logo
What's in the Senate's version of Trump's budget bill — and who stands to benefit

What's in the Senate's version of Trump's budget bill — and who stands to benefit

CNBC14 hours ago

After weeks of sparring over the specifics of the "one big, beautiful bill," the package is poised to soon head to the Senate floor, where lawmakers are pushing to get it across the finish line and on President Donald Trump's desk before July 4.
Questions remain over whether the House will ultimately accept the Senate version of the bill, which was finalized just before midnight on Friday, as 11th-hour changes brought victories — and some losses — for lawmakers, businesses and special interest groups. The changes underscored the behind-the-scenes jockeying that went on to get the 940-page bill finished.
One major sticking point for fiscal hawks is the megabill's proposed $5 trillion debt ceiling increase, a figure some Senate Republicans continue to bristle at, raising questions about Senate Majority Leader John Thune's ability to align his chamber.
Thune has said he wants to bring the bill to the floor for a key procedural vote as soon as Saturday afternoon, while acknowledging that he may not have the votes. The uncertainty speaks to the reality of the Republicans' razor-thin majority.
Here are some of the key elements of the Senate's "big, beautiful bill," and who stands to benefit from them:
If enacted, the Senate bill would codify several of Trump's campaign promises, including extensions for his 2017 tax cuts, such as lower income-tax brackets, higher standard deductions, a bigger child tax credit and other provisions.
The Senate bill also includes new policy proposals, such as tax breaks for tip income, overtime pay, auto loans and a bonus deduction for older Americans to help offset Social Security income taxes.
Notably, several of the new tax breaks are only temporary boosts from 2025 through 2028, which could impact taxpayers as early as the 2026 filing season.
An earlier Senate draft would have slashed household taxes by an average of roughly $2,600 in 2026, slightly less than the House bill, according to the Tax Policy Center. However, the organization found that the benefits from both versions would skew to upper-income families.
Republicans and the Treasury Department on agreed this week to scrap the so-called revenge tax provision — formally known as Section 899 — bringing a sigh of relief to investors on Wall Street who feared it could make the U.S. a less attractive place for investments.
The tax is aimed at retaliating against any countries whose taxes were deemed "discriminatory" or unfair against the U.S.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that he would roll out a "joint understanding among G7 countries that defends American interests," as he asked Congress to remove the provision from the tax bill.
"Great concern had been expressed by Wall Street and affected stakeholders about the enactment of Section 899 and its impact on foreign investment in the United States, particularly in view of its complexity, potential scope of application and compliance obligations," attorneys at law firm Holland & Knight said in a note of the tax, CNN reports.
The Senate text also includes a tentative deal with House Republicans on the limit on the federal deduction for state and local taxes, known as SALT. Passed via Trump's 2017 tax cuts, the $10,000 cap has been a sticking point for certain lawmakers in blue states.
Senate Republicans would raise the cap to $40,000 starting in 2025, with the phaseout beginning after $500,000 of income. Both figures would increase by 1% each year through 2029 and the cap would revert to $10,000 in 2030.
However, in a win for industry groups, the legislation would leave intact a SALT cap workaround for pass-through businesses, which allows owners to sidestep the $10,000 cap. By contrast, the House-approved bill would have ended the strategy for certain white-collar professionals.
"This is nonsensical approach to tax policy," Chye-Ching Huang, executive director of the Tax Law Center at New York University Law, said in a tweet on Saturday.
"It preserves (and lessens) a limit on deductions for wealthy taxpayers while ignoring a loophole that allows the wealthiest of those taxpayers to avoid the limit entirely," she said.
One point of contention in the package is the proposed deep cuts to Medicaid, the insurance program for low-income and disabled Americans that provides coverage for more than 70 million people.
The Senate parliamentarian nixed some Medicaid cuts late this week, but kept others, including work requirements of 80 hours a month, which could threaten millions of Americans' ability to receive health insurance, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
Some lawmakers and industry groups notched last-minute wins that could benefit their state's constituents, underscoring the negotiating that likely took place until the bitter end to sway skeptical Republicans.
For instance, a provision in the bill would raise the deduction for whale-hunting-related expenses to $50,000 from $10,000, delivering a win for Alaska Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan, Politico reports.
And, in a significant blow to renewable energy advocates, car manufacturers and some consumers, the Senate bill would eliminate the $7,500 tax credit on electric vehicle sales and leases on Sept. 30, moving up the timeline proposed in an earlier version of the text.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I'm Oppenheimer's grandson. We can still go from crisis to conversation on Iran.
I'm Oppenheimer's grandson. We can still go from crisis to conversation on Iran.

USA Today

time32 minutes ago

  • USA Today

I'm Oppenheimer's grandson. We can still go from crisis to conversation on Iran.

Dialogue alone won't solve the problem. But it's where every solution begins. It also allows us to talk about the hopeful side of nuclear science. So I'm proposing something unconventional. The war in Iran has been terrifying. It pushed the threat of nuclear weapons back to the forefront of global consciousness. And yet – somehow – we've made it through this conflict in better shape than many feared, assuming the ceasefire holds. We now have an unexpected opportunity to turn this narrow escape into something bigger: a chance to expand global peace and security. Like many, I have serious criticisms of how we got here. A nation that has never signed the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty, Israel, used its undeclared nuclear status as leverage to launch a war against a country, Iran, that has no nuclear weapons and has submitted to international inspections. This directly sabotaged promising diplomatic efforts between Iran and America. When the United States entered the conflict with a military strike June 21, Americans braced for another endless war in the Middle East. And yet, remarkably, we've arrived at a ceasefire. That outcome wasn't inevitable. It required restraint from Tehran and surprising restraint from Washington. Credit must be given where it's due: President Donald Trump played a central role in stopping the escalation, using his signature unconventional diplomacy. That success offers a model ‒ if we're willing to learn from it. Lesson 1: Stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons fuel Since the first atomic breakthrough, one truth has remained: Safety in the nuclear age requires cooperation ‒ even with adversaries. Nuclear science is not a secret that can be kept, it's a fact of nature. From J. Robert Oppenheimer onward, scientists knew the only real safeguard was shared control of enriched uranium that can be used for bombs. We need more cooperation to prevent nuclear proliferation ‒ not just in Iran, but everywhere. Gen. Wesley Clark: This is the moment for American leadership in Middle East. We can't miss it. Lesson 2: Strengthen the institutions that have kept us alive The Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is more than a piece of paper. It is the backbone of the global nuclear order. It has slowed the spread of weapons, legitimized peaceful nuclear energy and built mechanisms for trust. The International Atomic Energy Agency ‒ through science and diplomacy, not force ‒ upholds this system. We must double down on supporting countries that respect these rules and hold accountable those, like Israel and North Korea, that operate outside them. The real nuclear threat before us The dangerous gamble to start a war in order to stop a single weapon from being developed must not become the global standard. Because the far greater danger isn't Iran or any one rogue nation ‒ it's a nuclear exchange between superpowers. That remains the true and growing risk, and it could even happen by accident. A false alarm, a cyberattack or a miscommunication could trigger an unstoppable chain reaction. Once missiles fly among the United States, Russia and China, no leader or even unconventional diplomacy can stop it. There won't be time. Opinion: Our nuclear weapons are much more powerful than Oppenheimer's atomic bomb So what can we do? We build on what has worked. Trump's success in brokering a ceasefire should now be expanded ‒ first to end the Gaza conflict, and then to revive stalled denuclearization dialogue. Trump has previously called for nuclear talks among America, China and Russia. That is exactly the right idea ‒ and this could be the moment. Charles Oppenheimer: I support President Trump's pursuit of nuclear diplomacy Some will call that impossible. They'll point to rising tensions, trade wars, proxy conflicts. They'll say the moment isn't right. But history teaches the opposite: It is precisely in moments of danger that real diplomacy must begin. Waiting for peace before negotiating peace is a contradiction. This is a time for bold action – of the Nobel Peace Prize variety – if done right. We are still living under a nuclear arms strategy called mutual assured destruction. Even its acronym ‒ MAD ‒ tells us how unsustainable it is. The threat is too vast, too fast and too complex for any one nation or leader to control. Most of us, as individuals, feel powerless in the face of such a system. But we're not without agency. Some people do have real influence, and that includes the leaders of the United States, China and Russia. They cannot be expected to make unilateral concessions, but they can be expected to sit down and talk. I'm not president. But I'm doing what I can ‒ using the name and ideas of my grandfather J. Robert Oppenheimer to push for a safer future. So I'm proposing something unconventional: an 'Oppenheimer Dinner,' inviting representatives from Washington, Beijing and Moscow to a private, off-the-record dialogue about how to reduce the risk of real nuclear war ‒ and discuss the positive side of nuclear energy. Dialogue alone won't solve the problem. But it's where every solution begins. It also allows us to talk about the hopeful side of nuclear science. The same technology that could destroy civilization can also power it, giving us clean energy, medical breakthroughs and global prosperity. It's up to us to choose which future we want ‒ and there is no time like the present. 'We can have each other to dinner. We ourselves, and with each other by our converse, can create not an architecture of global scope, but an immense, intricate network of intimacy, illumination, and understanding.' — J. Robert Oppenheimer, 1958 Charles Oppenheimer is the founder and co-executive director of the Oppenheimer Project. He is the grandson of J. Robert Oppenheimer, the director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory during the Manhattan Project.

New Jersey lawmaker proposes legislation renaming Delaware Bay to 'The Bay Of New Jersey'
New Jersey lawmaker proposes legislation renaming Delaware Bay to 'The Bay Of New Jersey'

Fox News

time38 minutes ago

  • Fox News

New Jersey lawmaker proposes legislation renaming Delaware Bay to 'The Bay Of New Jersey'

A New Jersey Republican has proposed legislation to change the Delaware Bay to "The Bay of New Jersey," appearing to be inspired by President Donald Trump's executive order changing the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America. The measure, introduced Thursday by GOP state Sen. Michael Testa, would order state agencies to use "The Bay of New Jersey" in publications, signage, websites and materials to reflect the new designation and notify relevant federal entities, reported. "I look at the robust fishing industry - commercial fishing industry and recreational industry of the State of New Jersey," he told the outlet. "I think that the fact that we have to call the bay that we fish in the Delaware Bay - they've had a claim to that long enough." Testa represents Cape May County, which the bay borders. "It's time to Make New Jersey Great Again!" Testa wrote on X. The bay is a vital body of water for New Jersey tourism, commerce and travel that has had the name of its southern neighbor since 1610, according to the Delaware government's website, and was named after the third baron de la Warr, Thomas West, who governed the Virginia colony. The proposed legislation comes after Trump signed an order in January renaming the northern part of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America. The body of water has shared borders between the U.S. and Mexico, and Trump's order only carries authority within the U.S. Last month, U.S. House Republicans passed the Gulf of America Act, marking the first step in codifying Trump's order in the U.S. The legislation is now awaiting consideration in the Senate. Trump's order also prompted Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont, a Democrat, to jokingly suggest amending the Long Island Sound to the "Connecticut Sound." "While the maps are changing, here's an idea," Lamont posted on X in February, tagging New York Democrat Gov. Kathy Hochul with an altered map with the sound renamed. Another bill Testa introduced this week seeks to reclaim a slice of land along Salem County's shore claimed by Delaware in a decades-old border agreement with New Jersey, according to

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store