Why US secretly armed Iran with missiles during a war
By then, the US-backed regime of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi in Iran had been overthrown, and an Islamic Republic had been established by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979 after the Iranian Revolution.The newly-established Islamic Republic was fighting a war with Saddam Hussein-led Iraq, which was unnerved by the setting up of a Shia power centre in its immediate neighbourhood. Saddam, fearing that Khomeini would influence the Iraqi Shias against his Ba'ath Party, initiated the war against Iran.advertisementRunning low on arms and ammunition and spare parts for US-made systems, Iran looked for help.Tehran had made millions of dollars in payments to the US during the Shah regime and got military hardware, including F14 Tomcat jets, M60 tanks, F4 Phantoms, and helicopters and missiles.Immediately after the Shah's regime was toppled, US-Iran diplomatic ties snapped, Iranian funds were frozen, and an arms embargo was imposed."Throughout 1981 and 1982, Israel provided Iran with modest amounts of spare parts, jet-plane tires and brakes, ammunition, and radar equipment. The Israelis reportedly set up Swiss bank accounts to handle the financial end of the deals," according to a Time magazine report from December 1986, when the Iran-Contra case blew up.The US was then being led by another Republican President, Ronald Reagan, who served from 1981 to 1989.Israel believed that its arms supply to Iran in time of crisis would get it closer to the Iranian military, the leaders of which were from a moderate faction, and would topple Khomeini's regime or capture power after his death.Israel saw the Iranian army as a distinct entity from the anti-West Iranian Revolutionary Guards.That bet on Iran army wouldn't pay off but the US would end up using its set-up to further its cause.THE HIJACKING OF TWA FLIGHT 847 BY HEZBOLLAH FIGHTERSadvertisementOn June 14, 1985, TWA Flight 847 with 153 people onboard was hijacked by Lebanese Hezbollah terrorists armed with grenades and pistols during a routine flight from Athens to Rome, according to the FBI website.The Hezbollah hijackers commandeered the plane to Beirut, Lebanon, demanding the release of Lebanese fighters in Israeli captivity. They expected the plane to have Israeli passengers, but finding none, they turned their focus on Americans.On June 15, the hijackers decided to send out a strong message and killed a 23-year-old US Navy diver and threw his body on the tarmac.While most of the hostages were released in stages, 39 were set free only after 17 days, and after a botched arms delivery by Israel that was intercepted by the Revolutionary Guards."White House officials hoped the arms transfers through Israel would help secure the release of seven US hostages being held in Lebanon," according to a 2013 Politico report.It recounted how Reagan defended the arms sale to Iran in a speech on November 13, 1986, 10 days after it was exposed by Lebanese newspaper Al-Shiraa.advertisement"My purpose was... to send a signal that the United States was prepared to replace the animosity between [the US and Iran] with a new relationship... The most significant step [for progress in ties] which Iran could take, we indicated, would be to use its influence in Lebanon to secure the release of all hostages held there," Reagan said in the nationally-televised speech.A week later, Reagan retracted his public statement, denying sale of weapons as part of the arms-for-hostages deal.REAGAN AIDES USED IRAN FUNDS TO SUPPORT NICARAGUA CONTRASThe money generated from the sale of weapons to Iran was used to fund the Contras, a rebel group, fighting the Sandinista government in Nicaragua in Central America.This too went against the US official stand. The US Congress had passed the Boland Amendment, prohibiting military aid to the Contras.Congressional investigators, The Washington Post reported in 1987, "believe that a total of $10.5 million was skimmed from the Iran arms deals to support Nicaraguan rebels".Key figures in the case included senior Reagan administration officials like National Security Council staff member Oliver North, National Security Advisor John Poindexter, and CIA Director William Casey.advertisementWHAT ARMS WERE SUPPLIED AS PART OF IRAN-CONTRA DEALBy the time the covert sales were discovered, more than 1,500 missiles had been shipped to Iran, according to a report by American public broadcaster PBS.According to another 1987 Washington Post report, 2,008 TOW anti-tank missiles and spare parts for the HAWK anti-aircraft missile system were part of the supplies to Iran.The TOW missile is a long-range, anti-tank guided missile, while the HAWK is an all-weather, ground-to-air missile system.Though it isn't clear, limited quantities of radar systems, ammunition components, and potentially aircraft spare parts might also have been supplied to Iran, mostly to shore up the Shah-era American systems that the Islamic Republic was using during its war against Iraq.Though the shipments weren't massive, they helped when Iran was suffering from battlefield attrition and equipment fatigue.The arrival of advanced US weapons must have boosted the morale and stabilised key fronts. TOW missiles, in particular, helped Iran blunt multiple Iraqi offensives between 1985 and 1986.Why the Iran-Contra case, the biggest scandal of the Reagan regime, is also important is because it highlighted the balance-of-power issue between the President's office and the legislature.This is very similar to the questions being raised on Trump's powers for getting the US into a new war in the Middle East by striking nuclear sites in Iran without wider bipartisan discussions.Though Reagan avoided direct criminal charges, the covert arms supply and the funnelling of funds in the Iran-Contra scandal damaged his public image and legacy. This was also the only instance when the US ended up arming the Islamic Republic of Iran, and helped it in a war situation.Must Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
39 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Iraqi police clash with paramilitary fighters who stormed government building
A gun battle erupted in Iraq's capital on Sunday between police and fighters from a state-sanctioned paramilitary force that includes Iran-backed groups, killing at least one police officer and leading to the arrest of 14 fighters, authorities said. The clash broke out in Baghdad's Karkh district after a group of fighters from the Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF) stormed an Agriculture Ministry building as a new director was being sworn in, the Interior Ministry said in a statement. The PMF, known in Arabic as Hashd al-Shaabi, is an umbrella group of mostly Shi'ite paramilitary factions that was formally integrated into Iraq's state security forces and includes several groups aligned with Iran. According to the Interior Ministry, the PMF fighters burst into the building during an administrative meeting, causing panic among staff who alerted police. Security sources and three employees at the scene said the fighters had wanted to stop the office's former director from being replaced. A statement from the Joint Operations Command, which reports directly to Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, confirmed that the detainees were PMF members and had been referred to the judiciary. At least one police officer was killed and nine others were wounded, police and hospital sources said. Sudani ordered the formation of a committee to investigate the incident, the command said. The arrested fighters belong to 'PMF brigades 45 and 46', the statement added. Both brigades are affiliated with Kataib Hezbollah, an Iran-aligned Iraqi armed group, according to Iraqi security officials and sources within the PMF.
Indian Express
39 minutes ago
- Indian Express
From Obama's ‘treason' to missing gold reserves, the wildest conspiracy theories consuming Trump's Washington
OK, so US President Donald Trump's name is in the Jeffrey Epstein files. But who put it there? Could it possibly have been Barack Obama from his prison cell? Or a tranquilized Hillary Clinton? Oh wait, maybe it was etched onto the documents by Joe Biden's magical autopen. Or is that mixing up different scandals? It's so hard to keep up with the latest wild notions circulating in the capital and beyond. Washington is awash in conspiracy theories these days, a cascade of suspicion and intrigue promoted or denied in the Oval Office, ricocheting around Capitol Hill and cable news and propelled at warp speed across social media. No commander in chief in his lifetime has been as consumed by conspiracy theories as Trump, and now they seem to be consuming him. They have been the rocket fuel for his political career since the days when he spread the lie that Obama was secretly born overseas and therefore not eligible to be president. More than a decade later, Trump is coming full circle by trying to divert attention from the Epstein conspiracy theory with a new-and-improved one about Obama supposedly committing treason. The harmonic convergence of competing conspiracies has overshadowed critical policy issues facing America's leaders at the moment, whether it's new tariffs that could dramatically reshape the global economy or the collapse of ceasefire talks meant to end the war in the Gaza Strip. The Epstein matter so spooked Speaker Mike Johnson that he abruptly recessed the House for the summer rather than confront it. The allegations lodged against Obama so outraged the former president that he emerged from political hibernation to express his indignation at even having to address them. The whispers and questions — 'this nonsense,' as Trump put it — followed the president all the way to Scotland, where he landed Friday for a visit to his golf club. 'You're making a very big thing over something that's not a big thing,' he complained to reporters, suggesting, in his latest bid at conspiracy deflection, that instead of him, the news media should be looking at Epstein's other boldface friends like former President Bill Clinton. 'Don't talk about Trump,' he said. Conspiracy theories have a long place in American history. Many Americans still believe that someone else had a hand in killing President John F. Kennedy, that the moon landings were faked, that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were an inside job or that the government is hiding proof of extraterrestrial visitors in Roswell, New Mexico. Sixty-five percent of Americans told Gallup pollsters in 2023 that they think there was a conspiracy behind Kennedy's assassination. Some conspiracy theories do turn out to be true, of course, or have some basis. But presidents generally have not been the ones spreading dubious stories. To the contrary, they traditionally have viewed their role as dispelling doubts and reinforcing faith in institutions. President Lyndon B. Johnson created the Warren Commission to investigate his predecessor's murder specifically to keep rumors and guesswork from proliferating. (Spoiler alert: It didn't.) Trump, by contrast, relishes conspiracy theories, particularly those that benefit him or smear his enemies without any evident care for whether they are true or not. 'There have been other conspiratorial political movements in the country's past,' said Geoff Dancy, a University of Toronto professor who teaches about conspiracy theories. 'But they have never occupied the upper echelons of power until the last decade.' Conspiracy theories are not the exclusive preserve of Trump and the political right. Around the time of last month's anniversary of the assassination attempt against Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, some on the left once again advanced the notion that the whole shooting episode had been staged to make the Republican candidate into a political martyr. Trump, however, has stirred the plot pot more than any other major political figure. In the six months since retaking office, he has remained remarkably cavalier about suggesting nefarious schemes even as he heads the government supposedly orchestrating some of them. He suggested the nation's gold reserves at Fort Knox might be missing, resurrecting a decades-old fringe supposition, even though he would presumably be in position to know whether that was actually true, what with being president and all. 'If the gold isn't there, we're going to be very upset,' he told reporters. It fell to Scott Bessent, the decidedly nonconspiratorial Treasury secretary, to burst the bubble and reassure Americans that, no, the nation's reserves had not been stolen. 'All the gold is present and accounted for,' he told an interviewer. Trump has played to long-standing suspicions by ordering the release of hundreds of thousands of pages of documents related to the assassinations of Kennedy, his brother Robert F. Kennedy and the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., an act of transparency for historians and researchers that may shed important light on those episodes. But Trump has gone beyond simple theory floating to make his own alternate reality official government policy. Some applicants for jobs in the second Trump administration were asked whether Trump won the 2020 election that he actually lost; those who gave the wrong answer were not helping their job prospects, forcing those rooted in facts to decide whether to swallow the fabrication to gain employment. Trump has likewise claimed that Biden was so diminished toward the end of his term that his aides signed pardons without his knowledge using an autopen. Biden was certainly showing signs of age, but the autopen story was conjecture. Asked if he had uncovered proof, Trump said, 'I uncovered, you know, the human mind. I was in a debate with the human mind and I didn't think he knew what the hell he was doing.' The past week or so has seen a fusillade of Trumpian conspiracy theories, seemingly meant to focus attention away from the Epstein case. Tulsi Gabbard, the president's politically appointed intelligence chief, trotted out inflammatory allegations that Obama orchestrated a 'yearslong coup and treasonous conspiracy' by skewing the 2016 election interference investigation — despite the conclusions of a Republican-led Senate report signed by none other than Marco Rubio, now Trump's secretary of state. She also claimed that Hillary Clinton was 'on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers' during the 2016 campaign. Relying on this, Trump accused Obama of 'treason,' suggesting he should be locked up and going so far as to post a fake video showing his predecessor being handcuffed in the Oval Office and put behind bars. The idea of a president posting such an image of another president would once have been seen as a shocking breach of etiquette and corruption of the justice system, but in the Trump era it has become simply business as usual. For all that, the conspiracy theorist in chief has not been able to shake the Epstein case, which reflects the rise of the QAnon movement that believes America is run by a cabal of Satan-worshipping pedophiles. Most of the files, the ones that his attorney general told him include his name, remain unreleased, bringing together an unlikely alliance of MAGA conservatives and liberal Democrats. It was well known that Trump was friends with Epstein, although they later fell out. So it's not clear what his name being in the files might actually mean. But Trump is not one to back down. Asked last week about whether he had been told his name was in the files, Trump again pointed the finger of conspiracy elsewhere. 'These files were made up by Comey,' he told reporters, referring to James Comey, the FBI director he had fired more than two years before Epstein died in prison in 2019. 'They were made up by Obama,' he went on. 'They were made up by the Biden administration.' The theories are endless.
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
'No Extensions Or Grace Periods': US Firm On August 1 Tariff Deadline
Last Updated: So far, five countries — Britain, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Japan — have agreed to new trade terms with the US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Sunday said that the United States will move forward with its planned tariffs on trading partners from August 1, with no extensions or exemptions. Speaking on Fox News Sunday, Lutnick made clear the administration's firm stance, 'No extensions, no more grace periods. August 1, the tariffs are set. They'll go into place. Customs will start collecting the money, and off we go." The decision adds pressure on key US allies and trading partners to finalise trade deals before the deadline, part of the Trump administration's push to rewrite global trade rules that it considers unfair to American industries. US President Donald Trump, currently in Scotland for talks with European Union officials, is still open to negotiations even after the tariffs are imposed, Lutnick said. However, he made it clear that the US has set the terms. 'They're hoping they make a deal, and it's up to President Trump, who's the leader of this negotiating table. We set the table," he added. So far, five countries — Britain, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Japan — have agreed to new trade terms with the US, securing deals ahead of the looming deadline. While the tariffs they accepted are often higher than the current 10 percent base rate imposed since April, they remain lower than what Washington had originally threatened in the absence of an agreement. The European Union, however, has yet to reach a deal. It now faces the risk of a 30 percent blanket tariff on exports to the US beginning August 1. Trump has said there's a '50-50" chance of striking an agreement with the EU. Earlier today, Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen were scheduled to meet at Trump's Turnberry golf resort in southwest Scotland. The meeting is seen as a final attempt to avoid a major transatlantic trade conflict. The EU's negotiating team has been working intensively to secure a deal that would protect a trading relationship worth an estimated $1.9 trillion annually. But any agreement must be approved by all 27 member states. EU ambassadors, currently visiting Greenland, were meeting Sunday to review the latest developments. (With inputs from agencies) view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
