H-1B Visa Crackdown Proposed Under Republican Bill: What to Know
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Republican lawmakers are hoping to strip away the H-1B visa exception from college professors and higher education staff.
Reps. Tom Tiffany (WI-07) and Andrew Clyde (GA-09) introduced the Colleges for the American People Act, or CAP Act, which would end the long-standing H-1B visa cap exemption for U.S. colleges and universities.
If enacted, all prospective foreign hires, including administrators and professors, would be required to compete under the standard 65,000 visa cap.
Newsweek has contacted the office of Congressman Tiffany for comment.
People arrive before the start of a naturalization ceremony at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Miami Field Office in Miami.
People arrive before the start of a naturalization ceremony at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Miami Field Office in Miami.
Wilfredo Lee/AP
Why It Matters
Currently, the H-1B visa program has an annual cap of 65,000 visas, with certain exemptions for institutions of higher education and other designated categories. An additional 20,000 visas are available for applicants who hold a master's degree or higher from a U.S. institution.
President Donald Trump has previously backed employment-based visas, especially the H-1B program.
There has been renewed scrutiny of employment-based immigration as the right is split over H-1B visas, with MAGA-aligned conservatives opposing the program over concerns about job displacement and corporate abuse. Moderate Republicans and tech entrepreneurs see it as a tool to fill critical workforce gaps, particularly in the tech sector.
What To Know
"American students spend years earning degrees, only to watch universities hand good-paying jobs to foreign workers on special visas," Congressman Tiffany said in a press release.
The CAP Act would eliminate the H-1B cap exemption for colleges and universities, requiring them to compete under the same 65,000-visa limit that applies to private-sector employers.
Congressman Clyde wrote in a post on X, formerly Twitter, that the bill will encourage higher educational institutions to prioritize American workers.
The bill was introduced following a report by news platform Wisconsin Right Now, which found that the University of Wisconsin System employs nearly 500 foreign workers on H-1B visas, with salaries totaling almost $43 million annually. The report also noted rising tuition rates at the same institutions.
The legislation would not retroactively affect current visa holders. Universities could continue to extend existing H-1B visas under the current rules until the six-year limit, after which new hires would fall under the cap.
This follows reports that the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, is considering replacing the current lottery-style H-1B selection system with a "weighted selection process."
USCIS received enough petitions to meet the H-1B visa cap as of last week for fiscal year 2026.
What People Are Saying
Congressman Tiffany said in a statement: "The CAP Act ensures our institutions invest in the people they are meant to serve and ends the backdoor hiring practices that undercut American workers."
Congressman Clyde wrote in a post on X: "Universities frequently exploit an H-1B visa loophole to hire foreign workers over Americans."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
4 minutes ago
- USA Today
Superman and the American flag once stood for same things. MAGA changed that.
Is the new 'Superman' movie political? Should it be? USA TODAY readers gave us their takes in our latest Opinion Forum. The latest news about the "Superman" movie is focused on box-office heroics, with more than $300 million in U.S. ticket sales since its July 11 release. But those big receipts have not completely eclipsed the controversy swirling around the DC Comics-inspired film that started after director James Gunn announced "Superman" was about immigration and empathy. In a July 4 Times of London story, Gunn said that "Superman is the story of America, an immigrant that came from other places and populated the country, but for me it is mostly a story that says basic human kindness is a value and is something we have lost.' The director's description was pure kryptonite to some, bringing howls over the politicization of an American icon in which the Man of Steel was turned in a woke undocumented immigrant. Others, though, nodded along with Gunn. To get a better sense of Superman's approval ratings, we went to USA TODAY readers, asking them for their take on the movie. Was "Superman" woke? And is that a good or a bad thing? And what about entertainment in general – has it become too political? Unsurprisingly, the responses were varied, nuanced and pointed. You can read them below as part of our latest Opinion Forum. 'Superman' woke? A little. But 'Snow White' ... I did see the new "Superman" movie, and I enjoyed it. In terms of whether it was "woke," I'd say yes, but it is really light compared with other movies. The movie is built on the traditional themes of Superman, which is truth, justice and the American way. I think the problem we have in the U.S. today is that the symbolism behind Old Glory used to apply to everyone equally. Immigration reflected this. Old Glory and Superman stood for the same things. But the red, white and blue is so strongly branded now with MAGA and conservatives, and they have such a strong RINO mindset about "you are with us or against us," that any criticism of their tenets gets labeled as woke. (Plus pulling the woke card gets more internet clicks.) Good storytelling can be political, but it has to be good storytelling. I think the root issue is "Superman" is a good movie and the receipts show this. Plus the political elements are relatable. "Snow White" in contrast was not a great movie. The leads were miscast. It's difficult to make Gal Gadot the evil one and less "beautiful one." And while I'd happily watch Rachel Zegler in most movies, it felt like Disney was trying to make a point all the way through the movie with her casting. Your Turn: Republicans, Democrats are held captive by extremes. Americans need a new party. | Opinion Forum As for whether entertainment is too political, I'm going to reverse that question: I think politics has become too performative. As a general rule, good quality politics − administrative and legislative − should be mostly boring. We are going through a period of dramatic change − generational change, transfers of wealth, technology and even our place in the world. I think we are in for excitement whether we like it or not. In general, the definition of woke is evolving. Today I would say it is partly a cancel culture tool for pundits on the right, and partly when left-leaning institutions with power (universities, media, etc.) do something to force adoption of their beliefs on everyone, e.g., many recent Disney movies. — Erin-Todd Hansen, Boise, Idaho Art is always political I haven't seen "Superman," but I'm planning to. I'm sure the movie is political. Art is always political. "Casablanca" is anti-fascist. "Gone with the Wind" is pre-lost cause ideology. "Star Wars" is anti-authoritarian. "Othello" is anti-racist. Hallmark movies are tacitly anti-feminist. Every work of art reflects the artist's worldview. It's stupid to think art is neutral. And I don't think other forms of entertainment are too political. We want your perspective: Are you concerned about starvation in Gaza? Should US do more to help? Tell us. | Opinion Forum As for the meaning of woke, it originally meant to be conscious of systemic racism. Now it's been coopted by conservatives to mean whatever they don't like. — Kim Akins, Columbus, Ohio Tired of forced woke movie characters I haven't seen the new "Superman" movie, and I don't plan to. I'm tired of the forced woke characters in movies. The constant emphasis on characters' sexual orientation that has nothing to do with the movie plot is boring and off-putting. Lyrics in rap songs are disgusting. If they were said in any other forum, the singer would be booed off the stage. Share your opinion: Trump wants Washington Commanders to revert to old name. Should they? | Opinion Forum Woke means an emphasis on sexual orientation rather than who the individual is. It's negative because it stereotypes the individual. People should be judged by who they are, not what they are. — Tim Walton, Brooksville, Florida Woke means caring for people, as Superman does I saw "Superman" and enjoyed it. Of course I think it was woke − like that's a bad thing? What's wrong with actually caring about people? Woke is caring and respect for ALL. It's positive. If people are triggered by compassion and respect for others, it's time for them to look in the mirror and ask why they enjoy hatred. What are they afraid of? Do you want to take part in our next Forum? Join the conversation by emailing forum@ You can also follow us on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and sign up for our Opinion newsletter to stay updated on future Forum posts. I find it a loaded question to ask someone if entertainment is too political. It seems to have the intent of gathering answers from those who are triggered by entertainment that doesn't fit their personal political bent. There's plenty of choices, so don't watch what upsets you. I believe that if people believe a show is too political, it's usually because it doesn't fit their own biases. — Deborah Tretter, Rochester, New York Is Superman illegal? They broke the story line. I watched the move and enjoyed it. Superman has never been politically motivated! Let's stop the woke stuff and just say it was a great movie, except that disappointing political stunt. Illegal is illegal. I wasn't aware that Superman was ever told he was here illegally before in any comic book. They broke the story line. I do sometimes think entertainment has become too political. I think people should have a right to their opinions, and if asked, they should share them. The problem is that people don't respect others' opinions. Woke, in my opinion, is a word made up by the media to get attention. It's a horrible word that causes hate and discontent. It divides our country. — Patrick Andrews, Jasper, Indiana You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.
The Hill
4 minutes ago
- The Hill
Ex-football coach Derek Dooley challenges Jon Ossoff in Georgia
Former University of Tennessee football coach Derek Dooley launched a bid on Monday for the Republican nod to take on Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) next year, adding a high-profile name to one of the midterms' most consequential contests. Dooley is the son of former University of Georgia football coach Vince Dooley, an icon in Georgia athletics whose teams nabbed a national championship and six SEC titles. Derek Dooley, like his father, played college football and later coached. The younger Dooley coached both at the NFL and college level. A political newcomer, Derek Dooley leaned into his family background, his time coaching football and his political outsider status in a two-minute ad announcing his campaign. 'I spent three decades in coaching, probably doing the exact opposite of what a lot of DC politicians were doing,' Derek Dooley says in the ad. 'I sat in kitchens and living rooms with people from all walks of life. The only thing that mattered was trying to create hope and opportunity for them and that family.' The ad hinted at some of the issues the former football coach might campaign on, including keeping transgender women out of women's sports leagues, reining in government spending, and border security. Derek Dooley also lauded Donald Trump in his ad, saying the president 'campaigned on things, and he's turning them into results,' while knocking Ossoff's voting record. The former football coach's entry adds to a growing field of GOP candidates, which include Reps. Buddy Carter and Mike Collins. Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R), who was heavily courted to run for Senate against Ossoff and ultimately declined, is backing Dooley, giving the candidate a major boost out of the gate. But Collins has also racked up some early endorsements, including from former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), state Senate Majority Leader Jason Anavitarte, state House Majority Whip James Burchett and state Rep. Matthew Gambill, one of Kemp's House floor leaders. Trump so far has not weighed in. Collins does enjoy some ties to Trump's orbit, including his chief of staff Brandon Phillips, who's a Trump campaign alum. Georgia is seen as a critical pickup opportunity for Republicans, and the party is looking to avoid a repeat of 2022, when the GOP nominated a weak candidate in former football star Herschel Walker who later narrowly lost to Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.).
Axios
4 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump squeezes states on college tuition for undocumented students
Republican-leaning states, once at the forefront of laws helping undocumented students pay in-state college tuition, are trying to roll back that access thanks to pressure from President Trump. Why it matters: Around 8% of the nation's estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants are under 18, and the ending of in-state tuition would make college unaffordable if those laws are reversed. Without in-state tuition, undocumented immigrants who have gone through the state's public school system would still have to pay out-of-state or international rates to attend public colleges and universities. Catch up quick: The repeal efforts follow a Trump administration federal lawsuit filed in June to block the enforcement of Texas laws that grant in-state tuition rates to undocumented immigrants. The complaint states that federal policy bars undocumented immigrants from receiving "tuition benefits denied to out-of-state U.S. citizens," citing Trump's executive orders that instructed agencies to block such practices. The Department of Justice and Texas then reached an agreement to end the two-decades-old law. The DOJ followed with similar lawsuits in Minnesota and Kentucky. Zoom out: According to the Higher Ed Immigration Portal, 24 states and the District of Columbia offer in-state tuition to undocumented students — though Florida repealed its policy earlier this year. Republicans in many of those states are pushing for their legislatures to repeal their laws. State of play: The Trump administration's move against in-state tuition for undocumented students is one of many to make life difficult for immigrants amid a mass deportation plan. The IRS has agreed to share the personal information of undocumented taxpayers with immigration authorities, for example. What they're saying: "No state can be allowed to treat Americans like second-class citizens in their own country by offering financial benefits to illegal aliens," said Attorney General Pamela Bondi in a statement. The Trump administration says federal law prohibits public institutions of higher education from providing benefits to undocumented immigrants that are not offered to U.S. citizens. Yes, but: Many of the laws are designed to aid undocumented students who've attended high school for several years to qualify for in-state tuition, just like other state residents. Any student who has not lived in the state for a specified number of years prior must pay out-of-state tuition, regardless of their status. However, some states participate in a consortium that allows in-state tuition to be applied across state lines at certain universities for all state residents who meet the qualifications. The other side: " Ending in-state tuition is a deliberate and wicked effort to keep predominantly Black and brown immigrant students in a permanent caste in society where they are underpaid and exploited," Juan Martinez-Guevara of the advocacy group United We Dream told reporters last week. Advocates argue that states will lose revenue and talent by forcing college-potential students into menial jobs. The rollbacks are "putting in jeopardy the dreams and aspirations of our students," said Gladys Fatima Marquez, an executive committee member at the National Education Association. Between the lines: The push to repeal is a shift from Republicans of the President George W. Bush era, who championed in-state tuition for undocumented students and pathways for citizenship through military service. Bush and his brother, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, had long preached that such policy goals were economically beneficial to the country. Texas was the first state to pass a "tuition equity" law, or local Dream Act, when lawmakers approved legislation in 2001. Following Texas, other states like New Mexico, Kansas and Nebraska began allowing immigrants access to in-state tuition. The intrigue: Some left-leaning states, such as California and Massachusetts, were slower to pass similar measures. What we're watching: Democratic attorneys general could put up a fight against the Trump administration's rollback.
