logo
Isis-supporting illegal immigrant avoided detention over mental health

Isis-supporting illegal immigrant avoided detention over mental health

Yahoo15-03-2025
An Islamic State-supporting illegal migrant was allowed to leave a detention centre after judges found that being confined was bad for his mental health.
The Iranian man, named only as 'D8' in court documents, entered Britain illegally on a small boat in March 2021 and claimed asylum.
A 32-year-old Sunni Muslim, he had previously been granted five years' leave to remain as a refugee in March 2017 after crossing the English Channel in the back of a lorry.
This was revoked by the Home Office in April 2020 after he visited Iraq, prompting concerns he was a danger to national security.
After entering Britain for a second time, D8 was detained in an immigration jail in 2021.
However, he was released on bail in June 2022 after a judge found detention had 'caused or aggravated' his depression.
In July 2022, the Home Office rejected his asylum application on national security grounds, after asserting he had an 'Islamist mindset' and maintained 'support for Islamic state'.
He was allowed to avoid detention on condition that he stayed at one address, did not work and was monitored by an electronic tag.
In January this year, the Court of Appeal backed the Government in the battle over his asylum claim, ruling that he supported the Islamic State and was a threat to national security.
It revoked his refugee status but concluded he could not be deported to Iran, his home country, as he might face torture.
It is the latest case uncovered by The Telegraph of migrants avoiding deportation on human rights grounds.
Others include the case of an Albanian criminal allowed to remain after claiming his son had an aversion to foreign chicken nuggets, and a Pakistani paedophile who was jailed for child sex offences but escaped removal from the UK as it would be 'unduly harsh' on his children.
The record number of immigration appeals, which often cite the right to a family life under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), threatens to hamper the Government's attempts to remove illegal migrants.
It has prompted Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, to consider restricting migrants from citing their right to a family life to avoid deportation.
In the Court of Appeal hearing in January, Justice Males, Justice Phillips and Justice Laing noted that the secretary of state had concluded D8 was a danger to the British public.
But they said that he was likely to be interrogated by the Iranian authorities if he were sent back, and criticised the Foreign Office's reasoning – laid out in a report – as 'somewhat blithe' and 'jejune'.
They ruled: 'Drawing the threads together, the secretary of state has concluded that D8 is a danger to the national security of the United Kingdom.
'It is inherent in that conclusion, which the secretary of state was entitled to reach, that he represents a real and serious danger.'
The judges found, however, that if D8 were returned to Iran 'his life would be put at risk' and he would be exposed to 'a real risk of torture or other inhuman or degrading treatment'.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Myanmar's military government enacts a tough new electoral law ahead of year-end vote
Myanmar's military government enacts a tough new electoral law ahead of year-end vote

Associated Press

time12 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Myanmar's military government enacts a tough new electoral law ahead of year-end vote

BANGKOK (AP) — Myanmar's military government has enacted a new electoral law that imposes punishments of up to the death penalty for anyone who opposes or disrupts the elections it has promised to hold at the end of this year. The new law was published Wednesday in the state-run Myanma Alinn newspaper. It comes as the country continues to suffer from the turmoil that followed the army's seizure of power from the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi in February 2021, which triggered widespread popular opposition. The military sought to justify its seizure of power by claiming massive fraud took place in the 2020 election, though independent observers did not find major irregularities. After peaceful pro-democracy demonstrations were put down with lethal force, many opponents of military rule took up arms. Large parts of Myanmar are now embroiled in conflict. The ruling military had said after its takeover that an election was its primary goal but repeatedly pushed back the date. The plan for a general election is widely seen as an attempt to normalize the military's seizure of power through the ballot box and deliver a result that ensures that the generals retain control. The new law, signed by Senior Gen. Min Aung Hlaing, the head of the military government, says anyone who orates, speaks, organizes, incites, protests or distributes letters to disrupt any part of the electoral process shall be punished with three to 10 years imprisonment, as well as a fine. It also says that anyone who threatens, obstructs, abuses or severely hurts any personnel of the election commission, candidates or voters could be sentenced to three years to life in prison. It says whoever destroys or damages any equipment or materials used in elections, including ballot papers, or any related building or structure, could get five years to life in prison. 'If the action results in the death of a person, each person involved shall be sentenced to death,' the law says. Security committees will be formed to monitor the activities of internal and international organizations that may threaten security during the election period, it says. Critics have said the military-planned election will be neither free nor fair because there is no free media and most of the leaders of Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy party have been arrested. The country's current security situation also poses a serious challenge to holding elections, with the military believed to control less than half the country. However, the military-appointed state election commission said in June that it would hold the elections in 267 of the total 330 townships, depending on the security situation. The National Unity Government, Myanmar's main opposition organization, and the powerful ethnic armed groups that have been fighting the central government for greater autonomy have said they would try to prevent the election. Padoh Saw Taw Nee, spokesperson for the Karen National Union, the main ethnic Karen fighting force battling Myanmar's army in the southeast, told The Associated Press on Wednesday that the new law showed the military is tenacious in trying to hold the 'illegal and sham' election. 'We will continue with our own methods and plans regarding that election matter,' he said.

‘Predatory' sex offender who raped two underage girls has sentence increased
‘Predatory' sex offender who raped two underage girls has sentence increased

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘Predatory' sex offender who raped two underage girls has sentence increased

A 'predatory sexual offender' who abused five underage girls, two of whom he raped, has had his jail sentence increased at the Court of Appeal. Ashley Darbyshire was imprisoned for 15 years in April after admitting 19 offences, including rape, sexual activity with a child and making indecent images. One victim, referred to as V1, was abused by the 28-year-old over two years, beginning when she was just 13. During that time, Darbyshire introduced her to eight other offenders who also abused her in the Blackrod and Adlington areas of Bolton, Greater Manchester, and who were jailed alongside him at Liverpool Crown Court. The Solicitor General referred all nine sentences to the Court of Appeal, claiming they were 'unduly lenient' and should be increased. In a ruling on Wednesday, three senior judges ruled that Darbyshire's sentence should be raised to 18-and-a-half years, but dismissed the bids to increase the jail terms in the other cases. Lord Justice Edis, sitting with Mr Justice Butcher and Judge Angela Morris, said: 'Darbyshire was significantly more culpable than anyone else in this case, having committed 19 offences against five victims. 'He is a predatory sexual offender who targets child victims, albeit ones who are not under the age of 13. 'The fact that they were only just past their 13th birthday is, in his case, a highly material factor. 'The persistent and entrenched nature of his behaviour in targeting not just one 13 to 14-year-old child, but five, is also a highly material factor.' Darbyshire first contacted V1 on social media in 2016, when she was aged 13 and he was 19. He went on to abuse her until she was 15, raping her twice, and abusing four other girls aged under 16, one of whom he also raped. Sentencing him, Judge Simon Medland KC said Darbyshire had a 'crazed attitude to sex' and that he treated V1 as a 'human sexual commodity'. The judge said much of the abuse took place in a house in Blackrod, which he described as a 'lawless den of iniquity' and a 'filthy hovel'. Darbyshire also introduced V1 to the other defendants: Cory Barrett, Jack Poulson, Brandon Harwood, Richard Haslam, Elliot Turner, James Fitzgerald, Ross Corley and Daniel Bainbridge-Flatters. They were jailed for between two and 17 years for a combined 37 offences against V1, with Poulson, Harwood, Barrett and Haslam convicted of raping her. In her victim personal statement read out at sentencing, V1 said: 'I'd rather be dead most days than deal with all this mental torture and memories. 'I shouldn't have had to grow up so young and spend the rest of my life 'healing' from what these monsters did to me, leaving me in my own prison I built for myself in my own mind for the rest of my life.' Barrett, 24, from Wigan, was jailed for 12 years after being convicted of five counts of rape and one of assault by penetration. Poulson, 32, from Bolton, was jailed for 17 years after being convicted of 11 offences, including two counts of rape. Harwood, 25, from Bolton, was jailed for 10 years after being convicted of rape, attempted rape and sexual activity with a child. Haslam, 36, from Bolton, was jailed for 16 years after being convicted of seven offences, including three counts of rape. Turner, 27, from Bolton, was jailed for two years after being convicted of two counts of sexual activity with a child. Fitzgerald, 37, from Bolton, was jailed for five-and-a-half years after being convicted of assault by penetration. Corley, 30, from Bolton, was jailed for two years and four months after admitting two counts of sexual activity with a child. Bainbridge-Flatters, 35, from Bolton, was jailed for seven years after being convicted of four counts of sexual activity with a child, and pleading guilty to supplying cocaine and aggravated vehicle taking. Lord Justice Edis, Mr Justice Butcher and Judge Morris also dismissed bids by Poulson and Harwood to appeal against their sentences on Wednesday. Following the ruling, Solicitor General Lucy Rigby said: 'Ashley Darbyshire raped two underage girls and abused three more. 'I referred his case to the Court of Appeal under the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme, and I welcome the court's increase to his sentence today.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store