UK, France among nations calling for end to Israel's Gaza war
The joint statement, issued on Monday, came after more than 21 months of fighting that have led to catastrophic humanitarian conditions for Gaza's more than two million residents. Signatories included Israeli allies such as the United Kingdom, France, Australia, and Canada, along with 21 other nations and the European Union.
"The suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths," the statement read. "The war must end now." The countries urged a negotiated ceasefire, the release of captives held by Palestinian fighters, and unrestricted humanitarian access to Gaza.
According to Al Jazeera, the signatories condemned "the drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food".
The United Nations and the Gaza Health Ministry have reported that at least 875 people have been killed while trying to access food since late May, when Israel began to slightly ease a more than two-month-long total blockade.
"The Israeli government's aid delivery model is dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity," the countries said in the statement. "The Israeli government's denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable. Israel must comply with its obligations under international humanitarian law."
Al Jazeera's Sonia Gallego, reporting from London, said the statement marked a significant escalation from Israel's traditional allies in their criticism of the war.
"This also reflects a broader consensus beyond Europe," she reported. "European nations have condemned the situation in Gaza, and now you have foreign ministries - such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Japan - that put their names in this statement."
The joint appeal also underscored readiness to back a political process for peace. "The next ceasefire must be the last ceasefire," British Foreign Secretary David Lammy said while addressing Parliament. He thanked the United States, Qatar, and Egypt for their continued mediation efforts.
Al Jazeera reported that ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas have been ongoing, but no breakthrough has been achieved so far. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has reiterated that expanding military operations in Gaza will pressure Hamas at the negotiation table.
The war began after Hamas led a surprise attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, killing at least 1,129 people and taking 251 others hostage. According to Israeli sources, about 50 captives remain in Gaza, but fewer than half are believed to be alive.
In response, Israel launched a full-scale military campaign in Gaza. According to Gaza's Health Ministry, more than 59,000 Palestinians have been killed so far, the majority being women and children.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
13 hours ago
- Observer
Oman hails 'historic' France recognition of Palestinian state
The Sultanate of Oman has commended and welcomed the historic announcement by the French President regarding his country's intention to recognize the State of Palestine during the upcoming session of the United Nations General Assembly, according to an official statement from the Foreign Ministry. Oman called upon the remaining countries that have not yet recognized the Palestinian state to follow suit, in fulfillment of the two-state solution and in affirmation of the legitimate right of the Palestinian people to establish their independent state on the 1967 borders with East Al Quds (Jerusalem) as its capital. Saudi Arabia on Friday welcomed President Emmanuel Macron's announcement that France would recognise the state of Palestine, and urged other countries to follow suit. Other European Union members have recognised Palestine since the Gaza war erupted in October 2023 but France is the first member of the G7 group of major advanced economies to do so. The Saudi foreign ministry said "the kingdom commends this historic decision, which reaffirms the international community's consensus on the Palestinian people's right to self-determination and to establish their independent state".It called on other countries "that have not yet recognised the State of Palestine to take similar positive steps". Macron said on Thursday that France would formally recognise a Palestinian state during a United Nations meeting in September. Qatar also welcomed the French move. Its foreign ministry said the move "constitutes significant support for the legitimate rights of the brotherly Palestinian people" and "contributes to advancing prospects for achieving a just and comprehensive peace in the region". The Kuwaiti foreign ministry said it "commended this significant step".
Observer
13 hours ago
- Observer
Oman backs global push for Palestine
The Sultanate of Oman has renewed its call for all nations to recognise the State of Palestine, following the announcement by French President Emmanuel Macron that France will officially extend recognition during the upcoming United Nations General Assembly in September. In a statement issued by the Foreign Ministry on Friday, Oman welcomed France's position and urged countries that have not yet recognised the Palestinian state to take this step as a moral and political imperative. 'The Sultanate of Oman calls on all countries that have not yet recognised the State of Palestine to do so — embodying the two-state solution and consolidating the legitimate right of the Palestinian people to establish their independent state on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital', the statement said. Oman added that such recognition would enhance the chances of achieving peace and justice in the Middle East. Meanwhile in Riyadh, Secretary-General of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), Jassim bin Mohammed al Budaiwi, also praised the French announcement, calling it 'an important step that reflects the French Republic's firm commitment to justice, international legitimacy and global stability'. He called on all countries that have not recognised Palestine to 'take this historic and responsible step, which will contribute to alleviating the suffering of the Palestinian people and support the path towards a just and lasting peace'. Al Budaiwi reaffirmed the GCC's unwavering position in support of the Palestinian cause and the establishment of an independent Palestinian state on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital, in accordance with relevant UN resolutions and the Arab Peace Initiative. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump accused Hamas on Friday of not wanting to reach a ceasefire deal in Gaza as Israel said it would explore 'alternative options' to rescue hostages after negotiations collapsed. An Israeli official meanwhile said air drops of aid would resume soon over the Gaza Strip, where aid groups warned of surging numbers of malnourished children as international concern mounted over the deepening humanitarian crisis after more than 21 months of war. After US and Israeli negotiators quit indirect talks with Hamas in Qatar, Trump said that 'it was was too bad. Hamas didn't really want to make a deal. I think they want to die.' His special envoy Steve Witkoff accused Hamas of not 'acting in good faith' in the negotiations that ended on Thursday. Meanwhile, aid groups warned of surging numbers of malnourished children in war-ravaged Gaza as a trio of European powers held an 'emergency call' on Friday on the deepening humanitarian crisis. Doctors Without Borders (MSF) said that a quarter of the young children and pregnant or breastfeeding mothers it had screened at its clinics last week were malnourished, a day after the United Nations said one in five children in Gaza City were suffering from malnutrition. — ONA, Agencies
Observer
a day ago
- Observer
Australia charts a middle path in the Indo-Pacific
When Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese arrived in Beijing for his six-day official visit - his second since taking office - he wasn't seeking a breakthrough. He was offering predictability. After years of diplomatic friction, punitive tariffs, and frozen ministerial contact, the signal from Canberra was clear: Australia is open to engagement, but not at the expense of its strategic backbone. This measured tone marks a departure from both confrontation and capitulation. While no new doctrines were unveiled and no red lines erased, the visit itself restored what had been lost in recent years: a sense of stability in one of the Indo-Pacific's most consequential bilateral relationships. It also underscored a broader shift in how middle powers like Australia are navigating an increasingly bipolar world. Since Albanese assumed office in 2022, Beijing has gradually dismantled over A$20 billion worth of informal trade restrictions that once crippled key Australian exports. In the second quarter of 2024, exports to China surged more than 8,000 per cent year-on-year. Lobster shipments are projected to generate over A$700 million by year-end. Bilateral trade in goods and services hit A$325 billion in 2023-24, with China accounting for roughly one-third of Australia's total trade volume. These are not symbolic gestures - they are economic oxygen for sectors still recovering from the pandemic and the diplomatic freeze. Yet the recalibration is not confined to the ledger books. Australia remains firmly committed to its security alliance with the United States. Joint exercises such as the 2024 Talisman Sabre drills, which involved 19 countries and more than 35,000 military personnel, reflect Canberra's continuing role in regional deterrence. Australia's participation in AUKUS and its ongoing alignment with the Quad grouping further affirm that no strategic pivot is underway. Albanese's China visit unfolded in parallel with US-Australia naval operations in the South China Sea - a choreography that speaks volumes. What distinguishes this approach is not its neutrality but its dual engagement. Australia is refusing to choose between economic lifelines and strategic loyalties. It is instead constructing a flexible foreign policy scaffold - one that allows it to embrace China where interests align, while ring-fencing sectors and values it deems non-negotiable. This explains why, even amid revived trade talks and green cooperation agreements, Canberra declined Beijing's overture for artificial intelligence collaboration, citing national sovereignty and technology security concerns. For Southeast Asia, particularly countries like Singapore and Vietnam that have long balanced economic integration with China against security partnerships with the West, Australia's posture resonates. It validates a pragmatic style of diplomacy that avoids binary choices. In fact, Albanese's framing – 'cooperate where we can, disagree where we must' - is strikingly similar to Singapore's foreign policy ethos, which prizes stability, openness, and agency. The regional implications extend beyond symbolism. A more diplomatically agile Australia could bolster Asean's own strategic autonomy, providing space for small and middle powers to engage both Washington and Beijing without being pulled irreversibly toward one. This is especially significant as Asean itself wrestles with unity in response to contested maritime claims, competing infrastructure offers, and escalating tech decoupling. Equally important was what Albanese's delegation chose not to do. There was no public confrontation over Taiwan, no lecturing on the South China Sea, and no headline-grabbing statements about ideological divides. Sensitive issues were raised - but discreetly, behind closed doors. This quiet diplomacy reflects a growing recognition that performative posturing may win domestic headlines but seldom yields sustainable outcomes in Asia. Instead, the visit focused on future-facing cooperation. Agreements were signed on dryland farming, steel decarbonisation, and climate-smart agriculture - areas where Australia's resource capacity and China's manufacturing prowess are genuinely complementary. These efforts, while lacking the drama of geopolitical flashpoints, serve as stabilisers in a volatile region. They also provide a model for constructive engagement that doesn't require abandoning strategic vigilance. For Asia, the real lesson may be that managing complexity is more realistic than eliminating it. Albanese's visit to China did not break new ground, but it mapped a path that other states may choose to follow. At a time when ideological rigidity and strategic rivalry are resurgent, Australia's calibrated pragmatism may prove not just sustainable - but quietly influential. The writer is freelance columnist on international affairs.
