BJP MLA's funds threat video in village where he trailed in polls sparks controversy
Pune: Former cabinet minister and BJP MLA from Jalna, Babanrao Lonikar, sparked controversy when he allegedly threatened people of a village in his constituency, where he trailed during the assembly polls, with withholding funds.
A purported video of Lonikar surfaced on social media, showing him addressing a public meeting held in Borgaon village under Jalna's Partur constituency, represented by him in the assembly. The event was organised to inaugurate a concrete road constructed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana. According to the MLA, the road had cost Rs8 crore.
Addressing the villagers, Lonikar said, "Borgaon has traditionally supported BJP, but (in assembly) the votes got divided in the village. How could Babanrao trail in this village?"
You Can Also Check:
Pune AQI
|
Weather in Pune
|
Bank Holidays in Pune
|
Public Holidays in Pune
He said, "I got a road constructed of Rs8 crore for the village. At least now, the villagers should support me. Don't think that you will keep getting Rs5-10 crore funds if you do not vote for me."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
32 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Vandita Mishra writes: Not just about the Emergency
Dear Express Reader, This has been a week of commemoration of the Emergency as a cataclysmic event in the distant past. This has been a week to acknowledge that the shadows cast by the suspension of democracy, 1975-1977, are long. Many of the challenges for a democratic politics are the same, and they have been routinised — the weaponisation of laws to shrink spaces for dissent and free expression, a politics of labelling and distrust, attempts by the Executive to undermine and subdue other institutions like the Media and the Court, demonisation of the Opposition. Other challenges are new, because in its long journey, democracy itself stands at a different milestone. At that time, when India's democracy was less than 30 years old, Emergency was the result of, and it contributed to, a waning of brightness — it capped a draining of the lingering idealism of a newly independent nation that had pledged to be not just a representative democracy, but one that abides by rules of the game laid down in the wise and layered Constitution it gave itself. The Constitution set up a mosaic of monitory institutions to scrutinise power, enforce accountability, enable checks and balances — political theorist John Keane has christened this new historical form of democracy, worldwide in the post 1945 era, as 'monitory democracy'. Today, 50 years after the Emergency, India's monitory democracy is showing signs of wear and tear. It is also dealing with the pressures of the age of communicative abundance. In a global context, Keane writes that 'historical comparisons show that the combination of monitory democracy and communicative abundance is without precedent. It produces permanent flux, an unending restlessness driven by complex combinations of different interacting players and institutions, permanently pushing and pulling, heaving and straining, sometimes working together, at other times in opposition to one another…' Even as this combination makes democracy more exciting and viral, it also has corrosive effects. It breeds cynicism, disaffection and distrust vis a vis Parliaments and parties, governing institutions and leaders. Parliamentary democracy is being publicly 'wrong-footed', says Keane, there is 'decay amidst abundance'. In India and elsewhere, this fraught juncture is now the site of the rise of a populist politics. 'We the people' becomes 'Me the people', there is a relentless search for the Other and the enemy within, and the winner takes all. The populist moment seizes on the prevalent disillusions, as much as it speaks to rising aspirations, to frame an agenda of anti-elitism. It also propagates a politics of anti-pluralism. The week in which 50 years of Emergency were marked ended with a rising — and disquietingly anti-pluralist — clamour that seems to give the lie to the self-righteous lip service to democracy over the last few days by the BJP-led establishment. An RSS general secretary set the ball rolling, asking for a discussion on whether the words 'socialist' and 'secular', added to the Constitution's Preamble by the Indira Gandhi government during the Emergency, should be retained. He was joined by the Vice President, who said that the change to the Preamble was a 'sacrilege to the spirit of sanatan' and the words were 'nasoor', a festering wound. A BJP chief minister chimed in: 'Socialism' and 'secularism' are Western concepts, have no place in Indian civilisation, he said. And two Union ministers added the weight of their office to the argument. This, when successive post-Emergency regimes have not reversed the Preamble amendment, even as other changes have been rolled back, and the Supreme Court has upheld it. Secularism was described as a 'basic feature' in the 13-judge bench Kesavananda Bharati ruling even before the Emergency-era amendment, and the non-justiciable Directive Principles of State Policy have been invoked to recognise that 'socialism' was an ideal for those who framed a Constitution for a society of great inequalities. It is evident that the real aversion is not to 'socialist' — in fact, on the broad direction of the economy, all post-liberalisation governments have looked the same, more or less. This choreographed controversy is about 'secular'. The Narendra Modi government, now in its third term, has presided over the steady challenging of the constitutional commitment to secularism as equal respect for all religions, and a spreading Hindu-isation of public institutions and spaces. The PM's conduct of the rituals of consecration of the Ram Temple at Ayodhya in January 2024 marked a turning point. It underlined the message that, amid growing polarisation, the religion of the majority community would now be a visible marker of the life of a diverse and multi-religious nation, demanding deference, if not prostration from all. So, at the end of a week like this one, is a question: Who is responsible for ensuring that the Emergency does not come again? Who is expected to take on the burden of an anti-Emergency politics that guards against attempts to chip away at pluralism and democracy? In the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, 'democracy-in-danger' and 'Constitution-under-siege' became electoral slogans and while the outcome saw a whittling down of the BJP government's numbers, it was certainly no mandate for the Opposition. Does that mean that the people don't worry, or worry enough, about the spectre of diminishing democracy? It is possible that for a people cynical about power politics, democracy's predicament is not a trumping argument because they see no good guys out there. And that for the optimistic and aspirational, the system seems strong and self-correcting enough, does not require their ministrations. It could be that when voters feel disrespected, or 'dis-esteemed', they are more likely to grant governments the licence to rule arbitrarily, and to look for strongmen with a steel fist. Or it could be, simply, that for all the talk about democracy-in-danger, democracy never really was on the election menu, because the Opposition was unable to make a case that was eloquent or vivid enough. Whatever be the real story of the 2024 Lok Sabha election, the onus is not, it should not be, on the vulnerable voter. Protecting democracy's letter and spirit is also a task too large to be left only to the Opposition — in fact, it must not be seen as a project that is partisan. Keeping democracy whole requires influential institutions and powerful stakeholders to take ownership of it, instead of putting it only on the Opposition or passing the buck to 'the people'. Till next week, Vandita
Hans India
44 minutes ago
- Hans India
Himachal set to launch statewide anti-drug campaign, says CM Sukhu
Shimla: Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister Sukhvinder Sukhu on Sunday said the government is preparing to launch a large-scale statewide anti-drug campaign. 'Mapping is being conducted at the panchayat ward level to facilitate targeted intervention,' he said, adding the government is also forming a Special Task Force to clamp down on drug trafficking. Additionally, 500 new posts will be filled in the Police Department to strengthen enforcement efforts. 'Youth are the future of our nation, and protecting them from the menace of drugs is a collective responsibility,' said the Chief Minister, reiterating the government's policy of zero tolerance towards drug abuse. The Chief Minister was speaking after the facilitation ceremony of the 12th HP Police Half Marathon in Shimla. He honoured winners of the marathon, which featured participation in men, women, and senior citizens' (75 plus) categories. Expressing concern over the involvement of government employees in drug-related activities, the Chief Minister said strict action has been taken against 80 government employees. He said even police personnel have been found involved in drug trafficking activities, adding the government is considering to amend the police manual to ensure greater accountability within the force. The CM said the state is working on a two-pronged strategy -- strict enforcement and a sensitive approach towards victims. The government has implemented the PIT-NDPS Act, which was not enforced during the previous BJP government's five-year tenure. Under this Act, 40 detention orders have been approved, 36 of which were issued this year. The government has also demolished properties belonging to seven drug peddlers and is actively pursuing action against others, he added. Also, the state has passed the HP Anti-Drugs Act, which distinguishes between offenders and victims. He urged parents to maintain open communication with their children and educate them about the harmful effects of drugs.
Hans India
44 minutes ago
- Hans India
BJP Organizes ‘Rachabanda' in Eklaspur Highlighting 11 Years of Modi's Development-Oriented Governance
Gadwal: A spirited 'Rachabanda' (public interaction program) was organized in Eklaspur village under the leadership of BJP Mandal President Gopalakrishna. The event drew a significant crowd and saw the active participation of local BJP leaders, youth, and villagers. The chief guest of the event was T. RamAnjaneyulu, BJP Jogulamba Gadwal District President, who addressed the gathering with a powerful speech highlighting the achievements of the Central Government under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He proudly noted that Narendra Modi has now completed 11 years as Prime Minister, having recently been elected for a third consecutive term—a remarkable feat that he described as a testament to the people's faith in honest and development-oriented governance. RamAnjaneyulu emphasized that during Modi's tenure: Every village and town across India has been touched by welfare schemes funded by the Central Government. Infrastructure improvements such as CC roads, rural nature parks, and cleanliness drives under Swachh Bharat, as well as Rythu Vedikas (Farmer Halls), have been completed. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the distribution of free rice was done seamlessly, and nutritious food continues to be supplied to Anganwadi centers. On matters of national security, he referred to the recent confrontation with Pakistan, citing India's strong retaliation in the "Sindhur" operation, asserting that 'no country dares to threaten India under Modi's leadership.' India has fostered strong economic, industrial, and diplomatic ties with countries around the world. Programs like Bharatmala National Highways have significantly improved infrastructure, and funds are being directly transferred to village sarpanches, empowering grassroots governance. Schemes like the PM Kisan Samman Nidhi have directly benefited farmers. He contrasted this with the previous 60 years of Congress rule, which he claimed were marked by inefficiency and lack of vision. In contrast, he described Modi's 11 years in office as a golden era of governance and development. The event was also attended by: S. Ramachandra Reddy, Former BJP District President Srinivasulu, BJP Gadwal Mandal President Ranjith, BJP District Vice President Lakshman Goud, Municipal Vice President Local leaders from Eklaspuram, including Shivanna, Mahesh (Venkatapuran), Nagaraj, Swami, Telugu Narasimhulu, Bhagavan, and Venkatesh. A large number of youth from Devabandha and residents of the village participated actively in the event, showing strong support for the BJP and its leadership.
