Why the 'lock-in' phenomenon is gripping American homeowners
More than half of U.S. homeowners said they would be uncomfortable selling their home this year no matter what the mortgage rate is, an increase of 12 percentage points from last year's survey, according to Bankrate.
Homeowners with low, fixed-rate mortgages may be reluctant to sell their homes because they would have to give up their low interest rates. This is known as the "lock-in" phenomenon, according to the report.
'Mortgage rates haven't been below 6% in nearly three years, so buyers and sellers alike have reluctantly adjusted to high rates," said Greg McBride, chief financial analyst for Bankrate.
Current homeowners aren't looking to buy. Why not?
Nearly 40% of homeowners say mortgage rates would need to drop below 6% for them to be comfortable buying a home this year, the survey found.
'While many would-be buyers are holding out for lower mortgage rates, what constitutes 'lower' has evolved. Many that were pining for a return to 3% or 4% rates would probably jump for joy if rates fell into the fives," McBride said in a statement.
'With so many homeowners having bought or refinanced at sub 5-percent rates prior to 2022, there isn't much of an appetite or incentive to refinance at today's comparatively high rates,' McBride added.
The bank of mom and dad: Parents are helping their adult children become homeowners
What is the current mortgage rate?
In the week ending July 17, 30-year fixed-rate mortgages averaged 6.75%, Freddie Mac announced. That's close to the fixed-mortgage rate from a year prior. Those figures don't include fees or points, and rates in some parts of the country may be higher or lower than the national average.
CONTRIBUTING Rachel Barber, Andrea Riquier, USA TODAY
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
5 minutes ago
- Axios
Salt Lake City named USDA hub in federal reshuffling
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is moving most of its employees from Washington, D.C., to five hubs, including Salt Lake City. Why it matters: Shifting operations to Utah's capital could give the state's farmers and ranchers more access to federal officials — and potentially shape policies that better serve the Mountain West. The big picture: The move, announced Thursday by Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, will close nearly all USDA offices in D.C. It is part of the Trump administration's effort to cut costs and consolidate the federal government. The other agriculture hubs include: Raleigh, North Carolina; Kansas City, Missouri; Indianapolis; and Fort Collins, Colorado. Despite the relocation, USDA has maintained that its critical functions "will continue uninterrupted," according to a news release. Reality check: While Utah's cost of living is lower than D.C.'s, it still has one of the nation's most expensive housing markets. Salt Lake City's federal salary locality rate is about 17%. Zoom in: Utah's farmland totaled about 10.5 million acres in 2023 — one-fifth of the state's total land area, according to the University of Utah's Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute. Utah ranks 25th among U.S. states for total farmland. What they're saying: Utah Republican leaders, including Gov. Spencer Cox and U.S. Sen. John Curtis, celebrated Rollins' Thursday announcement. "The USDA's decision to refocus on its core mission, supporting farmers, families, and rural communities, is long overdue," Curtis posted on X. "Utahns are the best at advocating for and advancing American agriculture." The other side: U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) called the decision a "half-baked proposal," warning it could affect the USDA's "ability to provide critical services for Americans" and farmers.
2 hours ago
With student loan forgiveness under IBR plan paused, what it means for millions of borrowers
The Department of Education has paused the Income Based Repayment plan (IBR) in another significant move that alters the student loan repayment process for millions of Americans. The IBR plan cancels loan debt in full for borrowers who've made 300 monthly payments -- or about 25 years of payments. After that 25-year period, the plan cancels any outstanding balances and considers the borrowers' repayment obligation to be satisfied. Student loan advocates tell ABC News that borrowers are still being billed when their student loan should already be cancelled under the plan. "As of today, if you have been in debt for 25 years, you have a right under federal law to get your debt canceled, and the government is not honoring that law," Student Borrower Protection Center (SBPC) Executive Director Mike Pierce said. This plan was statutorily mandated under the Higher Education Act and encouraged by the Trump administration's Education Department while the agency launches its new Repayment Assistance Plan. The recent pause was not announced but is listed on a Frequently Asked Questions page of the Federal Student Aid site. It is now causing worry and confusion for borrowers who have been left in the dark, according to student loan experts. Pierce said the government suspended the forgiveness plan for reasons that the administration hasn't explained. "We don't know how many people are affected by it, we don't know how many people will be affected by it in the future, we don't know why it's happening," Pierce told ABC News. "We're worried that this is just the Trump administration deciding that its judgment is more important than the judgment of Congress, and it's going to do whatever the hell it wants," Pierce added. ABC News has reached out to the Department of Education for comment on the communication of the IBR plan pause. Under the recent pause, IBR accounts are being audited for the number of qualifying payments it has received. Abby Shafroth, managing director of advocacy at the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC), called the pause both surprising and concerning for borrowers as many have met the qualifying number of payments, but say that they're still getting billed. "It has sort of quietly come out that [IBR is] still not giving people cancellation," Shafroth told ABC News. Shafroth described the situation as a "mess." She noted the IBR plan is the one program that the current Education Department has encouraged borrowers to enroll in, has said will provide debt forgiveness and that Congress clearly established and mandated. "The Department of Education really has to own this and fix it," Shafroth said. "If they don't fix it, it's both going to break down trust and it's going to cost a lot of people more money. I don't know how many people, but it's going to cost people more money," she said. According to Shafroth, borrowers will keep getting billed on debts that they no longer owe and, as a result, they could end up having to pay large tax bills in their 2026 tax year. IBR is one of four Income Driven Repayment plans that takes a percentage of your income for monthly payments, including the Pay As You Earn (PAYE), Income Contingent Repayment and the Savings on a Valuable Education or "SAVE" plans. Borrowers on the Biden-era SAVE plan -- about 7.7 million people -- will have interest charges return on Aug. 1 at the same time the Education Department said it's complying with a federal court injunction that blocked implementation of the plan. The interest restart comes as President Donald Trump recently signed into law his signature domestic policy agenda, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which included a provision to terminate all current student loan repayment plans -- such as SAVE and other IDRs -- for loans disbursed on or after July 1, 2026. The plans will be replaced with two separate repayment plans: a standard repayment plan and the Repayment Assistance Plan, a new income-based repayment plan. However, these repayment plans are currently affected by legal challenges, according to a release from the department. The Education Department's recent student loan adjustments signal the Trump administration's shift away from former President Joe Biden's debt forgiveness plans. The department will create a Reimagining and Improving Student Education (RISE) Committee to address its upcoming changes. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said she wants to simplify the overly complex system. Contrary to borrower fears, McMahon told ABC News her agency's reforms aren't meant to be "punitive" nor does she want to see borrowers defaulting on loans. "When you are in default on a loan, you can't buy a house, you can't buy a car, so call [the department]," McMahon said, adding, "Just make sure that you are on the right repayment plan." "Be proactive and get back into one of the payment plans," she said. Meanwhile, Shafroth said this pause in the IBR plan potentially makes borrowers more distrustful and, in turn, further divides the borrower and the government. "It really alienates borrowers, and they stop trusting the government and stop, in some cases, repaying, or, you know, being responsive on their loans," she said. SBPC's Pierce warned this is a legal matter that borrowers are entitled to having resolved.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump suggests giving out ‘rebates' from billions in tariff revenue
WASHINGTON — President Trump suggested Friday that some Americans may receive 'rebates' from the federal government after the US Treasury took in $64 billion in tariff revenue in the first three months since his 'Liberation Day' announcement April 2. 'We're thinking about a rebate because we have so much money coming in from tariffs, a little rebate for people of a certain income level,' the president told reporters as he left the White House en route to Scotland for a five-day visit. Trump, 79, didn't detail who might be eligible for the government payment and the White House did not immediately respond to inquiries from The Post. 3 President Donald Trump speaks after disembarking Marine One, as he departs for Scotland, at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, July 25, 2025. REUTERS Any disbursement from the federal government would require congressional approval. The House is currently out of session until Sept. 2 and the Senate is set to follow suit at the end of next week. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the government issued three rounds of stimulus checks to assist Americans affected by widespread business shutdowns and furloughs. The first payments, of $1,200 to individuals making up to $75,000 and $2,400 to couples making up to $150,000, were issued in March 2020. A second round of payments, of $600 to individuals and $1,200 to couples under those thresholds, was doled out in December 2020. The third and final payment, of up to $1,400 to individuals and $2,800 to couples, was approved as part of the Biden-era American Rescue Plan in March 2021. In all, $814 billion in federal relief money was dispersed across those three handouts. In early 2008, most taxpayers making under $75,000 received $300 per individual ($600 for couples) in an unsuccessful bid to stave off a recession. EJ Antoni, the Heritage Foundation's chief economist, frowned on the possibility of taxpayers getting additional money back, telling The Post: 'While it's always politically advantageous to hand out money to constituents, the fact is the federal government has no money to give at this point. When the annual deficit is over $1 trillion, the priority has to be getting that down, not giving the Treasury another outlay. 3 Scott Bessent has estimated trade revenue could total $300 billion. 3 A container ship is seen leaving the Port Jersey Container Terminal, with the Manhattan skyline in the background, as viewed from Staten Island, New York City, on July 23, 2025. AFP via Getty Images 'The real 'rebate' for the American people will come in the form of less inflation from a reduced federal deficit,' Antoni added. 'That's how you solve the current cost of living crisis.' Trump imposed baseline tariffs of 10% in his 'Liberation Day' announcement and has set an Aug. 1 deadline for countries to agree one-for-one trade deals with the US or risk paying additional duties. While the White House has struck framework deals with the UK, Japan, the Philippines, Indonesia, Australia and Vietnam, and a preliminary deal with China, agreements with major trading partners the European Union, Mexico, Canada, Brazil and South Korea remain elusive. According to US Treasury data released earlier this month, the government has raised $64 billion in customs duties — with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and White House trade adviser Peter Navarro forecasting a windfall of $300 billion.
