TikTok under investigation over claims it misled Ireland's data regulator
TikTok in May were
fined €250m after it was found that it had stored European users' data on Chinese-hosted online servers
.
During that inquiry, the firm originally told the Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) that the information was not housed within China and that its Beijing-based employees accessed users' details remotely.
Advertisement
It was later confirmed by TikTok that it had given erroneous information to investigators, the DPC said. On foot on that, a fresh inquiry has now opened into the platform's accountability when it comes to handling and managing the data of European citizens.
TikTok is also under investigation for allegedly failing to adhere to Section 31 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which places an obligation on companies to cooperate with investigators from the DPC and other European privacy agencies.
The transfer of data to China is also being reviewed once more, the DPC said today.
In the first investigation, TikTok did correct the statements it originally gave to the Irish data watchdog, which had been probing the platform's compliance with GDPR and other relevant laws on behalf of the entire EU.
It said that the original denial of the allegations was incorrect and that the company did in fact store information in China. Deputy Commissioner at the DPC Graham Doyle
said that the agency was taking the mistaken statements very seriously at the time
.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
33 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
61-acre Wexford farm guiding at €16k-€18k/acre at online auction
Coming up for public online auction on Friday, August 29, is a 61-acre farm at Scarawalsh, Ferns, Co Wexford. The significant acreage on offer will already provide a strong incentive for bidders to put their hands up on the day. The sale is being handled by Gorey-based auctioneers Quinn Property. 'We're delighted to introduce this valuable parcel of land to the market,' said selling agent David Quinn. 'It's only 4km from Ferns and just over 1km to the Scarawalsh Roundabout, which gives access to the N30 and the N80.' Part of the property has frontage onto the R772, and it is presented in two lots, separated by a field. 'This land is in an area of strong agricultural production,' said David. Selling agent David Quinn said the 'land quality is excellent, with free-draining soils that are suited to most agricultural activities.' 'Tillage and grassland are predominant around here, and this land quality is excellent, with free-draining soils that are suited to most agricultural activities.' Lot 1 consists of 11 acres fronting onto the R772, with a derelict farmhouse and outbuildings. The latter includes a four-bay round roof shed with two lean-to buildings, an open silage pit, concrete yard, cattle crush and dungstead. Lot 2 is 50 acres of top-quality land. Lot 3 is the entire property. The farm is convenient to a number of other major towns in the area, and the price guide is €16,000 to €18,000/acre. Read More 58-acre South Wicklow farm snapped up pre-auction

The 42
an hour ago
- The 42
A new era for The League of Millionaires?
Free Podcast A new era for The League of Millionaires? David Sneyd and Shane Keegan take a deep dive into the League of Ireland's rising wages and increased European bonuses, before turning their attention to Evan Ferguson and Roma.

The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Ireland's new age check system kicks in and seeks to stop children accessing ‘adult' video
A NEW AGE verification system which seeks to prevent children from accessing 'adult-only' video content on sites such as Instagram and TikTok has come into place. The age verification system is contained in Part B of the Online Safety Code from Ireland's media regulator Coimisiún na Meán. The code, which aims to address harmful and illegal content, applies to video-sharing platforms whose EU headquarters are in Ireland. Many of these platforms are household names and includes Facebook and Instagram, as well as YouTube, TikTok, X, and Reddit. However, this means many other major platforms, such as Snapchat, is outside of the remit of the Code and is instead subject to UK online safety legislation. CyberSafeKids meanwhile noted that children will still have unrestricted access to harmful or pornographic content provided by other commercial operators outside of the Code's remit, which falls instead under the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA). The new age verification system seeks to provide an 'effective method of age assurance' that will prevent children from accessing pornography or extreme violence. Other restricted categories include cyberbullying, promotion of eating and feeding disorders, promotion of self-harm and suicide, dangerous challenges, and incitement to hatred or violence. In the Code, Coimisiún na Meán notes that 'merely asking users whether they are over 18 will not be enough'. It added that platforms will 'need to use appropriate forms of age verification to protect children from video and associated content which may impair their physical, mental or moral development'. The Code requires video sharing platforms to implement 'effective age assurance measures' to ensure that 'adult-only video content cannot normally be seen by children'. The Code does not mandate a specific type of age verification method but notes that an age assurance measure 'based solely on self-declaration of age by users of the service shall not be an effective measure'. Advertisement The video sharing platform is also required to have an 'easy-to-use and effective procedure for the handling and resolution of complaints' around age verification and related issues. Platforms are also required to provide parental controls that enable parents or guardians to set time limits in respect of video content and to restrict children from viewing video uploaded or shared by users unknown to the child. The Code was formally adopted last November but platforms were given nine months to make any changes that were needed to their online systems. CyberSafeKids described today as a 'milestone that formally shifts legal responsibility onto tech companies to protect children online'. It added that this move 'finally places a clear obligation on platforms to face the reality that underage users are accessing harmful content daily on their platforms, and to implement effective safeguards'. While Coimisiún na Meán has not mandated a specific type of age verification system, CyberSafeKids said the nine-month implementation period has allowed 'more than enough time to develop robust age verification systems other than self-declaration'. Meanwhile, CyberSafeKids expressed concern that the Code does not cover the recommender algorithm system. The recommender system is an algorithm that uses data to suggest items that a social media user might be interested in. However, CyberSafeKids warns that 'much harmful content coming through a child's feed originates from this'. The Irish Council for Civil Liberties previously warned that recommender systems 'push hate and extremism into people's feeds and inject content that glorifies self-harm and suicide into children's feeds'. CyberSafeKids has called for the Code to be reviewed within 12 to 24 months. 'If the Code has failed to reduce underage access to harmful content, stronger measures must be implemented to keep children safe,' said CyberSafeKids. 'Financial penalties should be quickly and fully imposed for non-compliance, in line with the legislation.' Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal