EU envoy heads to Washington as trade deal deadline looms
EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic headed to Washington Tuesday in a push to seal a trade deal with President Donald Trump's administration ahead of a July 9 negotiating
deadline.
The European Commission, which conducts trade policy for the 27-nation bloc, has until Wednesday next week to reach a deal or see swinging US tariffs kick in on a majority of its goods.
Sefcovic told reporters he aimed to hold meetings with his US counterparts in Washington on Wednesday and Thursday. 'The ninth of July is around the corner,' he said.
Since the United States observes the Independence Day public holiday on July 4, the two days will be critical for the European Union to snag a deal to avoid the sweeping levies.
If no agreement is reached, the default tariff on EU imports is expected to double to 20 percent or even higher — Trump having at one point threatened 50 percent.
Sefcovic said he has held 'intensive' and 'very intense' discussions with his US counterparts, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.
'Of course, we hope to see them in Washington, DC later this week, we know that there is the fourth of July on Friday, so it leaves us Wednesday and Thursday for eventual meetings, which we are planning right now,' he told reporters in Brussels.
Sefcovic last met US negotiators face-to-face in Paris on the sidelines of an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development meeting early in June, but he has spoken to his counterparts several times by phone in the past few months.A technical EU delegation is already in Washington, Sefcovic said.
The EU commission has received 'first drafts of the proposals for the eventual agreement in principle' that 'we are working on', he added.
The EU's biggest economies, France and Germany, last week urged a quick agreement—indicating they could back an unbalanced accord with some level of US tariffs on EU goods.Meanwhile, the European Union said Monday it had agreed a new long-term trade deal with Ukraine, covering imports of food products from the war-torn country that have angered EU farmers.
'With this modernized agreement, we are securing trade flows from Ukraine to Europe and global markets,' European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said.'At the same time, we continue to safeguard the interests of our farmers.'
Brussels and Kyiv have been wrangling over the deal after protests from farmers saw the EU slap quotas on tariff-free Ukrainian agricultural imports into the bloc.
In the wake of Russia's February 2022 invasion, the EU gave tariff-free access to most Ukrainian agricultural imports to help the country's economy.
But irate EU farmers said the Ukrainian produce unfairly undercuts their own. In response, Brussels added certain restrictions in 2024, when it extended the agreement for one additional year, by introducing a maximum ceiling on certain tariff-free products such as cereals, poultry, eggs, sugar and corn.
The European Commission said that under the new deal -- which still needs to be finalized -- quotas would remain for those sensitive agricultural areas.
The new terms 'improve access compared to the previous 2016 agreement, but moderate imports compared to their peak,' EU agriculture commissioner Christophe Hansen said.
In return, Kyiv will cut its quotas for pork, poultry and sugar imported from the EU and push to align its food production standards with those of the 27-nation bloc by 2028, Brussels said.
Agricultural powerhouse Ukraine has been desperate to maintain preferential access for its products to the EU as it seeks to keep income flowing after three-and-a-half grueling years of war.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump claims victory as he signs controversial budget and tax bill into law
Washington, DC – United States President Donald Trump has signed his signature tax and spending bill, capping a months-long push to codify his top policy priorities into law. The sweeping bill has prompted controversy among both Democrats and members of Trump's own Republican Party for its deep cuts to social safety programmes and the hefty sum its tax cuts and spending are expected to add to the national debt. Recent polls have also shown tanking public support for the legislation – which Trump calls the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' – as many of its provisions come to light. Still, Trump on Friday took nothing short of a victory lap, hosting a White House signing ceremony aligned with the Independence Day celebrations in Washington, DC. The address began with a flyover from a B-2 Spirit bomber, the same jet used in US strikes on Iran last month. 'The last two weeks, there has never been anything like it as far as winning, winning, winning,' Trump said from the White House balcony. 'I want to tell you that I've never seen people so happy in our country, because so many different groups of people are being taken care of.' He also took a moment to revisit his victory in the 2024 election and reiterate his belief that voters gave him an ironclad mandate to carry out his policy agenda. He signed the bill flanked by Republicans, including Speaker Mike Johnson and Representative Steve Scalise. 'The American people gave us a historic mandate in November,' Trump said. 'This is a triumph of democracy on the birthday of democracy.' Opponents, meanwhile, used the occasion to again condemn the bill, with the top Democrat in the Senate, Chuck Schumer, again saying that the sweeping legislation is 'betraying' US citizens. 'This bill isn't freedom. This bill isn't independence. This bill is betrayal,' Schumer wrote on the social media platform X. A months-long journey The legislation represents the most substantial salvo yet in Trump's policy blitz, in which he has mostly relied on more presidential orders than on congressional action. The passage of his mega-bill underscores the president's deep hold on the Republican Party, which has largely been remade in his likeness since his first term from 2017 to 2021. The party currently controls both chambers of Congress. The 'One Big Beautiful Bill' is set to add an estimated $3.3 trillion to the national debt, an increase that might once have been considered a sacrilege for the party's fiscal hawks. It also tightens eligibility for the low-income healthcare programme Medicaid and the food assistance programme SNAP, in a move that could hurt Republicans facing tough re-election campaigns. Still, in the end, only three Republicans in the Senate and two in the House were willing to break from Trump, in both cases leaving opponents just short of the votes needed to scuttle the bill. For their part, Democrats were unified in their opposition. In a last-ditch and largely symbolic effort on Thursday, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries embarked on a record-breaking speech to delay any voting on the bill. Over the next eight hours and 45 minutes, Jeffries condemned Republicans for rushing to meet Trump's July 4 deadline, accusing them of fast-tracking a bill that many conservatives had publicly voiced discomfort towards. 'We don't work for Donald Trump. We work for the American people,' he said at one point. 'That's why we're right here now, on the floor of the House of Representatives, standing up for the American people.' He maintained Republicans would be punished at the ballot box over the bill during the midterm elections in 2026. A wide-ranging bill The legislation covers a range of issues, from immigration to tax reforms. For example, it extends sweeping tax cuts passed in 2017 during Trump's first term, amounting to a total of $4.5 trillion in tax reductions. It also allows taxpayers to deduct income earned from tips and overtime, as well as interest paid on loans for buying cars made in the US, while raising exemptions on estate taxes. It also extends a child tax credit. The administration has hailed the cuts as a victory for working-class Americans, although several analyses have found that wealthier taxpayers are most likely to benefit. Gains for lower-income taxpayers are likely to be offset by healthcare and food assistance cuts, according to Yale University's Budget Lab. All told, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, about 11.8 million more Americans will be uninsured over the next 10 years due to the Medicaid cuts, with another 4.2 million to lose health insurance due to cuts to pandemic-era subsidies. The legislation also peels back green energy and electric vehicle tax incentives, part of Trump's wider push to pivot away from clean energy and towards the influential fossil fuel industry. It allocates $170bn for immigration and border enforcement funding, in what the American Immigration Council calls the 'largest investment in detention and deportation in US history'. Nonpartisan analysts have said the increase in the national debt from the spending has the potential to slow economic growth, raise borrowing costs and crowd out other government spending in the years ahead. But on Friday, Trump dismissed the criticism. 'They [Democrats] have developed a standard line: 'We can't let them get away with it. It's dangerous. Everybody's going to die,'' Trump said. 'It's actually just the opposite. Everybody's going to live.' 'After this kicks in, our country is going to be a rocket ship, economically.'
Al Jazeera
11 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Elon Musk revives third party idea after ‘One Big Beautiful Bill' passes
Billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has weighed in publicly for the first time since the passage of President Donald Trump's signature piece of budget legislation, commonly known as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill'. On Friday, Musk took to his social media platform X to once again float the possibility of a third party to rival the two major ones — the Democrats and the Republicans — in United States politics. 'Independence Day is the perfect time to ask if you want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system! Should we create the America Party?' Musk asked his followers, attaching an interactive poll. Musk has maintained that both major parties have fallen out of step with what he describes as the '80 percent in the middle' – a number he estimates represents the moderates and independents who do not align with either end of the political spectrum. His desire to form a new party, however, emerged after a public fallout with Trump over the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', a sweeping piece of legislation that passed both chambers of Congress on Thursday. Yet again on Friday, Musk revisited his objections to the bill, albeit indirectly. He shared Senator Rand Paul's critique that the bill 'explodes the deficit in the near-term', responding with a re-post and the '100' emoji, signifying his full agreement. The 'One Big Beautiful Bill' has long been a policy priority for Trump, even before he returned to office for a second term on January 20. His aim was to pass a single piece of legislation that included several key pillars from his agenda, allowing him to proceed with his goals without having to seek multiple approvals from Congress. But the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' has been controversial among Democrats and even some Republicans. The bill would make permanent the 2017 tax cuts from Trump's first term, which critics argue disproportionately benefit the wealthy over middle- to low-income workers. It also raises the debt ceiling by $5 trillion and is projected to add $3.3 trillion to the country's deficit, according to a nonpartisan analysis from the Congressional Budget Office. Further funding is earmarked to bolster Trump's campaign to crack down on immigration into the US. But to pay for the tax cuts and the spending, the bill includes cuts to critical social services, including Medicaid, a government health insurance programme for low-income households, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), also known as food stamps. Fiscal conservatives opposed the debt increase, while several other Republicans worried about how Medicaid restrictions would affect their constituents. But in recent weeks, Trump and other Republican leaders rallied many of the holdouts, allowing the bill to pass both chambers of Congress by narrow margins. Senator Paul of Kentucky was one of only three Republicans in the Senate to vote 'no' on the bill. In the aftermath of its final passage on Thursday, he wrote on social media: 'This is Washington's MO: short-term politicking over long-term sustainability.' Trump is slated to sign the bill into law in a White House ceremony on Friday. The debate over the bill, however, proved to be a tipping point for Trump and Musk's relationship. In late May, during his final days as a 'special government adviser', Musk appeared on the TV programme CBS Sunday Morning and said he was 'disappointed' in the legislation, citing the proposed increase to the budget deficit. 'I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful,' Musk told a CBS journalist. By May 30, his time in the Trump administration had come to an end, though the two men appeared to part on cordial terms. But after leaving his government role, Musk escalated his attacks on the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', warning it would be disastrous for the US economy. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote on June 3. Musk went so far as to suggest Trump should be impeached and that he had information about the president's relationship with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, though he did not offer evidence. Those posts have since been deleted. Trump, meanwhile, accused Musk on social media of going 'CRAZY' and seeking to lash out because the bill would peel back government incentives for the production of electric vehicles (EVs). On June 5, Musk began to muse about launching his own political party. 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' he wrote. In follow-up posts, he noted that his followers appeared to agree with him, and he endorsed a commenter's suggestion for the party's potential name. ''America Party' has a nice ring to it. The party that actually represents America!' Musk said. As the world's richest man and the owner of companies like the carmaker Tesla and the rocket manufacturer SpaceX, Musk has billions of dollars at his disposal: The Bloomberg Billionaires Index estimates his net worth at $361bn as of Friday. But experts warn that third parties have historically struggled to compete in the US's largely two-party system, and that they can even weaken movements they profess to back, by draining votes away from more viable candidates. Musk's estimate about the '80 percent in the middle' might also be an overstatement. Polls vary as to how many people identify as independent or centrists. But in January, the research firm Gallup found that an average of 43 percent of American adults identified as independent, matching a record set in 2014. Gallup's statistics also found a decline in the number of American adults saying they were 'moderate', with 34 percent embracing the label in 2024. Still, on Friday, Musk shared his thoughts about how a potential third party could gain sway in the largely bifurcated US political sphere. He said he planned to take advantage of the weak majorities the major parties are able to obtain in Congress. 'One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts,' he wrote. 'Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people.'
Al Jazeera
16 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
When will Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' take effect? Here's what comes next
On July 3, the United States House of Representatives passed President Donald Trump's signature tax cut and spending package, which he has called the 'One Big Beautiful Bill'. The bill combines tax reductions, spending hikes on defence and border security, and cuts to social safety nets. Democratic Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries warned that the bill 'hurts everyday Americans and rewards billionaires with massive tax breaks'. Trump's erstwhile ally, billionaire Elon Musk, publicly opposed the bill, arguing it would bloat expenditure and the country's already unmatched debt. Trump is expected to sign the bill into law on Friday, July 4 – the US's independence day – at 4pm ET. Here's what's next – and whom the bill will affect: How have taxes been lowered? The main goal of the bill was to extend Trump's first-term tax cuts. In 2017, Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which lowered taxes and increased the standard deduction for all taxpayers, primarily benefitting higher-income earners. More than a third of the total cuts went to households with an income of $460,000 or more. The top 1 percent (roughly 2.4 million people) received average tax cuts of about $61,090 by 2025 – higher than any other income group. By contrast, the middle 60 percent of earners (78 million people) saw cuts in the range of $380 to $1,800. Those tax breaks were set to expire this year, but the new bill has made them permanent. It also adds some more cuts Trump promised during his latest campaign. For instance, there is a change to the US tax code called the State and Local Taxes deduction. This will let taxpayers deduct certain local taxes (like property taxes) from their federal tax return. Currently, people can only deduct up to $10,000 of these taxes. The new bill would raise that cap from $10,000 to $40,000 for five years. Taxpayers will also be allowed to deduct income earned from tips and overtime, until 2028, as well as interest paid on loans for buying cars made in the US from this year until 2028. Elsewhere, the estate tax exemption will rise to $15m for individuals and $30m for married couples. In all, the legislation contains about $4.5 trillion in tax cuts. How big are social welfare cuts? To help offset the cost of the tax cuts, Republicans plan to scale back Medicaid and food assistance programmes for low-income families. Their stated goal was to focus these programmes on certain groups – primarily pregnant women, people with disabilities and children – while also reducing what they deem to be waste, including by limiting access to immigrants. Currently, more than 71 million people depend on Medicaid, the government health insurance program. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the bill would leave an additional 17 million Americans without health cover in the next decade. While Medicaid helps Americans suffering from poor health, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) helps poor people afford groceries. About 40 million Americans currently receive benefits through SNAP, also known as food stamps. The CBO calculates that 4.7 million SNAP participants will lose out over the 2025-2034 period, due to program reductions. Changes to Medicaid and SNAP could become permanent provisions, with no sunset clauses attached to them. A recent White House memo pointed to more than $1 trillion in welfare cuts from the new bill – the largest spending reductions to the US safety net in modern history. Will there be new money for national security? The bill sets aside about $350bn, to be spread out over several years, for Trump's border and national security plans. This includes: $46bn for the US-Mexico border wall $45bn to fund 100,000 beds in migrant detention centres Billions more to hire an extra 10,000 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents by 2029, as part of Trump's plan to carry out the largest mass deportation effort in US history. Will clean energy be affected? Republicans have rolled back tax incentives that support clean energy projects powered by renewables like solar and wind, instead giving tax breaks to coal and oil companies. These 'green' tax breaks were a part of former President Joe Biden's landmark Inflation Reduction Act, which aimed to tackle climate change and reduce healthcare costs. A tax break for people who buy new or used electric vehicles will expire on September 30 this year, instead of at the end of 2032 under current law. How will the bill affect the US debt profile? The legislation would raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, from $36.2 trillion currently (which amounts to 122 percent of gross domestic product or GDP), going beyond the $4 trillion outlined in the version passed by the House in May. Washington cannot borrow more than its stated debt ceiling. But since 1960, Congress has raised, suspended or changed the terms of the debt ceiling 78 times, facilitating more leverage and undermining the US's long-term fiscal stability. In his first term, Trump oversaw a roughly $8 trillion increase in the federal debt, which surged due to 2017 tax cuts and emergency spending, approved by Congress, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Debt as a share of GDP was already higher last year than it was anytime outside of World War II, the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis or the COVID-19 pandemic. Deficit concerns contributed to Moody's downgrading of the US credit score in May. For its part, the White House claims the new tax bill will reduce projected deficits by more than $1.4 trillion over the next decade, in part by spurring additional growth. But economists on both sides of the aisle have strongly disputed that. Indeed, according to the non-partisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, interest payments on national debt will rise to $2 trillion per year by 2034 owing to the legislation, crowding out spending on other goods and services. How did the House of Representatives vote on the bill? The lower house of the US Congress voted by a margin of 218 to 214 in favour of the bill on Thursday. All 212 Democratic members of the House opposed the bill. They were joined by Representatives Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, who broke from the Republican majority. On July 1, the Senate narrowly passed the bill by a 51–50 vote, with the deciding vote cast by Vice President JD Vance. Who will benefit the most? According to Yale University's Budget Lab, wealthier taxpayers are likely to gain more from this bill than lower-income Americans. They estimate that people in the lowest income bracket will see their incomes drop by 2.5 percent, mainly because of cuts to SNAP and Medicaid, while the highest earners will see their incomes rise by 2.2 percent.
