Rajasthan HC fines two officials for ignoring lake survey orders
Hearing a suo moto writ petition pending since 2016, the division bench of Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Chandra Shekhar Sharma on Friday took serious note of continued non-compliance and observed that no sincere effort had been made by the state authorities apart from filing 'half-baked affidavits'.
Also Read: Panchkula: Shoddy probe leads to acquittal in railway theft case
In its earlier order dated November 18, 2024, the high court had granted three months to complete the survey of lakes across all districts. The order had underlined that while nine lakes had been notified so far, the real task was to conduct a district-wise survey to identify other lakes that must be notified under the 2015 Act. The bench had then specifically directed, 'Let the exercise towards completion of survey be undertaken and all endeavor be made to complete the process of survey within a period of three months.'
The order also recorded that the State Level Committee had held a series of meetings with district authorities and required financial assistance from the government to carry out the survey. A phased release of funds was also ordered by the court.
However, despite the time given, no compliance affidavit was filed and no application seeking extension was submitted prompting the court to impose costs while observing, 'This must be made known to the State authorities that the Court's order must be complied within the stipulated time and non-compliance of the Court's orders shall be viewed very seriously in the matter like the present one which pertains to public interest.'
The court said it saw no justification for the non-compliance.
'It is clear on a glance at the order dated November 18, 2024, that the survey was already ongoing and some meetings were held by the State Level Committee for obtaining survey reports and therefore this Court directed the respondents to complete the survey within three months' time.'
The additional advocate general informed the court that the survey was still ongoing, which the bench found unsatisfactory.
The court directed both officials to deposit the ₹50,000 each within two weeks with the Registrar (Administration) of the High Court. The amount will be drawn in favour of Government Blind School, Mata ka Than, Jodhpur, and Government Blind School, Jaipur.
The matter is now listed for further hearing on May 23, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Undressing Girl Despite Protest 'Attempt to Rape', Rules Allahabad High Court
Last Updated: The court found that it had been proved by the prosecution that the victim was forcibly kidnapped by the appellant with intention of marrying and having intercourse with her The Allahabad High Court on July 1, 2025, upheld the conviction of a man for attempting to rape a girl after forcibly abducting and detaining her for nearly 20 days, holding that the offence of attempt to rape is made out even if attempt to penetration does not occur clearly, as long as intent and overt acts are established. The Court distinguished the case from the Supreme Court's findings in Tarkeshwar Sahu vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) (2006), where the top court had set aside the conviction under Section 376/511 of the IPC (attempt to rape) recording a finding that the accused had neither undressed himself nor even asked the prosecutrix to undress so there was no question of penetration. The top court had said that 'in the absence of any attempt to penetrate, the conviction under Section 376/511 IPC is wholly illegal and unsustainable". The bench of Justice Rajnish Kumar emphasised that the ruling in the said case was not applicable to the case at hand as here the victim had stated not only in her statement under Section 164 CrPC before the magistrate but in evidence before the trial court also that the appellant had undressed her, however on her protest, he could not do intercourse. The single judge bench referred to the Supreme Court's judgment in Pandharinath vs. State of Maharashtra (2009) where it was held that if the accused-appellant had removed the victim's clothes and he had not rebutted this statement of the prosecutrix in his examination-in-chief, it was definitely a case of attempt to rape. In every crime, there is first, the intention to commit, secondly, preparation to commit it, and thirdly, the attempt to commit it. If the third stage, that is 'the attempt' is successful, then the crime is complete. If the attempt fails, the crime is not complete, but the law punishes the person attempting the Act under Section 511 IPC, the high court said, referring to the Supreme Court's ruling in Koppula Venkat Rao vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004). The court found that in the present case, it had been proved by the prosecution that the victim was forcibly kidnapped by the appellant with intention of marrying and having intercourse with her. The appellant with the said motive kept her at the residence of his relative for about 20 days, where he not only outraged her modesty but also attempted rape by undressing her, however, he could not do so due to victim's protest. 'Nothing could be extracted from her (the victim) in cross-examination, which may create any doubt on her version or about the veracity of her evidence," the single judge bench noted. Further, since the FIR was lodged by the girl's mother on August 31, 2004, 21 days after the girl went missing, the appellant argued that the delay pointed to fabrication and that the incident was consensual. However, the court rejected both claims, stating that the delay had been explained and that such delays are not unusual in cases involving sexual assault due to societal stigma. Therefore, finding no illegality or infirmity in the trial court's order, the court dismissed the appeal against conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376/511 and 354 of the IPC.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
BMC निवडणुकीपूर्वी शिवसेना पक्ष, धनुष्यबाण परत मिळवण्याची तयारी; ठाकरे गटाची न्यायालयात मागणी
Shivsena Ubt Demands Court To Decide On Shiv Sena Party Name And Symbol Before Bmc Elections
India Gazette
2 hours ago
- India Gazette
Delhi HC directs Centre to frame rules for mode-specific RTI information
New Delhi [India], July 2 (ANI): The Delhi High Court on Wednesday directed the relevant authority of the Union Government to take necessary steps and issue directions or frame rules to guarantee that information under the Right to Information Act, 2005, is provided in the format or mode requested by the applicant, while ensuring that appropriate safety measures are in place. Highlighting a gap in the current RTI Rules, a division bench of Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela stated that the need for providing information in the format sought by applicants--such as email or pen drives--while ensuring proper safeguards. The Court emphasised that existing rules do not account for present-day digital preferences, which can limit accessibility and defeat the spirit of the RTI Act, 2005. The judges instructed the appropriate authority to evaluate the issue and make a decision within three months. The directions came in response to a petition filed by two law students, who argued that RTI procedures continue to reference outdated formats, such as diskettes and floppies. They urged that information delivery should reflect current technology, including cloud platforms and secure email transfers. The plea also requested clear provisions for modern digital payment methods, such as UPI, net banking, and credit cards, to make the RTI process more user-friendly. Despite earlier representations made to the concerned ministries, no action had been taken, prompting the petitioners to approach the Court, stated the plea. The High Court concluded that framing updated rules is essential for ensuring the effective realisation of citizens' rights under the RTI Act in today's digital era. (ANI)
