logo
Senate panel votes to tighten rules on big pharmacy firms

Senate panel votes to tighten rules on big pharmacy firms

Yahoo05-06-2025
BATON ROUGE, La. (LSU Manship School News Service) — A bill aimed at increasing transparency in how pharmacy benefit managers operate advanced out of the Senate Insurance Committee Wednesday, signaling a push to regulate an industry that critics say drives up drug prices and puts local pharmacies at risk.
House Bill 264, authored by Rep. Michael Echols, R-Monroe, cleared the committee with amendments that would ban pricing schemes, strengthen oversight and increase transparency in the often-confusing world of drug benefits.
PBMs are third-party companies that manage prescription drug benefits for health insurers, large employers and government programs like Medicaid. They negotiate with drugmakers and reimburse pharmacies, all while claiming to lower costs for patients. In practice, critics say they frequently do the opposite.
A 2023 New York Times investigation found that the three largest PBMs–CVS Caremark, Express Scripts, and OptumRx–frequently steer patients toward higher-priced drugs, inflate prices and pocket billions in hidden fees. Owned by major healthcare conglomerates like CVS Health, Cigna, and UnitedHealth Group, PBMs operate largely behind the scenes but have significant control over drug costs for more than 200 million Americans.
These layers of secrecy are what Louisiana lawmakers are now trying to peel back. But the Louisiana bill does not go as far as a law that took effect in Arkansas last year, which has led to concerns that CVS could close its stores in that state.
Echols' bill would prohibit PBMs in Louisiana from engaging in spread pricing, a practice where they charge insurers more than they reimburse pharmacies and keep the difference.
It would also require PBMs to pass 100% of manufacturer rebates to insurers or employers. It also would mandate annual certification under oath that they followed state transparency rules and give the Louisiana Department of Insurance power to audit their contracts and compensation programs.
'It creates a broader model nationally for transparent, fair BPM operations,' Echols said. 'It provides robust transparency, prohibits some of the spread pricing games that have been played in the past, and creates a local pharmacy reimbursement that has national standards.'
Trump signs executive order aimed at slashing prescription drug costs
To some extent, the debate in Louisiana echoes the turmoil in Arkansas, though Echols' bill is not as far-reaching.
Arkansas passed a law in the spring of 2024 banning PBMs from owning or operating pharmacies.
Last month, a year after the law was enacted, CVS Health sued to block it, warning that the policy would force the company to close 23 CVS Pharmacy locations in the state, eliminate more than 500 jobs and reduce patient access to life-saving medications.
CVS Caremark, the PBM arm of CVS Health, manages prescription drug benefits for millions of Americans.
Don Caffery, who represented the Louisiana Independent Pharmacies Association, called some of the changes in the Louisiana bill essential.
'Moving to a model prohibiting steering and prohibiting spread pricing, these are things that are going to keep independent community doors open ,' he said. 'This is simply about allowing the pharmacy to recoup the price of the drug and keep their doors open.'
The bill drew wide support from local pharmacies, many of whom did not wish to speak publicly. Sen. Rick Edmonds, R-Baton Rouge, said he has heard from constituents struggling to get prescriptions filled.
'We are obligated to take up this issue and not let this happen to our local pharmacies or our constituents,' Edmonds said. 'I just want a fair dollar for dollar for our constituents, for our local pharmacies and our providers.'
Sen. Regina Barrow, D-Baton Rouge, pressed Echols on whether the bill would truly benefit independent pharmacies and patients.
'I think 'scheme' is such an accurate word,' she said, referring to current PBM pricing practices. 'This has been one of the biggest schemes I've seen in a long time.'
But she questioned whether the bill would keep money in the pockets of consumers and union workers.
A representative from a Baton Rouge-based union testified against the bill, raising concerns that parts of the bill might conflict with a federal law that regulates employer-sponsored health plans, but there was testimony that the bill aligns with a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision that gave states limited authority to regulate PBMs, particularly on reimbursement rates.
Still, the amendments added to Echols' bill focus less on rate-setting and more on tightening the appeals process for pharmacies and shielding certain proprietary PBM information from public disclosure.
Echols said the bill began as a transparency measure in the House but has 'broadened' through its amendments in the Senate.
'At the end of the day, if the money isn't going to the patient, it has to go somewhere,' he said. 'This is an opportunity to lower premiums for our people and help our independent pharmacies.'
Louisiana bill inspired by Make America Healthy Again movement heads to governor
Musk calls for killing House's 'big, beautiful bill'
Trump calls for scrapping debt limit
US Education Department to determine funding EBR Schools gets for diversity program
California teen stripped of track title after imitating iconic celebration
Judge blocks deportation of family of man charged in Boulder attack
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TikTok will go dark in US if China doesn't OK sale before Trump's deadline: Lutnik
TikTok will go dark in US if China doesn't OK sale before Trump's deadline: Lutnik

New York Post

time28 minutes ago

  • New York Post

TikTok will go dark in US if China doesn't OK sale before Trump's deadline: Lutnik

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Thursday that TikTok will have to stop operating in the United States if China does not approve a deal for the sale of the Chinese-owned short video app that is used by some 170 million Americans. Lutnick, speaking on CNBC, also said the US must control the algorithm that makes the social media platform work. Last month, President Trump extended by 90 days to Sept. 17, a deadline for China-based ByteDance to divest the US assets of TikTok. Trump's action took place despite a 2024 law that mandated a sale or shutdown by Jan. 19 of this year if there had not been significant progress. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick warned TikTok will go dark in the US if China doesn't approve a sale to American investors. REUTERS 'China can have a little piece or ByteDance, the current owner, can keep a little piece. But basically, Americans will have control. Americans will own the technology, and Americans will control the algorithm,' Lutnick said. 'If that deal gets approved, by the Chinese, then that deal will happen. If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark, and those decisions are coming very soon.' TikTok did not immediately comment. A deal had been in the works this spring that would spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm, majority-owned and operated by US investors. This stalled after China indicated it would not approve it following Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese goods. Trump has three times granted reprieves from federal enforcement of the law that mandated the sale or shutdown of TikTok that was supposed to take effect in January. A deal had been in the works this spring that would spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm, majority-owned and operated by US investors. REUTERS Attorney General Pam Bondi sent letters to Apple, Google and other companies that provide services or host the TikTok app that were made public this month. The letters said the Justice Department was irrevocably relinquishing any claims against the companies for potential violations of the law, citing Trump's determination that an abrupt shutdown would interfere with his overseeing national security and foreign affairs. Some Democratic lawmakers argue Trump has no legal authority to extend the deadline and suggest the deal under consideration would not meet legal requirements.

UnitedHealth Group Says It Is Cooperating With a DOJ Investigation
UnitedHealth Group Says It Is Cooperating With a DOJ Investigation

Gizmodo

time28 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

UnitedHealth Group Says It Is Cooperating With a DOJ Investigation

UnitedHealth Group, the company that owns healthcare conglomerate UnitedHealth, said on Thursday that it is cooperating with the federal government as it fields criminal and civil requests from authorities. The company announced its cooperation with the feds in a statement published to its website on Thursday. 'UnitedHealth Group (the 'Company') proactively reached out to the Department of Justice after reviewing media reports about investigations into certain aspects of the Company's participation in the Medicare program,' the statement reads. 'The Company has full confidence in its practices and is committed to working cooperatively with the Department throughout this process.' The New York Times writes that the investigation seems to center around UnitedHealth's Medicare offerings: The probe appears to focus on the private insurance plans that UnitedHealth offers as an alternative to traditional Medicare. The company is the largest supplier of these Medicare Advantage plans, which are sold to millions of older Americans and to people with disabilities. The business has become a critical source of revenues to UnitedHealth as Americans have increasingly chosen to enroll in these plans instead of the government's program. UnitedHealth has had a rocky few years. Last year, its CEO, Brian Thompson, was gunned down in front of his hotel in Manhattan. A 27-year-old man, Luigi Mangione, was arrested in connection with Thompson's killing (Mangione, due to his good looks and his supposed leftist politics, has since gone on to become an internet sensation), but he has denied responsibility for the executive's murder. At the time of Thompson's death, the company was weathering multiple crises, including court cases and government probes. Prior to becoming UnitedHealth's CEO, Thompson ran UnitedHealthcare's Medicare business. Citing a former colleague, the Washington Post previously reported that legal 'scrutiny around UnitedHealthcare's Medicare business regarding potentially overbilling the government affected Thompson personally during that time.' Allegations of anti-competitive practices have dogged UnitedHealth. In February of 2024, the Justice Department launched an antitrust investigation into UnitedHealth and, in November of that year, sued to block the company's acquisition of a home health and hospice services provider. Not long after Thompson's death, a pair of bipartisan Congressional bills were introduced that sought to break up UnitedHealth. The company has also faced multiple recent lawsuits, including one related to allegations that it uses algorithms to deny care for seniors enrolled in its Medicare Advantage plans. In March of 2024, the company was the victim of a large cyberattack. The attack, the work of a ransomware group, 'paralyzed' the company's billing systems—leading to widespread dysfunction for medical care providers throughout the country. The attack impacted the sensitive personal information of over 100 million people, including Social Security numbers and billing information, and United eventually paid Blackcat, the group behind the attack, $22 million. In a congressional hearing, Andrew Witty, CEO of UnitedHealth Group, admitted that the criminals had hacked the company using a web portal that did not require multi-factor authentication.

Are you paying way more for gas than your neighbor? This state-by-state map shows where gas prices are highest.
Are you paying way more for gas than your neighbor? This state-by-state map shows where gas prices are highest.

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Are you paying way more for gas than your neighbor? This state-by-state map shows where gas prices are highest.

For many Americans, the cost of gasoline is a key indicator of how the economy is doing. While prices at the pump can be influenced by a number of factors, including global oil markets, geopolitics and seasonal demand, fuel costs still shape public opinion. So far, gas prices have been relatively stable this summer, compared with previous, more volatile seasons. Even with lower costs nationwide, what people pay in each county can vary dramatically. Drivers in California, Hawaii, Washington and Oregon pay the most. In California's case, the state requires drivers to use a special blend of gas to reduce pollution, a process that can cost more and relies mostly on in-state refineries. Washington and Oregon have similar but less strict low carbon fuel standard programs. Other factors that can drive up prices include distance from refineries, transportation costs, market competition and gas taxes. California, Illinois and Pennsylvania have the highest gasoline taxes in the nation. View the map and table to see where people pay the most for gas.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store