
Movie Tea: Reimagined 'Night At The Museum' In Development; 'Shrek' Trilogy Leaving Netflix Soon
Say what you will about legacy sequels; this is exciting news for anyone who managed to watch these films when they first debuted back in the early 2000s. If you need a brief refresher or would like to go down memory lane, streaming has you covered – but it's best to act fast, as they won't be there forever. Check out what we mean with the article below.
Tripper Clancy To Write 'Night At The Museum 5'
It's never too late for a beloved franchise to come back from the dead. Time and time again, despite many people's complaints about reboots and reimaginings, it is still a very lucrative market, with many people willing to watch them, regardless of reasoning. A case in point is the recent 'How to Train Your Dragon' live-action remake, as well as Disney's various attempts at gatekeeping its monopoly on old stories (the good ones, specifically, like 'Jungle Book'). Even legacy sequels such as '28 Years Later,' 'Karate Kid: Legends,' and 'Final Destination: Bloodlines' managed to squeeze their way into a very polarising market.
Naturally, with so many films and franchises coming back from the past, and with a proven market for them, other studios are busting out the archives to get a piece of that nostalgia pie. One such example is 20th Century Studios, who are currently working behind the scenes to bring us a new 'Night at the Museum' movie.
In Deadline's exclusive report, the studio is currently working on reimagining the popular family film alongside 21 Laps Entertainment, an American production company that had its hand in the original movies. Furthermore, they've also enlisted the talents of one Tripper Clancy to write a script. Unfortunately, he does not have the best track record when it comes to writing, as some of his works have received mixed to negative reviews, with the lowest being 'Hot Dog', which has scored 4.2 out of 10 on IMDb. He is also best known for writing each installment of the 'Die Hart' franchise, which got worse and worse reviews with each installment. It is worth mentioning that he is a frequent collaborator of 21 Laps and has also dipped his hand in other works, such as Netflix's 'I Am Not Okay With This'.
For those who aren't familiar with the movie, 'Night at the Museum' is a movie adaptation of the 1993 children's book by Milan Trenc that was first released back in 2006. The movie follows Larry Daley (played by Ben Stiller), a divorced father who applied for a night guard job at a museum. What was supposed to be an easy job became a wild night as all the exhibits on display came to life due to a spell.
Though it did not have the best critical reviews, it was still widely loved by many moviegoers and spawned two additional sequels that were released back in 2009 and 2014. Following Disney's acquisition of Fox back in 2019, the studio moved to further expand the franchise with an animated sequel, 'Night at the Museum: Kahmunrah Rises Again', that was released directly to Disney+ back in 2022 and received generally positive reviews.
Unfortunately, the specifics as to what the film will be about are shrouded in mystery, but it has been confirmed that the story will take place 'at the museum with all-new characters,' as per Deadline's reporting. We can only speculate as to what they mean by this, but we theorise that we would return to the exact same museum that we all know and love, from all the way back in 2006. We simply hope that Clancy can pull out all the stops in his writing ability so as not to taint the memory of this early 2000s franchise, something that has become more of a trend as of late.
'Shrek' Trilogy Will Be Leaving Netflix Soon
No matter how big you are, you can never have it all. This is a fact that many Netflix users know by now: that the series that they know and love won't be in the same convenient spot forever. Ever since the streaming giant lost the rights to beloved titles such as 'Friends' and 'The Office', people have decided to constantly re-binge all their favourite series while they still can. And if you are a subscriber or user of the service, it's best to start rewatching the best animated trilogy movie of all time while you still can.
We are obviously referring to the legendary 'Shrek' trilogy, of course. Starting 1st August, the beloved trilogy will be leaving the Netflix platform permanently, with no sign of it returning in the foreseeable future. In the meantime, the trilogy in question will be moving to Peacock, another rival streaming service. However, the fourth installment of the franchise, 'Shrek Ever After', can be streamed on Max and on Hulu, though only time will tell if it will stay there.
It goes without saying that 'Shrek' has always had a special place in 2000s kids' hearts. The first entry to the franchise, which was released back in 2001, was a legendary film that many still remember fondly to this day. Its sequel, 2004's 'Shrek 2', managed to top that and has been regarded as the best entry in the entire franchise.
Unfortunately, its follow-up, 'Shrek the Third', dropped the ball and has since been regarded as one of the worst entries in the entire franchise, as the writing was mediocre at best with unimaginative jokes to top it all off. 'Shrek Forever After' tried its best to recoup its losses by creating a far darker story, but with more emotional bite, which blended nicely with its writing and its jokes. However, due to the bad taste the third movie left in people's mouths, the fourth entry never got the love it deserved and marked the end of the line for the franchise… until now.
After 15 years, 'Shrek 5' is just around the corner, something fans have been begging for all this time. Sadly, the fanbase is split down the middle, largely due to the new art style shown in the trailer, with Shrek, in particular, looking quite uncanny. Though their appearances are controversial, all our favourite cast members, such as Mike Myers, Eddie Murphy, Cameron Diaz, and John Lithgow, are coming back for this lovely reunion. So if you are in need of a quick refresher or want something to watch in your free time, then why not hop on to your Netflix and start catching up while you still can?
Source: Deadline, Movieweb
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Lucy Liu joins all-star cast of 'Devil Wears Prada 2'
Lucy Liu (pic), Justin Theroux and B.J. Novak are the newest cast members who will be joining Meryl Streep and Anne Hathaway in headlining The Devil Wears Prada sequel. The casting of Liu, Theroux, Novak as well as Pauline Chalamet was announced by Variety on Wednesday, July 9. Also joining the new cast are Broadway stars Helen J. Shen, Conrad Ricamora and comedian Caleb Hearon. Simone Ashley, best known for her role in the hit TV series Bridgerton , was reportedly cast in the sequel as well, as per industry sources cited by Deadline . The actors' respective roles, however, were not immediately disclosed. Kenneth Branagh's casting as the husband of Streep's Miranda Priestly was also previously announced. The Devil Wears Prada 2 , which is set in New York and Italy, will reportedly centre on the career of Priestly amid the decline of traditional magazine publishing. It was not immediately known how Hathaway's Andy Sachs will be incorporated into the story. The sequel is helmed by David Frankel, who directed the first film, and is set to premiere in theaters on May 1, 2026. – Philippine Daily Inquirer/Asia News Network


Hype Malaysia
2 days ago
- Hype Malaysia
Movie Tea: Reimagined 'Night At The Museum' In Development; 'Shrek' Trilogy Leaving Netflix Soon
In recent years, Hollywood has essentially created a trend where old franchises will birth a legacy sequel once in about 20 years. Don't believe that's a trend? Well, the 'Night At the Museum' franchise is now hard at work producing its fifth movie, alongside 'Shrek', which is slated to come out in the near future. Say what you will about legacy sequels; this is exciting news for anyone who managed to watch these films when they first debuted back in the early 2000s. If you need a brief refresher or would like to go down memory lane, streaming has you covered – but it's best to act fast, as they won't be there forever. Check out what we mean with the article below. Tripper Clancy To Write 'Night At The Museum 5' It's never too late for a beloved franchise to come back from the dead. Time and time again, despite many people's complaints about reboots and reimaginings, it is still a very lucrative market, with many people willing to watch them, regardless of reasoning. A case in point is the recent 'How to Train Your Dragon' live-action remake, as well as Disney's various attempts at gatekeeping its monopoly on old stories (the good ones, specifically, like 'Jungle Book'). Even legacy sequels such as '28 Years Later,' 'Karate Kid: Legends,' and 'Final Destination: Bloodlines' managed to squeeze their way into a very polarising market. Naturally, with so many films and franchises coming back from the past, and with a proven market for them, other studios are busting out the archives to get a piece of that nostalgia pie. One such example is 20th Century Studios, who are currently working behind the scenes to bring us a new 'Night at the Museum' movie. In Deadline's exclusive report, the studio is currently working on reimagining the popular family film alongside 21 Laps Entertainment, an American production company that had its hand in the original movies. Furthermore, they've also enlisted the talents of one Tripper Clancy to write a script. Unfortunately, he does not have the best track record when it comes to writing, as some of his works have received mixed to negative reviews, with the lowest being 'Hot Dog', which has scored 4.2 out of 10 on IMDb. He is also best known for writing each installment of the 'Die Hart' franchise, which got worse and worse reviews with each installment. It is worth mentioning that he is a frequent collaborator of 21 Laps and has also dipped his hand in other works, such as Netflix's 'I Am Not Okay With This'. For those who aren't familiar with the movie, 'Night at the Museum' is a movie adaptation of the 1993 children's book by Milan Trenc that was first released back in 2006. The movie follows Larry Daley (played by Ben Stiller), a divorced father who applied for a night guard job at a museum. What was supposed to be an easy job became a wild night as all the exhibits on display came to life due to a spell. Though it did not have the best critical reviews, it was still widely loved by many moviegoers and spawned two additional sequels that were released back in 2009 and 2014. Following Disney's acquisition of Fox back in 2019, the studio moved to further expand the franchise with an animated sequel, 'Night at the Museum: Kahmunrah Rises Again', that was released directly to Disney+ back in 2022 and received generally positive reviews. Unfortunately, the specifics as to what the film will be about are shrouded in mystery, but it has been confirmed that the story will take place 'at the museum with all-new characters,' as per Deadline's reporting. We can only speculate as to what they mean by this, but we theorise that we would return to the exact same museum that we all know and love, from all the way back in 2006. We simply hope that Clancy can pull out all the stops in his writing ability so as not to taint the memory of this early 2000s franchise, something that has become more of a trend as of late. 'Shrek' Trilogy Will Be Leaving Netflix Soon No matter how big you are, you can never have it all. This is a fact that many Netflix users know by now: that the series that they know and love won't be in the same convenient spot forever. Ever since the streaming giant lost the rights to beloved titles such as 'Friends' and 'The Office', people have decided to constantly re-binge all their favourite series while they still can. And if you are a subscriber or user of the service, it's best to start rewatching the best animated trilogy movie of all time while you still can. We are obviously referring to the legendary 'Shrek' trilogy, of course. Starting 1st August, the beloved trilogy will be leaving the Netflix platform permanently, with no sign of it returning in the foreseeable future. In the meantime, the trilogy in question will be moving to Peacock, another rival streaming service. However, the fourth installment of the franchise, 'Shrek Ever After', can be streamed on Max and on Hulu, though only time will tell if it will stay there. It goes without saying that 'Shrek' has always had a special place in 2000s kids' hearts. The first entry to the franchise, which was released back in 2001, was a legendary film that many still remember fondly to this day. Its sequel, 2004's 'Shrek 2', managed to top that and has been regarded as the best entry in the entire franchise. Unfortunately, its follow-up, 'Shrek the Third', dropped the ball and has since been regarded as one of the worst entries in the entire franchise, as the writing was mediocre at best with unimaginative jokes to top it all off. 'Shrek Forever After' tried its best to recoup its losses by creating a far darker story, but with more emotional bite, which blended nicely with its writing and its jokes. However, due to the bad taste the third movie left in people's mouths, the fourth entry never got the love it deserved and marked the end of the line for the franchise… until now. After 15 years, 'Shrek 5' is just around the corner, something fans have been begging for all this time. Sadly, the fanbase is split down the middle, largely due to the new art style shown in the trailer, with Shrek, in particular, looking quite uncanny. Though their appearances are controversial, all our favourite cast members, such as Mike Myers, Eddie Murphy, Cameron Diaz, and John Lithgow, are coming back for this lovely reunion. So if you are in need of a quick refresher or want something to watch in your free time, then why not hop on to your Netflix and start catching up while you still can? Source: Deadline, Movieweb


The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
YouTube pirates are cashing in on Hollywood's summer blockbusters
SAN FRANCISCO: After spending about US$100mil on Lilo & Stitch, a live-action remake of a 2002 animated film, Disney had plenty to celebrate. The film pulled in US$361mil (RM1.53bil) worldwide on its opening weekend in May and bested Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning at the box office. But the company also had cause to be concerned. In the days after the Disney film's opening, a pirated version of Lilo & Stitch proved to be a hit on YouTube, where more than 200,000 people viewed it, potentially costing Disney millions of dollars in additional sales, according to research from Adalytics, a firm that analyses advertising campaigns for brands. The findings of the research shed new light on the copyright issues that once threatened to upend YouTube's business. They also show how advertisers have unwittingly supported illicit content on YouTube, and they provide rare data about piracy on the platform. YouTube has long tried to tamp down piracy, but users who upload stolen films and television shows have employed new tactics to evade the platform's detection tools, the research showed, including cropping films and manipulating footage. YouTube then recommended the uploaded videos to users on its homepage, promoting pirated streaming of box office releases like Lilo & Stitch, or movies exclusively available on streaming platforms, like Captain America: Brave New World, according to screen recordings compiled by Adalytics and an analysis by The New York Times. YouTube, which is owned by Google, may also have generated revenue from some stolen videos, though it's unclear how much money it may have made. The company has a program known as Content ID to identify videos protected by copyright. It allows copyright holders to block the videos, share in advertising sales of the videos or receive data about who views the videos. Over the years, YouTube has paid billions of dollars to rights holders. YouTube reported flagging 2.2 billion videos last year and said rights holders permitted about 90% of those videos to stay on the platform. Jack Malon, a spokesperson for YouTube, said the company does not analyze the less than 10% of videos it removes at the request of copyright holders and does not track how many of those videos may be recently released, full-length movies. The channels that uploaded the videos of Lilo & Stitch and Captain America: Brave New World were terminated for violating YouTube's policies on spam, Malon said. He declined to say whether the company had profited from commercials shown in copyrighted videos that evaded detection by Content ID or racked up views before rights holders asked that they be taken down. At YouTube's request, Adalytics and the Times provided 200 videos for YouTube to review, most of them full-length films. YouTube analysed the videos but declined to provide insight into what percentage of the films their rights holders had permitted to stay up or had required to be removed. 'To frame these videos as 'illicit' without first reviewing the specific choices made by each rights holder misunderstands how the media landscape on YouTube works today,' Malon said. While 'mistakes do occur' on YouTube, he said, he dismissed the Adalytics report as an effort to get companies to sign up for the firm's services. Holders of copyrights for the videos, including all the major film studios, did not respond when asked for comment by the Times. The founder of Adalytics, Krzysztof Franaszek, who conducted the research, said he had observed 9,000 examples of possible copyright violations, 'including full-length movies that were in theatrical release, Netflix exclusives such as Extraction 2, TV shows such as Family Guy and live NCAA college football games.' The videos collectively had more than 250 million views. More than 100 of these uploads were also reviewed by the Times. Movies from every major film studio were found on YouTube in unofficial streams uploaded from last July to May, Adalytics found. When briefed on the research findings, Larissa Knapp, the chief content protection officer of the Motion Picture Association, a trade group for movie studios, said she found them concerning. At one point, the anti-piracy work between the studios and YouTube 'did work', Knapp said. 'But now it seems like some of the stuff may have gone off the rails if illegal content is being placed with ads.' The research recalled a time in YouTube's history when Hollywood accused the platform of profiting from its stolen content. In 2007, Viacom sued YouTube, claiming it engaged in 'brazen' copyright infringement by allowing uploads of the media company's material without its permission. In 2012, YouTube won the suit by arguing it was shielded from liability by the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which exempted YouTube from liability for hosting copyrighted work. The law shifted the burden for protecting a copyright from the platform and video creators to rights holders, said Eric Goldman, a law professor at Santa Clara University. Without the rule, he said, 'the Internet would not be able to exist in its existing format.' YouTube has tried to work with film studios, television networks and streaming services to combat piracy. Google, YouTube's parent company, developed its Content ID technology to recognise copyrighted videos, and YouTube became more aggressive at policing its platform for piracy. Copyright holders gained the right to either have the content removed or collect a share of the advertising revenue the videos generated. The box office in the United States and Canada routinely loses US$1bil (RM4.25bil) each year to piracy, which is roughly 15% of its annual haul, according to the Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment, a trade group of 50 entertainment companies that tries to reduce piracy. Franaszek began the research after his advertising clients noticed that as much as 60% of their ad spending on YouTube went to videos or channels that were labelled 'no longer available'. After digging deeper, he found that his clients had paid to support content that YouTube later removed because it violated company policies against nudity, violence or hate speech, or because of other offenses. When videos are removed from the platform, YouTube scrubs advertisers' records so that they can no longer see the name of the video. Advertisers have to go to the link for the removed video to see if it was removed for a copyright violation, Franaszek said. He added that the platform did not fully reimburse the advertisers for the cost of commercials in those videos. Erich Garcia, a senior vice president at which lets consumers compare insurance offerings, said his company's ads routinely ran with videos that had disappeared, limiting his insight into the effectiveness of his promotions. Malon said YouTube advertisers could get more insight into those videos by asking their account representatives for more information. Representatives can provide advertising credits. Ads from Disney, Hulu, HBO Max, Focus Features and dozens of other companies from various industries were found alongside unauthorised film and television uploads, Adalytics said. Pirates deployed a range of deceptive tactics to evade YouTube's anti-piracy algorithms. Some uploaded and voluntarily removed copyrighted videos on the same day, racking up viewers before being caught. Other pirates mirrored the videos to reverse the images, or cropped the frames in an effort to trick the Content ID system. Still others placed clips of regular people at the end of a Hollywood blockbuster video to further cover their tracks, Adalytics and the Times found. Franaszek said Adalytics clients who paid for advertising in videos that were removed over copyright issues had a simple request: 'to have visibility into what content their YouTube ad dollars are funding, and where their ads appear.' – ©2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times.