Russia becomes the first country to recognize Taliban's rule in Afghanistan
The Russian Foreign Ministry announced that it had received credentials from Afghanistan's newly appointed Ambassador Gul Hassan Hassan. The official recognition of the Afghan government will foster 'productive bilateral cooperation,' the ministry said in a statement.
Afghanistan's Foreign Ministry called it a historic step, and quoted Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi as welcoming the decision as 'a good example for other countries.'
The Taliban took control of Afghanistan in August 2021 following the withdrawal of U.S. and NATO forces. Since then, they have sought international recognition while also enforcing their strict interpretation of Islamic law.
While no country had formally recognized the Taliban administration until now, the group had engaged in high-level talks with many nations and established some diplomatic ties with countries including China and the United Arab Emirates.
Still, the Taliban government has been relatively isolated on the world stage, largely over its restrictions on women.
Although the Taliban initially promised a more moderate rule than during their first stint in power from 1996 to 2001, it started to enforce restrictions on women and girls soon after the 2021 takeover. Women are barred from most jobs and public places, including parks, baths and gyms, while girls are banned from education beyond sixth grade.
Russian officials have recently been emphasizing the need to engage with the Taliban to help stabilize Afghanistan, and lifted a ban on the Taliban in April.
Russia's ambassador to Afghanistan, Dmitry Zhirnov, said in remarks broadcast by state Channel One television that the decision to officially recognize the Taliban government was made by President Vladimir Putin on advice from Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.
Zhirnov said the decision proves Russia's 'sincere striving for the development of full-fledged relations with Afghanistan.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Payout offered to Afghans hit by UK data breaches
Afghan nationals whose personal information was mistakenly exposed by the Ministry of Defence in 2021 will be offered up to £4,000 each in compensation, the government has said. The data breaches affected 277 people, some of whom had worked for the UK government and were in hiding from insurgent Taliban forces at the Minister Luke Pollard said he could not "undo past mistakes" but promised that the payments would be made "as quickly as reasonably practical". The government expects the total cost to be around £1.6m and comes on top of the £350,000 it had to pay after receiving a fine from the data watchdog. The biggest breach took place in September 2021 when the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) team was working to evacuate people from Afghanistan following the chaotic withdrawal of western troops.A mass email was sent to those, such as interpreters, whose work with the UK government meant they could be targeted by the Taliban and therefore made them eligible to be relocated. Their email addresses were added to the 'To' field instead of the 'blind carbon copy' (Bcc) section, meaning their names could be seen by all Ministry of Defence later launched an internal investigation that revealed two similar breaches on 7 September and 13 September of that Humber from the Leigh Day law firm which is representing some of those affected said the government's statement about compensation contained "little information"."As far as we are aware, there has been no consultation with those affected or their legal advisors about the scheme - it is not clear the criteria that will be used to identify the proposed payment amount."In our client's case, he and his family spent five very scared months in hiding in Kabul concerned that the Taliban were now aware that he had assisted UK forces and were looking for him. "He feared for his life and was aware of the Taliban beating and killing others that had assisted UK forces. "We will need to review critically with our client whether any sum that is now being offered adequately compensates him for distress that he has undoubtedly suffered." After investigating the breaches in 2023, information commissioner John Edwards said the error could have led to a "threat to life" and had "let down those to whom our country owes so much".The commissioner initially fined the government £1m but that was reduced to £700,000 in recognition of the measures taken by the Ministry of Defence to report the incident, limit its impact and the difficulties of the situation for teams handling the relocation of was further reduced to £350,000 as part of a change in approach by the watchdog to public sector fines. Announcing the compensation payouts in a statement on Friday, Pollard said his department would "drive improvement in the department's data handling training and practices".Earlier this week, the government announced that the Arap scheme was closing to new applicants, having resettled 21,316 Afghans in the half of those brought to the UK were children, and a quarter were women. A Home Office paper published on Tuesday said Defence Secretary John Healey believed the scheme had "fulfilled its original purpose".It said the scheme could now be shut down "not least so that defence efforts and resources can be focused where they are most needed - on our nation's security, to combat the acute threats and destabilising behaviour of our adversaries".
NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
Russia intensifies attacks on Kyiv with overnight strikes
Russia launched an all-night drone and missile attack on Kyiv, injuring at least 23 people, according to Ukrainian authorities. The attacks are the latest in a series of Russian assaults on the Ukrainian capital that include some of the deadliest since the war began.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Kneecap, Sir David Murray, Scotland's politicians and sectarianism
Everett held aloft the pair of giant foam hands which had been made famous by his mock evangelical preacher character Brother Lee Love on his eponymous television show and declared, 'Let's bomb Russia!'. His gag went down a storm with the Tories in the packed arena. There was riotous laughter, a huge cheer and thunderous applause. Even Margaret Thatcher, who was seeking re-election as prime minister at the time and who was in attendance at the gathering, appeared tickled. It was, though, the height of the Cold War and the fallout was considerable. The media had an absolute field day. 'Not funny, Kenny,' screamed the front page of the tabloid News of the World. Read more: Representations ultimately had to be made to the Russian Embassy to explain that Everett had no control over the United Kingdom's nuclear arsenal and stress that his comment did not reflect their foreign policy. Thatcher also found it necessary to issue a statement in the aftermath. 'No one is talking politically about bombing the Russians,' she said. 'Every single thing I do is to deter any hostilities of any kind of breaking out. No one was seriously suggesting anything to the contrary at the time.' Armageddon was averted. At no stage during the whole row, however, was Everett ever cautioned by the police, never mind arrested. Would that be the case if a similar incident happened today? It is improbable. The treatment of Mo Chara from the Irish hip hop trio Kneecap suggests that artists face far more serious consequences for their words and actions than they did 40 years ago and much less likely to gain the approval of those who occupy the corridors of power if they court controversy. (Image: Yui Mok) Chara, in case you have been residing on Pluto in recent months and are unaware, has been charged with a terrorism-related offence for allegedly chanting 'up Hamas, up Hezbollah' and purportedly displaying a Hezbollah flag during a concert in London last year. Expressing support for those proscribed organisations in the United Kingdom is illegal under the Terrorism Act 2000. The group have since denied backing those bodies and also offered apologies to the families of murdered MPs Jo Cox and David Amess for stating, 'The only good Tory is a dead Tory. Kill your local MP.' Those pronouncements didn't prevent the police from prosecuting the Belfast-born rapper. Our elected representatives, too, have not been slow to condemn the activities of the pro-Palestinian triumvirate or offer their opinions on the controversy. Kier Starmer, the prime minister, and Lisa Nandy, his culture secretary, both expressed their misgivings about Kneecap playing Glastonbury last weekend. Their appearance at the music festival was, the former opined, 'not appropriate' due to the ongoing legal proceedings. Starmer and Nandy's motivations for pitching in to the affair are moot. It has been widely suggested that a desire to deflect attention away from the United Kingdom's involvement in Israel's attacks on Gaza, warfare which the United Nations special committee has found is 'consistent with the characteristics of genocide', are behind their interventions. But John Swinney, the first minister, has also got in on the act. He argued it would be 'unacceptable' for Kneecap to play at TRNSMT in Glasgow. They were subsequently removed from the line-up due to safety concerns. Read more: There would seem to be far weightier matters for our leaders to concern themselves with at this present moment in time than a popular beat combo whose material is steeped in humour and whose output has been described by cultural commentators in the past as 'satire not sectarianism'. Whatever the reason, the whole episode has shown that politicians can and do speak out on matters they deem to be offensive and unacceptable when the mood takes them. Or perhaps when they feel there is a significant gain in their public popularity ratings to be had. If only they were consistent with their approach. Where was the outrage in Westminster or Holyrood when the Green Brigade displayed a 'Victory to the Resistance' banner in the safe-standing section at Parkhead just hours after Hamas militants had launched attacks on western Israel and murdered over 1,000 people back in 2023? Or when the same group flew the red flag of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine at a game in the East End of Glasgow soon after? Where are the promises of action when sectarian songs like The Billy Boys or No Pope of Rome are belted out at football matches every week? Why aren't debates held in parliament when chants of 'up the 'RA' and 'soon they'll be no Protestants at all' pollute the atmosphere at grounds around the country? (Image: SNS Group Bill Murray) Airings of The Famine Song are now non-existent in our national game. The consul general for the Republic of Ireland approached the Scottish government about this odious ditty when it entered the Rangers fans' repertoire in 2008. It was deemed racist by High Court judge Lord Carloway and supporters were warned they faced arrest if they were caught singing it. So MSPs are far from toothless. It is nothing short of incredible that sectarianism is allowed to persist in Scottish football in these politically correct times we live in. Will anything change in the season ahead? Don't hold your breath. Read more: Sir David Murray - who sanctioned the signing of Rangers' first high-profile Catholic player and who took Bears to task for their love of The Billy Boys during his lengthy tenure as owner of the Ibrox club – was bang on the money about the topic of bigotry earlier this week. Speaking to promote his autobiography Mettle: Tragedy, Courage and Titles, Sir David said, 'They don't address it, they won't take it chin on. We're stuck in a time warp. It's like a hot potato for the government, for the Scottish parliament. But when it's on the streets it's their responsibility.' Our politicians should spend less time trying to pander to the least informed and most prejudiced members of the electorate by scapegoating hip hop trio Kneecap and more of their working days tackling a problem which should have been consigned to the dustbin of history decades ago. Sectarianism in Scottish football remains no laughing matter.
