
The Guardian view on Kosovo's election result: a gateway to rapprochement with the EU
There are tentative grounds for hoping that the outcome of Kosovo's latest election on Sunday, in which Mr Kurti's ruling party came first but lost its majority, can deliver a route out of this impasse. Mr Kurti's understandable but sometimes heavy-handed moves to demonstrate Pristina's control over the north – such as imposing ethnic Albanian mayors after a mass election boycott by ethnic Serbs – have been strongly criticised by both the European Union and the US. On the eve of the poll, Richard Grenell, the newly appointed US special envoy for special missions, said that relations between Washington and Pristina had 'never been lower'.
Meanwhile the EU has imposed sanctions that have so far cost one of the poorest and smallest nations in Europe about €150m (£125m). The prospect of a new coalition government in Pristina opens up the possibility of a less intransigent and more pragmatic approach. Both main opposition parties campaigned on the need to improve relations with western partners, and anxiety over Kosovo's isolation at a perilous geopolitical moment was one of the election's major themes. If the new Kurti administration can move beyond sometimes strident nationalist rhetoric and get Brussels and Washington back onside, that will be overwhelmingly in Kosovo's interest.
The goal should be the belated implementation of a 2023 normalisation agreement, which theoretically obliged Serbia's president, Aleksandar Vučić, to recognise Kosovo's nationhood, in exchange for semi-autonomous powers for ethnic Serbs in the north. But getting there will require Mr Vučić, who has constantly fanned the flames of ethnic tension, to cease playing to his own nationalist gallery and finally sign the deal.
Brussels should respond to any conciliatory steps from Pristina with alacrity and generosity. It takes two to create a deadlock, but while one of the tiniest and most vulnerable nations in Europe has been punished by sanctions, its large, bullying and hostile neighbour has not, for reasons of regional realpolitik. Given the obvious and ominous precedent of Ukraine, Mr Kurti's fears over Belgrade's ultimate agenda in Kosovo's north are entirely comprehensible. They will be compounded by the memory of Donald Trump's previous backing of a plan which at one stage included Kosovo's partition.
The EU has a new foreign affairs chief in the former Estonian prime minister Kaja Kallas, and a new special envoy for Kosovo and Serbia normalisation in the Danish diplomat Peter Sørensen – a regional specialist. Britain's new special envoy to the region, Karen Pierce, was ambassador to the US for five years. That offers the opportunity for a fresh start in relation to a country that has established a well-functioning democracy in the most challenging of contexts. Kosovo's next government needs to be more pragmatic and less driven by Mr Kurti's 'you're with us or against us' brand of nationalism. But the west must do more than just meet it halfway.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BreakingNews.ie
19 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Explained: Zelenskiy's controversial move against Ukraine's anti-corruption agencies
Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy is under pressure at home and abroad for stripping the independence of anti-corruption agencies whose work is seen as essential to Kyiv's path to join the European Union. Amendments giving his appointed prosecutor more power over the two investigative bodies have drawn criticism from top EU officials and sparked the country's largest wartime protests. Advertisement Here is what it means. What are Ukraine's anti-corruption agencies? The National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) were set up after a 2014 revolution toppled a pro-Russian president and set Kyiv on a Western course. They are responsible for independently weeding out high-level graft, a central requirement for Ukraine to receive billions of dollars in Western aid and join the 27-member EU. The agencies have stepped up their work during Russia's full-scale invasion, producing charges against lawmakers, senior government officials and a former deputy head of Zelenskiy's administration. Advertisement Last month, they accused a deputy prime minister of accepting a €300,000 kickback. Why have their powers been curbed? In a late-night address on Tuesday, Zelenskiy said the agencies needed to be "cleansed" of Russian influence and their work strengthened and sped up. A day earlier, Kyiv's domestic security agency had arrested two NABU officials on suspicion of ties to Russia and conducted sweeping searches into agency employees, a move critics described as excessive. The new measures, which were fast-tracked in large part by Zelenskiy's ruling party, allow the general prosecutor to transfer cases away from the agencies and re-assign prosecutors, several lawmakers said. Advertisement Critics, including an anti-corruption campaigner charged this month with fraud and evading military service, have alleged the crackdown was a politically motivated response to their work. What was the reaction? After the vote, the EU's enlargement commissioner said she was "seriously concerned" about the measures, and on Wednesday Germany's foreign minister warned Kyiv against hampering its path to the EU. At home, thousands of Ukrainians rallied in Kyiv just steps away from the site of the 2014 uprising, which itself was sparked by a democratic rollback and threats to Ukraine's European integration. Protesters in Kyiv hold placards during a demonstration about the independence of Ukraine's two anti-corruption agencies. Photo: AFP via Getty Fighting corruption and embracing the West, especially since Moscow's 2022 invasion, are seen as critical to erasing a legacy of Russian rule. Advertisement Ukrainians are furious at signs of corruption and misrule at a time when tens of thousands of troops have been killed on the front fending off Russia. "My brother didn't die for this kind of future," read a placard at the Kyiv protest. What's next? On Wednesday, Zelenskiy said he had met with anti-corruption and security officials to hash out a joint plan within two weeks to better combat corruption. Writing on X, he said the officials would aim to "resolve existing contradictions, and eliminate threats". "We all hear what society is saying," he said. "We see what people expect from state institutions." Still, NABU and SAPO said in a joint statement on Wednesday that they wanted their independence restored through legislation. Meanwhile, lawmakers pledged to challenge the amendments while Ukrainians on social media called for continuing public protests.


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Ukraine erupts with anger at Zelenskyy, threatening wartime unity
KYIV, Ukraine — Ukrainian fury was fixed Wednesday on its own government. As Russian drones peppered their homes, their loved ones fought in trenches and their negotiators waded through more pessimistic diplomacy, Ukrainians waged a new battle on the streets of Kyiv and other major cities. Activists called for further protests Wednesday over a law signed by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that curbs the country's top two anti-corruption agencies. The move already fueled the first major demonstrations since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022, and drew alarm from European officials and experts. 'Destroy Russians, not democracy,' one of the hastily drawn cardboard signs in Kyiv read, while crowds yelled 'Shame!' and 'Veto the law!' Natalia, 48, a therapist who like many in this febrile atmosphere doesn't want to use her last name, said trying to restrict anti-corruption agencies risked "endangering the values of freedom, democracy in our country and the future of our children." She sees the protests as a way to support the army on the front lines. "I am coming out to give them a signal that we are here," she said, "so that we are not stolen and betrayed." The sudden crisis could offer the Kremlin a powerful propaganda tool and threaten not just Ukraine's unity, but also its support from the West at a crucial moment in the war. Parliament had swiftly passed the law giving Zelenskyy's prosecutor general sweeping powers over the National Anti-Corruption Bureau and Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office. He said he did this to make them more efficient and to clear out 'Russian influence,' but critics feared it would further enhance the power of his divisive inner circle. It prompted howls of outrage and dismay, not just from Ukrainians themselves, but also Western officials and experts alarmed that the country could be backsliding on its endemic graft problem. It comes a week after the arrest of a prominent anti-corruption campaigner who had embarrassed senior officials with investigations into their affairs. All of this overshadowed a third round of peace talks between Russia and Ukraine set to begin Wednesday in Istanbul. Though both sides remain pessimistic of serious progress, these are the first discussions since President Donald Trump gave Russian President Vladimir Putin a 50-day ultimatum to agree to a truce or face new tariffs. Most observers expect another prisoner exchange but little else. Many Ukrainians are also worried that Zelenskyy's move will be weaponized by the country's opponents as evidence of the corruption they say makes supporting Kyiv untenable. The head of Ukraine's military intelligence, Kyrylo Budanov, even appeared to question the move, warning that 'Ukrainian history has taught us that a nation loses if it is torn apart by internal contradictions.' Ukraine's endemic corruption is one of the reasons it has not been accepted into the European Union and NATO. Marta Kos, the E.U.'s commissioner for enlargement, said she was 'seriously concerned' about the new law, which she called a 'serious step back.' Responding to the criticism Wednesday, Zelenskyy gathered with the heads of the anti-corruption agencies, as well as law enforcement chiefs and the prosecutor general. 'We all hear what society is saying,' he said in a statement, promising measures to 'strengthen the work of each institution.' He added, 'We all share a common enemy: the Russian occupiers. And defending the Ukrainian state requires a strong enough law enforcement and anti-corruption system — one that ensures a real sense of justice.' It also requires air defense against the nightly waves of drones launched by Russia. Overnight, it shot down 27 of 71 unmanned aircraft, with those that got through killing at least four people and injuring more than 40 across Kherson, Donetsk, Sumy and Kharkiv, officials said. On the ground, Russian forces continue to make grinding gains in eastern Ukraine, including enveloping the key town of Pokrovsk, in the Donetsk region, according to the Institute for the Study of War, a think tank in Washington. Though many analysts believe Russia's hemorrhaging of men and military equipment will soon begin to tell, morale is frayed for many. 'They won't stop until we surrender,' said Agneshka Shyba, 23, who works in social media. 'Frankly speaking, I am exhausted.'


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
EU prepares €100bn no-deal plan to match Trump's threat of 30% tariffs
The EU has threatened to impose nearly €100bn (£87bn) worth of tariffs on US imports ranging from bourbon whiskey and Boeing aircraft in one fell swoop if Donald Trump does not agree a trade deal by the end of next week. The European Commission said on Wednesday it now planned to combine two previously prepared separate lists of US goods to be included in any retaliatory moves against the US president's import tariffs. If Brussels follows through on the threat, it would mean tariffs on US imports to the EU including poultry and alcohol in the first €21bn list, as well as the more recent list of €72bn of goods, which featured cars and planes. If agreed by EU member states, through a vote expected in the coming days, the €93bn of counter-tariffs could be imposed from 7 August. 'The EU's primary focus is on achieving a negotiated outcome with the US,' said Olof Gill, a trade spokesperson for the European Commission,adding that it would 'continue in parallel to prepare for all outcomes'. To make countermeasures 'clearer, simpler and stronger we will merge lists 1 and 2 into a single list', he said. The EU trade commissioner, Maroš Šefčovič, was due to talk to the US commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, before a briefing to EU ambassadors on Wednesday afternoon. Diplomats say the mood is hardening in Brussels towards Trump after the US president rejected an agreement in principle 10 days ago while at the same time upping the ante by threatening 30% blanket tariffs from 1 August in the event of no deal. Germany, which has publicly pushed for a quick deal to end the crippling 27.5% tariffs on its car industry, is now favouring the use of the anti-coercion instrument (ACI), an EU regulation considered its 'nuclear deterrent' against economic coercion. The ACI would enable the EU to retaliate with an arsenal of measures including tariffs, but also a potential ban on US services, which would hit the tech sector hard. The European car industry has been particularly impacted by the tariffs. Stellantis, the owner of Jeep and Vauxhall, this week said Trump's tariffs have cost it €300m and Volvo reported a sharp decline in second-quarter operation. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, has long argued that the EU needs to be prepared to retaliate and counter Trump's threats in a tougher fashion. Both Germany and France spoke about the ACI at a meeting of ambassadors last Friday. 'It was certainly a shift in rhetoric, but it is not clear whether they would be advocating pressing the actual button,' said one diplomat in Brussels. Tobias Gehrke, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations thinktank, said the EU had missed an opportunity by not warning that it would use the ACI after a trade ministers summit early last week, two days after Trump sent the EU a letter threatening 30% tariffs. Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion 'There is a sense that the bloc has fumbled its hand, despite holding decent cards,' he said. 'The EU should have immediately retaliated against US tariffs. While the mantra 'negotiate from a position of strength' was oft-repeated in speeches, any associated actions never materialised,' he added. He argues the only move to break the impasse is a face to face meeting between Merz, Macron and Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni and Trump, who is in Scotland this weekend. The latest EU move comes ahead of a summit with China on Thursday between European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the EU council, Antonio Costa, and China's president Xi Jinping. China maintains a dominant position in the trade relationship – its trade surplus for the first six months of 2025 stood at €143bn, up 20% year on year, with exports of hybrid electrical cars tripling from January to May. These do not attract the punitive tariffs introduced in 2023 by the EU. Electric car imports dropped 32% for the same period. At the same time, China's restriction on rare earths is hitting the German car industry which needs magnets for window and boot opening mechanisms.