New way to lose your shirt: Betting on basketball
Like most people who have worked in the casino business – I had a short but lucrative career in the bingo business before my first journalism job – I have mixed feelings about gambling.
For most people, it may be a bit of harmless fun. The proportion of partakers who get hooked is quite small. But for them, the addiction is a life-wrecker.
Serious gambling also seems a terrible waste of money. The house wins in the long run. That means in the long run, you don't.
I am suspicious of stories of 'professional gamblers' who show a profit. But if they exist, this trick clearly depends on a lot of hard work and research. You might as well get a real job and do something useful with your life.
These thoughts surfaced when I read that the government plans to launch a whole new betting option. People will be allowed to gamble on basketball. A licence will be issued by the Secretary for Home and Youth Affairs.
Will the lucky recipient of this licence to print money be carefully selected? Of course not. It is going to the Jockey Club.
Our government's affection for market forces and competition does not, it appears, extend to the gambling industry. The Jockey Club has a great deal of expertise in the highly technical and complex business of running horse casinos.
It also has a lot of influence where it counts. So whenever another gambling option comes along, the Jockey Club gets another opportunity to fleece the unwary punter.
We have been through this before. When the idea of legal football betting came up, the government said, as it says now, that of course it does not approve of betting at all. But a legal outlet for the public's weakness must be supplied, since otherwise, unapproved and illegal betting will flourish.
The same arguments are offered for basketball betting, and this leads to the suspicion that something may be going on here that we are not being told about.
Why do people use illegal bookmakers when the legality and convenience of a Jockey Club account are on offer? Could it be because they suspect that the illegal bookies will be … more generous?
There will be 'net stake receipts' from legal basketball betting, according to the official notice. I take this to mean that the cash paid out to lucky winners will be somewhat less than the receipts from luckless losers.
The 'net stake receipts' will be shared on a 50:50 basis with the government. They will, clearly, be considerable.
Football betting was licensed in 2004, but this did not in fact result in the disappearance of the illegal version. Meanwhile, the illegal bookies went on to basketball.
I wonder if in 20 years we shall be reading that there has been an upsurge in illegal betting on something else – Indian cricket, Rumanian pickleball, the number of times a senior official can get 'national security' into one speech – and the only solution to this problem is for a legal version to be offered by … the Jockey Club, naturally.
The club is rightly famous for its charitable activities, but there is surely something a bit odd about a private members' club for rich people being given a succession of lucrative monopolies. Also a bit odd is the club's progression from running betting on its own races to running betting on other sports taking place in other countries.
Will there come a time when the Jockey Club is offering a book on everything from athletics to yodelling competitions (I do not think there is a sport beginning with z) in every country you can think of?
And at that point, will someone say that running horse races consumes a lot of attention, space and water, most of which is wasted, and is a distraction from the club's real business, which is running a lucrative gambling operation.
I am reminded of the story of the Eastern potentate who built a magnificent mausoleum around his wife's tomb, but eventually decided the building would look better if the tomb were removed.
HKFP is an impartial platform & does not necessarily share the views of opinion writers or advertisers. HKFP presents a diversity of views & regularly invites figures across the political spectrum to write for us. Press freedom is guaranteed under the Basic Law, security law, Bill of Rights and Chinese constitution. Opinion pieces aim to point out errors or defects in the government, law or policies, or aim to suggest ideas or alterations via legal means without an intention of hatred, discontent or hostility against the authorities or other communities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
HKFP
a day ago
- HKFP
New way to lose your shirt: Betting on basketball
Like most people who have worked in the casino business – I had a short but lucrative career in the bingo business before my first journalism job – I have mixed feelings about gambling. For most people, it may be a bit of harmless fun. The proportion of partakers who get hooked is quite small. But for them, the addiction is a life-wrecker. Serious gambling also seems a terrible waste of money. The house wins in the long run. That means in the long run, you don't. I am suspicious of stories of 'professional gamblers' who show a profit. But if they exist, this trick clearly depends on a lot of hard work and research. You might as well get a real job and do something useful with your life. These thoughts surfaced when I read that the government plans to launch a whole new betting option. People will be allowed to gamble on basketball. A licence will be issued by the Secretary for Home and Youth Affairs. Will the lucky recipient of this licence to print money be carefully selected? Of course not. It is going to the Jockey Club. Our government's affection for market forces and competition does not, it appears, extend to the gambling industry. The Jockey Club has a great deal of expertise in the highly technical and complex business of running horse casinos. It also has a lot of influence where it counts. So whenever another gambling option comes along, the Jockey Club gets another opportunity to fleece the unwary punter. We have been through this before. When the idea of legal football betting came up, the government said, as it says now, that of course it does not approve of betting at all. But a legal outlet for the public's weakness must be supplied, since otherwise, unapproved and illegal betting will flourish. The same arguments are offered for basketball betting, and this leads to the suspicion that something may be going on here that we are not being told about. Why do people use illegal bookmakers when the legality and convenience of a Jockey Club account are on offer? Could it be because they suspect that the illegal bookies will be … more generous? There will be 'net stake receipts' from legal basketball betting, according to the official notice. I take this to mean that the cash paid out to lucky winners will be somewhat less than the receipts from luckless losers. The 'net stake receipts' will be shared on a 50:50 basis with the government. They will, clearly, be considerable. Football betting was licensed in 2004, but this did not in fact result in the disappearance of the illegal version. Meanwhile, the illegal bookies went on to basketball. I wonder if in 20 years we shall be reading that there has been an upsurge in illegal betting on something else – Indian cricket, Rumanian pickleball, the number of times a senior official can get 'national security' into one speech – and the only solution to this problem is for a legal version to be offered by … the Jockey Club, naturally. The club is rightly famous for its charitable activities, but there is surely something a bit odd about a private members' club for rich people being given a succession of lucrative monopolies. Also a bit odd is the club's progression from running betting on its own races to running betting on other sports taking place in other countries. Will there come a time when the Jockey Club is offering a book on everything from athletics to yodelling competitions (I do not think there is a sport beginning with z) in every country you can think of? And at that point, will someone say that running horse races consumes a lot of attention, space and water, most of which is wasted, and is a distraction from the club's real business, which is running a lucrative gambling operation. I am reminded of the story of the Eastern potentate who built a magnificent mausoleum around his wife's tomb, but eventually decided the building would look better if the tomb were removed. HKFP is an impartial platform & does not necessarily share the views of opinion writers or advertisers. HKFP presents a diversity of views & regularly invites figures across the political spectrum to write for us. Press freedom is guaranteed under the Basic Law, security law, Bill of Rights and Chinese constitution. Opinion pieces aim to point out errors or defects in the government, law or policies, or aim to suggest ideas or alterations via legal means without an intention of hatred, discontent or hostility against the authorities or other communities.
RTHK
a day ago
- RTHK
DC economic groups' revitalisation mission a success
DC economic groups' revitalisation mission a success Secretary for Home and Youth Affairs Alice Mak says that the current district councils are actively fostering collaboration with a diverse number of community stakeholders. Photo: RTHK Authorities have said they extended the terms of the district councils' working groups tasked with boosting the local economy because of their success in revitalising the business atmosphere across Hong Kong. Originally scheduled to wind up at the end of 2024, the terms of these working groups on boosting local economy had been extended by a year, running through to December 2025. The groups are tasked with developing activities tailored to each district's unique characteristics to attract both residents and visitors, in a bid to stimulate district-level economic development. Speaking to RTHK in an interview marking the third year of John Lee's administration, Secretary for Home and Youth Affairs Alice Mak said that the current district councils are moving beyond initiatives that are solely council-led, and are now actively fostering collaboration with a diverse number of community stakeholders including businesses and local organisations when hosting events. Citing one success case, she said the district council in Lam Tsuen worked with the rural committee and young designers to organise last year's wishing tree event, adding they used that experience to enhance this year's festivities. Meanwhile, Sham Shui Po held a night market called "Lightsaber Spin in the Shell" last year, in collaboration with local electronics shops and merchants, which significantly boosted economic activity in the area, with some shops reporting revenues reaching seven figures in over just two days. Additionally, Tuen Mun's Gold Coast Hydrangea Festival – which featured a drone show and performances – saw some nearby shops take advantage of the activities to host their own events. "We see that the effect achieved by the working group on boosting local economy is that when we organise events, it's not only the district council or the government's resources involved," Mak said. "Instead, we can rely on diverse range of help from within society – the business sector, local organisations such as the rural committees, chambers of commerce, and so on – to work together. "Moreover, we have created a platform allowing merchants or private sectors to organise events independently." Mak said the working groups will continue to discover new platforms, which include revitalising traditional festivals and also organising new events, to empower different businesses to host their own activities.
AllAfrica
6 days ago
- AllAfrica
US strike on Iran triggers oil shock in Asia
A targeted US military strike on Iranian military assets has reignited geopolitical risk in global markets, and the immediate fallout is being felt most acutely across emerging Asia. Asian currencies, equities and bonds are under renewed pressure as investors price in higher energy costs, a potential capital exodus and a delayed path to monetary easing. The Bloomberg Asia Dollar Index dropped 0.3%, its largest single-day decline in weeks. The South Korean won and Indonesian rupiah led regional currency losses, while equity markets from Manila to Seoul posted declines. The driver is oil. Brent crude has surged toward US$80 per barrel on concerns that the confrontation may escalate and disrupt crude flows through the Strait of Hormuz. Nearly a third of all global maritime oil passes through that narrow chokepoint. Any material disruption to this corridor will have a disproportionate effect on Asia, which imports the overwhelming majority of its energy. India, for example, imports more than 85% of its crude oil. Indonesia and the Philippines are similarly exposed. South Korea, Japan and Thailand—all manufacturing powerhouses—are highly sensitive to fuel costs. Any sustained increase in crude prices will directly impact consumer inflation, industrial production costs and current account balances. Bond markets have begun to reflect this risk shift. Yields on Indian, Indonesian, and Thai local currency bonds are rising as investors adjust for the dual risk of rising inflation and capital outflows. Foreign holdings in Asian debt had been increasing over the last two months, supported by disinflation and expectations of rate cuts. This trend could now be at risk. The Indian rupee, in particular, is facing renewed headwinds. Widening trade and fiscal deficits leave the currency vulnerable to sustained oil shocks. The Reserve Bank of India may find its room to cut rates narrowing, especially if the inflation pass-through accelerates. Similar dynamics are at play in the Philippines, where food and fuel make up a large portion of the inflation basket. South Korea's won is under pressure not only from energy prices but also from broader sensitivity to global supply chains and shifts in investor sentiment. The Bank of Korea has kept monetary policy tight to manage household debt and inflation expectations, but a prolonged energy spike may force it to choose between growth and price stability. Thailand and Indonesia, while more domestically driven, are still at risk. Thailand's tourism recovery could slow if global travel costs rise. Indonesia's central bank has only recently managed to stabilize the rupiah through rate hikes, and another round of external pressure could complicate that progress. Meanwhile, China—the world's largest oil importer—faces a different but equally significant challenge. While it holds substantial strategic reserves and maintains long-term import contracts, a spike in crude still threatens margins for exporters and industrial firms. Higher shipping and insurance costs through the Gulf would only add to the pressure. With domestic demand already uneven, any input cost inflation from energy may undermine China's fragile recovery momentum. The broader message is this: Asia's exposure to oil imports and trade routes leaves it vulnerable in moments of geopolitical volatility. If Brent moves above $85 and stays there, inflation expectations across the region will rise again. That would likely derail any near-term plans for rate cuts in India, Indonesia, the Philippines, or South Korea. Central banks could be forced to hold or even hike again—at the cost of growth. Market flows are adjusting accordingly. The dollar is strengthening. Gold prices are climbing. Demand for safe-haven assets is rising, while risk appetite in Asia is diminishing. These aren't knee-jerk reactions. They reflect deeper concern about how the current conflict might evolve and how exposed Asia remains to external energy shocks. The coming days will be crucial. If Iran retaliates or the conflict escalates, markets will reprice even further. The possibility of another round of global energy inflation is now being reflected in commodity markets and FX volatility. Investors in Asia must now re-evaluate their positioning. Countries with better energy self-sufficiency, lower debt and stronger current account balances will fare better. Others will face rising fiscal and monetary constraints as the cost of energy, debt service, and currency defense rises simultaneously. The uneasy calm that had returned to emerging Asia has been disrupted. This is not yet a regional crisis—but it is a clear warning that the balance between growth and inflation remains precarious. Energy prices are once again the most important variable for policymakers and geopolitical risk is back as a central driver of capital markets. Asian economies must brace for further volatility. For investors, selectivity will be critical. The ability to differentiate between vulnerable and resilient markets will define outcomes in the months ahead.
