
Pete Hegseth Faces Backlash For Pentagon Press Crackdown: 'Direct Attack'
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is facing backlash after issuing orders on Friday restricting credentialed journalists from unescorted access to much of the Pentagon building.
Newsweek contacted the Department of Defense press office for comment on Saturday via email.
Why It Matters
President Donald Trump has long had a tempestuous relationship with much of the news media, who he has previously accused of spreading "fake news" and being "the enemy of the people."
In February the White House confirmed it had banned The Associated Press news agency from its press pool after the publication refused to go along with Trump's decision to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America.
What To Know
On Friday Hegseth issued a memorandum containing "updated physical control measures for press/media" within the Pentagon complex.
The document, which Hegseth shared on X, announced a number of changes designed to strengthen operational security and to "reduce the opportunities for in-person inadvertent and unauthorized disclosures."
Hegseth's memorandum prohibits credentialed journalists from accessing large sections of the Pentagon unless they are accompanied by an authorized person. It also said "Pentagon Press Corps members will be required to complete an updated in-briefing form explaining their responsibilities to protect CNSI [classified national security information] and sensitive information."
The move sparked a furious response from the Pentagon Press Association (PPA), which represents journalists working at the Pentagon.
U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth attends a meeting between President Donald Trump and Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store at the White House in Washington, D.C., on April 24, 2025.
U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth attends a meeting between President Donald Trump and Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store at the White House in Washington, D.C., on April 24, 2025.
Chip Somodevilla/GETTY
In a statement the PPA said: "There is no way to sugarcoat it. Today's memo by Secretary Hegseth appears to be a direct attack on the freedom of the press and America's right to know what its military is doing.
"The Pentagon Press Association is extremely concerned by the decision to restrict movement of accredited journalists within the Pentagon through non-secured, unclassified hallways."
The statement continued: "The decision is purportedly based on concerns about operational security. But the Pentagon Press Corps has had access to non-secured, unclassified spaces in the Pentagon for decades, under Republican and Democratic administrations, including in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, without any concern about OP-SEC from DoD leadership."
The PPA added: "Journalists working from the Pentagon everyday will now have less freedom of movement than officers from foreign countries who are assigned to the U.S. military's headquarters, as well as maintenance staff and concession workers scattered throughout one of the world's largest office buildings."
On X Idrees Ali, Reuters' national security correspondent based out of the Pentagon, commented: "As one individual put it, I'd have more access to the Pentagon if I quit as a journalist and worked at the Baskin-Robins that operates there."
Separately the U.S. Army plans to update the records of transgender service personnel to reflect their sex at birth according to an internal memo acquired by Reuters.
What Happens Next
Hegseth's move should give the Department of Defense greater control over who is speaking to journalists in the Pentagon and about what. Critics will likely continue arguing this is an infringement on the free press.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Boston Globe
13 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
'Relieved': Educators await Trump administration to release $6 billion in frozen funding
Advertisement The Trump administration announced the funding freeze on June 30, a day before the money was supposed to be sent to school districts in both New England and across the nation. It was another move toward the White House's goal to dismantle the Education Department, as President Trump argues that classrooms are teaching left-wing ideology. In Massachusetts, the freeze translated into $108 million withheld, leaving many districts scrambling to ensure they could still provide services during the summer months and the upcoming fall semester, with some cancelling summer programs entirely. In addition to training educators Advertisement Ray Hart, executive director of the Council of the Great City Schools, a nationwide association of urban districts that includes Boston, said in a statement they're 'relieved' about the administration releasing the funds 'for the benefit of schoolchildren throughout our nation.' In Rhode Island, education commissioner Angélica Infante-Green said, 'On behalf of Rhode Island's students, families, and teachers,' it is 'relieved to hear that the congressionally approved education funding is set to be released.' The Education Department 'will begin dispersing funds to states next week,' said Madi Biedermann, a spokesperson for the department, in a statement Friday. Biedermann said the Office of Management and Budget completed its review of the grants and directed the Education Department to release the funding. The move comes after the District of Columbia and 24 states, including Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Maine, 'It is impossible for states to effectively budget for an upcoming school year ... when the president takes the football away from us, like Lucy in a Charlie Brown cartoon,' said Peter Neronha, Rhode Island Attorney General, at a press conference announcing the lawsuit earlier this month. Related : A coalition of school districts and teachers' unions, including the Rhode Island Federation of Teachers and Health Professionals, Susan Collins, a Republican senator from Maine, and Ed Markey, a Democratic senator from Massachusetts, were among the politicians who criticized the freeze and demanded the administration release the money. Advertisement 'Every day that goes by without this education funding hurts our students, educators, and communities,' said Pedro Martinez, Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department for Elementary and Secondary Education, in a statement Thursday. 'We are still recovering from pandemic learning loss, and these federal funds are directly related to improving student academic achievement.' In early July, Governor Maura Healey said in a statement that districts would be forced to lay off staff, delay or cancel programs, and disrupt learning. 'Our schools were promised this funding, and the Trump Administration needs to deliver it,' Healey said. In a survey by the School Superintendents Association, about three-quarters said they would cut academic programs, and half said they would lay off teachers if funding was not restored. In a statement, the executive director of the association, David Schuler, said he was 'pleased' with the news of the funding being released. Some programs saw an immediate, negative impact following the freeze, including the The program, which has operated in Massachusetts since 1966, aims to address the toll on children's education caused by the frequent moves, as students transfer between different school districts or miss school altogether to work alongside their parents. In Springfield, 9-year-old Ery Perez Gutierrez last summer focused on sharpening his academic skills at Advertisement Ery is among hundreds of children in Massachusetts spending the summer at home because of the funding freeze. President Trump had proposed cutting the Migrant Education Program altogether in the next Last year, the grant served 438 students for summer programs statewide, said Emily Hoffman, director of the program in Massachusetts. The loss of the program at Boland Elementary is 'heartbreaking' and a 'huge step backwards,' as students are going without much-needed services, said Lisa Bakowski, the school's principal, who oversaw the program for the past three summers. Bakowski said the children enrolled in the program are among the most vulnerable in the community. Their parents work in the fields all day and often don't speak English. 'It sickens me that it's become a political issue when it really should never have been,' Bakowski said. 'It's about the betterment of humanity and being able to work to assist and provide for pockets of our community that need it.' Related : Other programs targeted in the freeze weren't immediately impacted. The largest grant frozen, known as Advertisement In previous years, Boston Public Schools used the funding to provide additional support for the district's recruitment efforts and educator preparation, including through an intensive 12-month program that prepares aspiring teachers to enter the classroom at no cost to them. Following the freeze announcement, BPS 'identified temporary one-time funding to maintain these efforts, which will continue in Fiscal Year 2026 despite the funding freeze with the hopes that the funding will eventually be available,' a spokesperson said in a statement Thursday. Massachusetts districts received $27 million in fiscal year 2025 for teacher training, with BPS receiving about Marcela Rodrigues can be reached at


Fox News
14 minutes ago
- Fox News
Rep Nancy Mace says a decision on potential gubernatorial campaign will be made in next couple of days
Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., said she will decide whether to run for governor of South Carolina in the coming days on 'Fox Report.'


CNN
14 minutes ago
- CNN
New York City mayoral race: Andrew Cuomo says young voters have ‘real issues' worth hearing
Andrew Cuomo, who lost the Democratic primary to state Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, speaks to CNN's Gloria Pazmino about his independent bid for New York City mayor.