Trump appoints former Fox News host as interim U.S. attorney for D.C.
May 9 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump has appointed former Fox News host and ex-prosecutor Jeanine Pirro as interim U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C.
Trump made the announcement on his social media platform, Truth Social, on Thursday, after withdrawing his original pick for the job due to a lack of congressional support for confirmation.
Pirro continues the trend of Trump, a former TV personality himself, selecting people for his cabinet and other positions from among Fox News personalities and those who pushed his false claims of election fraud.
"Jeanine is incredibly well qualified for this position, and is considered one of the Top District Attorneys in the History of the State of New York," Trump said in the post, without providing proof.
"She is in a class by herself."
Trump picked Pirro after abandoning Ed Martin, as it became clear this week he would not have the votes for Senate confirmation.
Martin was a controversial pick for the position, as the only prosecutorial experience he had gained came after Trump named him interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia on Jan. 20.
A far-right activist, Martin supported the president's false claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election who has aligned himself with Jan. 6 defendants, reasons why Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said he could not support his nomination.
On Friday night, Trump said in a statement that Martin will be named the new director of the Justice Department's Weaponization Working Group.
"In these highly important roles, Ed will make sure we finally investigate the Weaponization of our Government under the Biden Regime," Trump said, "and provide much needed Justice for its victims."
Like Martin, Pirro has been accused of supporting Trump's claims of election fraud following his 2020 loss to Joe Biden, and was among Fox News hosts named in a lawsuit brought against the broadcaster by Dominion Voting Systems for spreading Trump's false election denial claims. Fox News and Dominion settled the lawsuit in April 2023, with Fox agreeing to pay the election company $787.5 million.
"Grand slam, home run, hat trick pick," Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said in a statement Friday.
"She is exactly the right person at the right time to take on this responsibility," he continued, adding that "This is exactly what is needed to clean up DC."
Pirro was elected a Westchester County Court judge in 1990 and became the county's district attorney three years later. In the 2000s, she became a right-wing TV personality, hosting Justice w/ Judge Jeanine from 2011-2021 and The Five from 2021-2022, according to her IMDb page.
"Jeanine Pirro is yet another unqualified TV personality with a history of putting Trump and violent insurrectionists above the rule of law," the Democratic National Committee said Friday in a statement.
"She'll be a disaster for public safety and an embarrassment to law enforcement -- just like Trump's last failed pick for the same job."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
26 minutes ago
- Politico
Newsom just can't quit Fox News
Presented by California Environmental Voters SIREN SONG — For all Gavin Newsom's experimentation with alternative media — hosting his own podcast, starting fact-checking sites and posting irreverent Star Wars-themed videos about his adversaries on social media — he can't seem to shake the allure of Fox News. The defamation lawsuit he filed against the multimedia giant Friday was the latest sign of Fox's enduring importance to him, even in an increasingly fractured media ecosystem. His connection to the network spans decades. And it's personal, not only because his ex-wife Kimberly Guilfoyle was one of its on-air stars; Newsom has texted with Sean Hannity, chatted with Bret Baier and known host Jesse Watters, the target of his lawsuit, for years. 'I'm in their head,' Newsom previously told POLITICO of such conservative media personalities. 'Even when I'm not making news, I'm in their news cycles.' The governor who has marveled at and lamented Fox's sway has, more than anything, tried to use it. There was an hour-plus sit-down with Hannity in 2023. His debate against Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (and the moderator, also Hannity) later that year. A barrage of ads aired on Fox bashing DeSantis over abortion policy and, more recently, another round blasting tariffs to the network's conservative audience. The lawsuit, over Watters' claim that Newsom lied about a call with Donald Trump before the president deployed National Guard troops to Los Angeles amid immigration protests, displays Newsom's continued attentiveness to Fox even as left-leaning cable news networks have seen their ratings fall since Trump's return to office. It also marks a shift from using the network to introduce himself to conservative audiences to making it a punching bag — much the way its hosts use him. The suit is 'a tactic that I think raises some of the liberal bona fides that he has tried to regain after some of the podcast stuff,' said Democratic consultant Danielle Cendejas, referencing the way Newsom frustrated progressives by inviting MAGA favorites on his podcast and breaking with Democrats on transgender athletes. 'Attacking Fox News is something you do to gin up your fundraising base. You get people to see you as leading the resistance, being proactive and going after this conservative media situation,' said Cendejas, who works for several progressive candidates in California. Indeed, Newsom's team blasted out a fundraising email on Friday after the lawsuit was announced, writing: 'Until they're willing to tell the truth, I'll keep fighting back against their propaganda machine.' The suit also helped keep Newsom in the national conversation now that the Los Angeles immigration protests have faded and state budget negotiations have pulled him back into less-than-flashy state business. Keeping national buzz is key for a figure who has at last acknowledged he could run for president. 'Is it a publicity stunt? I guess, to some degree it might be,' Democratic consultant Garry South said. 'But it's not as trivial as some people are making it out to be. This is a much larger issue dealing with the sending of the Marines to California for domestic law enforcement purposes without even notifying the governor of the state.' Fox was far more dismissive. 'Gov. Newsom's transparent publicity stunt is frivolous and designed to chill free speech critical of him,' the network said in a statement. 'We will defend this case vigorously and look forward to it being dismissed.' Newsom's filing, though focused on an established cable player, nabbed views in the alternative media ecosystem with which he's become fascinated. Pop Crave heralded the news, and Newsom talked with progressives including video host Brian Tyler Cohen and MeidasTouch about the case. And there is at least one way the suit could get the governor's face back in front of Fox viewers. Newsom's camp offered to drop the case if the network apologized on air. 'It's simple, just apologize, and give it as much air time as you did when you weaponized the lie,' Newsom told Cohen, before reflecting on the network's importance. 'Remember, this is the largest news organization, cable news organization, in the United States. Sixty-five-plus million people, Fox News. Fox Business, hundreds of millions of people as it relates to social networks.' GOOD MORNING. Happy Monday. Thanks for waking up with Playbook. You can text us at 916-562-0685 — save it as 'CA Playbook' in your contacts. Or drop us a line at dgardiner@ and bjones@ or on X — @DustinGardiner and @jonesblakej. WHERE'S GAVIN? Nothing official announced, though today is the deadline for the state budget to be passed and signed into law. More on that next… ON THE AGENDA DOWN TO THE WIRE — State lawmakers will vote today on the portion of the budget that Newsom has demanded they approve before he signs off on the rest of the state's $320 billion spending plan. The measure would ease environmental reviews for housing construction in urban areas and includes $500 million to combat homelessness. As our colleagues Eric He, Camille von Kaenel and Alex Nieves reported for POLITICO Pro subscribers, the housing measure is part of a budget bill that lawmakers unveiled Friday. They are aiming to approve it this afternoon, and Newsom would sign it shortly thereafter. Newsom has flexed his political muscle by inserting language in his budget agreement with lawmakers that conditions the entire spending plan on the housing measure's passage. The bill, AB 131, would create sweeping exceptions to the California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA, which requires an environmental analysis for all new construction projects. But the proposal faces fierce opposition from some environmentalists, who've called it the 'worst rollback of environmental and public health protections' in decades. SENATE GOP'S BIG VOTE — Meanwhile on Capitol Hill, Senate Republicans are on a trajectory to vote today on their budget megabill to fund Trump's domestic agenda. The bill would cut spending on Medicaid and other safety-net programs while extending tax breaks that primarily benefit higher income earners. While enough Republicans voted to start debating the bill over the weekend, it's not yet assured they have enough to pass it in both the Senate and House. SAN FRANCISCO IS WIENER TIRED OF WAITING? — State Sen. Scott Wiener opened a fundraising committee on Friday to run for San Francisco's congressional seat — his boldest move yet in a yearslong shadow campaign to succeed Nancy Pelosi. Pelosi, the former House speaker who's represented the city in Congress since 1987, hasn't said whether she plans to run for another term in 2026. She's certainly left the door open. But Wiener's foray speaks to rumblings that the race could be more competitive than expected. Pelosi already faces a challenge on the left from Saikat Chakrabarti, a tech investor and former chief of staff to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Other wealthy contenders are also rumored to be eyeing the seat. Wiener has previously said he would not run against Pelosi, a San Francisco icon and arguably the most powerful speaker in modern political history. But he has been noticeably ambiguous about his plans in recent days. On Friday, his campaign declined to comment when asked if he would consider a challenge. Any money he raises for his 2028 committee could easily be transferred to the 2026 cycle. Despite Wiener's campaign sidestepping the question, his statement Friday indicated he wouldn't run unless the seat were open. 'I've been clear that I intend to run for this seat whenever the race opens up, whether in 2026 or 2028,' Wiener said in a statement. 'This filing is a critical step to prepare for the serious work of running to succeed one of the icons of American politics.' Wiener added, 'In a potential race against extremely wealthy candidates who can self-fund, I'll have to work very hard to prepare to go toe to toe.' ON THE AIRWAVES FIRST IN PLAYBOOK: COUNTERCLAIM — Public insurance adjusters will today unveil a TV ad to oppose one of the most high-profile insurance bills in the Legislature this session. The spot argues that AB 597, by Assemblymember John Harabedian, would harm victims of wildfires. His bill would limit how much insurance adjusters representing policyholders can be paid related to claims that involve catastrophic disasters. In the spot, a victim of the Palisades Fire argues that public adjusters are crucial for holding insurance companies accountable. 'We've had five different insurance-company adjusters. We've had no straight answers, delays, excuses,' the victim states. 'Dealing with the insurance company, that was the real disaster.' CAMPAIGN YEAR(S) FIRST IN PLAYBOOK: MONEY MOVES — Media consultant Brian Goldsmith said he has raised more than $1 million this quarter since he launched his campaign in mid-April to succeed state Sen. Ben Allen in District 24, an open seat that is expected to draw one of the most competitive Dem-on-Dem legislative races next year. Goldsmith, who founded two tech startups, also said that he's received endorsements from more than 100 community leaders, including Rick Caruso and Antonio Villaraigosa. CLIMATE AND ENERGY BREAKING UP IS HARD TO DO — California climate officials are caught in a juggling act as Republicans attack them on gas prices. California Energy Commission Vice Chair Siva Gunda recommended pausing a profit cap on refineries Friday as part of a broader plan to boost the in-state oil industry. Meanwhile, California Air Resources Board Chair Liane Randolph is defending her agency's new rules reducing the carbon intensity of transportation fuels. Read more about what it all means in California Climate. TOP TALKERS GRUDGE MATCH — A former longtime friend of Elon Musk has a word of caution for Trump about the tech mogul: He doesn't really move on. That's what Philip Low, a Silicon Valley founder and former pal of the Musk's, told our colleague Christine Mui in an exclusive interview reported over the weekend. Low said he learned that the hard way in 2021 when he fired Musk, one of his early investors, from the advisory board of the Silicon Valley startup he founded. 'I've had my share of blowouts with Elon over the years,' Low said. 'Knowing Elon the way I know him, I do think he's going to do everything to damage the president.' AROUND THE STATE — Los Angeles County Supervisor Hilda Solis wants the county to explore legal action against the federal government over violent ICE raids. (Los Angeles Times) — San Diego's largest jail is facing complaints over its use of a small cage-like structure to provide inmates with mandatory out-of-cell time. (San Diego Union-Tribune) — A San Francisco bookstore has stopped carrying the 'Harry Potter' books, citing author J.K. Rowling's anti-transgender advocacy. (KQED) — Two men accused of pretending to be ICE officers in Fresno have been charged with one count each of misdemeanor impersonating an officer. (GV Wire) PLAYBOOKERS WEDDING BELLS — Jessica Gordon, special assistant attorney general and senior environmental adviser to Attorney General Rob Bonta, and Michael Colvin, California energy program director at the Environmental Defense Fund, married in Los Gatos on June 22. PEOPLE MOVES — Adam Taylor, the former military legislative assistant and legislative director for Rep. Scott Peters, is now his Washington chief of staff. BIRTHDAYS — Todd Campbell at Clean Energy Fuels … Evangeline George … Bob McBarton … BELATED B-DAY WISHES — (was Sunday): Molly Robson at Planned Parenthood Affiliates of CA … director Matthew Weiner … Savannah Causey at Social Proper Agency … Christina Pearson … Kaya Singleton at ROKU … Josh Meyer (was Saturday): Elon Musk … former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta … POLITICO's Alex Keeney … consultant Erin McPike … former U.S. Rep. Jane Harman … Stephanie Benedict … Mike Basch … Miranda Johnson … Jas Sajjan at the California Resources Corporation … actor Mel Brooks … James Ruxin at the USC School of Cinematic Arts … Kenneth Ribet … former state Sen. Marty Block … actress Ayelet Zurer WANT A SHOUT-OUT FEATURED? — Send us a birthday, career move or another special occasion to include in POLITICO's California Playbook. You can now submit a shout-out using this Google form.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chrisleys reveal prison conditions, future plans after controversial Trump pardon
In one of their first interview since being released from federal prison, reality TV stars Todd and Julie Chrisley spoke out about their experience behind bars and their controversial presidential pardon. The former "Chrisley Knows Best" stars were freed about one month ago after serving just over two years of their sentences for bank fraud, wire fraud and tax evasion. They were originally sentenced to 12 and seven years respectively, but received a pardon from President Donald Trump in May. "You don't realize how much your freedom means to you until you don't have it," Todd Chrisley told ABC News' Juju Chang. ABC News Studios' "IMPACT x Nightline: The Chrisleys: Life After Lockup" is streaming on Hulu. The couple revealed that their first post-prison meals were from Pizza Hut and Zaxby's. As for the first shower back in their own home? "It was almost like your first sexual encounter," Todd joked. The couple described difficult conditions in prison, with Todd reporting issues of black mold and asbestos at his facility in Florida. Julie, who was held in Kentucky, said she developed health problems including asthma. "I could see my health deteriorating," Julie told ABC News. The Federal Bureau of Prisons responded to the Chrisleys' claims about prison conditions, stating they operate "facilities that are safe, secure, and humane" with regulated temperatures and nutritionally adequate meals. MORE: 'Still don't believe it's real': Savannah Chrisley reacts to parents being pardoned by Trump Their daughter Savannah Chrisley, 26, emerged as their strongest advocate, campaigning for their release while also becoming legal guardian to her younger brother Grayson and niece Chloe. "I forced myself into rooms I was never invited into. I educated myself," Savannah told ABC News of her efforts to secure her parents' freedom. The pardon came after Savannah, a vocal Trump supporter, spoke at the 2024 Republican National Convention. She received a personal call from the president informing her of his decision to pardon her parents. Critics questioned whether the Chrisleys deserved the pardon, noting that both a jury convicted them and an appeals court upheld the conviction. Todd defended their pardon, questioning the makeup of their jury and comparing their case to other presidential pardons. MORE: Trump's flurry of pardons include some to campaign contributors Despite their time in prison, the Chrisleys said they remain unapologetic about their lifestyle. "I don't have an apology to give you or anyone else over the money that I've made," Todd said. The couple said they're now focused on prison reform, inspired by the people they encountered while incarcerated. "I have met some amazing women. I've met some women that I will be friends with till the day that I die," Julie said. "Chrisley Knows Best" aired on USA Network from 2014 to 2023, filming mostly in Georgia and Tennessee. The family plans to return to television with a new show on the Lifetime network. Todd and Julie said they are considering relocating to Charleston, South Carolina, where they hope to convert a mansion into a hotel -- with cameras rolling. "I've always told my children that it doesn't matter what someone else's opinion is of you unless it causes you to question who you are at your core," Todd said. "No one's opinion of me has ever caused me to question who I am at the core, so I don't worry about someone else's opinion." ABC News' Karin Weinberg, Anthony McMahon and Deborah Kim contributed to this report.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Last-minute changes to Senate's 'big, beautiful bill' stun clean energy industry (and Elon Musk)
The Senate is making a final push to advance President Trump's signature legislation with a flurry of last-minute changes that stunned Elon Musk and the already besieged clean energy industry while offering new support for fossil fuels. The controversy surrounding the bill's energy approach is just one front in a frenzied final push with plenty of additional attention on the price tag after a new weekend tally found that bill has grown by nearly $1 trillion since the Senate took it up. Meanwhile a grueling final Senate push to approve the package cleared a key procedural hurdle over the weekend, with consideration continuing and an amendment process expected to take up much of Monday before a final vote later Monday or perhaps Tuesday. The energy provisions of the 900-plus page bill have come in for particular scrutiny after last minute changes phased out clean energy tax credits faster than expected and also added new taxes on wind and solar projects. At the same time, new last minute inducements were unveiled for fossil fuels, including one classifying coal as a critical mineral when it comes to a government manufacturing credit. "We're doing coal," Trump said in an interview released over the weekend on Fox News's "Sunday Morning Futures" where he also called solar energy projects "ugly as hell." The mix left fossil fuel advocates celebrating and clean energy advocates slamming the bill at a new higher volume. Tesla (TSLA) CEO Musk — who worked in the White House before his dramatic falling out with the president — was perhaps the loudest voice in the latter group. He issued a series of weekend posts calling the bill "utterly insane and destructive [with] handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future." The energy changes came as top-line costs of the deal remained a key point of contention. A nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office tally released over the weekend showed the revised bill would add at least $3.3 trillion to the national debt. That assessment, which does not include additional interest costs, comes after a similar analysis of the House package found a $2.4 trillion tab. Trump suggested Republicans look past the deficit implications in one of his weekend posts, urging passage as soon as possible saying he also wants to cut costs but adding to lawmakers: "REMEMBER, you still have to get reelected." He also made a case that White House projections of blockbuster economic growth (dismissed by many economists as fantastical) will make the math add up in the end. The focus on energy comes after weeks of debate over Biden-era energy credits. The initial Senate blueprint had offered a slower rollback of clean energy credits for things like solar panels and electric vehicles but last minute changes to the bill put it more in line with the harder line House version which seeks to eliminate the credits sooner. Some provisions are even more immediate with the Senate version proposing to eliminate EV credits by September 30 of this year. And on top of that, a new tax was unveiled when the bill was released that would not just eliminate government help for renewable energy projects — but add a new cost for wind and solar projects completed after 2027 if a certain amount of supplies came from China. The changes stunned many clean energy advocates — not just Musk — with a statement from the American Clean Power Association saying the effect would be to "strand hundreds of billions of dollars in current investments." What that could means for consumers down the road — some concluded — are higher utility bills as currently under construction AI data centers are set to increase electricity demand in the years ahead. Some are even projecting double digit price increases in some utility bills by 2029. An analysis from the left-leaning Center for American Progress found that the bill would exacerbate existing upward pressure on utility prices, with Democratic Senator Brian Schatz adding "we are literally going to have not enough electricity because Trump is killing solar." Fossil fuels advocates meanwhile were largely ebullient at the last minute changes which saw existing fossil fuel focused provisions — around issues like permitting, lease sales, and methane emissions fees — joined by some new credits for these producers including for coal. Senate Republicans say the bill will generate over $15 billion in new federal revenue through expanded oil, gas, and coal leasing with leaders with Senator John Barasso of Wyoming saying "America is an energy superpower and once again, we are going to act like it." The bill is also set to be even more expensive after weeks of negotiations saw expensive compromises on issues like state and local tax (SALT) deductions, more generous business tax credits, and the adjustment of some cost savings around Medicaid. The fullest accounting came over the weekend when the CBO estimated the Senate bill would increase the debt by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034. The analysis also found that 11.8 million additional Americans would become uninsured by 2034 because of the health care provisions — an increase over the findings for the House-passed version that tallied that 10.9 million people would be without health coverage of that version passed. The bill is projected to be even more expensive after things like interest costs are included, with the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget protecting the current total tally as in the neighborhood of $3.5 to $4.2 trillion over the next decade. "The debt impact could rise as high as $4.5 trillion if various rumored adjustments are made," the group added of potential additional changes still to come. The findings also come as Senate Republicans push forward on a budget gimmick that is set to hide $3.8 trillion in red ink using a "current policy baseline" that Democrats say violated Senate rules but appears set to proceed. Either way the sky-high debt findings could imperil the bill politically, with two GOP senators already likely to vote no and others not yet saying they will back Trump's effort to get this over the line in the coming hours. The bill will also need to be approved by the House if the amended package advances and is then considered by a bloc of fiscal conservatives there who say they barely voted in May for that less expensive version. One initial comment from the House Freedom Caucus was negative, with the group writing that the new tally was above "our agreed budget framework." Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data