Would you fly a jet with Chinese chips? Veterans say no to Russia's Su‑57, pushes for India's AMCA instead
Ajay Ahlawat
has sounded a clear warning. He believes India must reject the lure of imported fifth‑generation fighters and put every resource into building its own stealth jet, the
AMCA
.
"It would be best if we eliminate the option to import FGFA (
Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft
). We have two bad choices. F‑35 comes with strings attached. US can not be trusted to steer a predictable foreign policy. Su57 is not really a FGFA. Moreover, a large part of electronics, avionics components and chips etc are sourced from China. Imagine being in a shooting war with your equipment vendor," Ahlawat wrote on Tuesday.
His words land at a time when Russia has made a tempting pitch: co‑produce the Su‑57E with complete technology transfer.
Play Video
Pause
Skip Backward
Skip Forward
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
0:00
Loaded
:
0%
0:00
Stream Type
LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
1x
Playback Rate
Chapters
Chapters
Descriptions
descriptions off
, selected
Captions
captions settings
, opens captions settings dialog
captions off
, selected
Audio Track
default
, selected
Picture-in-Picture
Fullscreen
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text
Color
White
Black
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Text Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Transparent
Caption Area Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Transparent
Semi-Transparent
Opaque
Font Size
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
200%
300%
400%
Text Edge Style
None
Raised
Depressed
Uniform
Drop shadow
Font Family
Proportional Sans-Serif
Monospace Sans-Serif
Proportional Serif
Monospace Serif
Casual
Script
Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values
Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Dukung Orang Terkasih Menghadapi Limfoma: Mulai Di Sini
Limfoma
Pelajari
Undo
Call for direct oversight
Ahlawat wants more than just a rejection of imports. He wants the AMCA declared a national mission, personally monitored from the top.
"AMCA is the only viable option. Bring the program under PMO. Call it a mission of national importance. Nominate one IAF 3‑star as program head, reporting to NSA. All agencies under," he added.
Live Events
In his view, India must break free from foreign dependency if it wants real air power.
A different view
But not everyone agrees. Former Air Marshal Sanjeev Kapoor sees strategic merit in Russia's plan. He thinks India should grab the chance while President Putin is set to visit.
"Just before Putin's visit on Thursday, Russia proposed a game changer offer for us, full tech transfer for co‑production of the Su‑57E at
HAL
Nashik (site of 220+ Su‑30MKI builds) plus direct delivery of Su‑35M jets in India's MRFA tender for 117 fighters. The dual offer promises deep localisation, source code access, it is a strategic boost for India's '
Make in India
' and our
air power ambitions
," Kapoor said on Monday.
— sanjeev__kapoor (@sanjeev__kapoor)
For him,
Russian cooperation
means faster firepower with local jobs and know‑how.
Former chief says no
Backing Ahlawat's view, former Air Chief Marshal RKS Bhadauria stays firm. No shortcuts, no imported jets. He says India must stick with its plan to finish the AMCA, no matter how long it takes.
"My answer is no. Now, the government has clearly put their faith in AMCA, and now we need to do everything as a nation to expedite the AMCA," Bhadauria said.
He spoke against panic buys, especially since Pakistan is expected to get Chinese J‑20 or J‑35 jets.
"That cause of concern in terms of what Pakistan is going to get from China in the interim – be it J20 or J‑35 – let them get these. That will be studied. What is important is in the interim how do you handle these threats and there are ways and means of tackling this threat that they will have,' he said.
Stronger defences the answer
Bhadauria stressed that India's answer lies in tougher air defences, not shopping abroad.
"We have already demonstrated our capabilities in the air defence zones… in air‑to‑ground precision zones in terms of standoff. So therefore we'll need to have an action plan to be able to sort this out and I think that's the way to go," he said.
He accepts that Pakistan may fly stealth jets before India. But he believes that does not have to tilt the balance.
"In terms of stealth capability Pakistan is likely to get before us, we'll have to take some other measures in order to be able to detect by some means, to be able to still hold them off our borders much inside so that they are unable to launch. And should they be able to launch their cruise missiles or their standoff weapons, we are able to tackle the weapons," Bhadauria added.
Where AMCA stands now
The AMCA, short for Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft, is India's first attempt to build a fifth‑generation
stealth fighter
on its own. DRDO, HAL and private firms are working together. The project is now in the detailed design stage. The first flying prototype is likely by the end of this decade.
At stake is more than just an aircraft. The real test is whether India can build what it needs without outside help. If it works, the AMCA could close the stealth gap with rivals and cut foreign ties that come with hidden risks.
The next few months will show which path India picks: build at home or buy from abroad. The debate has begun.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's BRICS warning to India adds new twist to trade deal
US President Donald Trump's threat to impose new tariffs on India over its participation in the BRICS forum puts New Delhi in a tough position as it races to finalize a favorable trade deal with the US. Trump said Tuesday that India could face an additional 10% tariff alongside other members of BRICS — a bloc of emerging economies he has labeled 'Anti-American.' The remarks came just a day after the US leader said he was close to finalizing a trade deal that New Delhi hopes would give it reprieve from 26% reciprocal tariffs. The latest threat by the US president followed a two-day BRICS summit in Brazil, in which leaders agreed on a joint statement that criticized trade-distorting tariffs. But while Brazil and South Africa have blasted Trump separately for his comments, India has refrained from responding publicly, a sign that it's treading a fine line in maintaining its relationship with Washington. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Officials in New Delhi say they're not overly alarmed by Trump's latest threats for now. The US leader's view is that BRICS is seeking to undermine the dominance of the US dollar, which is not India's goal, the officials said, asking not to be identified because the discussions are private. India doesn't support moves for a single BRICS currency, and any participation in local currency trade arrangements are aimed solely at reducing risks, they said. India's Ministry of Commerce and Industry didn't respond to an email seeking comment. Senior Indian diplomat P Kumaran said at a press briefing on Tuesday that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Brazilian counterpart Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva had 'no discussion' on Trump's tariff threats during the Indian leader's state visit there. 'We didn't have an opportunity to discuss that.' Live Events You Might Also Like: India's BRICS move isn't anti-America—it's a stealthy check on Beijing's ambitions With India set to assume the BRICS chairmanship in 2026, it will need to differentiate itself from members like China and Russia, who are seeking to build the bloc as a stronger opposition voice to the US. India would be banking on its strategic value and neutral currency stance to be treated differently by Washington. 'Trump is unhappy with some BRICS members who have been talking about an alternate reserve currency,' said Mohan Kumar, a former Indian envoy and lead negotiator at the World Trade Organization, who now teaches at OP Jindal Global University. 'India has time and again differentiated between local currency trade and de-dollarization and therefore doesn't fall in that category.' India has been cultivated by several US administrations over the years as a strategic partner and key regional counterweight to an increasingly assertive China. As recently as April, US Vice President JD Vance remarked that the fate of the 21st century 'is going to be determined by the strength of the United States and India partnership.' Those ties have recently come under strain, though, after Trump took credit for brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan in May. Modi has pushed back at Trump's claims he used trade as a bargaining tool to secure a truce. The Trump administration has also made overtures to Islamabad, including its powerful army chief, in the aftermath of the conflict, a source of concern in New Delhi. You Might Also Like: Trump says all BRICS nations, including India, to face additional 10% tariff Much is riding on the success of the India-US trade deal, which both countries have pledged to finalize by the fall of this year. Shashi Tharoor, an opposition lawmaker who has led India's diplomatic outreach since the Pakistan conflict, said a trade deal would signify the strong ties between the two countries. 'The relationship with the US is in a good shape,' he said in an interview in London on Tuesday. If the terms of the trade deal are agreed, 'that will be a very, very healthy sign.' After months of talks, Indian trade negotiators have put forward their best offer to the Trump administration and are now awaiting a response. The latest tariff threats from Trump may also be a bargaining tool to secure more concessions from New Delhi. Trump has previously threatened to slap 100% levies on BRICS if they ditch the dollar in bilateral trade. You Might Also Like: China says it opposes tariffs being used as a tool of coercion by Trump 'We need to distinguish between President Trump's narrative and his action,' Kumar said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Who is UN special rapporteur Francesca Albanese and why has US sanctioned her
The United States on July 9 has imposed sanctions on Francesca Albanese , a United Nations Special Rapporteur investigating human rights violations in the occupied Palestinian territories, for what it called 'illegitimate and shameful' efforts to push the International Criminal Court (ICC) into taking action against US and Israeli officials and businesses. In her July 1, 2025, report, Albanese accused Israel of committing acts that constitute genocide in Gaza. The report named over 60 international companies, including arms manufacturers, tech firms, and financial institutions, that she alleges are complicit in enabling Israeli military operations and settlement expansion. Also Read: Johnson Amendment defanged? Trump backs IRS on places of worship backing political leaders Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Contribute ToGau Seva At Hare Krishna Mandir Hare krishna Mandir Donate Now Undo She urged these companies to end their involvement and called for legal accountability of their executives under international law. Live Events Her report stated: 'While life in Gaza is being obliterated and the West Bank is under escalating assault, this report shows why Israel's genocide continues: because it is lucrative for many.' Who is Francesca Albanese? Francesca Albanese is an Italian lawyer, academic, and internationally recognised expert on human rights, particularly in the context of forced displacement and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Born in Ariano Irpino in southern Italy, Albanese holds a law degree with honours from the University of Pisa and a Master of Laws in human rights from SOAS, University of London. Over the course of a decade, she worked with the United Nations, including the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), advising on human rights norms and protections across the Middle East, North Africa, and Asia-Pacific regions. Her work has focused especially on refugees and migrants. Currently, she serves as an Affiliate Scholar at Georgetown University's Institute for the Study of International Migration and is a senior advisor on migration and displacement at the Arab Renaissance for Democracy and Development (ARDD), where she also co-founded the Global Network on the Question of Palestine. Albanese is the co-author, alongside Lex Takkenberg, of Palestinian Refugees in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2020), a widely cited legal reference. She frequently lectures on international law and forced displacement in both Arab and European universities and regularly participates in public debates and conferences on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In 2023, she received the International Stefano Chiarini Award for her reporting on the Middle East. She was named PassBlue's UN Person of the Year in 2024 and received the Dries van Agt Prize in 2025 from The Rights Forum for her advocacy on human rights in Palestine. Albanese has faced criticism over claims about her legal title, with some detractors accusing her of misrepresenting her credentials. In a May 2025 interview, she clarified that while she holds a degree in law, she chose not to take the bar examination in Italy as her interest was in human rights rather than courtroom practice. She is married to Massimiliano Calì, a World Bank economist, and the couple has two children. Remarks on the Gaza Conflict Albanese's sharpest criticisms came in the context of the Israel-Gaza conflict, which began on October 7, 2023, after Hamas militants killed around 1,200 Israelis and took more than 250 hostages. In response, Israel launched a large-scale military campaign in Gaza that, according to the territory's Health Ministry, has killed over 57,000 Palestinians, most of them women and children, though it does not distinguish between fighters and civilians. Speaking to media outlets including The World with Yalda Hakim, Albanese described the situation as 'an assault against civilians,' and highlighted the mental trauma among youth in Gaza. In a social media post in July, she alleged that torture and sexual violence against Palestinian prisoners have become 'widespread and systematic' since the war began. She wrote, 'This is not just cruelty: inflicting severe physical or mental harm on members of a group, as such' is a constitutive element of genocide.' US response Although Albanese's views are her own and do not represent official UN policy, her work has drawn strong reactions. Secretary of State Marco Rubio cited her support for ICC arrest warrants against Israeli leaders, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and her criticism of US foreign policy as grounds for the sanctions. The US had previously attempted to remove her from her UN position but was unsuccessful. This move follows earlier Trump-era policies to disengage from international institutions seen as critical of Israel. The administration had already withdrawn from the UN Human Rights Council, suspended funding to several UN agencies, and sanctioned four ICC judges for pursuing investigations against Israel and the US. Pushback from Rights Groups The US sanctions against Albanese have been widely condemned by human rights organizations . Amnesty International and other watchdogs have called it a direct attack on the independence of UN mandate holders. Agnes Callamard, Amnesty's Secretary General and herself a former UN special rapporteur , said governments must work to 'protect the work and independence of Special Rapporteurs.'
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
'Fighting alone': Former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol rearrested; concerns over evidence destruction risk
Former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol (Image credits: AP) Former South Korean president Yoon Suk Yeol was detained for a second time on Thursday and placed in solitary confinement as investigations continue into allegations of insurrection. Yoon is accused of attempting to subvert civilian rule by declaring martial law on December 3 and deploying armed soldiers to parliament to prevent lawmakers from rejecting the declaration. The incident triggered a major political crisis in South Korea. He was first arrested in January after resisting detention for weeks, using his presidential security team to block investigators. That arrest made him the first sitting president in South Korean history to be taken into custody. He was later released in March on procedural grounds, though his trial on insurrection charges remained ongoing. Following his impeachment in April, confirmed by the Constitutional Court, Yoon refused to comply with multiple summons from investigators. Authorities then sought a second detention, citing concerns he would destroy evidence. A judge at the Seoul Central District Court approved the latest arrest early Thursday. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like เปรียบเทียบสเปรด: ระหว่าง Bitcoin และ Ethereum CFDs IC Markets อ่านเพิ่มเติม Undo Yoon, 64, was then moved to a detention center near Seoul, where he will remain in solitary confinement for up to 20 days while prosecutors prepare formal charges. If indicted, he could be held for up to six additional months. "Once Yoon is indicted, he could remain detained for up to six months following indictment," said Yun Bok-nam, president of Lawyers for a Democratic Society, while talking to AFP. "Theoretically, immediate release is possible, but in this case, the special counsel has argued that the risk of evidence destruction remains high, and that the charges are already substantially supported," he added. On Wednesday, Yoon attended a seven-hour hearing where he denied all charges. He told the court he was 'fighting alone' and that his legal team was under pressure, with lawyers withdrawing one by one. "One by one my lawyers are stepping away, and I may soon have to fight this alone," said Yoon as quoted by AFP. Yoon's lawyers argued the detention was unnecessary, noting he no longer holds any official power. However, prosecutors pointed to the risk of evidence destruction and the seriousness of the charges. Investigators recently questioned Yoon about his resistance during the failed arrest in January and allegations that he authorised drone flights to Pyongyang to justify martial law. He also faces charges of falsifying official documents tied to the martial law attempt. The former President has defended his actions, saying martial law was necessary to eliminate pro–North Korean and anti-state elements. But the Constitutional Court called his actions a 'betrayal of people's trust' and a 'denial of the principles of democracy.' Current President Lee Jae Myung, elected in June, has approved special investigations into Yoon's declaration of martial law and other criminal allegations involving his administration and wife.
