
Why the BJP simply loves Indira's Emergency
The Emergency, the repeated reminders of it and the election thereafter have helped the BJP and the bigger Sangh Parivar chisel an image beyond Hindutva politics. It also helps the Parivar, which has been blamed for not playing an active role in the freedom movement, subtly project itself as being at the forefront of a national movement.advertisementThe post-Emergency election of 1977 is also crucial for giving the saffron leaders their first taste of power and being the catalyst for the BJP's birth.Now, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi in power and the Congress sitting in the opposition for over 10 years, the Emergency also helps the BJP counter its narrative of the government trying to "change the Constitution" and an "authoritarian" leadership.EMERGENCY: BJP ONLY PARTY THAT'S OPPOSING CONGRESSThe Emergency has helped the BJP project itself as the party that has historically been opposing the Congress, and keeps doing that even today.Most other leaders and parties, like Lalu Prasad and the Communists who opposed the Congress during the Emergency, have joined forces with it against the BJP.The Congress-led INDIA bloc has the Left parties as well as the RJD, led by Lalu Prasad -- one of the products of the JP Movement.It was the leaders of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, the RSS-affiliated political outfit, who formed the BJP in April 1980.Jana Sangh leaders like Nanaji Deshmukh, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Lal Krishna Advani among others were at the forefront of the agitation against the Indira government and were jailed for months.So, the BJP uses the Emergency to highlight the relentless and uncompromising fight of its leaders against the Congress for 50 years.HELPS BLUNT ATTACK ON NATIONAL MOVEMENT, TAKES AMBIT BEYOND HINDUTVAadvertisementThe BJP and the RSS have seen parties, especially the Congress, allege that the Parivar didn't play an active role in India's freedom struggle.The struggle against the brutal suppression of constitutional rights during the Emergency was the biggest pan-India movement after Independence. The marching of saffron leaders with Socialists like Jayaprakash Narayan gives the BJP a significant counter to the narrative of the Sangh Parivar's non-participation in a national movement.While thousands of members of the Jana Sangh and RSS affiliates went to jail, Nanaji Deshmukh emerged as the face of the fight for the restoration of constitutional rights.This helped the Sangh Parivar and the Jana Sangh, and later its inheritor BJP, broaden their image to citizen-centric politics, beyond the Hindutva ideology with which they were always identified.BROUGHT SAFFRON LEADERS IN CENTRAL GOVERNMENTThe election of 1977, after the Emergency was lifted, saw the Janata Party formed with the merger of the Janata Morcha, the Bharatiya Lok Dal, the Swatantra Party, the Socialist Party of India, and the Jana Sangh.advertisementThe Janata Party formed the government under the leadership of Morarji Desai. Jana Sangh's Vajpayee became the foreign minister while Advani was the information and broadcasting minister.This was India's first non-Congress government at the Centre, and would allow the saffron leaders their first taste of power.Vajpayee would go on to run India's first full-term non-Congress government, while Advani became the deputy Prime Minister. Both have launched the BJP and steered it to power.EMERGENCY HELPS BJP BLUNT CONGRESS ATTACKSThe rise of the BJP, from two seats in the 1984 election, to a majority on its own in 2014 with 282 seats, has also been at the cost of the Congress.The Congress saw itself ceding ground and drop to the lowest-ever tally of 45 seats in the Lok Sabha in 2014. The BJP juggernaut spooked it.One of the issues of choice of the Congress to attack the BJP has been the allegation that the latter craved a brutal majority to change the Constitution. Its leaders, particularly Rahul Gandhi, have campaigned in elections with copies of the Constitution.The Congress leaders also allege that the BJP brass display a streak of authoritarianism, and have infiltrated the independent institutions like the Election Commission. They allege that the country is living through a period of "undeclared Emergency".advertisement"Over the past eleven years and thirty days, Indian democracy has been under a systematic and dangerous five-fold assault that can be best described as Undeclared Emergency," Congress MP Jairam Ramesh wrote on X.Indira Gandhi's Emergency comes in as the single-most potent weapon for the BJP and its leaders to counter these charges. They project Indira Gandhi as a "dictator" and the Congress as the party during whose rule the country saw the worst authoritarian regime.The Emergency was also the time when constitutional provisions were used to suspend rights guaranteed by the Constitution. BJP leaders also allege that Indira, by getting a Chief Justice of India appointed by superseding three senior judges, compromised the sanctity of the Supreme Court.On Wednesday, as the government marked the 50th anniversary of the Emergency as Samvidhan Hatya Divas, PM Modi tweeted: "No Indian will ever forget the manner in which the spirit of our Constitution was violated, the voice of Parliament muzzled and attempts were made to control the courts. The 42nd Amendment is a prime example of their shenanigans."Modi, way back in 1975, was an RSS pracharak. "The anti-Emergency movement was a learning experience for me," he said.The fight against the Indira-Gandhi-imposed Emergency, the election that followed in 1977 and the repeated reminders of how rights were trampled by a Congress government helps the BJP, a party that now has the reins of power, counter opposition charges and strafe the Congress.- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
28 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Kejriwal ‘misled' public by inaugurating fake phansi-ghar: Speaker
Delhi Assembly Speaker Vijender Gupta on Tuesday accused former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal of 'misleading the public' by inaugurating a 'bogus' British-era phansi-ghar (execution room) in the Assembly premises in 2022. Addressing the House, Mr. Gupta said that on August 9, 2022, the phansi-ghar was inaugurated. 'We contacted the National Archives to get the map of the building from 1911-12. From that, it was found out that there was no phansi-ghar here,' he said. The Speaker said the wooden structure in the Assembly was a lift and used as a 'tiffin room' by the members of the Assembly. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) members demanded an apology from Mr. Kejriwal for 'misleading' the House, while the Aam Aadmi Party members questioned the Speaker for raising the issue at a time when the city was in the grip of several critical problems. Mr. Gupta said a meeting of historians was called with experts from the Delhi University, Jawaharlal Nehru University, and others. 'They [experts] also said that it [execution room] is fictitious and the wooden structure is a lift. A sensation was created that it was a phansi-ghar. It was a lie,' the Speaker said. When the AAP members opposed taking up the issue, the Speaker said, 'You are telling lies and distorting the truth... misleading the nation and not even allowing us to discuss the issue.' BJP member Shikha Roy said the 'false claim' is a 'disrespect' to the dignity of the House. 'It is a criminal offence and there should be an FIR on this,' Ms. Roy said. However, Leader of the Opposition (LoP) Atishi said that there are numerous issues affecting Delhi, but no discussion is being held on them. AAP member Virendra Singh Kadian stated that MLAs lack expertise in history and have no experience working with the Archaeological Survey of India. 'This discussion is being done without any prior information. If any mistake has been made, it should be rectified. We should not consider taking criminal action or any similar actions. Many important issues have to be discussed in this session,' said Mr. Kadian. However, the Speaker stated that the discussion will continue on Wednesday, and the LoP should provide documents to support the declaration of the room as an execution room. U.K. delegation Meanwhile, the Speaker held a courtesy meeting with the visiting British parliamentary delegation, led by Nusrat Ghani, Deputy Speaker of the U.K. House of Commons. 'Our shared democratic values and historic ties continue to guide the evolving partnership between India and the U.K.,' the Speaker told the delegation.


The Hindu
28 minutes ago
- The Hindu
BJP backs school fee Bill, AAP seeks House scrutiny
The Hindu Bureau The Delhi Assembly on Tuesday saw a heated discussion on the School Education (Fee Regulation and Transparency) Bill, 2025, with the Opposition demanding that it be sent to a Select Committee to incorporate feedback from parents and other stakeholders. The debate came a day after Education Minister Ashish Sood tabled the Bill, which aims to regulate fee hikes in private schools. BJP MLA Satish Upadhyay lauded it as a 'revolutionary step' in Delhi's education history, while party colleague Ajay Kumar Mahawar said, 'With this Bill, CM Rekha Gupta is wiping away the tears of lakhs of parents.' However, Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MLA Prem Chauhan criticised the composition of the proposed fee regulation committees, pointing out that six out of 11 members would be from the school, potentially compromising impartiality. 'There should have been more parents than administrators,' he said, cautioning that the multilayered redress process could result in delayed justice. 'By the time a complaint is addressed, the child may have already passed out or left the school,' Mr. Chauhan said. He reiterated AAP's demand to refer the Bill to a Select Committee with members from both the BJP and AAP, and called for a freeze on fees for the current academic year, citing delays in the Bill's introduction. Responding to the Opposition, BJP MLA Mohan Singh Bisht said public turnout and support for the Bill demonstrated its urgency and relevance. Parent protests While the Assembly debated the Bill, some parent groups held protests and submitted their recommendations to Mr. Sood. One key demand of the protesters was that any parent, not just 15% of them, should be allowed to raise an issue with the district-level committee. On fee-related clauses, parents objected to subjective criteria such as the school's location and educational standard. They demanded a uniform fee structure and standardised fee heads across all schools to avoid ambiguity. 'False narratives' The Education Minister's office said he had met parents ahead of the Assembly debate and dismissed AAP's criticism as 'false narratives'. He clarified that the Bill supplements the Delhi School Education Act, 1973, by introducing stronger checks and balances to protect students and parents. The Minister assured that the Bill provides for three layers of oversight and includes penalties for violations.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
NCP workers dream of Ajit Pawar becoming CM: Mushrif
Kolhapur: NCP veteran and minister Hasan Mushrif on Monday said every party worker wanted Ajit Pawar to become the chief minister, and they should work ceaselessly to achieve this goal. "Ajit Pawar is an influential leader. He is committed to the public and never backs down from his word. He has a great future. Every worker dreams of him becoming the chief minister. We will work tirelessly till Ajit Pawar becomes the CM," Mushrif said, while addressing a party workers' meeting in Sangli. The minister said (undivided) NCP gave outside support to BJP on multiple occasions. "Even Sharad Pawar took BJP along while forming the Pulod govt (Progressive Democratic Front). Ajit Pawar decided to join BJP-led govt too. But, we have not compromised on the party's progressive ideals. We believe in Shahu-Phule-Ambedkar's ideology. Our aim is to develop the state and expand the party," he said. Mushrif said the upcoming local body elections were crucial. "Our aim is to win. We have to keep in mind that NCP is in alliance with Shiv Sena and BJP. Wherever possible, NCP will form an alliance with these two parties, and wherever it is not, we will have to contest alone and fight to win," the minister added.