Reclassify Balajiga, Banajiga under Group B for education, job: Karnataka HC
Allowing the petition filed by V Sumitra, a resident of Gejjalamatta village in Kollegal taluk of Mysuru district, Justice Suraj Govindaraj directed the state government to reclassify the Balajiga/Banajiga community under Article 16(4) as Group B instead of Group D.
'It is declared that the petitioner belonging to Balagiga/Banajiga community would be entitled to reservation for employment under Group B, and as such her employment as a primary school teacher is directed to be continued by availing such benefit,' the court said.
The court stated that a particular community cannot be classified differently for educational and employment purposes, and quashed the order dated April 8, 1996, passed by the Caste and Income Verification Committee, and the order dated June 15, 1999, by the Appellate Authority in the petitioner's case.
The petitioner, who belongs to the Balajiga/Banajiga community, after being selected as teacher in a primary school, obtained a certificate from the tahsildar that she belongs to Group B category.
After obtaining a provisional appointment letter dated January 17, 1993, the petitioner continued to render services. In February 1996, she received a notice alleging that for purpose of employment, she would belong to Group D and not Group B, and that the caste certificate issued was not proper or applicable for reservation.
The Caste and Income Verification Committee cancelled the caste certificate in April 1996. Therefore, her case was not considered by the Administrative Tribunal, prompting her to move the high court in 2013 against the tribunal order.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
How Young Is Too Young? India Debates Legal Age For Sexual Consent
New Delhi: Senior Advocate Indira Jaising stood before the Supreme Court of India in the last week on July and made a request that reignited an old and uncomfortable question: should consensual sex between teenagers still be considered a crime? At the center of this storm is one number: 18. That is the age set by Indian law for legally consenting to sex. Jaising argued this threshold may be punishing teenagers instead of protecting them. In her written submission, she urged the court to reconsider how the law treats consensual relationships between adolescents aged 16 to 18. Such relationships, she said, do not fit the definitions of exploitation or abuse. The government disagreed. It fears that lowering the bar could leave minors, those legally not adult, below 18, vulnerable to coercion, manipulation or worse. It argued making room for exceptions could lead to loopholes that might be exploited by traffickers or abusers. But the law, especially the 2012 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, draws no lines between love and violation when it comes to minors. It sees all sexual activity under the age of 18 as criminal, even when both parties consent. This hard line has come under scrutiny from activists, judges and rights groups who believe the law is outdated or at least too rigid. In some cases, they say, parents have used the law to intervene in relationships they disapprove of, especially when caste, religion or class are involved. Many experts say the law has become a tool of control more than protection. The Global Picture and India's Long Trail Consent laws around the world are not the same. In countries like the United Kingdom and Canada, the age is 16. In the United States, it varies state to state. But in India, it is fixed, one rule for all. Back in 1860, when India first codified its criminal laws, the age was 10. In 1940, it was raised to 16. Then came POCSO, which made 18 the new standard. That was over a decade ago. Since then, the conversation has shifted, slowly, painfully but noticeably. The Courts Speak, Then Pause In 2022, the Karnataka High Court stepped in. It suggested that the Law Commission revisit the consent age under POCSO. The court pointed to several cases where teenage couples, a girl just over 16 and a boy barely out of adolescence, had been pulled into criminal trials under the law, even when there was no allegation of force. The Law Commission reviewed the matter but did not recommend lowering the age. Instead, it proposed something else: allowing courts to use 'judicial discretion' in cases involving teenagers. This means judges could consider the nature of the relationship, the age gap and whether coercion was involved before passing judgment. Even without formal legislation, some courts across India have started doing that. They have granted bail, overturned convictions or dismissed charges in cases where evidence showed mutual consent and emotional connection between teenagers. But not every bench agrees. In April, the Madras High Court overturned an acquittal in a case where a 17-year-old girl left home to be with a 23-year-old man. Her family had arranged her marriage elsewhere. The court sentenced the man to 10 years in prison under POCSO. Process as Punishment For Advocate Jaising, this is part of the problem. She said simply giving judges the discretion is not enough. Trials can be long, traumatic and carry the weight of stigma. 'For many people, the process itself becomes the punishment,' she stated. A report from the India Child Protection Fund shows just how overloaded the system is. As of January 2023, nearly 250,000 POCSO cases were pending in special courts created to handle them. Jaising argued for consistency and for a system that does not criminalise teenagers for being teenagers. 'Leaving everything to judicial discretion can result in unequal outcomes,' she warned. A Society in Conflict With Itself This is where India finds itself today caught between the need to protect and the need to understand, the fear of abuse and the reality of young love and between a law that seeks clarity and a society that lives in shades of grey. Lawyer and child rights advocate Bhuvan Ribhu said exceptions cannot be unconditional. He worries about misuse in cases of trafficking or child marriage. He supports discretion, but also faster trials, better rehabilitation of survivors and greater awareness. Not everyone is cautious. Ananashi Ganguly, co-founder of HAQ: Centre for Child Rights, stands with Jaising. 'We cannot avoid reform only because we are afraid of misuse,' she said. According to her, society is changing. The law needs to change with it. As this debate continues, India faces another question: what does protection mean when it becomes punishment? Where does responsibility lie in a law written for children or in a society still learning to talk to them about sex, safety and consent?
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
If there is proof of voter fraud, Cong should release it: Bommai
Bengaluru: Saying that it is not appropriate for Congress to accuse constitutional institutions for political motives in the name of voter fraud, former CM and MP Basavaraja Bommai said if they have evidence, they should release it immediately and if it's like an atom bomb, let them detonate it — if it's with them, it might explode right there. Speaking to the media in Bengaluru on Sunday, he said Congress is creating doubt over constitutional institutions in the name of voter fraud. First, they cast suspicion on EVMs, and now on the Election Commission. When a demonstration was organized to clarify the confusion about EVM hacking, Congress did not attend. State government officials serve as chief electoral officers in the state. Political parties are also allowed to appoint their representatives at booths. To claim that the Election Commission is involved is incorrect. Questions about inclusion or deletion of voters' names should have been raised at the time itself. He said Dr. C. Manjunath, the MP from Bengaluru Rural, entered politics during the election. Accusations against the Election Commission are unwarranted. If there was interference by officials, they must provide evidence. The integrity of the Election Commission should not be undermined. 'If something is wrong with the Election Commission, say it clearly. But Congress has not even submitted a written complaint. The court has already responded to the allegations regarding EVMs. Narendra Modi becoming Prime Minister for the third time has shocked Congress. Calling the Election Commission the accused could amount to harming the Constitution. That is why BJP is opposing such statements. Responding to a question about the submission of the internal reservation report, Bommai said that even today, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah is not sincere about the matter. Earlier he said a constitutional amendment was required to implement internal reservation. But after the Supreme Court verdict last year, he has remained silent. Since 2013, Congress has only paid lip service to the SC community. The report may be submitted tomorrow, but the SC community itself has no confidence that this government will implement it. There is no need for Congress to blame BJP over the issue of internal reservation. 'We had formed a cabinet subcommittee and received a report on internal reservation. However, they kept citing constitutional amendment as an excuse. Now, in light of the Supreme Court order, it must be implemented. We will have to see what Justice Nagamohan Das's report says. Let us see what proportion of internal reservation is allocated. But the SC community does not believe this government will implement it,' he said. When asked about the seizure of drugs in Mysuru, Bommai responded that it is unfortunate that the police were unaware of a drug factory operating there. Gujarat police came and arrested a suspected woman terrorist, while the Karnataka police did nothing. Criminal cases are on the rise in the state. The government and senior officers have lost control — everyone is sitting idle. He said he had written a letter to the DGP regarding the rise in gambling in Haveri, but the police response has not been up to the expected level. The police have bowed to political pressure. 'We will fight against this,' he said. When asked about the sentencing of Prajwal Revanna, the former CM said that everything has happened according to the law and there is nothing more to say about it. 'It will not have any impact on the alliance'.
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Chandigarh: Judiciary plays the role of stabilising core of democracy, says justice Surya Kant
The judiciary serves as the stabilising core of democracy, ensuring that its generative powers are channelled within constitutional boundaries and not allowed to descend into chaos, said Supreme Court judge justice Surya Kant on Sunday. He was delivering the first annual HL Sibal Memorial Lecture at the Punjab and Haryana high court. (From left) Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, chief justice of Punjab and Haryana high court, justice Sheel Nagu, and Supreme Court judge justice Surya Kant during the event in Chandigarh on Sunday. (Keshav Singh/HT) Addressing a gathering of judges, senior advocates and legal luminaries at the high court's main Bar Room, justice Kant reflected on the judiciary's critical role in upholding constitutional values, particularly through the power of judicial review. He underscored that elections in a democracy are not mere procedures but fundamental mechanisms that require judicial oversight to maintain integrity and fairness in elections. 'Judicial review acts as a powerful deterrent against electoral malpractices. It upholds democratic values and fosters public trust, ensuring that the lifeblood of democracy continues to flow unblemished,' he said. Recalling the contributions of late Heera Lal Sibal—a renowned constitutional expert and senior advocate—justice Kant said that Sibal had a deep engagement with election law and the judiciary's supervisory powers under Articles 32, 226, and 227. He cited landmark cases such as Jagannath V Union of India and Ghapilal V Banshilal, where Sibal had appeared in matters involving allegations of electoral corruption. Justice Kant also spoke about the evolving dimensions of judicial review in contemporary times. One example he cited was the Supreme Court's intervention in enforcing political parties' financial disclosure norms and regulating election spending, recognising the corrosive impact of unaccounted expenditures on electoral integrity. He further highlighted Article 324 as one of the more visionary provisions in the Constitution, allowing the Election Commission to function independently and uphold democratic guarantees without political interference. The lecture was presided over by chief justice of Punjab and Haryana high court, justice Sheel Nagu. Senior advocate RS Cheema, additional solicitor general of India Satya Pal Jain, and many members of the legal fraternity attended the event. An emotional Kapil Sibal—senior advocate in the Supreme Court and MP—delivered the vote of thanks, honouring the memory of his father. Several members of the Sibal family, including those from abroad, were also present for the occasion.
