logo
Fact Check: Linda McMahon's claim that 70% of 8th-graders 'can't read proficiently' lacks a bit of reading comprehension

Fact Check: Linda McMahon's claim that 70% of 8th-graders 'can't read proficiently' lacks a bit of reading comprehension

Yahoo20-05-2025

Claim:
In the United States, 70% of eighth-grade students cannot read at grade-level proficiency.
Rating:
What's True:
In 2024, 70% of U.S. eighth-graders did not meet the "National Assessment of Educational Progress Proficient" reading achievement level on a test often referred to as the "Nation's Report Card."
What's False:
National Assessment of Educational Progress scores are not representative of grade-level performance, per the Department of Education's website. According to 2022 data, most state reading standards are closer to the NAEP Basic level, and 67% of eighth-graders in 2024 met that standard.
On May 15, 2025, U.S. Education Secretary Linda McMahon claimed that 70% of the country's eighth-graders "can't read proficiently."
"When we see scores that 70% — 70% of eighth-graders can't read at grade level or read proficiently, and that actually, when you go into high school, you see that same percentage," McMahon alleged in a clip posted on X from a discussion with Marissa Streit, CEO of the conservative advocacy group PragerU. Social media users on X and Facebook repeated McMahon's claim.
McMahon appeared to be citing a legitimate 2024 statistic on reading levels from the National Assessment of Educational Progress, often known as the "Nation's Report Card" because it's the "largest continuing and nationally representative assessment of what our nation's students know and can do," according to its website. A Department of Education spokesperson, Ellen Keast, confirmed McMahon was referring to the NAEP.
However, that 70% data point isn't indicative of grade-level proficiency — in fact, the Education Department's own website for NAEP data cautioned that it "does not represent grade-level proficiency as determined by other assessment standards (e.g., state or district assessments)." Thus, we rate this claim a mixture of truth and falsehood.
The Education Department notes that NAEP achievement levels "are to be used on a trial basis and should be interpreted and read with caution" until "the Commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) determines that the achievement levels are reasonable, valid, and informative to the public," which has not happened as of this writing.
It is also worth noting that 2024 NAEP scores for 12th-graders — the only high-school level tested — aren't out yet; in fact, the last time the federal government tested 12th-graders on the NAEP was in 2019, when 37% of high schoolers met or exceeded the NAEP Proficient reading level. Thus, it is not possible to verify McMahon's claim regarding high schoolers' proficiency levels, as the publicly available information is outdated.
As referenced by McMahon, in 2024, 70% of eighth-grade students read below the NAEP Proficient level.
(National Assessment of Educational Progress)
The National Assessment Governing Board, which sets policy for the NAEP, defined "NAEP Proficient" as "competency over challenging subject matter, including subject-matter knowledge, application of such knowledge to real-world situations, and analytical skills." Detailed explanations of the different NAEP levels are available online.
The governing board called the idea that the NAEP Proficient level is equivalent to grade-level proficiency a "common misconception" and listed it as a myth in an informational sheet:
Myth: The NAEP Proficient level is like being on grade level.
Fact: NAEP Proficient means competency over challenging subject matter. This is not the same as being "on grade level," which refers to performance on local curriculum and standards. NAEP is a general assessment of knowledge and skills in a particular subject.
The board even said in its explainer about the NAEP Proficient level that "NAEP Proficient is defined differently than other uses of the term," thus outright contradicting McMahon's claim that it represents how many students "can read proficiently."
Not every student is tested; instead, NAEP uses a representative sample. The assessment also cannot be used "to figure out 'grade level,' which depends on performance on local curriculum and tests," according to the board.
Education policy experts often criticize the assessment criteria for setting unrealistic standards: "Scholarly panels have reviewed the NAEP achievement standards and found them flawed," Tom Loveless, former director of the Brown Center on Education Policy at Brookings, wrote in 2016. "The highest scoring nations of the world would appear to be mediocre or poor performers if judged by the NAEP proficient standard."
The NAEP website addresses this criticism, calling its standards an "aspirational goal" for what students should be able to do.
NAEP also previously tracked whether state standards for reading proficiency map onto NAEP levels, and according to 2022 data, only six states have reading proficiency standards at the NAEP Proficient Level. In contrast, 48 states had standards at or above the NAEP Basic level, one step below NAEP Proficient.
In 2024, 67% of eighth-grade students met or exceeded the NAEP Basic level. That was a drop from 73% in 2019.
"A Closer Look at NAEP." Https://Www.nagb.gov/, National Assessment Governing Board, www.nagb.gov/content/dam/nagb/en/documents/publications/a-closer-look-at-naep.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2025.
"Explore Results for the 2022 NAEP Reading Assessment." Nationsreportcard.gov, Department of Education, www.nationsreportcard.gov/reports/reading/2024/g4_8/?grade=8. Accessed 16 May 2025.
Jacobson, Linda. "Report Says NAEP's 'Proficiency' Term Is Misleading." K-12 Dive, 17 Jan. 2018, www.k12dive.com/news/report-says-naeps-proficiency-term-is-misleading/514842/. Accessed 16 May 2025.
Loveless, Tom. "The NAEP Proficiency Myth." Brookings, 13 June 2016, www.brookings.edu/articles/the-naep-proficiency-myth/. Accessed 16 May 2025.
"NAEP - Mapping State Proficiency Standards onto NAEP Scales." Ed.gov, National Center for Education Statistics, nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/studies/statemappingtool/#/subject-grade. Accessed 16 May 2025.
"NAEP Guides - Scale Scores and Achievement Levels." Nces.ed.gov, Department of Education, nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/guides/scores_achv.aspx. Accessed 16 May 2025.
"NAEP Nations Report Card - the NAEP Reading Achievement Levels by Grade." Nces.ed.gov, Department of Education, nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/reading/achieve.aspx#2009_grade8. Accessed 16 May 2025.
"NAEP Reading: Reading Results." Www.nationsreportcard.gov, Department of Education, www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading/?grade=12. Accessed 16 May 2025.
"NAEP Report Cards - about the Nation's Report Card." Www.nationsreportcard.gov, Department of Education, www.nationsreportcard.gov/about.aspx. Accessed 16 May 2025.
"NAEP State Mapping." Nces.ed.gov, Department of Education, nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/studies/statemapping/. Accessed 16 May 2025.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NYC's free summer meal program offers halal food, without listing kosher options
NYC's free summer meal program offers halal food, without listing kosher options

New York Post

time2 days ago

  • New York Post

NYC's free summer meal program offers halal food, without listing kosher options

The city Department of Education's summer meal program for NYC youths boasts a variety of halal options at more than 25 locations citywide, but kosher food 'must be specially ordered,' officials told The Post. Free breakfasts and lunches will be served at hundreds of locations – schools, pools, libraries and parks – for anyone up to 18 years old, including all students from both public and private schools. 'You don't need to sign up, show any papers, or have an ID to get these meals,' the DOE says. 'Just head to one of our spots and enjoy a delicious breakfast and lunch.' Halal food – permissible for Muslims to eat under Islamic law – is available for the taking by anyone who shows up at the listed locations. Kosher food, for observant Jewish kids, is not mentioned on the DOE website. 4 DOE food worker Maria Gonzalez said she gave out 100 meals from a food truck in Haffen Park in the Bronx on the first day of the free summer meal program Friday. J.C. Rice Only when asked by The Post, the DOE said kosher meals 'must be specially ordered, and they are only available upon request. However we do not currently have any applications for kosher meals.' The glaring omission angered some Jewish advocates. 'The DOE's clear promotion of halal options alongside silence on kosher meals highlights a gap that needs urgent attention,'' said Karen Feldman, a DOE teacher and co-founder of the NYCPS Alliance, which fights antisemitism in the city public schools. 'Jewish families who keep kosher deserve the same outreach to feel fully included in this important program.' 4 A DOE food truck gave out free summer breakfasts and lunches to youths in Prospect Park, Brooklyn. J.C. Rice A similar controversy erupted in 2020 amid the COVID-19 pandemic, when the City Council's Jewish Caucus demanded that Mayor De Blasio's DOE include kosher meals along with vegetarian and halal food for Muslims in its free meal program. The DOE does not track students by religion, but an estimated 10 percent of NYC public-school students, roughly 100,000, are Muslim. The number of Jewish kids in NYC public schools is unclear, but 105,776 K-12 students enrolled in private Jewish schools in 2024-2025, said Gabriel Aaronson, director of policy and research for the non-profit advocacy group Teach Coalition. Poverty and hunger plague many NYC Jews, among other groups. The Metropolitan Council on Jewish Poverty, which serves more than 325,000 clients, says it provides emergency food that meets the cultural and religious dietary needs of both kosher and halal-observant households. 4 Karen Feldman, a DOE teacher and co-founder of a group fighting antisemitism in public schools, faulted the city's free summer meal program's failure to list kosher meals for Jewish kids. Gregory P. Mango The DOE's summer menus offer a variety of halal options it says meet Islamic guidelines. For instance, a breakfast of egg and cheese on a buttermilk biscuit, home fries, and fresh fruit; and a lunch of chicken tenders with dipping sauce, garlic knot and corn. Other halal breakfasts include waffles, zucchini and banana bread, whole-grain bagels and buttermilk pancakes. Lunches feature pizza, mozzarella sticks, beef patties, falafel, chicken sandwiches, veggie burgers and empanadas. Kosher foods meet Jewish dietary laws, including restrictions on certain animals like pork and shellfish, separation of meat and dairy, and specific slaughtering and preparation methods. If ordered, the DOE said, a kosher breakfast would include a muffin, granola or cereal, plus yogurt, an apple, and milk. A lunch would consist of hummus, tuna or egg salad, whole wheat bread, grape tomatoes, apple and milk. 4 The DOE posted July summer meals with multiple halal options, but none for kosher food, angering some Jewish advocates. DOE Last week, the DOE would not detail its preparation or purchase of halal and kosher foods. 'We are thrilled that our summer meals program is returning this year, making sure that our youngest New Yorkers are fed and nourished,'said DOE spokeswoman Jenna Lyle. Funding for the summer meal program comes out of the DOE's yearly $600 million budget for all school food.

Raskin on LGBTQ books ruling: Implications are ‘breathtaking'
Raskin on LGBTQ books ruling: Implications are ‘breathtaking'

The Hill

time2 days ago

  • The Hill

Raskin on LGBTQ books ruling: Implications are ‘breathtaking'

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) on Friday criticized the Supreme Court ruling that sided with parents who seek to opt out their children from reading LGBTQ books in school, calling its implications 'breathtaking.' 'If you can opt out of mandatory classroom readings because it offends your religious objections, you can do it because it offends your philosophical beliefs, your political beliefs, your moral beliefs, or what have you, and the court basically says, 'We'll deal with all that down the road,'' Raskin told CNN's Jim Sciutto Friday afternoon. The ruling, which stemmed from a case of Muslim, Roman Catholic and Ukrainian Orthodox parents in Maryland suing over a school district's incorporation of book with LGBTQ characters in curriculum, was decided in a 6-3 vote along ideological lines. 'You're gonna have a lot more cases where people are saying 'Our family doesn't believe in evolution. So we don't want our kid to be in class when evolution is taught,'' Raskin said about the decision, which impacts his constituents, Friday. The Montgomery County school district originally provided an opt-out option for families but rescinded it after several parents wanted to opt out for religious reasons. Parents argued up to the Supreme Court that the lack of drop out options infringed on their constitutional right of religious liberty. In a separate statement on Friday, the Maryland Democrat railed against the decision, saying it 'opens a gigantic Pandora's box.' 'At a time when public schools are under severe attack by right-wing politicians, this decision just makes running a school and teaching in a classroom that much more difficult,' he added, alluding to the Trump administration's upheaval of the Department of Education.

Kansas AG wants state education department to remove gender, sex language from lunch contracts
Kansas AG wants state education department to remove gender, sex language from lunch contracts

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Kansas AG wants state education department to remove gender, sex language from lunch contracts

Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach at a June 17, 2024, news conference at the Statehouse in Topeka. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector) TOPEKA — Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach encouraged the Kansas State Board of Education to remove sex discrimination language from the state's lunch contracts, the latest in his offensive against gender and identity politics. In a letter to state education commissioner Randy Watson and board chair Cathy Hopkins, Kobach requested the board 'comply with federal law and recent court rulings.' He took issue with wording in contracts for child nutrition and wellness programs, which expanded the definition of sex discrimination to include gender identity and sexual orientation. 'The inclusion of such language in school contracts is not only unnecessary but also contrary to federal law and the recent court ruling,' Kobach said Thursday in a news release. In his first days in office, President Donald Trump signed executive orders that did away with diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, including broader definitions of gender identity and sex discrimination. Kobach said those orders, along with a Biden-era Title IX court case led by Kobach, are enough to warrant modification of school lunch contracts The letter comes in the same week Kobach requested the U.S. Department of Education investigate four Kansas school districts that have policies allowing teachers to maintain confidentiality with children who are socially transitioning, which refers to the changes a person makes to the way they present themselves to align with their gender identity. The four school districts in Kansas City, Olathe, Shawnee Mission and Topeka were the subject of a Title IX complaint from the Defense of Freedom Institute for Policy Studies, a conservative nonprofit founded by two former Trump administration officials. The Kansas State Board of Education is scheduled to meet on July 8 and 9. Its agenda indicates the board will discuss Kobach's letter at the end of its July 8 meeting.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store