overwhelmed—there are more than 3.7 million cases in the immigration courts, and USCIS is also facing a bureaucratic backlog in terms of processing applications, including for the I-90. Green card holders must fill out the form every 10 years to renew their green card or in the case that theirs is damaged or lost.
The median time it took to process I-90 forms jumped from less than a month to more than eight months in the second quarter, according to data released by USCIS last month.
What to Know
From January 1 to March 31, 2025, the processing time for I-90 forms averaged 8.3 months, according to USCIS data. This is a notable uptick from the fourth quarter of 2024—from October 1 to December 31, 2024—when the median processing time was only 0.8 months.
USCIS defines the processing time as the "number of months it took for an application, petition, or request to be processed from receipt to completion in a given time period." The median represents the time it took to complete 50 percent of all cases processed in the quarter.
A stock image shows an envelope from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
A stock image shows an envelope from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
Evgenia Parajanian/iStock via Getty Images
The USCIS office's website states that 80 percent of cases for "initial issuance or replacements" for I-90 are completed within 21.5 months, while 80 percent of cases for the 10-year renewal are completed within 12.5 months.
USCIS received more than 285,000 I-990 forms from January through March, compared to roughly 189,000 from October through December of last year. There were more than 356,000 pending applications at the end of the second quarter, compared to 265,000 pending applications at the end of the first quarter.
The processing time has swung back and forth in the past few years. In FY2024, it took about 1.1 months on average for I-90s to be processed, down from 9.1 months in 2023. In 2022, The processing time averaged 1.2 months in 2022 and 5.2 months in 2021.
USCIS announced in September 2024 that the validity of green cards would be extended to 36 months for lawful permanent residents amid the processing backlog.
What People Are Saying
Niskanen Center analyst Cecilia Esterline wrote to X (formerly Twitter) on July 1: "I-90 applications for a replacement green card had the sharpest increase in median processing time: 938% over Q1. In both FY2024 Q2 and FY2025 Q1, its median processing time was approx. 0.8 months. By the end of FY2025 Q2, it was more than 8 months."
USCIS said in September when announcing the validity extension: "These receipt notices can be presented with an expired Green Card as evidence of continued status and employment authorization. This extension is expected to help applicants who experience longer processing times, because they will receive proof of lawful permanent resident status as they await their renewed Green Card."
What Happens Next
President Donald Trump has cracked down on immigration upon his return to office and has pledged mass deportations, and many green card holders have been impacted by his immigration enforcement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
31 minutes ago
- Newsweek
IRS Wants New Carve Out for Pastors
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The IRS says pastors who endorse political candidates from the pulpit should not have to risk losing their tax-exempt status — and now it's asking a federal court to interpret the law accordingly. In a joint legal filing, the IRS and a coalition of Christian media and religious groups urged that the Johnson Amendment is not enforced against sermons and religious speech delivered through "usual channels of communication" during worship services. That interpretation, if adopted, would carve out a broad exemption for faith-based political endorsements made in churches. A sign outside the Internal Revenue Service building is photographed May 4, 2021, in Washington. A sign outside the Internal Revenue Service building is photographed May 4, 2021, in Washington. Associated Press The request came in a filing submitted in Texas federal court, where the IRS and the National Religious Broadcasters Association — a prominent evangelical media consortium — are seeking to end an ongoing lawsuit over the issue. The filing asks the court to prohibit the government from enforcing the Johnson Amendment against the plaintiffs. The Johnson Amendment, enacted in 1954 and named after then-Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson, bars tax-exempt organizations, including churches, from formally endorsing or opposing political candidates. Although seldom enforced, it has long been a source of tension between religious groups and federal regulators. The plaintiffs, which include the NRB and several religious leaders, filed the lawsuit last August, arguing the amendment violates their First Amendment rights — specifically, the freedoms of speech and religious exercise. In Monday's court filing, the parties called for the Johnson Amendment to be interpreted so it "does not reach communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services through its usual channels of communication on matters of faith." The IRS has historically avoided applying the Johnson Amendment to church sermons or similar religious messages involving electoral politics. Still, faith-based groups have continued to view the rule as a looming threat to free expression. President Donald Trump campaigned on repealing the Johnson Amendment and in 2017 signed an executive order directing the Treasury to ignore it. "I will get rid of and totally destroy the Johnson Amendment," Trump said at that year's National Prayer Breakfast, "and allow our representatives of faith to speak freely and without fear of retribution." Earlier this year, Republican lawmakers introduced legislation aimed at permanently repealing the amendment. This article includes reporting by the Associated Press. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Newsweek
41 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Luxury Department Store Closing Locations in Two Cities: What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Nordstrom department store is closing locations in two cities but is opening one new location. Newsweek has contacted Nordstrom via email for comment. Why It Matters Nordstrom was founded as a shoe store by Wallin & Nordstrom in 1901 by family patriarch John W. Nordstrom, a Swedish immigrant. It has been in business for over a century and is one of only a handful of U.S. luxury department stores to remain in business as consumers increasingly rein in their discretionary spending and move toward online retailers for the purchases that they do make. Low-angle view of sign with logo on facade at Nordstrom, Broadway Plaza, Walnut Creek, California, April 8, 2025. Low-angle view of sign with logo on facade at Nordstrom, Broadway Plaza, Walnut Creek, California, April 8, 2025. Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images What To Know Two Nordstrom stores are set to close by the end of this summer. The first is 20 Broadway in Santa Monica, California, which will close by August 26. The second is 1453 Saint Louis Galleria in St. Louis, Missouri, which will close by August 24. A spokesperson for Nordstrom confirmed the closures to USA Today and said that despite the closures, they hope to transition employees at the affected stores to other locations, adding that "decisions like this are never easy." Fox News has reported that Dick's House of Sports will replace the St. Louis location. Nordstrom is far from the only store closing locations. Back in March, Macy's announced that it would shutter 150 underproductive stores, and JCPenney closed seven locations across the country in May. The retailer is, however, set to open a new location in San Francisco. The store will be replacing Nordstrom's flagship in the city, which shut in 2023 after 25 years, citing changing dynamics in the San Francisco market. The store had been hit by looters and was one of multiple stores, including Saks Off 5th, Banana Republic, and Office Depot, to shutter locations in the city as San Francisco became a flashpoint for theft. California Governor Gavin Newsom launched a statewide crackdown on theft starting in 2025. Nordstrom local will look different from the original full-scale department store. It will be a smaller-format concept, offering pickups of online orders, returns, tailoring and personal styling appointments. The store will not carry traditional retail inventory. Nordstrom announced that it would be going private in December after the family announced it had made a $6.25 billion deal to buy all remaining shares in the company alongside Mexican department store company El Puerto de Liverpool. What People Are Saying Nordstrom CEO Erik Nordstrom said in a statement in December when the announcement hit that the company would be going private: "Today marks an exciting new chapter for the business. On behalf of my family, we look forward to working with our teams to ensure Nordstrom thrives long into the future." What's Next How brick-and-mortar locations for Nordstrom evolve remains to be seen.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
New US Aircraft Carrier Hit by Significant Delays
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The USS John F. Kennedy, the second ship in the new Ford class of U.S. Navy aircraft carriers, could be delayed by up to two years, according to a new report. Why It Matters Many U.S. Navy shipbuilding projects have been plagued by setbacks and ballooning costs, including the USS Gerald R. Ford, the first Ford-class aircraft carrier. The Gerald R. Ford was commissioned, or formally marked as in active service, by President Donald Trump during his first term in office. What To Know The USS John F. Kennedy, also known as the CVN-79, was expected to be handed over to the U.S. military in July this year, but will instead be ready in March 2027, according to U.S. Navy budget documents for the coming year. The delay was first reported by the USNI News outlet attached to the Naval Institute non-profit on Monday. The USS Gerald R. Ford heads to the Norfolk, Virginia naval station on April 14, 2017 after almost a week of trials during which the ship's systems were tested. The USS Gerald R. Ford heads to the Norfolk, Virginia naval station on April 14, 2017 after almost a week of trials during which the ship's systems were tested. Bill Tiernan/The Virginian-Pilot via AP The USS John F. Kennedy is the second of the new Ford-class aircraft carriers, replacing the decades-old Nimitz-class. The third aircraft carrier in the class, the USS Enterprise, will be delivered in July 2030, rather than September 2029, according to the U.S. Navy budget documents. The delay was chalked up to issues getting hold of materials for the vessel, and hold-ups with industry and supply chains. The delay in delivery of the USS John F. Kennedy is "not surprising," bearing in mind the changes it needed after its initial building phase and "challenges throughout the U.S. shipbuilding industry," said Robert Murrett, a retired U.S. Navy vice admiral who is now a professor of practice of public administration and international affairs at Syracuse University. The USS John F. Kennedy needs to take on board the lessons from the first of the new class of aircraft carriers, Murrett told Newsweek. It also needs to build in new technology, like updated radars, and equipment for F-35C fighter jets, Murrett said. Although the U.S. Navy's fleet of operational carriers will hit just 10 for a year, he added, "this can be mitigated with careful management of existing CVNs' maintenance and overhaul schedules, as well as equally careful management of longer deployments for our carrier sailors, which is already an issue." CVN is shorthand for nuclear-powered aircraft carriers. A Navy spokesperson told USNI News that the military was "exploring opportunities for preliminary acceptance of the vessel prior to formal delivery and is coordinating closely with stakeholders to ensure the fastest possible transition to fleet operations and a combat-capable carrier." Newsweek has reached out to the U.S. Navy for comment via email. The Navy budget documents put the delay to the USS John F. Kennedy down to the Advanced Arresting Gear (AAG) for the ship and Advanced Weapons Elevator work. AAG is a new system for the second and third Ford-class aircraft carriers, according to the military. It is designed to make sure aircraft landing on the carriers slow down quickly and safely. Advanced Weapons Elevators help move weapons and ammunition around a ship. What People Are Saying The U.S. military has hailed the USS John F. Kennedy as "the most agile and lethal combat platform globally," kitted out with "improved systems" that link the carrier up more closely with other forces.
