logo
EVs widen life-cycle emissions gap over combustion cars, new study finds

EVs widen life-cycle emissions gap over combustion cars, new study finds

Yahoo10-07-2025
An increase in sustainable energy in Europe is making battery-electric vehicles substantially cleaner over their life cycles compared with combustion-engine cars, according to a new report from the International Council on Clean Transportation.
New BEVs will produce 73 percent fewer CO2 emissions than gasoline-powered cars, the ICCT said in a report July 9. That figure is 24 percent better than a 2021 estimate from the group.
In addition to taking advantage of renewable energy for charging and production, BEVs have also become more efficient, Marta Negri, a researcher at the ICCT, said.
'Battery electric cars in Europe are getting cleaner faster than we expected and outperform all other technologies, including hybrids and plug-in hybrids,' Negri said in a release.
In contrast, combustion-engine-based cars, including full hybrids and plug-in hybrids, have been getting only marginally cleaner in recent years, the group said. Hybrids have life-cycle emissions that are 20 percent lower than gasoline models, while PHEV emissions are 30 percent lower.
'When running on the EU average fuel and electricity mix, only BEVs offer a large-scale reduction in life-cycle GHG emissions,' the report said, referring to greenhouse-gas emissions.
Sign up for the Automotive News Europe Focus on Electrification newsletter, a weekly wrap-up of the latest electric vehicle news, including interviews and global EV sales data.
The ICCT study considered sales-weighted characteristics of compact cars sold in the EU in 2023 and assumes a life cycle of 20 years.
Renewable energy such as solar and wind is expected to make up 56 percent of Europe's mix, an 18-percentage-point gain from 2020, and could be 86 percent by 2045, the ICCT said, citing figures from the European Union.
Life-cycle assessment is a way to measure the carbon footprint of a car, from raw materials extraction, component manufacturing, production, energy consumption (including how the energy is produced) and end of life disposal or recycling.
Proponents say it is more accurate than current emissions standards, which focus on tailpipe emissions, while critics say life-cycle data can be selectively manipulated.
Earlier life-cycle assessment studies 'have repeatedly demonstrated that battery-electric vehicles eliminate tailpipe GHG emissions and represent the most promising pathway for rapidly reducing life-cycle emissions,' the ICCT said, while acknowledging that 'given varying scopes and inconsistent methodological choices, individual LCA studies can yield widely differing and sometimes contradictory results.'
Critics of EVs, for example, say that emissions from battery production are often so high that they cannot be offset by zero tailpipe emissions. The ICCT, in its report, acknowledged this claim but said that this 'emission debt' can be offset after 17,000 km of driving.
The European Commission and the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) are currently working on harmonizing life-cycle assessment measurements. Automakers will be able to voluntarily report their cars' life-cycle emissions starting next year using the commission's methodology.
A gasoline car has life-cycle emissions of 235 grams of CO2 per km based on the average European power grid (assuming current mix of renewable and nonrenewable energy), while an EV's emissions are 63 g/km, the ICCT said (see chart, above). Plug-in hybrid emissions are 163 g/km, while full hybrids are 188 g/km.
The report argues that electric cars' life-cycle emissions are often overstated because they are based on a static electricity grid mix, rather than assuming that the percentage of renewable energy will continue to increase.
In addition, a shorter life-cycle assumption (less than 20 years) also tends to disadvantage EVs, as does a discrepancy between as-tested and real-world usage — for example, in-car monitoring has found that PHEV emissions are up to 3.5 times higher than tested, because owners do not regularly charge the batteries.
If these factors are not considered, the ICCT said, life-cycle emissions of BEVs can be up to 64 percent higher. 'Under such conditions, BEVs appear to have emissions levels comparable to PHEVs,' the report said.
Other findings of the study:
Production and recycling emissions were roughly equivalent across fuel types, ranging from 6.5 metric tons for BEVs to 7.9 tons for PHEVs (because of their complexity).
Battery production had emissions of 3.9 tons of CO2 for BEVs and 1.0 ton for PHEVs.
Maintenance: BEVs had emissions of 4 g/km (largely because they need fewer consumable items such as spark plugs or belts), while diesel maintenance was 7 g/km (due in part to the need for urea in exhaust treatment) and gasoline cars had maintenance emissions of 6 g/km.
Fuel-cell EVs have the potential to reduce life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions by 79 percent, but only if they use hydrogen that is processed using renewable electricity.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Both sides can claim victory in US-EU tariff deal, but devil may be in detail
Both sides can claim victory in US-EU tariff deal, but devil may be in detail

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Both sides can claim victory in US-EU tariff deal, but devil may be in detail

After weeks of tense negotiations between their top trade officials, the EU and US have finally struck a deal - and it comes on the eve of America's latest round of tariff talks with China. Ultimately it took leaders from Washington and Brussels to sit down face to face to reach Sunday's agreement. That's something we've also seen with the other deals that President Donald Trump has struck - his personal involvement is what has pushed them over the line – even when the prospects of a breakthrough did not seem bright. This matters to both sides because so many businesses and jobs depend on what the EU calls "the world's largest bilateral trade and investment relationship". Both President Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen can paint this as something of a victory. For the EU, the tariffs could have been worse at 15%, rather than the 30% that had been threatened – although it's not as good as the UK's 10% rate. For the US that equates to the expectation of roughly $90bn (£67bn) of tariff revenue for government coffers – based on last year's trade figures - plus there's $600bn of investment now due to come into the country. A lot of other big numbers have been thrown around in terms of how much the EU will invest in the US, but the devil will be in the detail. Questions like exactly when those investments will be made, and in what areas, are for now, unanswered. This deal is being sold as a landmark moment in relations between the US and the EU. It has not been easy getting to this point. Washington and the 27-nation bloc have both played hardball and neither was ready to give in easily, which is why these talks went down to the wire. But neither side wanted these negotiations to drag on beyond the 1 August deadline. For years, the US president has railed against what he regards as Europe's unfair trade practices. The first part of that is the deficit. Last year that meant the US bought $236bn of goods more from the EU than it sold to the bloc. Trump takes the somewhat simplified view that this is American wealth needlessly leaving the country. The reality is that international trade is a more complex affair. The other complaint has been that the EU's strict regulations on everything from cars to chickens make it harder for American companies to sell their products in the EU than the other way round. When we get more details of this deal, we may know how much has been done to address that. But European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen seemed to acknowledge the need to tackle the deficit. In announcing the agreement, she said: "We have to rebalance it. We have an excellent trade relation. "It's a huge volume of trade that we have together. So we will make it more sustainable." This deal shows how serious President Trump is about renegotiating how the US, the world's biggest economy, does business with everyone else. Given the EU consists of 27 very different countries, it has seemed one of the trickier trade agreements to pull off. It comes days after the US struck another major agreement with Japan - there have also been deals with the UK, Vietnam and Indonesia. The other big ones still on the table are with the three biggest US trade partners - Mexico, Canada and China. And with the US president in a deal-making mood, there could be more positive news for the global economy over the next 48 hours. For the third time in as many months, the US and China are holding their next trade talks in Stockholm, Sweden, on Monday and Tuesday There is some expectation that higher tariffs could be suspended for another 90 days. A few days ago Trump said the US was "getting along with China very well" and implied that the major sticking point of rare earth metals exports had been overcome. With the broad outlines of an EU agreement in the hold, Washington's trade negotiators have the wind in their sails going into talks with Beijing. But China has so far taken a more uncompromising approach than other US trade partners. And if talks between the world's two biggest economies falter, global trade could still be heading for choppy waters in the months ahead. EU and US agree trade deal, with 15% tariffs for European exports to America Trump says US may not reach trade deal with Canada Philippines goods to face 19% tariff, Trump says

EU Agrees to Pay 15% Tariff on Most Exports to US
EU Agrees to Pay 15% Tariff on Most Exports to US

Bloomberg

time13 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

EU Agrees to Pay 15% Tariff on Most Exports to US

By and Samantha Stewart Save Good morning. The US and EU strike a deal. A new premium credit card joins the fray. And China moves to launch an international AI organization. Listen to the day's top stories. Just in time for the Friday deadline, the US and European Union have reached an agreement that will see the bloc face a lower-than-threatened 15% tariff on most goods, including cars. China bought itself some more time, with the South China Morning Post reporting that the US will hold off on implementing measures against the country for another 90 days.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store