Israel agrees to Gaza truce talks
But Netanyahu, who is due to meet with President Donald Trump in Washington on Monday, said the Palestinian Islamist group's proposals for changes to a draft US-backed ceasefire deal were "unacceptable".
Trump has been making a renewed push to end nearly 21 months of war in Gaza, where the civil defence agency said 42 people were killed in Israeli military operations on Saturday.
Hamas said Friday it was ready "to engage immediately and seriously" in negotiations, and was sending its responses to the truce proposal.
"The changes that Hamas is seeking to make in the Qatari proposal were conveyed to us last night and are unacceptable to Israel," said a statement from Netanyahu's office.
"In light of an assessment of the situation, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has directed that the invitation to proximity talks be accepted and that the contacts for the return of our hostages -- on the basis of the Qatari proposal that Israel has agreed to -- be continued," the statement added.
Hamas has not publicly detailed its responses to the US-sponsored proposal, which was transmitted by mediators from Qatar and Egypt.
Two Palestinian sources close to the discussions told AFP the proposal included a 60-day truce, during which Hamas would release 10 living hostages and several bodies in exchange for Palestinians detained by Israel.
However, they said, the group was also demanding certain conditions for Israel's withdrawal, guarantees against a resumption of fighting during negotiations, and the return of the UN-led aid distribution system.
Two previous ceasefires mediated by Qatar, Egypt and the United States secured temporary halts in fighting and the return of Israeli hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners.
The Egyptian foreign ministry said Saturday that top diplomat Badr Abdelatty held a phone call with Washington's main representative in the truce talks, Steve Witkoff, to discuss recent developments "and preparations for holding indirect meetings between the two parties concerned to reach an agreement".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
43 minutes ago
- IOL News
Doubts surround potential probe into allegations of police corruption
Political analyst warns of systemic corruption in South Africa's police force Image: File/Archive Questions are mounting over the likelihood and sincerity of any investigation into allegations raised by KZN police head General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, amid concerns about political bias and systemic corruption. Independent political analyst Joe Mhlanga expressed scepticism about the current political climate, suggesting that entrenched interests may compromise justice. This was after Mkhwanazi made shocking claims alleging serious corruption involving a network of criminals, drug lords, police Minister Senzo Mchunu and National deputy police commissioner Shadrack Sibiya. Mhlanga pointed to the broader pattern of impunity among those aligned with the president, citing the foreign currency hidden under the couches at Ramaphosa's Phala Phala farm. 'We might have seen the report from the Public Protector that cleared President Cyril Ramaphosa of any wrongdoing, but if you look at the laws, laws-particularly the banking regulations, and the facts surrounding the arrest of a young woman found with over a million US dollars, the picture becomes murky," stated Mhlanga. 'She was arrested around the same time President Ramaphosa was cleared of any misconduct, despite allegations that his house contained more foreign currency than legally permissible. This raises serious questions about the integrity of these investigations.' 'There's a clear tendency for people close to him to avoid repercussions. If those around him continue to shield misconduct, it suggests that corruption is deeply rooted and unlikely to be addressed unless there's a major shift.' He further criticised the political establishment's reliance on the police and justice mechanisms to protect allies rather than uphold the rule of law. 'South African politicians seem to view the Ministry of Police as a tool to shield their own, rather than a public institution to serve justice. Appointments within the police, judiciary, and prosecutorial agencies appear based on loyalty rather than merit, making it almost impossible to hold powerful figures accountable.' Mhlanga also highlighted concerns about President Ramaphosa's pattern of appointing close allies to key positions. 'He ensures that those in critical roles, including the Chief Justice, police chiefs, and NPA officials, are aligned with him. This significantly reduces the chances of any internal investigations leading to his downfall. It's a cycle of protection that has persisted for years, with past leaders and officials similarly shielded from scrutiny.' He warned that this systemic issue is unlikely to change unless there is a deliberate effort to break the cycle. 'Given the history and current appointments, it's clear that any investigation into Mchunu's actions will likely be managed and manipulated to produce a favourable outcome for him. The whole process seems orchestrated to prevent any real accountability.' Meanwhile, the African People's Convention (APC) has commended Mkhwanazi for his courageous stance against drug syndicates and political corruption within SAPS. In a Monday statement, the APC lauded Mkhwanazi and his team for their unwavering commitment to putting citizens' safety first. 'By openly revealing that drug cartels are the cancer within SAPS, and implicating powerful political figures and parliamentarians, General Mkhwanazi demonstrates that some officers are willing to stand against corruption,' the statement read. The party highlighted concerns over allegations that the Minister of Police is involved in undermining investigations, possibly to protect vested interests. 'The reported instructions to dismantle anti-crime units and the alleged links between the Minister and questionable entities point to a systemic capture of the police service,' the APC noted. 'This jeopardises the safety of our citizens and hampers efforts to fight crime effectively.' The APC also stressed the importance of accountability. 'There must be a thorough investigation into the Minister's conduct, whether through parliamentary inquiries or a judicial commission. The serious allegations of misleading parliament and illicit funding require urgent attention.' The party's president, Themba Godi, who previously served as SCOPA chair, reaffirmed their support for officers like Mkhwanazi. 'His integrity and discipline reflect the true spirit of policing. It's time for all citizens to support those in blue who risk their lives to defend justice and fight corruption.' Ramaphosa's spokesperson Vincent Mangwenya did not respond to questions from IOL. [email protected] IOL Politics
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Israel launches first strikes on Yemen in weeks, Houthis retaliate with aerial attack
By Yomna Ehab and Mohammed Ghobari The strikes hit the ports of Hodeidah, Ras Isa and Salif, as well as the Ras Qantib power plant on the coast, in response to repeated Houthi attacks on Israel, the military said. Hours later, Israel said two missiles were launched from Yemen. Attempts were made to intercept them, though the results were still under review. The Iran-aligned Houthi forces said they had fired missiles and drones at multiple targets in Israel in retaliation for the strikes on Yemen. The Israeli ambulance service said it had not received any calls regarding missile impacts or casualties following the launches from Yemen. Since the start of the war in Gaza in October 2023, the Houthis have fired at Israel and at shipping in the Red Sea, disrupting global trade, in what the group says are acts of solidarity with the Palestinians. Most of the dozens of missiles and drones fired toward Israel have been intercepted or fallen short. Israel has carried out a series of retaliatory strikes. Israel said its attacks on Monday also targeted a ship, the Galaxy Leader, which was seized by the Houthis in late 2023 and held in Ras Isa port. 'The Houthi terrorist regime's forces installed a radar system on the ship, and are using it to track vessels in international maritime space in order to promote the Houthi terrorist regime's activities,' the military said. The Houthi military spokesperson said the group's air defences had responded to the Israeli attack with 'a large number of domestically produced surface-to-air missiles'. Israel's military told residents to evacuate the three ports before it launched its attacks. Residents of Hodeidah told Reuters that the strikes on the power station had knocked out electricity. There was no immediate information on casualties. The Israeli assault comes hours after a ship was attacked off of Hodeidah and the ship's crew abandoned it as it took on water. No one immediately claimed responsibility for the attack, but security firm Ambrey said the vessel fit the typical profile of a Houthi target. The Houthis, who control northern Yemen including the capital Sanaa, are one of the last pro-Iran armed groups still standing in the Middle East after Israel severely hurt other allies of Tehran: Lebanon's Hezbollah, the Palestinian militant group Hamas and Iran itself in a 12-day air war last month. Under the direction of leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi, the group has grown into an army of tens of thousands of fighters and acquired armed drones and ballistic missiles. Saudi Arabia and the West say the arms come from Iran, though Tehran denies this.
TimesLIVE
3 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Rare trial to begin in challenge to Trump-backed deportation of pro-Palestinian campus activists
Groups representing US university professors seeking to protect international students and faculty members who engage in pro-Palestinian advocacy from being deported are set to do what no other litigants challenging the Trump administration's hardline immigration agenda have done so far: Take it to trial. A two-week non-jury trial in the professors' case scheduled to kick off on Monday in Boston marks a rarity in the hundreds of lawsuits that have been filed nationally challenging Republican President Donald Trump's efforts to carry out mass deportations, slash spending and reshape the federal government. In many of those cases, judges have issued quick rulings early on in the proceedings without any witnesses being called to testify. Now US district judge William Young, in keeping with his long-standing practice, instead ordered a trial in the professors' case, saying it was the 'best way to get at truth'. The lawsuit was filed in March after immigration authorities arrested recent Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil, the first target of Trump's effort to deport non-citizen students with pro-Palestinian or anti-Israel views. Since then, the administration has cancelled the visas of hundreds of other students and scholars and ordered the arrest of some, including Rumeysa Ozturk, a Tufts University student taken into custody by masked and plainclothes agents after co-writing an opinion piece criticising her school's response to Israel's war in Gaza. In their cases and others, judges have ordered the release of students detained by immigration authorities after they argued the administration retaliated against them for their pro-Palestinian advocacy in violation of the free speech guarantees of the US Constitution's First Amendment. Their arrests form the basis of the case before Young, which was filed by the American Association of University Professors and its chapters at Harvard, Rutgers and New York University, and the Middle East Studies Association. They allege the state department and department of homeland security adopted a policy of revoking visas for non-citizen students and faculty members who engaged in pro-Palestinian advocacy and arresting, detaining and deporting them. That policy, they say, was adopted after Trump signed executive orders in January directing the agencies to protect Americans from non-citizens who 'espouse hateful ideology' and to 'vigorously' combat anti-Semitism. Secretary of state Marco Rubio in late March said he had revoked more than 300 visas and warned that the Trump administration was looking every day for 'these lunatics'. The goal, the plaintiffs say, has been to suppress the types of protests that have roiled college campuses after Israel launched its war in Gaza after the Hamas attack of October 7 2023 on Israel. Trump administration officials have frequently spoken about the efforts to target student protesters for visa revocations. Yet in court, the administration has defended itself by arguing the plaintiffs are challenging a deportation policy that does not exist and cannot point to any statute, rule, regulation or directive codifying it. 'We don't deport people based on ideology,' homeland security department spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said. Homeland security secretary Kristi Noem 'has made it clear that anyone who thinks they can come to America and hide behind the First Amendment to advocate anti-American and anti-Semitic violence and terrorism — think again. You are not welcome here,' McLaughlin said. The trial will determine whether the administration has violated the plaintiffs' First Amendment free speech rights. If Young concludes it has, he will determine a remedy in a second phase of the case. Young has described the lawsuit as 'an important free speech case' and said as alleged in the plaintiffs' complaint, 'it is hard to imagine a policy more focused on intimidating its targets from practising protected political speech'. The case is the second Trump-era legal challenge so far that has gone to trial before Young, an 84-year-old appointee of Republican former president Ronald Reagan. While other Trump-era cases have been resolved through motions and arguments in court, the veteran jurist has long espoused the value of trials and in a recent order lamented the 'virtual abandonment by the federal judiciary of any sense that its fact-finding processes are exceptional'. Young last month, after another non-jury trial, delivered civil rights advocates and Democratic-led states a win by ordering the reinstatement of hundreds of National Institutes of Health research grants unlawfully terminated because of their perceived promotion of diversity, equity and inclusion.
