Starmer to convene urgent Cabinet meeting on Gaza to set out pathway to peace
Sir Keir shared plans he is working on with France and Germany to 'bring about a lasting peace' with US President Donald Trump when they met in Scotland, Downing Street said.
And he plans to share details with Arab states and other key allies in the coming days.
Sir Keir is facing mounting calls to recognise Palestinian statehood immediately.
The Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'This week, the Prime Minister is focused on a pathway to peace to ensure immediate relief for those on the ground, and a sustainable route to a two-state solution.
'We are clear that the recognition of the Palestinian state is a matter of when, not if, but it must be one of the steps on the path to a two-state solution as part of a wider plan that delivers lasting security for both Palestinians and Israelis.'
Amid international alarm over starvation in Gaza, Israel announced at the weekend that it would suspend fighting in three areas for 10 hours a day and open secure routes for aid delivery.
The UK confirmed it was taking part in airdrops of aid into the territory.
Aid agencies have welcomed the new measures but said they were not enough to counter the rising hunger in the Palestinian territory.
Sir Keir said that the British public is 'revolted' at the scenes of desperation in Gaza as he appeared alongside Mr Trump at his Turnberry golf course on Monday.
'It's a humanitarian crisis, it's an absolute catastrophe.
'Nobody wants to see that. I think people in Britain are revolted at seeing what they're seeing on their screens, so we've got to get to that ceasefire.'
The US president hinted at sticking points in US-led negotiations over a peace deal, saying Palestinian militant group Hamas had become 'very difficult to deal with' in recent weeks.
He suggested this was because they only held a small remaining number of Israeli hostages.
Sir Keir has likened the plan he is working on with France and Germany to the coalition of the willing, the international effort to support Ukraine towards a lasting peace.
The Prime Minister's official spokesman said the plan would build 'on the collaboration to date that paves the way to a long-term solution on security in the region'.
Sir Keir is meanwhile facing calls from a growing number of MPs to recognise a Palestinian state immediately.
More than 250 cross-party MPs have now signed a letter calling for ministers to take the step, up from 221 on Friday.
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds on Monday dismissed the idea that there is a split at the top of Government over when to recognise a Palestinian state, saying 'we all want it to happen'.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting is among those to have signalled a desire for hastened action, calling for recognition 'while there's still a state of Palestine left to recognise', while Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said the Government wants to recognise a Palestinian state 'in contribution to a peace process'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
JONATHAN BROCKLEBANK: Trump's assessment resonates not just with me but with much of Scotland. Sturgeon really WAS terrible
The post on former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon 's Instagram account assumed a certain knowledge on the part of the reader. 'Feeling was mutual, Donnie,' it read. 'Forever proud to represent all the things that offend your view of the world.' The first assumption is that we know that 'Donnie' refers to the President of the United States Donald Trump and that the intention behind the use of the diminutive is to demean him. The second assumption is that we are au fait with President Trump's position on Ms Sturgeon. As he flew back to Washington on Air Force One on Tuesday, he let slip to reporters that, while he had 'a lot of respect' for John Swinney he thought 'the woman who preceded him' was 'terrible as First Minister of Scotland'. Mr Swinney was actually preceded by Humza Yousaf but we shouldn't quibble if he is not on the leader of the free world's radar. He is hardly on Scotland's either. There is one more key assumption of understanding in Ms Sturgeon's riposte to the President. To get her meaning, it must be understood that her words flow down to their readers like consecrated crystal streams from the moral uplands in which she dwells. She has always lived there atop the highest peak in the kingdom of the righteous and if we don't know this about her then her Instagram post could not possibly hit its mark. It would read like some bitter has-been sassing back to power. 'When they go low, we go high,' Ms Sturgeon, in her pomp, once told her party. She was quoting Michelle Obama. In the same speech she name-checked Nelson Mandela as she groped ludicrously for common ground between Scotland's struggle for 'freedom' and the oppression of South Africa's black population under apartheid. Virtue must reside in every Sturgeon utterance and that's a given. We cannot see the person without first seeing that. Unless of course it is Ms Sturgeon who cannot see herself. Her autobiography, Frankly, which is due out this month, may shed more light on the extent to which the former First Minister is self-aware. But the evidence of her political lifetime suggests to me the penny has still to drop and, indeed, may never do so: her high moral ground is a land of make believe. I hear what Mr Trump said about Ms Sturgeon and what she said in response and cannot manage to see past two not particularly pleasant people engaging in trash talk. If anything, I'm rather more offended by her remarks and those offered on her behalf. 'Trump's lack of respect for women is hardly news,' a source close to Ms Sturgeon sniped. Really? We're playing the misogyny card? Can it be conceived of that a male politician might find fault with a female one because of what she stands for or must the attack on all womankind come baked in? And to what extent, do you think, is Ms Sturgeon's intemperate response in keeping with the ethos of going high when your opponent goes low? The truth is when they go low, she gets down in the mud with them. Oftentimes she has dragged others down there with her. In her mind she is the polar opposite of Donald Trump – dissimilar in every respect imaginable. In my mind she is fooling herself and, rather less successfully, us. Fake news? The two are co-authors of that book. During their respective times in office, both have used social media to peddle myths. Remember when Scotland was 'dragged out of Europe against her will' and how broken up Brussels was about it? On the day of our parting, the EU Commission building was bathed in a light show featuring the words 'Scotland' and 'Europe' linked with a love heart. 'If you look carefully, you'll see that they do appear to have left a light on for us,' cooed Ms Sturgeon beneath the picture purporting to portray mutual devotion. Those of us who looked even more carefully found her party had paid an Edinburgh firm to project the message on to the building. It was a cheap SNP stunt, an attempt to skew voters' perception of reality through a lie. It is what happens to politicians so confident in the indisputability of their position that they no longer care to be confused by anything as frivolous as the facts. You think Mr Trump surrounds himself with stooges and sycophants drunk on his Kool-Aid? Ms Sturgeon beat him to the punch. And I'm not just talking about her cabinet. More than two years after she left office, you cannot get moving in the public sector for the cult of Nicola – prissy, sanctimonious, overweeningly woke finger-waggers whose starting position in any conversation is the unshakeable conviction that they represent the enlightenment. I've had issues in the past with Mr Trump's inappropriate use of language. Certainly, he calls things as he sees them. So does Ms Sturgeon. As First Minister she was happy to go on record as someone who detests the Tories. That is a whopping great chunk of society to hate. Most of us down here in the glens she overlooks from Mount Righteous seem to muddle through our lives showing civility, even affection, towards those we disagree with on politics. My life would be poorer without the Nationalists I know and love in it. And another thing about the US commander in chief – his unfortunate habit of dismissing awkward questions by attacking the reporter or the news organisation asking them. Ms Sturgeon, surely, can claw back a few points on the moral scoreboard there. You think? During the pandemic I lost count of the number of times Ms Sturgeon ruled on the 'legitimacy' of questions rather than answering them. Was it my imagination or did they become less legitimate as they became more probing? I recall a thoroughly unpleasant response to our own political editor Michael Blackley who wanted to know whether self-isolation requirements for hospitality staff could be reduced to ease pressure on the industry. 'Yeah, that would really help …' snapped the First Minister. 'I don't know if you have listened to a word I have said, Michael.' A barb followed about the intelligence of the newspaper he writes for. It took 19 days before Ms Sturgeon cut the self-isolation requirements our journalist was asking about. I've made no secret of the fact Mr Trump was never my cup of tea. But his frank assessment of our longest serving First Minister resonates not just with me but with much of Scotland. She really was terrible. It is a blessed relief she's on the festival circuit now. And while she may wear his antipathy towards her as a badge of honour, the baleful truth which she will never accept is that she and he are not so very different. He went low and she went low. That is fact, not politics.
The Guardian
7 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump to sign executive order to bring back presidential fitness test in schools
Donald Trump will sign an executive order on Thursday to bring back the presidential fitness test, a series of physical tests for schoolchildren in the US that was in place for decades but suspended 12 years ago to focus less on competition and more on healthy lifestyles. Trump plans to announce the test's revival in a press event with famous athletes. The executive order also will reestablish the president's council on sports, fitness, and nutrition. The presidential fitness test was required in public schools in some form from the late 1950s until 2013, when it was changed into a program less focused on specific feats of strength. The test involves activities like a one-mile run, sit-ups, push-ups, pull-ups and a sit-and-reach. People who participated in the program as children often have memories , both fond and not, of their experiences attempting these challenges in their gym classes. Robert F Kennedy Jr, the health secretary, will administer the fitness program. There will also be criteria for a 'presidential fitness award'. In past iterations of the program, the top 15% of performers would receive the award. 'MAKE AMERICA FIT AGAIN!' Karoline Leavitt , the White House press secretary, wrote in a post on X about reintroducing the test. The fitness test aligns with the make America healthy again movement's focus on physical wellness and exercise. 'President Trump wants every young American to have the opportunity to emphasize healthy, active lifestyles – creating a culture of strength and excellence for years to come,' Leavitt said in a statement. Trump, an avid golfer, reportedly believes exercise is 'misguided', as a person is 'born with a finite amount of energy', the New Yorker reported in 2017.
The Sun
7 minutes ago
- The Sun
Starmer wasn't elected to virtue signal on Palestine – it was to fix these very real problems HERE
WHEN Sir Keir Starmer was elected Prime Minister, did anyone remember to tell him which country he was supposed to be running? I only ask because he seems to be blissfully unaware of the fact that he's meant to be in charge of THIS country, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and not spending his time pontificating about whether any other country should exist or not. 9 9 9 That would certainly explain why the British PM chose to call an emergency Cabinet meeting this week to discuss an urgent issue of great import which turned out to have nothing to do with this country at all. Instead, after the ministerial meeting, Sir Keir pompously strode to the No10 podium and announced to the world that Britain would recognise a Palestinian state in September, unless Israel agreed to abide by key conditions, such as allowing more food aid into Gaza and signing up to a two-state solution to the Middle East conflict. Let's forget for one moment that the PM was delivering yet another U-turn in a bid to appease his leftie backbenchers. And let's leave to one side the abject immorality and absurdity of placing conditions on Israel while having no requirement that the Hamas terrorists release their remaining hostages and lay down their weapons. Here to lap up free hotels and handouts Let's even ignore the fact that Sir Keir's pledge was so mind-blowingly wrong that it was cheered by Hamas leaders while condemned as 'shameful' by their former hostages, or that it will not save a single life in Gaza or bring about an end to the war one day sooner. Putting ALL of that to one side, the most striking thing about Sir Keir Starmer's announcement was that it wasn't about Britain, the country he is supposedly in charge of. You know, the one he was elected to run, the one where he's supposed to be busy delivering 'change' with a steely-eyed focus on growth. Yes, that one. Yet there was no emergency Cabinet meeting about any of the myriad problems back here in Blighty. Does the Prime Minister really believe there is so little that needs to be done at home? Awkward moment Trump blasts 'nasty' Sadiq Khan for 'terrible job'… before Starmer interrupts: 'He's a friend of mine!' After all, there are no end of items in his 'in-tray' that could merit an emergency Cabinet meeting. He could start with immigration — both legal and illegal. Yet again, we've had new official figures showing that almost all of a 700,000 increase in our population in just one year came not from births but from new arrivals. 9 9 9 And once again we saw boatloads of thousands of illegal migrants, mostly undocumented men of fighting age, coming to our shores to lap up the free hotels, the handouts, the black market jobs and the near-certain promise that they will never be deported. Did Sir Keir and his Cabinet ministers have anything to say about the growing protests outside asylum hotels spreading across the country? Starmer, Angela Rayner and their mates might even want to talk about the cost-of-living crisis still hitting millions of families who face prices, bills and rents going up... And what about having an emergency Cabinet meeting about the rising tide of crime after a report revealed that offences in London have rocketed by 86 per cent in the past ten years under Labour Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan? Didn't ministers wonder why only one in 20 muggings in our capital city ever results in a prosecution? Or why so many grooming gangs have yet to be prosecuted? Or is that just not worth a few minutes of their time during the summer recess? Maybe they might also want to discuss the chaos in our NHS after another five days of strikes by junior doctors, with nurses and GPs likely to follow suit, while millions of patients sit on waiting lists. Starmer, Angela Rayner and their mates might even want to talk about the cost-of-living crisis still hitting millions of families who face prices, bills and rents going up while Chancellor Rachel Reeves takes even more money in taxes out of their hard-earned wages. Indeed, they might want to wonder where all the jobs have gone since the employer National Insurance hike, or why we have millions of people languishing on welfare, many claiming mental health issues, or why hundreds of thousands of children are now routinely absent from school. Tackle the very real problems at home What about an emergency Cabinet meeting to discuss why we are a country where it rains half the year, yet we face hosepipe bans most summers and, despite being an island surrounded by North Sea oil and gas, we have some of the highest energy bills in the world, with the threat of blackouts thanks to the folly of Net Zero? They could even have a chat about why, whether it's planes, trains or automobiles, we can't get anywhere in this country any more thanks to technical failures at air traffic control, or the wrong leaves on the line or the one million-plus potholes on our roads. Frankly, if you can't work out how to fill potholes, run the NHS or stop dinghies crossing the English Channel, I'm not sure why you'd think you're up to solving one of the most intractable conflicts of the past century... Or perhaps they could ponder why we don't have the Armed Forces or the military hardware to defend our own nation, let alone any of our allies, despite the growing instability in the world. Every single one of these issues — and there are countless more — would be worthy of an emergency Cabinet meeting. Yet it is the plight of the Palestinian people that concerns our PM, not that of the people he is supposed to represent. Frankly, if you can't work out how to fill potholes, run the NHS or stop dinghies crossing the English Channel, I'm not sure why you'd think you're up to solving one of the most intractable conflicts of the past century in a far-flung region halfway across the world, but there we are. Someone needs to break it to the Prime Minister that he wasn't elected to virtue signal on the world stage about a nation ABROAD that doesn't yet exist. Instead, he should spend his time doing the job he is paid to do and tackle the very real problems hitting ordinary people AT HOME. 9 9 9
