Wisconsin's Democratic governor reaches budget deal with Republicans to cut taxes, fund university
The deal in the battleground state, where Evers and Republicans have a long history of not working together, emerged the day after the deadline for enacting a new budget. However, there is no government shutdown in Wisconsin when the budget is late. The Legislature is scheduled to pass it this week.
Here is what to know about Wisconsin's budget deal:
Tax cuts
Evers and Republicans agreed to $1.3 billion in income tax cuts largely targeting the middle class. More than 1.6 million people will have their taxes cut an average of $180 annually.
The deal would expand the state's second lowest income tax bracket and make the first $24,000 of income for people age 67 and over tax-free. It also eliminates the sales tax on electricity, saving taxpayers about $156 million over two years.
Republican legislative leaders praised the deal as providing meaningful tax relief to the middle class and retirees.
'This budget delivers on our two biggest priorities: tax relief for Wisconsin and reforms to make government more accountable,' Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos said in a statement.
And Senate Republican Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu praised it as a compromise that cuts taxes but also stabilizes the state's child care system and strengthens schools by increasing special education funding.
Higher education
The Universities of Wisconsin would see a $256 million increase over two years, the largest funding increase for the UW system in about two decades. UW Regents had asked for an $855 million overall increase and Republicans in June floated the possibility of an $87 million cut.
The deal also imposes a faculty minimum workload requirement and calls for an independent study on the system's future sustainability.
Schools, roads and child care get more
There will be $200 million in additional tax revenue to pay for transportation projects, but Evers and Republican leaders did not detail where that money would come from.
The agreement increases funding for child care programs by $330 million over two years, a third of which will be direct payments to providers. The money will replace the Child Care Counts program started during the COVID-19 pandemic. That program, which provides funding to child care providers, expired on Monday. Evers, Democrats and child care advocates have been pushing for additional funding to address child care shortages throughout the state.
Funding for K-12 special education programs will increase by $500 million.
State employees, including at the university, would get a 3% raise this year and a 2% raise next year.
The budget deal was reached after Republicans killed more than 600 Evers proposals in the budget, including legalizing marijuana, expanding Medicaid and raising taxes on millionaires.
Budget deadline missed
It is the first time the Legislature has missed the June 30 budget deadline since 2017. All three prior budgets passed by the Legislature since Evers has been governor were on time, until this one. Republicans have held the majority in the Legislature since 2011.
Republicans negotiated more with Evers on this budget than the previous three when their majorities in the Senate and Assembly were larger. Democrats gained seats in November and are pushing to take majority control of at least one legislative chamber next year.
Amid the ongoing talks last week, Assembly Republicans urged bipartisanship to reach a deal.
What's next?
The Legislature's budget-writing committee is scheduled to vote on the plan Tuesday. The full Legislature is set to meet starting Wednesday to give it final passage.
Republicans hold a narrow 18-15 majority in the Senate, and with two GOP senators previously saying they planned to vote against the budget, some Democratic votes were expected to be needed to pass it.
Once the budget clears the Legislature, Evers will be able to make changes using his expansive partial veto powers. But his office said Evers would not veto any budget provisions that were part of the deal he reached with Republicans.
Evers, who is midway through his second term, has said he will announce his decision on whether to seek a third term after he has signed the budget. He has 10 business days to take action on the spending plan once the Legislature passes it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
14 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Musk vows to start a third party. Funding's no issue, but there are others.
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Even some of Musk's own supporters have expressed doubts about the direction he now plans to take, preferring that he stay focused on the business ideas that fueled his net worth of roughly $400 billion. Advertisement But as his improbable bid to buy Twitter and front-and-center role in the 2024 election showed, Musk has defied expectations before. If nothing else, he could make life difficult for lawmakers he says have reneged on their promise to cut spending. Advertisement 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!' Musk wrote on X, the social media platform he bought when it was still named Twitter, this week. 'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.' Musk, who didn't respond to a request for comment, has already identified his next target: the reelection campaign of Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Kentucky), who opposes Trump's signature legislative package. Urged to support Massie by former GOP congressman Justin Amash, a Trump foe who declared himself an independent in a 2019 op-ed decrying the two-party system as an 'existential threat,' Musk replied, 'I will.' Representative Thomas Massie speaks to the media following a vote to stop a government shutdown at the Capitol on March 11. Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post Massie did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday about Musk starting a third party, but he posted a Fox News story about the chief executive's plans to donate to his campaign. 'An interesting thing just happened,' Massie wrote on X. With Trump already working to defeat Massie next year, the race in northern Kentucky appears to be the first to pit the two billionaires against each other. On Capitol Hill, where the Senate passed the massive tax and spending bill Tuesday afternoon, there were few signs of alarm about Musk. Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Oklahoma), when asked by reporters Monday evening about Musk's threats to punish Republicans who vote for Trump's plan, said the billionaire is not top of mind at the Capitol. 'Doesn't matter, doesn't matter at all, no. It's not even been a conversation of ours,' he said. 'I mean, if we ran every time someone said something about our election, we'd live in fear the whole time.' Advertisement Senator Markwayne Mullin bounces a rubber ball through the Ohio Clock Corridor on Monday, on Capitol Hill. Tom Brenner/For The Washington Post Unless that someone is Trump. Two Republican lawmakers who have been at odds with Trump both said in rapid succession this week that they would not seek reelection. Rep. Don Bacon (Nebraska), who has taken issue with Trump's tariffs and policy toward Russia, announced his retirement Monday. The day before, Sen. Thom Tillis (North Carolina) said he would not seek a third term after Trump vowed to punish him for opposing his legislative package. That leaves Massie as one of the only points of Republican resistance in Congress to Trump's agenda. Musk's decision to cast himself as a potential third-party leader raises questions about his political vision. It has just been in the last few years that he has evolved from Democratic-leaning Trump critic to staunchly Republican Trump acolyte. Trump allies mocked his latest incarnation. 'I think it's the ketamine talking in the middle of the night,' said Trump pollster Jim McLaughlin, referring to media reports about Musk's drug use that he has denied. 'Trump is the Republican Party right now. He is the conservative movement. There's not a hankering for a third party with Elon Musk.' A Gallup poll last year found that 58 percent of U.S. adults agree that a third party is needed in the U.S. because the Republican and Democratic parties 'do such a poor job' of representing the American people. Support for a third party has averaged 56 percent since 2003, according to Gallup. History shows that third-party candidates are rarely victorious. Ross Perot, one of the most successful independent candidates for president in American history, received about 19 percent of the popular vote and no electoral college votes. Advertisement 'Third parties are traditionally spoilers or wasted votes,' said Lee Drutman, senior fellow at the New America think tank. 'But if Musk's goal is to cause chaos and make a point and disrupt, it gets a lot easier.' Ralph Nader's presidential bid in 2000 was a classic example of a disruptive campaign, Drutman said, contributing to an outcome so close that Republican George W. Bush prevailed over Democrat Al Gore only after the Supreme Court weighed in. Ralph Nader acknowledges his mother at an event at the National Press Club before watching the election night voting unfold. Lucian Perkins/TWP The trend in the U.S. toward increased political polarization also makes it more difficult for third-party candidates, Drutman said. When Perot ran in 1992, Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush were both running as centrists, allowing Perot to argue that there wasn't much daylight between the two major parties. By contrast, the differences between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump in the 2024 election were much more stark. America's political diversity also complicates matters, Drutman said. 'If there clearly was a party in the center that was more popular than the Democrats or the Republicans, then someone would have organized it by now,' he said. 'It's not like we've just been waiting for Elon Musk to show up.' Musk entered politics in earnest during the 2024 presidential election. Beyond his massive financial investment, Musk frequently appeared alongside Trump at rallies and cheered him on over X. But since Trump's win, Musk's experience in politics has been turbulent. Earlier this year, the billionaire and groups affiliated with him donated more than $20 million in a bid to help conservatives take control of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. In the final stretch of the campaign, Musk drew derision for wearing a foam cheesehead at a town hall and for directing his America PAC to pay registered voters for signing petitions. A couple of voters won $1 million prizes. Advertisement But even with the race flooded with Musk's cash, the conservative judicial candidate — whom Trump also endorsed — lost by a wide margin in April. Musk's personal presence in the race did his candidate harm, said Barry Burden, director of the University of Wisconsin's Elections Research Center. Conservative voters appreciated Musk's money, but that wasn't enough to overcome negative perceptions of an ultra-wealthy outsider injecting himself into the state's politics, Burden said, adding that Musk's presence galvanized greater liberal turnout. 'A new party is going to benefit most from Musk if they can draw on his resources but keep him in the background,' Burden said. 'And if he can portray himself as an innovator and a tech entrepreneur — and somebody who is really contributing to the American economy and funding this new operation without being its front person — I think that's probably going to lead to the most success.' Musk floated his idea of a new party nearly one month ago on June 5, after days of criticizing the massive GOP tax bill as a measure that would burden the country with 'crushingly unsustainable debt.' 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' Musk wrote, along with a poll. Since then, Musk has regularly posted about starting a new party and going after lawmakers who vote for the spending bill. 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day,' Musk wrote Monday. Advertisement A person who has served as a sounding board for Musk, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive matter, questioned Musk's ultimate strategy in undermining a party he had hoisted to victory beyond wanting 'to be in the driver's seat.' 'I agree our government is broken, but it's a tougher problem to fix than landing a rocket,' the person said. Paul Kane contributed to this report.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House members in mad scramble back to DC to vote on Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' after heading home for July 4
Members of the House of Representatives from both parties were forced to return to Washington, D.C. to vote on President Donald Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' after the Senate passed it, Politico reported. With Trump exerting great pressure on Speaker Mike Johnson to get the bill to his desk for a signing before the July 4 holiday, the House plans to vote on the bill as soon as possible. That triggered a mad dash back to the nation's capital and comes amid a Republican rift over the amended bill — which would force cuts to Medicaid and makes states shoulder more of the cost for food assistance while extending the 2017 tax cuts Trump signed. Republican Rep. Nancy Mace posted that she and her team would travel back from South Carolina by van. We have secured a van for a DC road trip tonight to make it in time for votes on BBB tomorrow. Hoah! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 — Nancy Mace (@NancyMace) July 1, 2025 'We have secured a van for a DC road trip tonight to make it in time for votes on BBB tomorrow,' Mace posted. Democratic Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, who is running for Illinois' open Senate seat, hosted a Zoom town hall as he drove 14 hours to Washington after his flight was canceled. We made it. Drove overnight from IL to vote NO on this Large Lousy Law. — Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (@CongressmanRaja) July 2, 2025 'We made it,' he said. 'Drove overnight from IL to vote NO on this Large Lousy Law.' By coincidence, Rep. Derek Tran of California wound up stranded in the Pittsburgh airport, so he and fellow Democratic Rep. Chris DeLuzio of Pennsylvania drove to Washington and hosted a virtual town hall as well. Democratic Rep. Mark Pocan of Wisconsin posted how his flight was canceled because of thunderstorms, so he would drive to Chicago to make an early flight to Washington. The bill passed the House of Representatives narrowly last month, partially due to the fact that three Democratic members of Congress had died. House Speaker Mike Johnson has scheduled a vote for the morning. The vote comes after the Senate conducted a marathon 27-hour vote-a-rama before passing the bill by a 51-50 margin with Vice President JD Vance breaking a tie in the Senate. Three Republicans--Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Susan Collins of Maine and Thom Tillis of North Carolina--opposed the bill. But many House members have criticized the bill. During a House Rules Committee hearing, Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, who criticized the bill last month but nonetheless voted for it, said the Senate 'failed' with the bill. Plenty of Republican members also fear the cuts to Medicaid could disproportionately hurt their constituents.
Associated Press
15 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Why Central Banks Around the World Are Piling on Their Gold Reserves – And What It Means for Retail Investors
07/02/2025, London,England // KISS PR Brand Story PressWire // In recent years, central banks have been making a quiet yet powerful move: buying gold—lots of it. From China and India to Turkey and Poland, countries are adding to their gold stockpiles at the fastest rate in decades. But why is this happening now, and what should retail investors make of it? Let's dig into the motivations behind this global gold rush and what it means for you, especially in the age of the so-called 'Gold Bank'. 𝑨 𝑺𝒉𝒊𝒇𝒕 𝒊𝒏 𝑮𝒍𝒐𝒃𝒂𝒍 𝑺𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒈𝒚 The world's central banks added over 1,000 tonnes of gold to their reserves in 2023 alone—the highest annual purchase on record, according to the World Gold Council. What's driving this move isn't just financial. It's strategic. Gold has always been a hedge. Against inflation. Against currency collapse. Against geopolitical tension. Central banks—whose job is to manage national currencies and monetary policy—are increasingly uneasy about the US dollar's dominance and the state of the global economy. That unease is translating into action. Take China, for instance. The People's Bank of China has been steadily increasing its gold reserves month after month. Part of this is about diversifying away from the dollar. Holding gold insulates a country from the whims of US interest rate hikes and political decisions like sanctions. It's a buffer. A statement. And in times of global friction, it's insurance. 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑫𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒂𝒓 𝑫𝒊𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒎𝒂 Many central banks are nervous about their over-reliance on the US dollar. With the dollar still accounting for around 60% of global reserves, any volatility in the American economy sends shockwaves worldwide. But the geopolitical weaponisation of the dollar—sanctions, asset freezes, and trade restrictions—has made some countries wary of holding too much of their wealth in greenbacks. Gold, in contrast, is neutral. It doesn't rely on the performance of any one country. It can't be frozen, blocked, or sanctioned. It's physical. It's universal. And in uncertain times, that's exactly what institutions crave. 𝑰𝒏𝒇𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑹𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝑽𝒐𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚 Even in developed markets, central banks are under pressure. Inflation may be slowing, but the damage from the post-COVID monetary expansion is still lingering. Interest rates remain volatile. Bond markets have been unpredictable. And while fiat currencies lose value to inflation, gold maintains purchasing power over the long term. Central banks are now viewing gold as a way to stabilise their reserves. Unlike currencies or bonds, gold doesn't carry credit risk or default risk. It's a passive, enduring store of value. In a world full of uncertainty, it's a safety net. 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑹𝒊𝒔𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑮𝒐𝒍𝒅 𝑩𝒂𝒏𝒌 𝑴𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚 There's another angle to this: reputation and trust. In many ways, central banks are behaving more like what some are calling a " Gold Bank "—institutions that safeguard real, tangible wealth rather than abstract monetary tools. Think of it this way: if a central bank holds only paper assets—foreign currencies, debt instruments, and derivatives—its reserves are essentially IOUs. But gold is real. Gold is owned. And that's a powerful message to markets, investors, and citizens. The term Gold Bank is starting to gain traction as more national institutions look to gold not just as a reserve asset but as a backbone of financial credibility. 𝑾𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝑻𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝑴𝒆𝒂𝒏𝒔 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑹𝒆𝒕𝒂𝒊𝒍 𝑰𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒓 If central banks are loading up on gold, what should everyday investors take from that? 1. 𝑮𝒐𝒍𝒅 𝒊𝒔 𝑩𝒂𝒄𝒌 𝒊𝒏 𝑷𝒍𝒂𝒚 Gold has always been part of the financial ecosystem, but for years it was sidelined by equities, tech stocks, and crypto. That's changing. The fact that institutional players are reinforcing their gold holdings should signal that it's time for retail investors to reassess their own diversification strategies. Gold is not about explosive gains—it's about protection, preservation, and patience. But with so much institutional demand, even price growth is becoming a factor. Retail investors who get in early may benefit not just from safety, but from steady upside. 2. 𝑪𝒖𝒓𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒚 𝑫𝒆𝒗𝒂𝒍𝒖𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑰𝒔 𝒂 𝑹𝒆𝒂𝒍 𝑻𝒉𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒕 Whether you hold pounds, euros, or dollars, your money is under threat from inflation and government policy. Central banks know this—and that's why they're moving to hard assets. For retail investors, this should serve as a wake-up call. The value of your savings isn't guaranteed. Gold provides a way to hedge against the erosion of fiat value. 3. 𝑷𝒉𝒚𝒔𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒍 𝒗𝒔. 𝑷𝒂𝒑𝒆𝒓 𝑮𝒐𝒍𝒅 There are many ways to invest in gold—ETFs, mining stocks, futures contracts, and physical bullion. The growing appetite among central banks is overwhelmingly for physical gold, not paper proxies. This trend may drive up the premium on physical gold and increase competition for reliable storage. Retail investors should take note: if institutions are opting for real metal over paper, it might be wise to follow their lead. The rise of the Gold Bank mentality means physical custody is back in fashion—for reasons that go beyond price. 4. 𝑾𝒂𝒕𝒄𝒉 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑩𝑹𝑰𝑪𝑺 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑬𝒎𝒆𝒓𝒈𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑴𝒂𝒓𝒌𝒆𝒕𝒔 Countries like Russia, India, and Brazil are actively building their gold reserves. This could signal a long-term trend of realignment in the global financial system. If BRICS nations begin to trade with each other in gold-backed instruments or local currencies tied to gold, it could reduce global reliance on the dollar and shift the balance of financial power. For investors, this creates both risk and opportunity. Currency markets may become more volatile. Commodities may see increased speculation. And gold could see growing demand—not just as an investment, but as a geopolitical tool. 𝑭𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝑻𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒈𝒉𝒕𝒔: 𝑨 𝑵𝒆𝒘 𝑭𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝑬𝒓𝒂? The central bank gold rush isn't just a financial trend—it's a political and strategic one. It reflects the cracks in the old monetary order and the rise of a new one where trust, security, and sovereignty are paramount. The term Gold Bank captures this shift—a move away from fiat dependence and towards real assets. Retail investors should read the writing on the wall. When the most powerful financial institutions in the world start snapping up gold, it's not a fad. It's a signal. Diversification isn't optional anymore—it's essential. Gold isn't just for doomsday preppers or hedge fund managers. It's becoming mainstream again. And for anyone serious about protecting wealth in uncertain times, it might be the smartest play in the book.
