British FM says ‘window now exists' for diplomacy with Iran
Lammy met with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff at the White House, before talks on Friday in Geneva with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi alongside his French, German and EU counterparts.
The diplomatic flurry came as European countries call for de-escalation in the face of Israel's bombing campaign against Iran's nuclear program — and as US President Donald Trump weighs up whether or not to join the strikes against Tehran.
'The situation in the Middle East remains perilous,' Lammy said in a statement released by the UK embassy in Washington.
'We discussed how Iran must make a deal to avoid a deepening conflict. A window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution,' Lammy said.
'Tomorrow, I will be heading to Geneva to meet with the Iranian foreign minister alongside my French, German and EU counterparts,' the British minister said.
'Now is the time to put a stop to the grave scenes in the Middle East and prevent a regional escalation that would benefit no one.'
The State Department said Lammy and Rubio had 'agreed Iran can never develop or acquire a nuclear weapon.'
Araghchi earlier confirmed he would 'meet with the European delegation in Geneva on Friday,' in a statement carried by Iranian state news agency IRNA.
The talks are set to include Lammy, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot and German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul, as well as EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas.
Trump has said he is weighing military action against Iran's nuclear facilities as Israel pummels the country and Tehran responds with missile fire.
France, Germany, Britain and the European Union were all signatories of the 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran, which Trump sunk during his first term in office.
The EU's Kallas, in coordination with European countries, has insisted that diplomacy remains the best path toward ensuring that Iran does not develop a nuclear bomb.
On Wednesday, French President Emmanuel Macron said European nations were planning to suggest a negotiated solution to end the Iran-Israel conflict. He asked his foreign minister to draw up an initiative with 'close partners' to that end.
Barrot has been in regular touch with his German and British counterparts since Israel launched massive air strikes against Iran on Friday.
'We are ready to take part in negotiations aimed at obtaining from Iran a lasting rollback of its nuclear and ballistic missile programs,' Barrot said.
Israel says its air campaign is aimed at preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Iran had been enriching uranium to 60 percent — far above the 3.67 percent limit set by a 2015 deal with international powers, but still short of the 90 percent threshold needed for a nuclear warhead. Iran denies it is building nuclear weapons.
del-ec-bc/sst/acb
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leaders
5 hours ago
- Leaders
60 MPs Urge UK to Immediately Recognize Palestinian State
Approximately 60 British Labour MPs have urged the UK government to immediately recognize the Palestinian state and halt what they labeled as 'ethnic cleansing' in Gaza, according to The Guardian. Rafah Plan A group of centrist and left-wing MPs write a letter this week to the Foreign Secretary David Lammy asking him to act immediately to stop Israel's reported plan to establish a so-called 'humanitarian city' of tents in the ruins of Rafah, in southern Gaza. 'By not recognizing [Palestine] as a state, we undermine our own policy of a two-state solution and set an expectation that the status quo can continue and see the effective erasure and annexation of Palestinian territory,' the letter said. The MPs also described the plan as 'ethnic cleansing' warning that such a move means the forcible transfer of civilians and the erasure of Palestinian presence as well. 'It is with great urgency and concern that we are writing to you regarding the Israeli Defense Minister's announcement on Monday of his plans to forcibly transfer all Palestinian civilians in Gaza to a camp in the ruined city of Rafah without allowing them to leave,' the letter added. Five Measures In this context, the 59 MPs introduced five different measures for the government to stop the Israeli government from carrying out its Rafah plan. Organized by Labour Friends of Palestine and the Middle East group, the letter requests ministers to take five different measures to ensure the following: Recognizing the state of Palestine Supporting the UN Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA) Securing the release of hostages Pressing for the full and unhindered resumption of humanitarian aid Fully reviewing and placing restrictions on trade with and financial support of illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank Since the beginning of Hamas-Israel War in Gaza in 2023, the Israeli strikes have killed more than 57,000 Palestinians and wounded more than 137,000, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Related Topics: Malta to Recognize Palestinian State in June, Says PM France 'Determined' to Recognize Palestinian State, PM Says OIC Welcomes Slovenia's Decision to Recognize Palestine Short link : Post Views: 6
Arab News
5 hours ago
- Arab News
UK's steady, silent decline a worrying echo of the 1970s
In July 2025, the question of whether the UK is in decline no longer feels rhetorical in nature, it feels like resigned recognition of the fact. One year into Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government, the chaos and dysfunction of the Johnson-Truss era of Conservative rule have faded. But so too has momentum. A brittle, overstretched economic model, persistent underinvestment and political caution have combined to leave the country in a state of quiet regression. Britain in 2025 bears an uncomfortable resemblance to that of the 1970s, not in terms of the headlines but in the undercurrents. Back then, the UK faced a decade of stagflation, industrial unrest, a weakening global role and rising domestic disillusionment. The country suffered a brain drain, watched investors flee and relied on an International Monetary Fund bailout to steady its finances. By 1979, it had become, in the words of many commentators, 'the sick man of Europe.' Fast forward to 2025 and economic growth once again remains stagnant, with gross domestic product expected to rise by a mere 1.2 percent. While the IMF is not directly involved this time, the UK's fiscal landscape nevertheless appears increasingly precarious. National debt has soared to 105 percent of GDP, taxes are set to climb further and rising interest costs threaten to outstrip growth over the next five years. Inflation has subsided, yet public services continue to face significant strains. The Labour Party has managed to stabilize political tensions but failed to inspire confidence in its ability to achieve long-term revitalization. Taxation levels have reached historic postwar highs, with threshold freezes subtly shifting middle earners into higher tax brackets. Much like during the 1970s, the middle class feels excessively taxed, inadequately rewarded and uncertain about the future. And so, the similarities between the two eras deepen. In the late 1970s, the middle class, once the engine of postwar prosperity, similarly found itself squeezed between rising prices and falling state performance. Half a century later, the same group is once again under siege. Wages are stagnant in real terms, mortgage payments have surged, rising energy bills are biting deeper into family budgets, and private education and childcare have become luxuries. Homeownership, a once-solid symbol of middle-class stability, is increasingly out of reach. Professional families now live precariously on credit, vulnerable to shocks and increasingly disillusioned with the political class. The outcome of all this? A demographic shift reminiscent of the brain drain witnessed in the 1970s. This decline, driven mainly by reduced work opportunities and study visa allocations, underscores a troubling issue: the UK is losing its upward potential while experiencing a contraction of its talent pool. London, once a magnet for international capital, entrepreneurs and academics, is now seeing its allure dim. Paris, Frankfurt and even Amsterdam are claiming gains in finance and tech. The City of London remains resilient but its future feels encumbered by Brexit, bureaucracy and uncertainty. An exodus from the London Stock Exchange marks a pivotal moment for the UK's financial sector, the Confederation of British Industry has warned. Since 2016, 213 firms have delisted amid a wave of overseas listings, private takeovers and waning investor interest in UK stocks. Since Brexit, exports of UK goods have lagged behind its G7 peers, investment has slowed and regulatory divergence has raised costs, cumulatively undermining business confidence, cross-border trade and the UK's global competitiveness. Meanwhile, both middle-class professionals and high-net-worth individuals have increasingly relocated to Canada, Australia, the UAE, Singapore and the US, driven in part by tax pressures and the erosion of the UK's 'non-dom' regime. It is a quiet exodus reminiscent of the 1970s. Back then, disillusionment sparked radical realignment and Thatcherism eventually swept away the postwar consensus in favor of market liberalism. In 2025, the response is more muted. The Reform UK party is rising on the political right, while Labour governs by managerialism. The country has chosen order over ambition. But stability, on its own, is not prosperity. Even Britain's foreign policy posture echoes the previous decades. The country is active on the war in Ukraine, committed to NATO and respected diplomatically. But its economic weight no longer matches its strategic vocabulary. As in the 1970s, the UK of today retains influence through alliances, not autonomy. London, once a magnet for international capital, entrepreneurs and academics, is now seeing its allure dim. Dr. John Sfakianakis There are differences between the eras, too, of course. Britain in 2025 is more diverse, more peaceful and less industrial than it was in the 1970s. The labor market is more flexible, inflation is less volatile. But the psychological parallels are stark. Now, as then, there exists a pervasive sense that the country is falling behind, that its best days might be behind it and that no political force has yet made a convincing case for how to reverse the slide. Driven more by ideology than evidence, the UK, unlike Germany or Canada, is now one of the few countries to impose a 20 percent value-added tax on private education, a policy that risks placing strain on the state sector without meaningfully reducing inequality. What is striking is not the urgency of the decline, it is its normalization. As it did in the late 1970s, Britain is adjusting to lowered expectations; it still functions but it no longer aspires. And while it continues to avoid collapse, it increasingly tolerates stagnation and mediocrity. The lesson of the 1970s was not just about endurance, it was about transformation. That decade ended with a revolution in Britain's political economy, one that reshaped its state, markets and global role for a generation. In 2025, the question is not whether the UK can survive its decline, it is whether the nation can find the courage to confront it. Britain today has the institutions, human capital and democratic depth to recover. But that recovery will not come from managerial politics or minimal policy. It will require imagination and the willingness to once again ask what kind of country it wants to be. Decline, when it is met with denial, becomes destiny. Acknowledged, it can become a moment of aspiration. That was the lesson of the 1970s. It remains the lesson today. To reverse this present course, Britain will need more than competent administration; it must abandon its reliance on short-term fiscal management and embrace a long-term economic and institutional strategy grounded in investment, productivity and social cohesion. To revitalize the nation, the development of a fresh growth strategy, one that recognizes the difference between stable GDP figures and actual economic vitality, is critical. The stock market alone does not represent the health of the economy. Secondly, comprehensive reform of the tax system is overdue. Threshold freezes and stealth increases have disproportionately hurt the middle and aspiring classes, while failing to restore fiscal strength. Thirdly, the state must regain its strategic capability, not in the form of centralized bureaucracy but in institutional capacity. Fourthly, a radical approach to human capital is essential. From early childhood to lifelong learning, Britain's skills development system is fragmented and underfunded. Finally, a national narrative is needed. For too long, the UK's political class has offered the rhetoric of survival and slogans of heritage, rather than a persuasive account of the future. Britain's institutions remain intact. Its rule of law remains strong. Its people are creative, tolerant and adaptive. But these strengths must be mobilized, through ideas, investment and leadership that transcend the default settings of recent decades. It was once said that Britain 'muddles through' — but muddling has become a strategy, and it is one that can no longer cope with the demands of a complex and shifting world. The 1970s did not mark the end of the UK, they were a turning point. What followed was a redefinition of the state, the market and Britain's place in the world. In 2025, another pivot is required. As Shakespeare warned, the fault lies not in fate but in our own hands. The UK's decline is not preordained, but the result of strategic drift and political timidity.
Arab News
6 hours ago
- Arab News
'Inexcusable' failures led to Trump assassination attempt: Senate report
WASHINGTON: A congressional inquiry into the attempt to assassinate US President Donald Trump at a campaign rally a year ago on Sunday lamented 'inexcusable' failures in the Secret Service's operations and response, and called for more serious disciplinary action. On July 13, 2024, a gunman shot the then-Republican presidential candidate during a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, grazing his ear. One bystander was killed and two other people in addition to Trump were wounded before a government sniper killed the gunman, 20-year-old Thomas Crooks. 'What happened was inexcusable and the consequences imposed for the failures so far do not reflect the severity of the situation,' said the report released by the US Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. The dramatic incident energized Trump's bid to return to the White House, with his campaign using a photo of him bloodied and pumping his fist as he was hurried offstage to woo voters. The report did not shed new light on the gunman's motive, which still remains a mystery, but accused the Secret Service of 'a cascade of preventable failures that nearly cost President Trump his life.' 'The United States Secret Service failed to act on credible intelligence, failed to coordinate with local law enforcement,' said the committee's Republican chairman Rand Paul. 'Despite those failures, no one has been fired,' he added. 'It was a complete breakdown of security at every level-fueled by bureaucratic indifference, a lack of clear protocols, and a shocking refusal to act on direct threats. 'We must hold individuals accountable and ensure reforms are fully implemented so this never happens again.' Staff disciplined The Secret Service cited communication, technical and human errors and said reforms were underway, including on coordination between different law enforcement bodies and establishment of a division dedicated to aerial surveillance. Six unidentified staff have been disciplined, according to the agency. The punishments range from 10 to 42 days' suspension without pay, and all six were put into restricted or non-operational positions. Reflecting on the assassination attempt earlier this week, Trump said 'mistakes were made' but that he was satisfied with the investigation. In an interview with his daughter-in-law on Fox News' 'My View with Lara Trump,' Trump said the sniper 'was able to get him from a long distance with one shot. If he didn't do that, you would have had an even worse situation.' 'It was unforgettable,' Trump said of the events. 'I didn't know exactly what was going on. I got whacked. There's no question about that. And fortunately, I got down quickly. People were screaming.'
