logo
Wooler playpark where 176 bombs were found closed until summer

Wooler playpark where 176 bombs were found closed until summer

BBC News24-02-2025
A playpark where 176 bombs from World War Two were found will be closed for several months, a councillor says. The first of the practice devices, which still contain a charge, was discovered in Wooler, Northumberland, last month, followed by much larger finds.Wooler Conservative councillor Mark Mather said the total cost of the clear-up was more than £40,000 and was "disappointed" the Ministry of Defence (MoD) would not pay for it. The MoD said its Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Regiment operated at "extremely high-readiness" where there was "an immediate risk to life".
It is believed the area was used as a Home Guard training ground and the ordnance was buried at the end of the war.It was discovered when work began to add a £150,000 fully inclusive playpark to the existing area in Scotts Park.
"We've just about finished clearing the site now but there's a long way to go before we can reopen," Mather said."I'd like to thank the contractor Brimstone Site Investigations for their professionalism but I'm really disappointed in the MoD."We've had the cost of the survey, hiring a digger and now removing the ordnance but apparently the MoD has no mechanism to financially support us or remove the items themselves."
Northumberland County Council has agreed to cover the cost of the operation to make the playpark safe. Mather hopes contractors will be back on site by April or May and would love to see the park reopen "on the first day of the summer holidays". In a statement, the MoD said: "The UK's EOD Regiment has supported the local authority in Wooler, advising them on how to safely remove any further ordnance."It added that the regiment "is a small unit, responding to requests across the country".
Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gregg Wallace's excuses for groping, crude language and 'sock willy flashing'
Gregg Wallace's excuses for groping, crude language and 'sock willy flashing'

Daily Mirror

time9 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Gregg Wallace's excuses for groping, crude language and 'sock willy flashing'

Former MasterChef judge Gregg Wallace explained his reasoning behind some of his behaviour after he was axed from the BBC programme Gregg Wallace insisted he's 'not sexist or a misogynist' in a new interview, explaining his reasoning behind some of his behaviour after complaints were made against him. The TV star was axed as a judge on BBC's MasterChef, a programme he was part of for 20 years with former co-host John Torode. ‌ Earlier this month, it was revealed the production company, Banijay, upheld 45 claims out of 83 allegations spanning from 2005 until 2024 against the star and confirmed they had "no plans to work with him in future". While the majority of the complaints against him were related to sexual language and humour, a smaller number related to 'being in a state of undress' - more than one woman had complained about him exposing himself while not wearing underpants. ‌ ‌ And one allegation of 'unwanted physical contact' was substantiated from among those who had complained about being groped by Wallace. The 60-year-old father-of-three - who insisted " I'm not a groper, a sex pest or a flasher" following the conclusion of the BBC investigation - sat down for an interview where he insisted the claim he groped a woman was about when he had his hand on a woman's bum while he was drunk at a party 15 years ago. 'This girl told me about an affair she was having with a married man who was part of the Conservative government. I can't remember who it was," he said. ‌ Wallace, who was 'single but dating' at the time, claimed the woman gave him her phone number, which he "considered to be intimacy". During his chat with The Sun, he also discussed the complaint of him being in the studio with a sock on his penis 18 years ago. The TV star said there were no contestants in the "shut studio." ‌ Wallace said there was a sofa sitting outside his dressing room door with four of his friends from the show sitting on it. "I was getting changed to go to a black tie event, a charity event. I put my bow tie on and my shirt. It's only them outside the door. I put the sock on, opened the door, went, 'Wahey!' and shut the door again," Wallace claimed, before insisting "nobody was distressed". And while discussing the crude language he used, the former MasterChef judge said his background as a green-grocer from Peckham who also 'thrived' in Covent Garden's Fruit and Vegetable market was the main reason for that behaviour. ‌ 'In that environment that is jovial and crude. It is learned behaviour," he added. 'And that's exactly the persona I brought into the workplace. Nobody ever asked me to change." Earlier this month, the TV star said he was "deeply sorry for any distress" he caused with his past behaviour after the BBC finished their investigation. In a statement shared with the PA, he insisted that he "never set out to harm or humiliate" anyone.

Asylum seekers to lose housing and support if they refuse to move out of hotels
Asylum seekers to lose housing and support if they refuse to move out of hotels

The Independent

time2 days ago

  • The Independent

Asylum seekers to lose housing and support if they refuse to move out of hotels

Asylum seekers who refuse to move out of hotels into new accommodation will have financial and housing support removed from them, the government has warned. The new crackdown has been ordered by Keir Starmer's government as it attempts to demonstrate it is taking action amid fears of a repeat of last year's summer riots, with violence already seen in Epping in Essex after the far right fuelled protests at an asylum hotel. But the move also appears to be an attempt to get to grips with the continuing small boats crisis on the Channel, with fears of record crossings this summer. The issue has been seen as a key reason why Nigel Farage's Reform UK is leading in the polls and taking votes away from Labour in their traditional heartlands. The announcement also comes amid a row over the language being used by senior Tory figures, which some fear is 'stoking division' and 'inciting violence'. The latest rant on social media came from shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick, who many believe is positioning himself to be a rightwing candidate in a new leadership bid to replace Kemi Badenoch. In an inflammatory post on X, the former immigration minister took the side of protesters in Epping, saying: 'I don't want my young daughters to share a neighbourhood with men who broke into this country illegally and about whom we know next to nothing. 'And I don't want anyone else's family to have this forced on them either. 'When I see mothers and fathers peacefully protesting in Epping, I see decent, fair-minded people being pushed to breaking point.' The violence and protests in Epping, which have seen 16 arrested, broke out after accusations were made about asylum seekers sexually abusing local women. Mr Jenrick accused Sir Keir of 'being oblivious' to men pretending to be children to game the system, or migrants carrying guns and knives and, he claimed, security briefings suggesting that they pose a terrorist threat. 'It's high time Starmer took his head out the sand and listened to what communities are saying and experiencing. It's time he went and spoke to the law-abiding citizens who are being made to suffer the consequences of the failure to control our borders. Communities like Epping.' It came just 24 hours after it emerged that asylum seekers may be using payment cards intended for buying essentials for gambling. A Freedom of Information request made by PoliticsHome revealed more than 6,500 payments in gambling settings were attempted by asylum seekers in the past year, with shadow home secretary Chris Philp saying 'this madness has to end'. Meanwhile, fellow Tory MP Louie French took to X saying: 'Deport the migrants.' Mr Jenrick's outburst provoked a furious response from Labour. A Labour source said: 'Robert Jenrick was at the heart of a Conservative government that let the asylum system spiral into chaos. He had the power to act - and didn't. How dare he talk about a 'gutless elite' when for years he sat around the cabinet table and in the Home Office doing nothing? 'This Labour government is taking decisive action to regain control of our borders - cracking down on criminal gangs, clearing the asylum backlog, and ending the costly hotel use left behind by the Tories.' Among the measures to tackle the crisis is the government's new failure to travel policy which will be published today and is designed to tackle non-compliance by asylum seekers. It will ensure individuals who are moved from hotels to suitable alternative accommodation must take it. Those who refuse to move without a valid reason will now risk losing their housing and support. It is a firm but fair approach, aimed to end abuse of asylum support and contribute towards the closure of costly hotel accommodation. While the government has a duty to support all asylum seekers who would otherwise be destitute in appropriate accommodation, the new policy establishes clear consequences for those who game the system whilst protecting the vulnerable. At the peak of the crisis under the previous administration, 400 hotels were being used to accommodate asylum seekers, costing £9 million per day. The government made a clear commitment to end that practice, and is delivering. In the first three months of 2025 the number of asylum seekers in hotels fell by almost 6,000, a 15 per cent reduction since December. The number of hotels in use has now halved from its peak in 2023. Minister for Border Security and Asylum, Dame Angela Eagle, said: 'We inherited an asylum system on the brink of collapse - mismanaged, under strain, and costing the public a fortune. We are getting a grip. 'We are working to close hotels, restore order, and put fairness and value for money at the heart of our asylum system. This government is making those necessary decisions to protect the taxpayer and uphold the integrity of our borders. 'These reforms to the Failure to Travel policy are another example of this government's action to transform the asylum accommodation system and crack down on those who abuse our system, so it operates fairly and saves the taxpayer money.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store