Andrew Miller: Trump & Musk remind us humans are predictable in moral vulnerability and propensity for hubris
Their passion was hot, but now the bromance is over.
President Trump has thrown his virgin red Tesla out of the cot, and Elon Musk says he won't let Donald play with his rockets anymore.
If they are correct now, they must have been terribly wrong just last week.
Either way, neither is fit to run a lemonade stand, and the world is sick of their drama.
Their clowning example makes their mutual war on diversity, equity and inclusion in the name of 'merit' even more grotesque.
America will neither be the first nor last empire to fall.
'We are all Greeks,' wrote the nineteenth-century English poet Percy Bysshe Shelley, acknowledging the intellectual heavy lifting of the Hellenics, which underpins all modern western civilisations.
The Greeks told all the important stories.
Humans are nothing if not predictable in our moral vulnerability and propensity for hubris.
Icarus' father Daedalus gave him the advice that all caring parents try to impart — 'try to neither fly too low, nor too high.'
Back in the loved-up days of February, Musk swung a chainsaw about and paraphrased Robert Oppenheimer, claiming unironically, 'I am become meme.'
The world's richest alleged ketamine user triggered not only massive cringe, but a vision of young Icarus, flying too close to the orange sun.
Mind altering substances are never far from the action — even in ancient Greece.
Nicotine, alcohol, methamphetamine, cannabis, ketamine, opiates, psychedelics — none of these are new.
Percy Shelley used opium and laudanum to 'dampen his nerves,' between arguments with his neighbours about his pistol shooting, radical politics and 'science experiments.'
President Trump spuriously claims his right to impose tariffs is based on a fentanyl trafficking crisis.
A year ago, I wrote of Musk — 'when it comes to the chemical modulation of our impossibly complex brain, the stakes are much higher than boring old money.'
Now his whole house of cards is wobbling and the one president who possibly might have shored it up is brandishing a flame-thrower.
In properly trained hands, drugs can be useful.
I have been employing ketamine and opiates all week. How to use them safely and sparingly though is a matter of dispassionate science — populism does not make for good medicine.
In November 2019, I appeared on Channel 7's Flashpoint programme, alongside then low-flying WA Health Minister, now Premier Roger Cook.
As he announced that GPs would be permitted to openly prescribe medicinal cannabis henceforth, I was watching the face of another panelist — the CEO of a start-up cannabis supplier.
Her blushing visage could only be described as 'just told she won the lottery.'
I was called cynical at the time, but in the second half of 2024 eight doctors alone — assisted by eager pharmaceutical companies — wrote over 80,000 scripts for the highest strength cannabis, much of it to be smoked.
Over 400,000 Australians started prescriptions for the highest THC content cannabis during that period.
It's way out of control.
Mental health services picking up the pieces of addicted young people are not amused at this State-sponsored jump in the boringly predictable complications of cannabis.
'First doing no harm' won't be good for the online reviews of doctors or politicians, but that's our job.
Shelley's brilliant wife Mary wrote an excellent warning about science gone morally wrong.
Her protagonist was Doctor Frankenstein.
Percy Shelley's 1818 sonnet
Ozymandias
interpreted a statue of the Egyptian Pharaoh Ramesses the Great as saying, '
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!
'
He points out the irony of egotistical monuments:
'
No thing beside remains.
Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away
.'
Time kills the importance of all men.
It ends when we sink in the sand, so let's strive to do no harm.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Trans swimmer Lia Thomas stripped of titles after university caves to Trump administration
Transgender swimming champion Lia Thomas will be stripped of all her swimming titles by the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn). On Tuesday, it was announced that UPenn will strip Thomas and apologise to all biological female competitors who lost to Thomas. UPenn's decision to cave to the Trump administration follows an investigation by the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR). OCR's investigation found UPenn violated Title IX by 'allowing a male to compete in female athletic programs and occupy female-only intimate facilities'. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon announced UPenn's decision to strip Thomas of her titles and apologise to the competitors in a statement. 'Today's resolution agreement with UPenn is yet another example of the Trump effect in action,' McMahon said. 'Thanks to the leadership of President Trump, UPenn has agreed both to apologise for its past Title IX violations and to ensure that women's sports are protected at the University for future generations of female athletes.'
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Senate passes massive US tax cut and spending bill
US Senate Republicans have passed President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill by the narrowest of margins, advancing a package that would slash taxes, reduce social safety net programs and boost military and immigration enforcement spending while adding $US3.3 trillion ($A5 trillion) to the national debt. The legislation now heads to the House of Representatives for possible final approval, though a handful of Republicans there have already voiced opposition to some of the Senate provisions. Trump wants to sign it into law by the July 4 Independence Day holiday, and House Speaker Mike Johnson said he aimed to meet that deadline. The measure would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, give new tax breaks for income from tips and overtime pay and increase spending on the military and immigration enforcement. It also would cut about $US930 billion ($A1.4 trillion) of spending on the Medicaid health program and food aid for low-income Americans, and repeal many of Democratic former president Joe Biden's green-energy incentives. The legislation, which has exposed Republican divides over the nation's fast-growing $US36.2 trillion debt, would raise the federal government's self-imposed debt ceiling by $US5 trillion. Congress must raise the cap in the coming months or risk a devastating default. The Senate passed the measure in a 51-50 vote with Vice President JD Vance breaking a tie after three Republicans - Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Susan Collins of Maine and Rand Paul of Kentucky - joined all 47 Democrats in voting against the bill. The vote followed an all-night debate in which Republicans grappled with the bill's price tag and its impact on the US healthcare system. The vote in the House, where Republicans hold a 220-212 majority, is likely to be close. A White House official told reporters that Trump would be "deeply involved" in pushing House Republicans to approve the bill. "It's a great bill. There is something for everyone," Trump said at an event in Florida on Tuesday. "And I think it's going to go very nicely in the House." Republicans have struggled to balance conservatives' demands for deeper spending cuts to reduce the impact on the deficit with moderate lawmakers' concerns that the Medicaid cuts could hurt their constituents, including service cutbacks in rural areas. A group of more moderate House Republicans, especially those who represent lower-income areas, have objected to the steeper Medicaid cuts in the Senate's plan. The legislation has also drawn criticism from billionaire Elon Musk, the former Trump ally who has railed against the bill's enormous cost and vowed to back challengers to Republican lawmakers in next year's midterm elections. House Democrats are expected to remain unanimously opposed to the bill. "This is the largest assault on American healthcare in history," House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters. "It's the largest assault on nutrition in American history." US Senate Republicans have passed President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill by the narrowest of margins, advancing a package that would slash taxes, reduce social safety net programs and boost military and immigration enforcement spending while adding $US3.3 trillion ($A5 trillion) to the national debt. The legislation now heads to the House of Representatives for possible final approval, though a handful of Republicans there have already voiced opposition to some of the Senate provisions. Trump wants to sign it into law by the July 4 Independence Day holiday, and House Speaker Mike Johnson said he aimed to meet that deadline. The measure would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, give new tax breaks for income from tips and overtime pay and increase spending on the military and immigration enforcement. It also would cut about $US930 billion ($A1.4 trillion) of spending on the Medicaid health program and food aid for low-income Americans, and repeal many of Democratic former president Joe Biden's green-energy incentives. The legislation, which has exposed Republican divides over the nation's fast-growing $US36.2 trillion debt, would raise the federal government's self-imposed debt ceiling by $US5 trillion. Congress must raise the cap in the coming months or risk a devastating default. The Senate passed the measure in a 51-50 vote with Vice President JD Vance breaking a tie after three Republicans - Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Susan Collins of Maine and Rand Paul of Kentucky - joined all 47 Democrats in voting against the bill. The vote followed an all-night debate in which Republicans grappled with the bill's price tag and its impact on the US healthcare system. The vote in the House, where Republicans hold a 220-212 majority, is likely to be close. A White House official told reporters that Trump would be "deeply involved" in pushing House Republicans to approve the bill. "It's a great bill. There is something for everyone," Trump said at an event in Florida on Tuesday. "And I think it's going to go very nicely in the House." Republicans have struggled to balance conservatives' demands for deeper spending cuts to reduce the impact on the deficit with moderate lawmakers' concerns that the Medicaid cuts could hurt their constituents, including service cutbacks in rural areas. A group of more moderate House Republicans, especially those who represent lower-income areas, have objected to the steeper Medicaid cuts in the Senate's plan. The legislation has also drawn criticism from billionaire Elon Musk, the former Trump ally who has railed against the bill's enormous cost and vowed to back challengers to Republican lawmakers in next year's midterm elections. House Democrats are expected to remain unanimously opposed to the bill. "This is the largest assault on American healthcare in history," House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters. "It's the largest assault on nutrition in American history." US Senate Republicans have passed President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill by the narrowest of margins, advancing a package that would slash taxes, reduce social safety net programs and boost military and immigration enforcement spending while adding $US3.3 trillion ($A5 trillion) to the national debt. The legislation now heads to the House of Representatives for possible final approval, though a handful of Republicans there have already voiced opposition to some of the Senate provisions. Trump wants to sign it into law by the July 4 Independence Day holiday, and House Speaker Mike Johnson said he aimed to meet that deadline. The measure would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, give new tax breaks for income from tips and overtime pay and increase spending on the military and immigration enforcement. It also would cut about $US930 billion ($A1.4 trillion) of spending on the Medicaid health program and food aid for low-income Americans, and repeal many of Democratic former president Joe Biden's green-energy incentives. The legislation, which has exposed Republican divides over the nation's fast-growing $US36.2 trillion debt, would raise the federal government's self-imposed debt ceiling by $US5 trillion. Congress must raise the cap in the coming months or risk a devastating default. The Senate passed the measure in a 51-50 vote with Vice President JD Vance breaking a tie after three Republicans - Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Susan Collins of Maine and Rand Paul of Kentucky - joined all 47 Democrats in voting against the bill. The vote followed an all-night debate in which Republicans grappled with the bill's price tag and its impact on the US healthcare system. The vote in the House, where Republicans hold a 220-212 majority, is likely to be close. A White House official told reporters that Trump would be "deeply involved" in pushing House Republicans to approve the bill. "It's a great bill. There is something for everyone," Trump said at an event in Florida on Tuesday. "And I think it's going to go very nicely in the House." Republicans have struggled to balance conservatives' demands for deeper spending cuts to reduce the impact on the deficit with moderate lawmakers' concerns that the Medicaid cuts could hurt their constituents, including service cutbacks in rural areas. A group of more moderate House Republicans, especially those who represent lower-income areas, have objected to the steeper Medicaid cuts in the Senate's plan. The legislation has also drawn criticism from billionaire Elon Musk, the former Trump ally who has railed against the bill's enormous cost and vowed to back challengers to Republican lawmakers in next year's midterm elections. House Democrats are expected to remain unanimously opposed to the bill. "This is the largest assault on American healthcare in history," House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters. "It's the largest assault on nutrition in American history." US Senate Republicans have passed President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill by the narrowest of margins, advancing a package that would slash taxes, reduce social safety net programs and boost military and immigration enforcement spending while adding $US3.3 trillion ($A5 trillion) to the national debt. The legislation now heads to the House of Representatives for possible final approval, though a handful of Republicans there have already voiced opposition to some of the Senate provisions. Trump wants to sign it into law by the July 4 Independence Day holiday, and House Speaker Mike Johnson said he aimed to meet that deadline. The measure would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, give new tax breaks for income from tips and overtime pay and increase spending on the military and immigration enforcement. It also would cut about $US930 billion ($A1.4 trillion) of spending on the Medicaid health program and food aid for low-income Americans, and repeal many of Democratic former president Joe Biden's green-energy incentives. The legislation, which has exposed Republican divides over the nation's fast-growing $US36.2 trillion debt, would raise the federal government's self-imposed debt ceiling by $US5 trillion. Congress must raise the cap in the coming months or risk a devastating default. The Senate passed the measure in a 51-50 vote with Vice President JD Vance breaking a tie after three Republicans - Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Susan Collins of Maine and Rand Paul of Kentucky - joined all 47 Democrats in voting against the bill. The vote followed an all-night debate in which Republicans grappled with the bill's price tag and its impact on the US healthcare system. The vote in the House, where Republicans hold a 220-212 majority, is likely to be close. A White House official told reporters that Trump would be "deeply involved" in pushing House Republicans to approve the bill. "It's a great bill. There is something for everyone," Trump said at an event in Florida on Tuesday. "And I think it's going to go very nicely in the House." Republicans have struggled to balance conservatives' demands for deeper spending cuts to reduce the impact on the deficit with moderate lawmakers' concerns that the Medicaid cuts could hurt their constituents, including service cutbacks in rural areas. A group of more moderate House Republicans, especially those who represent lower-income areas, have objected to the steeper Medicaid cuts in the Senate's plan. The legislation has also drawn criticism from billionaire Elon Musk, the former Trump ally who has railed against the bill's enormous cost and vowed to back challengers to Republican lawmakers in next year's midterm elections. House Democrats are expected to remain unanimously opposed to the bill. "This is the largest assault on American healthcare in history," House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters. "It's the largest assault on nutrition in American history."
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Former Home Affairs boss Mike Pezzullo warns Australia could face strategic challenges if Donald Trump reconsiders the future of AUKUS
Former home affairs secretary Mike Pezzullo has said Australia may be forced to lift its defence spending, depending on the outcome of a critical AUKUS review in Washington and views of President Donald Trump. The Biden-to-Trump transition has put the AUKUS deal under a new light with Mr Pezzullo believing that this issue remains very much alive, particularly within the Pentagon, but that the current review of the AUKUS agreement will come down to President Trump. Speaking to Sky News' Laura Jayes, Pezzullo said the current review of the AUKUS agreement – due to conclude within days – could usher in significant changes. 'The review might well be quite difficult for Australia, because it might demand for instance more defence spending or it might put a pause on the potential transfer and sale in 2032, but if that's not President Trump's view, it'll just get shelved,' he told Sky News. 'If the White House takes the view that Europe has to do more and they apply that same rubric to Japan, Australia and others, then I think that's going to be quite a willing discussion. If that's not the President's view, then I think a very different outcome will arise.' Pezzullo said the Pentagon remains wary about the availability of Virginia-class submarines, with concerns over whether the US can spare vessels for Australia. 'From the Pentagon's point of view, the concern is if we sell one to the Australians in 2032 . . . then that's one fewer that we have,' he said. He also suggested there may be growing pressure for Australia to strengthen its military posture – particularly by enabling more direct US operations from its territory, while noting that the Pentagon may want to see Australia 'lift its game in terms of its own military capability' and deepen integration with US force posture initiatives. 'The ability to launch military strikes from Australia, the ability potentially to fire missiles from Australia, the ability to sail at submarines, as they will be able to do from Perth in a couple of years' time. Is that the White House's view? That's what I'm not clear about,' he said. These comments come as Foreign Minister Penny Wong met US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington, where the AUKUS pact was high on the agenda. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is yet to meet face-to-face with President Trump eight months since his election win and has faced criticism from the Coalition for not pushing harder to meet with him earlier. However, Senator Wong said she used talks with US Foreign Secretary Marco Rubio to discuss a future meeting between Mr Albanese and Mr Trump. 'I don't think that American policy in relation to the Indo-Pacific is as settled as what a lot of the commentators think,' Pezzullo said. 'President Trump has been so focused and so consumed, just in terms of time and attention, on the European theatre, both with what's happening in Ukraine and Russia, with NATO military capability, and obviously the Middle East … I don't think agencies want to get ahead of the President.' He said the bigger question that continues to hang over Washington is whether the US intends to actively counter China's ambitions in the Indo-Pacific – or step back. 'Is America going to confront China and seek to deter their use of aggression and force, or will they cede them space in the Indo-Pacific and take a step back?' he said. 'Until that question gets resolved, I think we're in a holding pattern in the Indo-Pacific.'
