logo
Contempt over toilet, SC asks BMC engineer to explain delay to HC; SC must not interfere in HC-initiated contempt, except in rare cases

Contempt over toilet, SC asks BMC engineer to explain delay to HC; SC must not interfere in HC-initiated contempt, except in rare cases

Time of India12 hours ago

NEW DELHI: : Importance of toilets can be best assessed by the fact that a few months delay in construction of a toilet block led to Bombay High Court initiating contempt proceedings against a Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation engineer and in turn the matter rolling up to the Supreme Court on Friday.
The Bombay HC on Oct 4 had directed the BMC to construct within three months the toilets at a slum cluster in Kalina, Santacruz E, invoking right to life guaranteed under Article 21 which included dignified living and the provisions under Swachh Bharat Abhiyan. Four months later, on Feb 2, the HC found that the toilet blocks remained incomplete and had slammed the BMC threatening to take contempt action.
BMC executive engineer Maheshkumar Sampat Jare, who had been bearing the brunt of the HC's displeasure, attempted to explain that the survey took some time and since it is a toilet block having 32 units - 15 for women, 16 for men and one for handicapped persons, it would require nine months for completion, as was estimated by his superiors in the corporation.
The HC on May 6 again found that despite its Feb 2 order, the toilet blocks had not been completed and initiated contempt proceedings against Jare. A week later, the toilet complex was inaugurated. With the contempt sword hanging, Jare rushed to the SC.
Senior advocate Gaurav Agrawal told a bench of Justices K V Viswanathan and N Kotiswar Singh that Jare had an unblemished service record of 35 years, that he would retire 18 months later and that it would be unfortunate to undergo the rigours of contempt of court proceedings when he had done everything possible under his control to finish the project as expeditiously as possible.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya
IC Markets
Mendaftar
Undo
The bench said, 'When the High Courts issue contempt notices, as a matter of principle, the Supreme Court should not interfere with it except in exceptional circumstances.' However, it noted that the toilet block has since been inaugurated and told Jare to appear before HC and explain the circumstances which led to delay.
Agrawal said that strong remarks have been made by the HC in its order and that the alleged contemnor is apprehensive about his fate. The bench requested HC to decide the issue involved in the contempt proceedings without being influenced by its observations in the earlier orders. 'HC is seeking an explanation only. SO go before the HC and explain everything,' the bench told Jare.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Some BJP MPs backing our Waqf stand': Top Muslim body chief on eve of Patna rally
‘Some BJP MPs backing our Waqf stand': Top Muslim body chief on eve of Patna rally

Indian Express

time36 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

‘Some BJP MPs backing our Waqf stand': Top Muslim body chief on eve of Patna rally

After holding scores of protest meetings against the amended Waqf law across Bihar, Jharkhand, Odisha and West Bengal, Imarat-e-Shariah, one of the country's leading Muslim organisations, is set to hold a mega rally in Patna's Gandhi Maidan on Sunday to keep the heat on the BJP-led Centre over the row. Imarat-e-Shariah, headquartered in Patna, has rejected the Waqf amendment legislation, calling for its withdrawal. The legislation was passed by Parliament in April. In May, after hearing multiple petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf Amendment Act, 2025, the Supreme Court reserved its decision on the prayer for interim directions. Speaking to The Indian Express, Imarat-e-Shariah head Faisal Rahmani said: 'Though we have been protesting against the draconian Waqf Amendment Bill right from the start, we want to keep the pressure on the Centre. We have been creating awareness among public about how the Centre's Waqf amendments are against several provisions of the Constitution and Supreme Court rulings. It is nothing but a bid to take away our places of worship and heritage buildings. This law undermines the spirit of brotherhood in the country.' Rahmani said: 'We accept the 1995 Waqf law. Going by the amendments to it, how can one disallow Hindus to donate their land for a good cause? Our records show that there are thousands of educational, medical and social organisations and institutions being run on Waqf land, some of which even have more Hindu beneficiaries in comparison to Muslims. Take for example Maulana Mazharul Haque University in Patna, which has 88% Hindu students in courses.' He said, 'The Centre summarily rejected our more than 300 representations against the Waqf Bill – we are also rejecting their amended Waqf law.' Calling the Waqf law 'irrational', the Imarat-e-Shariah chief also said: 'What will happen when someone asks for proof of Ashokan pillars or a whole lot of our historical monuments cutting across religions? This law aims at creating enmity among citizens… Public is a great force. It had made the NDA-led central government withdraw three farm laws. Patna rally is just the beginning, we will keep the pressure on the Centre.' Asked about timing of the Imarat-e-Shariah's protests ahead of the upcoming Bihar Assembly polls, Rahmani said they have been seeking support from all parties. 'We are getting calls of solidarity from various political parties. In fact, some BJP MPs have also been supporting our Waqf stand,' he claimed. The Muslim community accounts for over 17% of Bihar's population. Santosh Singh is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express since June 2008. He covers Bihar with main focus on politics, society and governance. Investigative and explanatory stories are also his forte. Singh has 25 years of experience in print journalism covering Bihar, Delhi, Madhya Pradesh and Karnataka. ... Read More

Labs at 2,676 govt schools in Tamil Nadu to be made hi-tech at a cost of Rs65 crore
Labs at 2,676 govt schools in Tamil Nadu to be made hi-tech at a cost of Rs65 crore

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Labs at 2,676 govt schools in Tamil Nadu to be made hi-tech at a cost of Rs65 crore

Coimbatore: School education minister Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi on Sunday said the state had allocated Rs65 crore to upgrade laboratories in 2,676 govt schools across Tamil Nadu into hi-tech ones. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "Currently, work is on to upgrade the laboratories in 850 govt schools that were in poor condition. We have installed 22,939 smart boards in govt schools so far. The govt has also spent nearly Rs600 crore on the implementation of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, in the past three years. The state is planning to move for a special leave petition (SLP) before the Supreme Court in connection with the Madras high court's order on the RTE admission. The RTE portal will be opened after that," the minister said. Admitting that the govt schools were facing shortage of computer teachers, the minister said, "While the state has plans to introduce artificial intelligence and robotics in govt schools, a permanent solution to the teacher shortage is being worked out and will be resolved shortly. Meanwhile, temporary trainers have been appointed at the hi-tech labs to assist students." He said around 9.8 lakh govt and aided school students were assessed under the State Level Achievement Survey to get a picture of the learning outcomes. Addressing a meeting to review the State Level Achievement Survey, 2025, the minister stated that Valparai, Pollachi, Periyanaickenpalayam and Sulthanpet blocks in the district were among the best performers, while Thondamuthur and Sulur required attention. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "It is appreciated that the teachers have identified and accepted the weaknesses. With acceptance comes improvement. Even if students perform well in the board exams, it is important to focus on their learning outcomes right from Class I to IX. All pass methods in these Classes will reflect on the board exams, and students will face the consequences. To avoid such impacts, it is necessary to mould them at every Class. Headmasters should motivate teachers to stay updated in their subjects, provide an interesting learning environment and simplify complex topics," the minister said.

CJI Gavai: Identifying creamy layer in SC/ST was my path-breaking ruling on a PIL
CJI Gavai: Identifying creamy layer in SC/ST was my path-breaking ruling on a PIL

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

CJI Gavai: Identifying creamy layer in SC/ST was my path-breaking ruling on a PIL

Nagpur: Chief Justice of India Bhushan Gavai on Saturday said one of the most defining moments of his judicial career was Supreme Court's recognition of the need to apply the "creamy layer" principle within Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST), describing it essential to refine the concept of social justice. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In an exclusive interaction with The Times of India at Raj Bhavan during his Nagpur visit, the CJI said, "Treating children of high-ranking SC/ST officers at par with those from truly disadvantaged families dilutes the purpose of affirmative action. Identifying the creamy layer ensures that benefits reach the most deserving." The observation was part of a PIL-based ruling in which the apex court allowed sub-categorisation within SC/ST groups to ensure equitable distribution of reservation benefits. Justice Gavai, the second Dalit and first Buddhist to serve as CJI, also cautioned against judicial overreach, emphasising that all institutions must function within constitutional boundaries. "Judicial activism will stay, but it should not turn into judicial adventurism or judicial terrorism. Parliament enacts laws, the executive implements them, and the judiciary ensures compliance with the Constitution. Overstepping by any branch disturbs this balance," he said. "The Constitution is not just a legal document, it is a tool for social transformation. It has withstood global and domestic upheavals due to its strong foundation," he said. Appointed as the 52nd Chief Justice on May 14 for a six-month term, Gavai made it clear he will not accept any post-retirement assignments. "It's a matter of personal principle," he said, adding his focus remains on reducing case pendency — over 81,000 in the Supreme Court alone — and improving infrastructure in rural courts to enhance access to justice. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Justice Gavai authored nearly 300 judgments, including landmark rulings on Article 370, electoral bonds, demonetisation, and freedom of speech. He was also part of the five-judge bench that upheld the abrogation of Article 370, which he called consistent with Dr B R Ambedkar's vision of "one nation, one Constitution." He underscored the gravity of another path-breaking ruling in which the court ruled that an arbitration clause in an unstamped or insufficiently stamped contract remains valid — a significant decision for commercial law. Similarly, he was part of the bench that unanimously annulled electoral bonds scheme, calling it inconsistent with transparency in political funding. Justice Gavai also recalled how the apex court under his watch stayed the Allahabad High Court's insensitive remarks in a sexual assault case, calling it "inhuman" and reflective of judicial insensitivity. In another crucial decision, Supreme Court declared the arrest of NewsClick founder Prabir Purkayastha illegal due to procedural lapses by Delhi Police. In his role as judge, Gavai often criticised the controversial practice of "bulldozer justice," where properties of accused individuals are demolished before a conviction. "Such actions go against constitutional protections. Punishment without trial violates every tenet of justice," he said. His views helped guide the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court to stay demolition of properties during the Nagpur riots probe. Gavai also granted bail to former Delhi Deputy CM Manish Sisodia in the liquor policy case and was part of several benches that strengthened environmental law, wildlife conservation, and tree protection. Among the pending matters before the Court under his leadership is the challenge to the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 — a politically sensitive issue with implications for property rights and minority law.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store