Senator criticizes Pentagon officials on alleged US troop drawdown in Europe
WASHINGTON — The chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee has criticized Pentagon "mid-level" leadership for what he said was a misguided plan to reduce the number of US troops based in Europe.
"There are some who believe now is the time to reduce drastically our military footprint in Europe," Senator Roger Wicker said at a hearing with US European Command and US Africa Command military leadership.
"I'm troubled at those deeply misguided and dangerous views held by some mid-level bureaucrats within the Defense Department."
It was not immediately clear what "mid-level bureaucrats" Wicker was talking about but he warned that "they've been working to pursue a US retreat from Europe and they've often been doing so without coordinating with the secretary of defense."
However, neither the Defense Department nor the Pentagon has made any proposal to cut force levels there public.
His criticism of any potential reduction in US support to NATO and Ukraine were a running theme throughout the hearing.
Under questioning from senators, Army General Christopher Cavoli, commander of US European Command and the supreme allied commander Europe, said a potential plan by the Trump administration to relinquish the allied commander position to another nation could create problems for control over the US nuclear weapons and the tens of thousands of American troops deployed across the continent.
A US general has long held the post of allied commander, a position that oversees all NATO military plans and decisions.
And the US is often the largest troop contributor to NATO operations.
"I think that would bring some challenges in terms of nuclear command and control. It would put us in a position where, in an Article Five situation, we could have for the first time since the First World War large numbers of American troops under non-US command," Cavoli said, referring to NATO's Article Five collective defense pledge in which an attack against one allied nation is considered an attack on all.
"I think those are things that would have to be considered carefully," Cavoli said, calling any plan to give up the leadership role "problematic."
He also noted that NATO allies are investing in their militaries "at a rate we haven't seen since the end of the Cold War. A 40% increase in spending since February of 2022."
He said the presence of US troops in Europe has been essential to NATO's transformation and modernization efforts and is also critical to America's national defense.
While there has been no official announcement about any US military drawdown in Europe, President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have both made it clear they want NATO to do more to defend its own region and that the US is turning to focus more on China and America's southern border.
The US has also dropped its leadership role in the broad effort to coordinate military support for Ukraine and given the helm to the British.
Both steps have worried allies, who fear the US is stepping away from its long-held commitment to Europe and NATO.
The number of US troops stationed in Europe increased by about 20,000 under Trump's Democratic predecessor Joe Biden in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
They helped with training, logistics of weapons shipments and reassured allies on NATO's eastern flank that the United States would defend them.
There have been roughly 100,000 troops there since, including the Navy's 6th Fleet, as well as nuclear warheads. US firepower ensures that NATO's ability to deter Russia is credible.
NATO allies have expressed concern about any reduction of American troops or support in the region.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio is in Brussels this week seeking to reassure NATO allies about the US commitment to the alliance under Trump.
That military reassurance had been almost put into question by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who used his first visit to NATO and the Ukraine Defense Contact Group in February to tell allies that the US would be reassessing troop levels with an eye towards a greater focus on China.
Hegseth told allies he was there "to directly and unambiguously express that stark strategic realities prevent the United States of America from being primarily focused on the security of Europe."
Trump has tried to broker a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine, but so far that effort has faltered. — Euronews
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
2 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Ukrainian F-16 shot down in Russian strike; pilot killed after downing seven targets
CHERKASY, Ukraine — Ukraine's Air Force confirmed Sunday that an F-16 fighter jet was shot down in a Russian overnight airstrike in the central Cherkasy region, killing the pilot and injuring six civilians. The pilot was hailed for his efforts in diverting the aircraft from populated areas and downing seven Russian aerial targets before the crash. According to the Air Force statement, the pilot was engaging waves of incoming Russian drones and missiles when his aircraft sustained critical damage. He continued fighting and attempted to steer the plane away from residential zones, but was ultimately unable to eject in time. 'The pilot used the full arsenal of onboard weapons and shot down seven air targets,' the statement said. 'He died heroically in the line of duty.' President Volodymyr Zelenskyy paid tribute to the pilot on X, calling for a full investigation into the circumstances of his death. He also reiterated urgent appeals for enhanced air defense capabilities to counter the scale of Russian bombardments. 'Ukraine needs to strengthen its air defense — the thing that best protects lives,' Zelenskyy said. 'We are ready to purchase American systems and count on the leadership and political will of the United States, Europe, and all our partners.' The overnight Russian assault involved 477 drones and 60 missiles, of which Ukraine claims to have intercepted 211 drones and 38 missiles. Cherkasy Governor Ihor Taburets said the airstrike also injured six people in the city of Smila, where three nine-story buildings and a college were damaged. Emergency teams have set up a crisis response center and are assessing the full extent of the damage. Meanwhile, Russia's Defense Ministry said the strikes targeted Ukrainian military-industrial facilities and oil refineries, declaring the attack 'successful' with all intended sites 'hit.' The loss of the F-16 marks a significant moment for Ukraine, which has only recently begun integrating the advanced U.S.-made jets into its defense arsenal amid hopes of shifting momentum in the ongoing war. — Agencies
Saudi Gazette
2 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
IAEA: Iran could resume uranium enrichment within months after U.S. strikes
WASHINGTON — Iran could restart uranium enrichment "in a matter of months" following recent U.S. airstrikes on its nuclear facilities, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) warned, signaling that the damage inflicted by American forces was not sufficient to dismantle Tehran's nuclear capabilities. In an interview released Saturday by CBS News, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi said that despite the scale of the attacks, Iran retains the technological and industrial capacity to resume its nuclear program. 'They can have, in a matter of months, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium or less than that,' Grossi said. 'The damage is severe, but not total.' On June 22, the United States launched a coordinated assault on Iran's nuclear infrastructure, dropping six bunker-buster bombs on the Fordo nuclear facility and unleashing dozens of cruise missiles on key sites in Natanz and Isfahan. The operation followed rising tensions between Iran and Israel and was aimed at halting what Washington described as Iran's expanding nuclear threat. In the wake of the strikes, U.S. officials have pushed back on reports suggesting the attacks merely delayed Iran's progress by several months, rather than eliminating it entirely. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi admitted the bombings caused 'excessive and serious' damage but insisted that Iran retains core capabilities. Grossi echoed that concern, saying Iran's nuclear knowledge and infrastructure cannot be erased. 'You cannot disinvent this,' he noted. 'Iran is a very sophisticated country in terms of nuclear technology.' He also raised alarm over unexplained traces of uranium found at undeclared Iranian sites, saying the IAEA still lacks credible explanations about their origin. On the issue of Iran's 408.6-kilogram stockpile of uranium enriched to 60%, enough to build more than nine nuclear bombs if further enriched, Grossi said, 'Some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved.' Grossi emphasized the urgency of restoring access for IAEA inspectors: 'There has to be at some point a clarification.' However, Araghchi announced Saturday that Grossi would be barred from entering Iran, a move swiftly condemned by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who called it 'a dangerous step toward further nuclear opacity.' The latest developments come on the heels of a 12-day war between Israel and Iran, which erupted on June 13 after Israeli airstrikes targeted Iranian military, nuclear, and civilian sites. Iran's Health Ministry reported 606 killed and over 5,300 injured. In response, Tehran launched drone and missile barrages that killed at least 29 people in Israel and wounded more than 3,400, according to figures from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The conflict ended with a U.S.-brokered ceasefire on June 24. — Agencies
Arab News
17 hours ago
- Arab News
Tehran remains committed to diplomacy, but ‘peace by force is not peace,' Iran's ambassador to Japan tells Arab News Japan
TOKYO: From the only country ever targeted by atomic bombs, a senior Iranian diplomat has called for a return to diplomacy over destruction amid simmering nuclear tensions in the Middle East. Peiman Seadat, Tehran's ambassador to Japan, says his country remains open to dialogue but cautions that 'peace by force is not peace' following recent attacks on its nuclear sites and failed negotiations. In an exclusive interview with Arab News on Saturday, Seadat described genuine diplomacy as requiring 'mutual respect, even on points of disagreement, equal footing, and a willingness to achieve a satisfactory outcome for parties involved.' Iranian authorities are 'now assessing the situation' and weighing options for resuming negotiations, he said. Seadat's remarks come amid simmering tensions following a 12-day conflict between Iran and Israel, which ended with a ceasefire on June 24. Accusing both the US and Israel of choosing aggression over diplomacy, he said the attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities were carried out two days before planned talks with the US, and thus have deepened a 'legacy of distrust.' 'Rather than condemning the party that disrupted the negotiations, the Americans sided with the aggressor,' he said. 'They, therefore, betrayed the very negotiation to which they were a party. 'Accordingly, the conclusion is that they were complicit in the aggression, a fact they further proved when they launched attacks against our peaceful nuclear sites, thus joining the Israelis in gross violation of every tenet of international law.' In his first public remarks after the truce, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei declared victory, claiming Iran 'slapped America in the face' by striking the Al-Udeid base in Qatar in retaliation for the US bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities. Warning that any future attacks would prompt further strikes on American targets, he asserted Iran's regional capabilities and rejected calls for concessions. Khamenei also downplayed the impact of the strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, claiming that the US acted mainly to protect Israel after Iranian missiles penetrated Israeli defenses. US President Donald Trump ridiculed Khamenei's victory claims, insisting Iran had been 'decimated' and its nuclear sites 'obliterated' during the conflict. Trump said he had considered but ultimately rejected plans to assassinate Khamenei, claiming he 'saved him from a very ugly and ignominious death' by stopping direct attacks from the US or Israel. He also said he halted plans to lift sanctions on Iran following Khamenei's 'blatant and foolish' statements and warned he would 'absolutely' consider bombing Iran again if Tehran resumed nuclear enrichment at threatening levels. Trump further claimed to have pressured Israel to avoid delivering a 'final knockout' blow, suggesting Israeli strikes could have targeted Tehran directly if not for US intervention. On Saturday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi condemned Trump's comments, saying a potential nuclear deal hinges on the US ending its 'disrespectful tone' toward the supreme leader. 'If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt supporters,' Araghchi posted on the social platform X. Seadat said that Iran remained committed to diplomacy, citing his country's continued adherence to the 2015 nuclear deal and participation in talks until Israeli strikes derailed the process. 'Iran has always been a party to genuine diplomacy, but peace by force is not peace; it is, rather, coercion,' he said. 'What we wanted was a cessation of aggression, and we achieved it at this stage, with resolve. So, while we remain highly vigilant, we will see how the situation unfolds.' As diplomatic strains persist, Israeli officials have signaled a readiness to escalate. On June 26, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz told local media that Israel has a 'green light' from Trump to strike Iran again if it appears to be advancing its nuclear program. He added that Israel would not have needed US permission to target Khamenei directly. That same day, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed victory and framed the conflict as a strategic opportunity to expand diplomatic ties with Arab states. 'We have fought with determination against Iran and achieved a great victory. This victory opens the path to dramatically enlarge the peace accords,' Netanyahu said in a video address, referencing the Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and several Arab countries in 2020. However, Gulf states have condemned both Iran's missile strike on Qatar and Israel's attacks on Iranian facilities, citing concerns over regional stability and national sovereignty. In a joint statement on June 16, Arab countries rejected and condemned Israel's military aggression against Iran, calling instead for a return to negotiations. Seadat insisted that Iran's nuclear program remains peaceful and said Iran's parliament moved to limit cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) only after repeated, ignored reassurances from Tehran. 'Up to the moment our sites were attacked in contravention of the NPT rules, the IAEA Statute, and two resolutions by its General Conference that prohibit any attack on IAEA-safeguarded peaceful nuclear sites, 130 IAEA inspectors were in place, meaning one-fifth of all inspections conducted by the IAEA in the world,' Seadat said. He added: 'Regardless of disagreements, the IAEA continued its most robust verification regime in the world in Iran.' Even after the attacks, Seadat said, both the IAEA and US intelligence confirmed there were no signs of nuclear weapons activity — despite early claims, which he attributed to a 'very irresponsible' IAEA report. He said the 2015 nuclear agreement created 'a balance: a cap on our peaceful nuclear program in return for full removal of sanctions.' That arrangement, he added, was especially reassuring as it was backed by UN Security Council Resolution 2231. 'This is a model that Japan and some others have. They also enrich uranium for peaceful purposes. I do not know what to say, unless the meaning of reassuring has changed, perhaps because of the aggressions by the Israeli regime and the Americans on Iran,' Seadat said. Tensions had started escalating after a May 31 IAEA report revealed that Iran had increased uranium enrichment to 60 percent — the only non-nuclear weapons state to do so — and expanded its stockpile of near-weapons-grade material by 50 percent in three months. Iran dismissed the report as 'politically motivated' and 'baseless accusations.' On Wednesday, Rafael Grossi, IAEA director general, said his top priority is resuming inspections in Iran to determine the impact of the recent strikes. The extent of any damage remains unclear. While Grossi suggested Iran may have relocated parts of its stockpile ahead of the attacks, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Thursday he had seen no intelligence supporting that claim. Looking ahead, Seadat noted that Japan could play a significant diplomatic role, referencing its unique moral standing as the only country to have experienced atomic bombings. 'The Hibakusha, the first generation of survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, still walk among us in Japan,' he said. 'Because of this, Japan possesses a profound moral authority, having known the depths of suffering like few others.' He added that Japan is well-positioned to support peace through 'inclusive' regional development, particularly efforts that enhance energy security for all. Seadat also said there is growing alignment between Iran and Arab and Islamic states, which he described as a 'positive and constructive path' toward regional peace. However, he cautioned that maintaining momentum would require active, sustained support from all sides. Although East Asia lies far from Iran, Seadat emphasized cultural similarities and the potential for cooperation — especially through Japan's technological expertise and diplomatic engagement. 'We need this new paradigm in our region, and I believe Japan, through the dynamism of its diplomacy, can contribute to it,' he said.
