Iran Suspends Cooperation With UN Nuclear Watchdog
The war between Iran and Israel, which broke out on June 13 and lasted for 12 days, has intensified tensions between Tehran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
On June 25, a day after a ceasefire took hold, Iranian lawmakers overwhelmingly voted in favour of the bill to suspend cooperation with the agency.
State media said on Wednesday that the legislation had cleared the final hurdle and was in effect.
The text, published by Iranian media, states that the legislation aims to "ensure full support for the inherent rights of the Islamic Republic of Iran" under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, and "especially uranium enrichment".
The issue of enrichment was at the core of disagreements between Washington and Tehran in nuclear negotiations that had been derailed by the war.
Israel and some Western countries had for long accused Iran of seeking to quire nuclear weapons -- an ambition Tehran has consistently denied.
The text of the law did not specify concrete moves linked to the suspension of cooperation with the IAEA, whose inspectors have had access to declared nuclear facilities.
Following the parliament vote, the bill was approved by the Guardian Council, a body tasked with vetting legislation, before a final ratification from the presidency.
Iranian President "Masoud Pezeshkian promulgated the law suspending cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency", state TV said on Wednesday.
Iranian officials have sharply criticised the IAEA for what they described as the agency's "silence" in the face of the Israeli and US attacks on Iranian nuclear sites.
Tehran has also lambasted the UN agency for a resolution adopted on June 12 that accuses Iran of non-compliance with its nuclear obligations.
Iranian officials said the resolution was among the "excuses" for the Israeli attacks.
On Wednesday, senior judiciary official Ali Mozaffari said that IAEA director Rafael Grossi should "be held accountable" for what he called "preparing the groundwork for the crime" against Iran, referring to Israel's air raids.
Mozaffari accused Grossi of "deceptive actions and fraudulent reporting", according to Iranian news agency Tasnim.
Iran has rejected a request from Grossi to visit nuclear facilities bombed during the war, and earlier this week Pezeshkian decried his "destructive" conduct.
Iran has said Grossi's request to visit the bombarded sites signalled "malign intent" but insisted there were no threats against him or against inspectors from his agency.
France, Germany and Britain have condemned unspecified "threats" against the IAEA chief.
Iran's ultra-conservative Kayhan newspaper has recently claimed that documents showed Grossi was an Israeli spy and should be executed.
On Monday, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the parliament vote to halt cooperation with the IAEA reflected the "concern and anger of the Iranian public opinion".
The 12-day war began when Israel launched a major bombing campaign on Iran and killed top military commanders and nuclear scientists, with Tehran responding with waves of missiles and drones launched at Israel.
On June 22, Israel's ally the United States launched unprecedented strikes of its own on Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz.
More than 900 people were killed in Iran, according to the judiciary.
Iran's retaliatory attacks killed 28 people in Israel, according to authorities.
US President Donald Trump said the US attacks had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear programme, though the extent of the damage was not clear.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has admitted "serious" damage to nuclear sites.
But in a recent interview with CBS Evening News, he said: "One cannot obliterate the technology and science... through bombings."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
What is BRICS and why does it matter? – DW – 07/03/2025
BRICS leaders meet in Brazil this weekend to advance plans to challenge Western dominance. As more nations join the economic bloc, how will BRICS reshape power, trade and influence in a rapidly shifting world? Leaders of the world's fast-growing BRICS economies gather in Rio de Janeiro this weekend, promising to strengthen trade and technology exchange within the bloc in the shadow of US President Donald Trump's tariff threat. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva will host the three-day talks, attended by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese Premier Li Qiang among others. The Kremlin has said that Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has an outstanding arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court (ICC) for alleged war crimes over Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, will not be appearing. DW recaps the history of BRICS and the nascent bloc's plans to take on the West. Goldman Sachs economist Jim O'Neill coined the term BRIC in 2001 to identify Brazil, Russia, India, and China as fast-growing economies with the potential to become global economic powers by 2050. The term highlighted their rising gross domestic product (GDP), large populations, and increasing global influence. Despite diverse political ideologies and social structures, policymakers in Brazil, Russia, India and China then took up the baton, initially holding informal talks between foreign ministers to lay the groundwork for collaboration. The first BRICS leaders' summit was held in Russia's Yekaterinburg in 2009. A year later, South Africa was invited to join the emerging bloc, and an 'S' was added to the BRIC acronym. The creation of BRICS has since been described as a major challenge to the US-led global political, economic, and financial systems that have dominated since World War II. The original members have advocated for a multipolar world order and a greater voice for fast-developing countries of the Global South in world affairs. BRICS has since created an alternative to the World Bank, which funds infrastructure and development projects, as well as a new mechanism to provide financial support during economic crises, partially rivaling the role of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). BRICS policymakers have also mooted the possibility of launching their own currency to challenge the US dollar, the world's reserve currency, but progress has been slow. The bloc has been keen to sign up other developing nations, especially those seeking greater alignment with other fast-growing economies. BRICS now comprises 10 countries — the original five, along with Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates and Indonesia, which joined earlier this year. Although it remains an informal bloc, the Brazilian Center for International Relations (CEBRI) last week labeled BRICS "the first-ever transregional association of non-Western States," in a preview report for this weekend's Brazil summit. Despite having no founding treaty, supporting secretariat or headquarters, BRICS has — on paper — grown into a significant geopolitical and economic power. The bloc represents more than 40% of the world's population and more than a third of global economic growth, based on purchasing power parity, exceeding that of the G7 group of developed nations. BRICS countries also control significant commodity markets, including around 40% of global oil production, thanks to new members like Iran and the UAE. The bloc also controls nearly three-quarters of rare earth materials, according to the BRICS website. Mutual trade among members has already surpassed $1 trillion (€0.85 trillion), the website says. According to CEBRI, BRICS nations applied for 44 million patents between 2009 and 2023, more than half of all patents registered globally. Through its New Development Bank (NDB), BRICS has approved over $39 billion for 120 projects, focusing on infrastructure, clean energy, and sustainable development. The BRICS chair position rotates every year among the different members, where the bloc's leaders have pushed for reform of global institutions like the United Nations Security Council, IMF and World Bank. BRICS nations also continue to diversify from US dollar-denominated trade — a process known as dedollarization. Intra-BRICS trade is increasingly done in local currencies and alternative payment systems to the Western-backed Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT). Plans for a BRICS currency have hit a stumbling block, however, due to resistance from some members, particularly India, over China's economic dominance. The plans were further stymied when Trump warned BRICS that the bloc would face 100% tariffs on imports to the US if a common currency was announced. BRICS is set for explosive growth, with 44 nations either formally applying for membership or making exploratory moves toward joining, according to the bloc's website. This year alone, Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, Uganda and Uzbekistan became partner countries, a prelude to formal membership, under the moniker BRICS+. Other nations expressing interest in joining include: Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Chad, Colombia, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Honduras, Laos, Kuwait, Morocco, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Pakistan, the Palestinian territories, Senegal, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Syria, Venezuela, and Zimbabwe. Saudi Arabia, which has strong ties with the United States, was slated to join BRICS last year, but has not yet made a final decision. The BRICS website, however, still has the Kingdom listed as a member. Turkey's plan to join was vetoed by India, citing Ankara's close ties with foe Pakistan. Argentina had applied to join, but its application was withdrawn under President Javier Milei in December 2023, citing a preference to maintain close ties with the West. BRICS is poised for massive expansion, with some analysts predicting it could further challenge Western-led global institutions, while others argue that internal divisions and competing national interests may impede its progress. China and Russia actively position BRICS as a counterweight to Western hegemony, while India and Brazil prioritize economic cooperation over geopolitical confrontation, potentially creating tensions within the bloc. As well as China and India's border dispute, rivalries between Saudi Arabia — if it joins — and Iran, or Egypt and Ethiopia over the Nile River dam, could hinder consensus on political issues and dilute the bloc's ability to advance its interests. The US currency's entrenched role in global trade and Beijing's curbs on the Chinese yuan's use in international trade could hamper the push for dedollarization, which some see more as an attempt by Beijing and Moscow to circumvent Western sanctions than a realistic strategy for a new reserve currency. The US and European Union imposed punitive measures on Russia following its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and Iran's economy is similarly hurt by sanctions over Tehran's nuclear program. Other countries are supportive of plans for an alternative financial system to hedge their bets in case they face similar sanctions in the future, say analysts. Economic disparities among members pose another challenge for BRICS as the bloc grows. China's GDP far exceeds that of South Africa or newer members like Ethiopia and risks skewing priorities toward Beijing's interests. There are also growing concerns about how democracies like India and Brazil can align with autocracies like China, Iran and Russia. O'Neill, who coined the term BRIC, now thinks the grouping is a failed project, writing in November that BRICS "serves no real purpose beyond generating symbolic gestures and lofty rhetoric."
Int'l Business Times
6 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
China, EU Should Not 'Seek Confrontation': FM Wang
China's top diplomat warned his EU counterpart against "confrontation", his foreign ministry said Thursday, after she urged Beijing to stop undermining Europe's security. Meeting Kaja Kallas in Brussels on Wednesday, Wang Yi said China and the European Union "should not be regarded as opponents because of differences, nor should they seek confrontation because of disagreements", according to a Chinese foreign ministry statement. Europe is "facing various challenges", Wang said, but stressed that none were caused by China "in the past, present or future". Ahead of their meeting, Kallas, the EU's foreign affairs chief, said China was "not our adversary, but on security our relationship is under increasing strain". She said Chinese firms were "Moscow's lifeline to sustain its war against Ukraine" and accused Beijing of carrying out cyberattacks, democratic interference and unfair trade practices that "harm European security and jobs". China has portrayed itself as a neutral party in Russia's more than three-year war with Ukraine. But Western governments say Beijing has given Moscow crucial economic and diplomatic support. "Enabling war in Europe while seeking closer ties with Europe is a contradiction Beijing must address," Kallas added on Wednesday. Wang, meanwhile, sought to cast Beijing as a steady counterweight against superpower rival Washington, which has threatened to slap sweeping tariffs on imports from European nations. "The path taken by the United States should not be used as a reflection of China," he said. "China is not the United States." Beijing's foreign ministry also said the two sides had discussed Ukraine, the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians, and the Iran nuclear issue. Beijing and Brussels should treat one another with "respect", Wang said, adding that Europe should pursue a more "active and pragmatic" China policy. The Chinese diplomat also met European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen and his Belgian counterpart Maxime Prevot on Wednesday. China and the EU should "uphold multilateralism and free trade... and work together to address global challenges such as climate change", Wang told von der Leyen. Wang will next travel to Germany, where he will hold talks with Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul on diplomacy and security. And in France, Wang will meet minister for Europe and foreign affairs Jean-Noel Barrot, who visited China in March. The visits come about three weeks ahead of a summit between Chinese President Xi Jinping and the EU's top officials in Beijing.
DW
18 hours ago
- DW
Iran orders suspension of cooperation with UN nuclear agency – DW – 07/02/2025
Iran's president has approved a bill to suspend cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). It comes weeks after US and Israeli airstrikes hit Iran's nuclear facilities. Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian on Wednesday signed legislation to suspend access for IAEA inspectors into the country until the "security" of its nuclear facilities is guaranteed. The move could further limit inspectors' ability to monitor Iran's nuclear program that had been enriching uranium to near weapons-grade levels. The suspension comes weeks after US and Israeli airstrikes targeted Iran's nuclear facilities. According to Iranian state television, the suspension "will remain in effect until certain conditions are met, including the guaranteed security of nuclear facilities and scientists." Further details on the decision are limited and it is not yet clear how Iran will implement it. The IAEA has already been refused access to the damaged nuclear facilities that Israel and the US bombed last month. On Sunday, Iran's ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, said IAEA inspectors' work had been suspended but denied any threats against them. Experts had feared that Iran's decision could have been more severe. They were worried that Iran would end, rather than suspend, its cooperation with IAEA. There were also concerns that Iran would abandon the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. Under the deal, countries agree to not build or obtain nuclear weapons and allow the IAEA to carry put inspections. Iran has previously used restrictions on IAEA inspections as a pressure tactic. However, Iran has signaled that there is no immediate plan to restart nuclear talks with the US. "I don't think negotiations will restart as quickly as that," Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said. However, he added: "The doors of diplomacy will never slam shut." Iran's move to suspend IAEA cooperation drew condemnation from Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar. He appealed to European nations that are part of Iran's 2015 nuclear deal to implement its so-called snapback clause. That would reinstate all UN sanctions on Iran, which were originally lifted by Tehran's nuclear deal. Israel is widely believed to be the only country with nuclear arms in the Middle East. The IAEA does not have access to its facilities.
