logo
Nine dead, search for missing after flooding in Nepal

Nine dead, search for missing after flooding in Nepal

7NEWS10-07-2025
Dozens of rescuers are searching the banks of a mountain river looking for people missing after monsoon floods swept away Nepal's main bridge connecting to the country to China and caused at least nine deaths.
Police said dozens of rescuers were at the area on Wednesday and more were expected to join the rescue efforts.
Nine dead bodies have been recovered from the river.
Security forces have rescued 55 people, including four Indians and a Chinese person, according to the Rasuwa District Administration Office.
Prime Minister Khadga Prasad Oli, along with top ministers and officials, flew to the area.
Oli called an emergency meeting Tuesday night and instructed all security forces and government offices to assist the rescue and recovery efforts.
The flooding on the Bhotekoshi River early Tuesday destroyed the Friendship Bridge at Rasuwagadi, which is 120km north of the capital, Kathmandu.
Several houses and trucks that were parked at the border for customs inspections also were swept away.
Hundreds of electric vehicles imported from China had been parked at the border point.
The 19 missing were 13 Nepali citizens and six Chinese nationals, the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority said.
The Chinese and eight of the Nepalis were workers at a Chinese-assisted construction project on the Nepali side of the border, according to the Chinese embassy in Nepal, quoted by state media.
The destruction of the bridge has halted all trade from China to Nepal through this route.
The longer alternative is for goods to be shipped from China to India and then brought overland to Nepal.
Monsoon rains that begin in June and end in September often cause severe flooding in Nepal, disrupting infrastructure and endangering lives.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Communications Minister once hailed YouTube as a place for kids — now she appears ready to ban it
Communications Minister once hailed YouTube as a place for kids — now she appears ready to ban it

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

Communications Minister once hailed YouTube as a place for kids — now she appears ready to ban it

Communications Minister Anika Wells once fawned over YouTube as a way to entertain her young children — now she appears ready to ban it as a legal furore erupts in the tech world. Minister wells is considering banning children under 16 from YouTube, but just a few years ago she praised the video sharing platform as a means for a young parent to navigate the "parliament hustle". "How do I handle the parliament hustle? Sturdy baby gates and The Wiggles on YouTube," she wrote in December, 2022, at a time she was sports minister. Minister Wells appeared to confirm for the first time publicly that she would formally adopt a push from eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant to prohibit children from creating accounts on YouTube. 'The eSafety Commissioner made it clear in her advice to the Minister that the law relates to children under the age of 16 having their own social media accounts,' Minister Wells told 'eSafety's recommendation does not prevent children from watching videos like The Wiggles on YouTube Kids or on their parent's account.' Under this scenario, kids would still be able to access YouTube logged out, which means they would not be protected by Google's sophisticated parental controls. YouTube has argued this move would make the internet less safe, a clear contradiction with the original intent of the Act. A formal decision is expected as early as Thursday this week but the government has been criticised for confusion around the rollout of these new laws. And it isn't just parents confused by Labor's flip-flopping on the social media ban. The rushed implementation of the laws and the lack of industry clarity has infuriated multiple platforms involved in negotiations, leading to tense and highly complex legal discussions behind closed doors. TikTok is understood to have made a legal threat on constitutional grounds over the ban. TikTok denies this but in a submission to the government, the Chinese owned platform alleged the laws would be fundamentally unworkable and anti-competitive in nature, if YouTube was exempt. Labor appears to have listened to these warnings and could announce a major change to the child ban policy as early as next week. After learning Labor was preparing to U-turn on a pledge to exempt YouTube, Google also called in the lawyers. The video sharing platform argued the child ban breaches the implied constitutional protections Australians have to engage in political speech. In March, TikTok wrote a scathing submission to the government which focused almost entirely on lobbying for YouTube to also be banned. TikTok's submission alleged the laws were "unsupportable" and "anti-competitive" in nature, and accused Labor of reverse engineering legislation. "Excluding any major platform by name from the minimum age obligation on educative grounds is unsupportable without evidence," the submission said. "What is clear is that the Government has begun its analysis from the starting position that YouTube must be exempt and then attempted, half-heartedly, to reverse-engineer defensible supporting evidence. "Handing one major social media platform a sweetheart deal of this nature - while subjecting every other platform in Australia to stringent compliance obligations - would be illogical, anti-competitive, and short-sighted." TikTok also warned that an exemption for YouTube raised anti-competition legal issues which, it argued, had already been highlighted by the ACCC. 'That Google or any rational economic actor in its position would seek to lobby Government for favourable treatment is comprehensible. That the Government would accede to it, against the warnings of its own competition watchdog, is not,' the submission said. In a forward to the submission TikTok warned the government the laws "would not work" if YouTube was exempt. "For the reasons set out in this submission, we have grave concerns that the Rules, if implemented in their current form, would not work," TikTok said. "We are particularly concerned that carving out any major platform by name - in this case, YouTube - from the minimum age obligation would result in a law that is illogical, anti-competitive, and short-sighted." eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant was accused earlier this month of misleading Australians after her push to have children banned from the platform was not supported in her own research. It was revealed that even Ms Inman Grant's office used YouTube to educate children as part of her own publishing strategy, specifically targeting the demographic. In late 2022, while Ms Inman Grant was in charge of the body, a series of videos called 'eSafety Mighty Heroes' including characters such as Dusty the frilled neck lizard, River the sugar glider, Billie the bilby, and Wanda the echidna was released on the same day - content clearly published with the intent to educate children.

US, China negotiators meet in Stockholm to extend trade truce
US, China negotiators meet in Stockholm to extend trade truce

AU Financial Review

timean hour ago

  • AU Financial Review

US, China negotiators meet in Stockholm to extend trade truce

Beijing | US and Chinese officials are meeting on Monday to extend their tariff détente beyond a mid-August deadline, and haggle over other ways to further defuse trade tensions. Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will lead the delegations for two days Stockholm — their third meeting in less than three months. The agenda includes discussions about how long the current tariff truce can be extended, as well as US levies tied to fentanyl trafficking and Chinese purchases of sanctioned Russian and Iranian oil.

'No appetite for him': Scandal-ridden Prince Andrew receives firm message from King Charles III he won't return to royal duties despite FBI dropping Jeffrey Epstein case
'No appetite for him': Scandal-ridden Prince Andrew receives firm message from King Charles III he won't return to royal duties despite FBI dropping Jeffrey Epstein case

Sky News AU

time4 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

'No appetite for him': Scandal-ridden Prince Andrew receives firm message from King Charles III he won't return to royal duties despite FBI dropping Jeffrey Epstein case

Prince Andrew's hopes of returning to royal duties have been firmly shut down by King Charles, despite the FBI confirming it will not pursue any further charges in the Jeffrey Epstein case. According to recent reports, the 65-year-old Duke of York has felt "optimistic" about stepping back into public life following announcements from the FBI and the US Department of Justice that no client list from Epstein exists and no third-party prosecutions will be pursued. But while the legal cloud may have lifted, his status within the Royal Family remains unchanged. Speaking to The Royal Report's Caroline Di Russo on Sunday, Bronte Coy confirmed the reminder from the King "shouldn't have come as too big of a surprise" to Andrew, though "it seems to have done". "The reports are that technically, the FBI are not pursuing any third-party charges (in relation to the Epstein case), and it seems that, in that regard, that shadow that has been cast over Andrew over the last few years is over now," Coy explained. "But when it comes to his royal duties and public life, nothing has changed." Coy said recent reporting suggested Andrew was "chipper" after the FBI dropped its investigation and was "possibly optimistic" about re-entering public life. But Charles, 76, has remained steadfast. "Andrew has been out of royal duties for five years, ever since his disastrous Newsnight interview, and he's had several controversies- his ties to Epstein were really just one of them,' she said. Coy also pointed to Andrew's links to alleged Chinese spy Yang Tengbo in late 2024, which saw him excluded from the Royal Family's Christmas celebrations. "At the very least, Prince Andrew is accused of very poor judgment along the way," Coy added. There also appears to be no public support for Andrew's return. "There's no appetite from the British public for him to return to Royal duties," Coy said. "And there seems to be no appetite at all from The King. "It was that reminder to Andrew that, despite the fact that it's a relief for him that the line has been drawn in the sand by the FBI, in terms of his future, he will probably just continue living life the way he was before- which by many accounts is largely reclusive." Though Andrew still resides at Royal Lodge with his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, he has no public role and "there really doesn't look like there will ever be a return to it". Di Russo agreed, saying, "The Royal Family is trying to be relevant and relatable, and he just doesn't fit that strategy at all." Despite the end of legal proceedings, Prince Andrew's association with Epstein continues to raise eyebrows. As recently as last week, the Mirror reported Andrew was allegedly asked to contribute a message to a leather-bound birthday album for Epstein's 50th birthday- compiled in 2003 by Ghislaine Maxwell. The "bawdy" book reportedly contained letters and notes from Epstein's inner circle, celebrating his supposed genius and generosity. "Jeffrey always saw Andrew as the pinnacle of his pals," a source told the Mirror. "Ghislaine made sure he was asked to contribute. She made it sound like an honour to be included." It remains unclear whether Andrew submitted a message. The father-of-two settled a civil sexual abuse case with the late Virginia Giuffre, an Epstein accuser, in 2022, reportedly paying more than £12 million (AUD $16.3 million). That same year, the late Queen Elizabeth II stripped him of his HRH title.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store