logo
Glam wife of Getty oil heir smashes Porsche into parked car, leaves victim with brain injury: suit

Glam wife of Getty oil heir smashes Porsche into parked car, leaves victim with brain injury: suit

New York Post3 days ago

The glamorous wife of a Getty oil heir has been accused of smashing her Porsche into a parked car — while looking for her glasses — leaving a senior with a traumatic brain injury.
Vanessa Getty, the wife of billionaire oil magnate Billy Getty, allegedly crashed her Porsche Taycan electric sports car — which cost as much as $100,000 — into Mary Riley's parked Mercedes in San Francisco on March 28, 2024.
4 Vanessa Getty, the wife of billionaire oil scion Billy Getty, has been accused of crashing into a parked car, leaving an elderly woman with traumatic brain injury.
Penske Media via Getty Images
Advertisement
'Suddenly and without warning a vehicle driven by Defendant Vanessa Louise Getty violently crashed into Plaintiff's parked vehicle,' reads Riley's June 18 lawsuit filed in San Francisco Superior Court.
Getty 'failed to use reasonable care' and was 'negligent' when she was driving near the intersection of Divisadero Street and Lombard Street when she collided into Riley's 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK 550, the suit and Riley's lawyer claim. Riley was getting into her car at the time.
Riley, 66, suffered 'orthopedic injuries and a traumatic brain injury,' the filing alleges.
Advertisement
4 Vanessa allegedly admitted to cops that she was distracted because she was looking for her glasses when she hit the parked car.
Getty Images
Her lawyer, Quinton Cutlip, told the San Francisco Standard that Getty admitted to cops at the scene that she 'had been distracted because she was looking for her glasses.'
Getty 'was apologetic at the scene,' the lawyer said.
Riley was brought to the hospital and she continues to receive treatment 'for injuries she suffered in the collision,' Cutlip said.
Advertisement
The San Francisco Fire Department confirmed that both cars were towed away and that one person was taken to the hospital.
4 Vanessa Getty allegedly hit the car of Mary Riley in San Francisco in March 2024.
Getty Images for WSJ.
Riley is suing for unspecified damages.
'This will all work itself out through the civil litigation process and trial, if necessary,' Cutlip told the outlet.
Advertisement
Getty, 52, married Billy Getty — the grandson of oil tycoon Jean Paul Getty — in 1999 and she shares three children with him.
4 Vanessa Getty is being sued for unspecified damages by Mary Riley.
WWD via Getty Images
Vanessa Getty, a philanthropist, is often seen at exclusive events. She was once a trustee at the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco and she founded the animal charity San Francisco Bay Humane Friends.
She has been a prominent donor for Democratic campaigns including for Vice President Kamala Harris who is the godmother of one of Getty's kids.
The Gettys put their gorgeous
Getty didn't immediately return a request for comment Wednesday afternoon.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Water expert warns Americans of ‘chemical cocktail' in dangerous chemically-tainted tap water
Water expert warns Americans of ‘chemical cocktail' in dangerous chemically-tainted tap water

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Water expert warns Americans of ‘chemical cocktail' in dangerous chemically-tainted tap water

Amid unbearable temperatures and seasonal changes, children and adults should increase their water intake, but are advised to avoid unfiltered tap and bottled water as much as possible, according to a water technology and sustainability expert. 'The whole reason our company exists is because we have a fundamental crisis in our drinking water in the United States today, and not a lot of people are talking about it,' Rich 'Raz' Razgaitis, CEO of FloWater, told FOX Business. Advertisement Raz, formerly of Fortune 500 companies and global pharmaceutical leaders Johnson & Johnson and Eli Lilly, co-founded FloWater 12 years ago to restore America's drinking water. America's water infrastructure is underfunded and outdated. In 2023, the EPA determined that the U.S.'s water infrastructure requires $625 billion over a 20-year period to address the issues, according to the Infrastructure Report Card. 'From the governmental side, whether it's federal or municipal, nobody can solve our infrastructure issues in one or two terms,' Raz said. 'So, it's a hot potato. Nobody wants to talk about this and amplify what the problem is.' 'A lot of companies are profiting off of a really broken water infrastructure.' Advertisement 5 Amid unbearable temperatures and seasonal changes, children and adults should increase their water intake, but are advised to avoid unfiltered tap and bottled water, according to experts. MediaNews Group via Getty Images Raz told FOX Business that consumer packaged goods companies, especially big beverage brands and energy drink companies, are capitalizing on impressionable young adults and fighting for kids' mindshare. 'I got personally passionate about this, watching my daughters at a young age get, what I would say is, programmed in the same way that I got programmed growing up by becoming really fixated on sugary, caffeinated drinks,' Raz said. 'This is a real problem because it creates lifelong behaviors, addictions, and dependencies that ultimately lead to cataclysmic choices downstream.' Advertisement 5 America's water infrastructure is underfunded and outdated, according to reports. Bloomberg via Getty Images Raz said choosing between unfiltered tap water and bottled drinking water is like comparing cigarettes. 'Seventy thousand to eighty thousand chemicals have been submitted to the toxicology division of the EPA over the last many decades,' Raz said. 'There are an estimated 50,000 chemicals in use in the United States today. Those chemicals are used for things like pharmaceutical manufacturing, textile manufacturing, agricultural use, and ultimately, fewer than 100 of those roughly 50,000 chemicals in use in the United States today are regulated by the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, which has hardly been updated since 1974.' 'We're literally drinking a chemical cocktail,' Raz said. Advertisement 5 'From the governmental side, whether it's federal or municipal, nobody can solve our infrastructure issues in one or two terms,' Rich 'Raz' Razgaitis, CEO of FloWater, said. 'So, it's a hot potato. Nobody wants to talk about this and amplify what the problem is.' luchschenF – In summary, the SDWA was established to protect water quality from common contaminants and was later amended and reauthorized in 1986 and 1996, according to the EPA website. Raz, however, told FOX Business that roughly 70% of Americans don't like or don't trust tap water, so they resort to bottled water, which is riddled with micro- and nanoplastic contaminants. 'Our job is really to stop that cycle,' he said of FloWater. FloWater, a purified drinking water system, is used to enhance both the taste and effects of drinking water. Raz founded the brand to get adults and children to fall in love with water again. Start and end your day informed with our newsletters Morning Report and Evening Update: Your source for today's top stories Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters 'The way that we do that is by taking the water that municipal systems deliver, which they do the best job they can possibly do given the decades of contamination that have happened in our drinking water,' Raz said. 'Then, we add a purification device onto that that radically changes that tap water. It reduces the bad stuff and puts good things in there, delivering what people say is the world's best-tasting water.' While Raz encourages offices, gyms, school districts, and other public places to provide people with FloWater systems that cost around $5 per month, he isn't particular about what system is used, as long as one is offered to consumers. Advertisement The FloWater website offers a water analysis feature for all zip codes in the U.S. to determine what exactly is in their tap water. 5 Raz said that roughly 70% of Americans don't like or don't trust tap water, so they resort to bottled water, which is riddled with micro- and nanoplastic contaminants. NurPhoto via Getty Images 'There are over 200 million Americans estimated to be drinking water from the tap with PFAS in it,' Raz said. PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are widely used, long-lasting chemicals, components of which break down very slowly over time. There are thousands of them found in commercial, consumer and industrial products, according to the EPA website. Advertisement 'Over 56% of Americans have been drinking tap water with lead in it,' Raz said. He added that microplastics found in bottled water become nanoplastics because they don't biodegrade, and individuals consume about one credit card's worth of plastic every week. 5 Raz continued to say that consumer packaged goods companies, especially big beverage brands and energy drink companies, are capitalizing on impressionable young adults and fighting for kids' mindshare. Education Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images 'The people that don't like that problem solved are people selling consumer packaged goods that are wrapped in plastic and distributed,' Raz told FOX Business. Advertisement For homeowners who don't have access to FloWater, Raz recommends a system with a triple filter and reverse osmosis, a membrane that is impervious to contaminants and removes them down to .0001 microns, according to Raz. Homeowners should have a system with a mineral filter that includes calcium, potassium, magnesium and sodium for the countertop or under the sink. Systems for the home can cost anywhere from a few hundred dollars to $2,000.

Senators launch a weekend of work to meet Trump's deadline for passing his tax and spending cuts
Senators launch a weekend of work to meet Trump's deadline for passing his tax and spending cuts

Chicago Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Senators launch a weekend of work to meet Trump's deadline for passing his tax and spending cuts

WASHINGTON — The Senate launched a rare weekend session Saturday as Republicans race to pass President Donald Trump's package of tax breaks, spending cuts and bolstered deportation funds by his July Fourth deadline. Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks. The 940-page bill was released shortly before midnight Friday. Senators are expected to grind through the days ahead with procedural vote Saturday to begin considering the legislation, but the timing was uncertain. There would still be a long path ahead, with hours of potentially all-night debate and eventually voting on countless amendments. Senate passage could be days away, and the bill would need to return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, opened the day's session with an impassioned defense of the package that he said has been misrepresented by its critics. 'Here's what American workers get out of 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' Moreno said as he began outlining the provisions. 'Read it for yourself.' The weekend session could be a make-or-break moment for Trump's party, which has invested much of its political capital on his signature domestic policy plan. Trump is pushing Congress to wrap it up, even as he sometimes gives mixed signals, allowing for more time. At recent events at the White House, including Friday, Trump has admonished the 'grandstanders' among GOP holdouts to fall in line. 'We can get it done,' Trump said in a social media post. 'It will be a wonderful Celebration for our Country.' The legislation is an ambitious but complicated series of GOP priorities. At its core, it would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including for Trump's mass deportation agenda. But the spending cuts that Republicans are relying on to offset the lost tax revenues are causing dissent within the GOP ranks. Some lawmakers say the cuts go too far, particularly for people receiving health care through Medicaid. Meanwhile, conservatives, worried about the nation's debt, are pushing for steeper cuts. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said he remains concerned about the fundamentals of the package and will not support the procedural motion to begin debate. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., pushing for deeper cuts, said he needed to see the final legislative text. With the narrow Republicans majorities in the House and Senate, leaders need almost every lawmaker on board to ensure passage. The release of that draft had been delayed as the Senate parliamentarian reviewed the bill to ensure it complied with the chamber's strict 'Byrd Rule,' named for the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd, It largely bars policy matters from inclusion in budget bills unless a provision can get 60 votes to overcome objections. That would be a tall order in a Senate with a 53-47 GOP edge and Democrats unified against Trump's bill. Republicans suffered a series of setbacks after several proposals were determined to be out of compliance by the chief arbiter of the Senate's rules. One plan would have shifted some food stamp costs from the federal government to the states; a second would have gutted the funding structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. But over the past days, Republicans have quickly revised those proposals and reinstated them. The final text includes a proposal for cuts to a Medicaid provider tax that had run into parliamentary objections and opposition from several senators worried about the fate of rural hospitals. The new version extends the start date for those cuts and establishes a $25 billion fund to aid rural hospitals and providers. Most states impose the provider tax as a way to boost federal Medicaid reimbursements. Some Republicans argue that is a scam and should be abolished. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has said that under the House-passed version of the bill, some 10.9 million more people would go without health care and at least 3 million fewer would qualify for food aid. The CBO has not yet publicly assessed the Senate draft, which proposes steeper reductions. Top income-earners would see about a $12,000 tax cut under the House bill, while the package would cost the poorest Americans $1,600, the CBO said. The Senate included a compromise over the so-called SALT provision, a deduction for state and local taxes that has been a top priority of lawmakers from New York and other high-tax states, but the issue remains unsettled. The current SALT cap is $10,000 a year, and a handful of Republicans wanted to boost it to $40,000 a year. The final draft includes a $40,000 cap, but for five years instead of 10. Many Republican senators say that is still too generous. At least one House GOP holdout, Rep. Nick LaLota of New York, had said that would be insufficient. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Republicans dropped the bill 'in the dead of night' and are rushing to finish the bill before the public fully knows what's in it. House Speaker Mike Johnson, who sent his colleagues home for the weekend with plans to be on call to return to Washington, had said they are 'very close' to finishing up. 'We would still like to meet that July Fourth, self-imposed deadline,' said Johnson, R-La. Johnson and Thune have stayed close to the White House, relying on Trump to pressure holdout lawmakers.

What's in latest version of Trump's tax bill now before Senate
What's in latest version of Trump's tax bill now before Senate

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

What's in latest version of Trump's tax bill now before Senate

Here's the latest on what's in the bill. There could be changes as lawmakers negotiate. Tax cuts are the priority Republicans say the bill is crucial because without it, there would be a massive tax increase, totaling some $3.8 trillion, after December when tax breaks from Trump's first term expire. Advertisement Those existing tax rates and brackets would become permanent under the bill. It temporarily would add new ones that Trump campaigned on: no taxes on tips, overtime pay or some automotive loans, along with a bigger $6,000 deduction in the Senate draft for older adults who earn no more than $75,000 a year. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up It would boost the $2,000 child tax credit to $2,200 under the Senate proposal, or $2,500 in the House's version. Families at lower income levels would not see the full amount, if any. A cap on state and local deductions, called SALT, would quadruple to $40,000 for five years. It's a provision important to New York and other high tax states, though the House wanted it to last for 10 years. Advertisement There are scores of business-related tax cuts. The wealthiest households would see a $12,000 increase from the legislation, which would cost the poorest people $1,600 a year, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office analysis of the House's version. Middle-income taxpayers would see a tax break of $500 to $1,500, the CBO said. Money for deportations, a border wall and the Golden Dome The bill would provide some $350 billion for Trump's border and national security agenda, including $46 billion for the U.S.-Mexico border wall and $45 billion for 100,000 migrant detention facility beds, as he aims to full his promise of the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history. Money would go for hiring 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, with $10,000 signing bonuses and a surge of Border Patrol officers, as well. The goal is to deport some 1 million people per year. The homeland security secretary would have a new $10 billion fund for grants for states that help with federal immigration enforcement and deportation actions. The attorney general would have $3.5 billion for a similar fund, known as Bridging Immigration-related Deficits Experienced Nationwide, or BIDEN, referring to former Democratic President Joe Biden. To help pay for it all, immigrants would face various new fees, including when seeking asylum protections. For the Pentagon, the bill would provide billions for ship building, munitions systems, and quality of life measures for servicemen and women, as well as $25 billion for the development of the Golden Dome missile defense system. The Defense Department would have $1 billion for border security. How to pay for it? Cuts to Medicaid and other programs To help partly offset the lost tax revenue and new spending, Republicans are seeking to cut back some long-running government programs: Medicaid, food stamps, green energy incentives and others. It's essentially unraveling the accomplishments of the past two Democratic presidents, Biden and Barack Obama. Advertisement Republicans argue they are trying to rightsize the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and food stamps, including older people up to age 65. Parents of children 14 and older would have to meet the program's work requirements. There's also a proposed new $35 co-payment that can be charged to patients using Medicaid services. Some 80 million people rely on Medicaid, which expanded under Obama's Affordable Care Act, and 40 million use the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program. Most already work, according to analysts. All told, the CBO estimates that under the House-passed bill, at least 10.9 million more people would go without health coverage and 3 million more would not qualify for food stamps. The Senate proposes a $25 billion Rural Hospital Transformation Fund to help offset those reductions. It's a new addition, intended to win over holdout GOP senators and a coalition of House Republicans warning that the proposed Medicaid provider tax cuts would hurt rural hospitals. Both the House and Senate bills propose a dramatic rollback of the Biden-era green energy tax breaks for electric vehicles. They also would phase out or terminate various the production and investment tax credits companies use to stand up wind, solar and other renewable energy projects. In total, cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy programs would be expected to produce at least $1.5 trillion in savings. Advertisement Trump savings accounts and so, so much more A number of extra provisions reflect other GOP priorities. The House and Senate both have a new children's savings program, called Trump Accounts, with a potential $1,000 deposit from the Treasury. The Senate provided $40 million to establish Trump's long-sought 'National Garden of American Heroes.' There's a new excise tax on university endowments, restrictions on the development of artificial intelligence and blocks on transgender surgeries. A $200 tax on gun silencers and short-barreled rifles and shotguns was eliminated. One provision bars money to family planning providers, namely Planned Parenthood, while $88 million is earmarked for a pandemic response accountability committee. Billions go for the Artemis moon mission and for exploration to Mars. What's the final cost? Altogether, keeping the existing tax breaks and adding the new ones is expected to cost $3.8 trillion over the decade, the CBO says in its analysis of the House bill. An analysis of the Senate draft is pending. The CBO estimates the House-passed package would add $2.4 trillion to the nation's deficits over the decade. Or not, depending on how one does the math. Senate Republicans are proposing a unique strategy of not counting the existing tax breaks as a new cost because those breaks are already 'current policy.' Senators say the Senate Budget Committee chairman has the authority to set the baseline for the preferred approach. Under the Senate GOP view, the cost of tax provisions would be $441 billion, according to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation. Democrats and others say this is 'magic math' that obscures the costs of the GOP tax breaks. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget puts the Senate tally at $4.2 trillion over the decade.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store