logo
Rotorua Annual Plan Hearings: Locals Share Needs And Desires For City

Rotorua Annual Plan Hearings: Locals Share Needs And Desires For City

Scoop20-05-2025
Rotorua councillors are considering hours of feedback and hundreds of submissions on its draft annual plan.
A range of opinions were shared at the council's draft Annual Plan 2025/2026 hearings last week.
Some related to the Tarawera sewerage scheme, others the city's night market. Other submissions asked for funding increases with one trust detailing its success story.
During the hearings Rotorua Trails Trustee Clair Scott outlined a 'good news story'.
The trust submitted that while the council investment of $217,000 a year was 'instrumental', it urged a 'significant increase in funding' in this annual plan to continue trail network maintenance and development.
It said this was vital to sustaining and enhancing the millions of dollars of economic contributions from mountain biking and trail running.
Scott said investment 'paid off in a big way' with 300km of trails being one of the city's most valuable recreational and economic assets. It supported major events, helped grow local mountain biking talent, brought in visitors, and boosted health and wellbeing while telling a 'broader story of what makes Rotorua special'.
The council funding covered about 25% of its operational costs.
Scott said the team was stretched as donations and grants became harder to secure; it faced a $140,000 funding shortfall this year.
She said she wasn't there because something was broken, but because it was thriving.
The trust wanted the council to partner in developing a sustainable long-term funding model.
'This is a good news story. A Rotorua success we should all be proud of.
'To keep it going we need to start treating these trails as the essential infrastructure they have become.'
Councillor Robert Lee asked whether a user charge could be applied to the trails, to which Scott said no as it was iwi-owned land with a Crown agreement to allow public access until 2042.
Many submissions related to whether the $32.3 million Tarawera Sewerage Scheme should have wider ratepayer funding, including input from community figures and residents arguing whether the scheme was justified and fair and that the cost burden on them was too high.
Lake Ōkāreka Community Association chairman Mitch Collins said the council failed in its planning.
He referred to district plan rules relating to recent court action debate on what was permitted earthworks activity.
Collins understood the plan required review every five years for efficiency and effectiveness but he said aspects of it had not been reviewed for two decades.
Cost added could have been avoided with better planning, he said.
Collins said the board acknowledged the need for the scheme to protect lakes, but it was concerned about the cost increases. It supported a further $4m of funding via the wider ratepayer base.
His community's scheme cost about $20,000 per household 'in today's terms'. The Tarawera scheme as it is funded now would cost about $50,300.
Ōkāreka residents had seen lake health improvement since their scheme was completed in 2011, he said.
Former Rotorua mayor and current Bay of Plenty regional councillor Kevin Winters said the council supported the additional $4m for the Tarawera scheme and remained committed to its own $750,000 grant.
An extraordinary meeting is scheduled for May 26 to discuss a district council request for further funding.
Other submitters wanted the scheme to be user-pays with no further funding, while others thought the extra $1m was fair.
Other annual plan submissions included suggestions on how the Rotorua Night Market should be delivered.
For the past year Farnoud Rahimi Mansour had run a stall at the market.
Previously a structural engineer on a sponsored working visa, he said he became an Uber driver when the Government project he was working on was cut.
'Many people lost their jobs.'
The 13 hours driving a day only covered his rent, he said.
'My life depends on the market. That is why I am here.'
He told councillors he was concerned he would end up homeless if there were changes to the night market.
He believed the stallholder fee of $172 each 'easily' covered the $200,000 it cost for the council to run the markets.
Mansour's view was that fee would go up if the market were run by someone else.
He asked the council to consider investing in the market.
Options were to scale it back to half a year, change the location, or have someone else run it with council sponsorship.
Other submitters supported half-yearly as being practical while some supported it being managed by someone else.
Rotorua Lakes Council proposed a 7.95% general average rates rise for the year, down from the projected 9.8%.
It had a capital works programme of $145m, $41.25m funded by debt.
Councillors will deliberate on May 28 and will adopt the plan on June 25.
- LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What is the city council spending on?​
What is the city council spending on?​

Otago Daily Times

time2 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

What is the city council spending on?​

Construction of One New Zealand Stadium at Te Kaha accounts for $92m of this year's Annual Plan budget. PHOTO:CCC About $1.6 billion will be spent on Christchurch City Council's Annual Plan this financial where it is going. Significant amendments to the draft Annual Plan were made by city councillors, with funding going to unexpected projects. The Air Force Museum of New Zealand will now receive $5 million towards its $16m extension project. The new wing will house the museum's C-130H Hercules and P-3K2 Orion. Another amendment is a pause in the Christ Church Cathedral reinstatement levy after the project was put on hold. The cathedral levy cost ratepayers $6.52 annually and was planned to last at least another three years. Other notable spending greenlighted through amendments include more chlorine-free water taps like those at Burnside Park and Rawhiti Domain. The taps will be installed with $900,000 allocated to the programme over three years from July next year. This will be enough to install at least two stations a year and potentially more if Government water regulations are relaxed as has been speculated. University students are winners of the budget with discounted prices for city council pools. A student ID will reduce prices to $4.90 from $6.70, in line with gold and community services cards. The reduced prices will start in July next year. Altogether, amendments added 0.04% to the rates increase. Rates have gone up by 6.6% on average to help pay for the $1.6 billion budgeted to cover the cost of running Christchurch. There will be $871 million in operational spending on day-to-day services and $648m in capital spending, including $95.5m for One New Zealand Stadium. Debt repayment will cost $81m. The city council will borrow about $366m to meet a budget shortfall with the goal of returning to surplus in 2028. Total debt will reach $2.8b after this year's Annual Plan. Mayor Phil Mauger says the Annual Plan strikes a 'difficult but necessary' balance between maintaining spending on services and keeping rates manageable. 'Across New Zealand, both organisations and households are grappling with challenging economic conditions and rising living costs, and our council is not immune to these pressures.' The rates increase will be 6.6% overall, including commercial properties, and 6.49% for the average household. This compares to a 9.52% average increase in the 2024/25 Annual Plan approved last year. Mauger points to 1.75% of this budget's rates increase going towards the One New Zealand Stadium build. 'If you take that out of the equation, the overall increase is below 5%,' he said. 'We will build on the foundation set this year – ensuring that Christchurch is well-positioned to face whatever lies ahead.' Several notable projects already had funding allocated in the draft Annual Plan ahead of the final budget. They include $20.3m for the continued Ōmōkihi South Library and Service Centre rebuild, expected to open end of next year. Flood protection and control infrastructure get $20m, which will help improve service and meet increasing demand. There is $19.6m for the activated sludge reactor at the Bromley waste plant, which aims to reduce greenhouse emissions and odour. Ongoing construction of the Ōtākaro-Avon River Corridor City to Sea shared pathway will cost $9.7m. It is due to open end of next year. The Akaroa Wharf will get $6.8m for its continuing upgrade, expected to finish in 2027. City council-funded community housing will receive $5.2m for any needed improvements. The Eastman Sutherland and Hoon Hay Wetlands will get $4.5m to improve stormwater capacity and reduce flooding. There is $3.5m for the Botanic Garden's Cunningham House, or main greenhouse, for an ongoing upgrade expected to finish next year. City council-owned companies and private organisations continue to receive significant grants from the city council. The funding includes Canterbury Museum getting $9m to continue its redevelopment and $4m going to city council-owned Venues Ōtautahi for any upgrades to major venues such as the Town Hall or Wolfbrook Arena. The city council-owned economic development agency ChristchurchNZ will receive $966,000. There is a $618,000 fund which major events hosts can request grants from. Some other well-known organisations receiving grants are Orana Wildlife Park ($260,000), The Arts Centre ($250,000) and the Watch This Space Street Art Programme ($250,000). City council income Rates cover about half of city council income with borrowing about a quarter. The rest mostly comes from fees to access city council services, and facilities and dividends from investments, particularly the city council's owned strategic assets such as Lyttelton Port Company and Christchurch International Airport. Rates: 52% $837m Borrowing: 25% $366m Fees, charges and operational subsidies: 12% $197m Dividends and interest from investments (including council-owned companies): 6% 102m Capital contributions, grants and subsidies: 3% $51m Development contributions: 2% $24m City council spending

The NZ economy is still sick, doubts are growing about the Govt prescription
The NZ economy is still sick, doubts are growing about the Govt prescription

NZ Herald

time3 days ago

  • NZ Herald

The NZ economy is still sick, doubts are growing about the Govt prescription

Are these the right antibiotics? Are the antibiotics making me feel sick? I do feel a little better I think. But it's taking longer than I expected. Maybe I should see the doctor again. Or am I just being impatient? Ugh, so much uncertainty. Hopefully, those who've tuned in for a fresh read on the state of the economy can see where this is going. Never let a metaphor go by, I say! Anyway, here's me and the New Zealand economy, both sick in the midst of a miserable wet winter and worrying about whether our recoveries have stalled. A run of negative data has knocked the wind out of the nation's sails. The bad vibes are being pushed along by a strong political current. Both the left and right are telling us that the Government has prescribed the wrong medicine. The left blames the Government for cutting spending into a downturn. The logic is pretty simple. Any good Keynesian will tell you, when demand in the private sector falls, that's the time for the Government to come to the party. Borrow a bit more, don't slash and burn civil service, hire more teachers and nurses, build more stuff ... it won't be inflationary because it won't be crowding out private sector competition, which is in recession. The trouble is, we're still in the aftermath of the last big spend-up, which went on too long. Labour's stimulus, once we got through the initial Covid shock, did clash with a private sector boom and exacerbated inflation. That muddied the political narrative. It made it inevitable that the incoming centre-right coalition would cut back despite the extra damage that would do to economic growth. In the context of using fiscal policy to drive economic prosperity, you can make a good case that successive governments have got things completely arse about face. You'd expect this argument from the left. But Christopher Luxon and Nicola Willis are being savaged even more aggressively from their right flank. The monetarists, the supply-side guys, the neo-liberals, (whatever you want to call them) are berating the Government for not dealing with the national debt and Crown deficit by administering a Rogernomics-style reboot of the whole economy. I doubt that would make the current downturn any more pleasant, but they argue it couldn't be much worse. And the payoff would be longer-term gains as the economy found a more productive and financially secure baseline. Both arguments can be compelling and, if nothing else, add to the concern that the current strategy of subtle market-oriented tweaks risks underdelivering on all sides. But through all of this gloom, one thing we need to remember is that most economists still believe the foundations of recovery are in place. Step back a bit from the mess of ugly recent economic data – the second quarter sucked, we get it! What are we actually experiencing? The labour market is tough. Unemployment is rising, and new job creation is almost non-existent. But this is not a surprise. In fact, while economists do get things wrong, they've been forecasting unemployment to be about where it is now for more than a year. We know it's one of the last pieces of data to turn in any recovery. Unfortunately, it is now overlapping with an unwanted and unexpected spike in inflation. Like a jump scare in the final scene of a horror movie, food prices (with rates and power, and insurance) have conspired to pause Reserve Bank rate cuts and rattled our faith in the recovery. Then there are tariffs and global unrest and all of that. It's not really surprising that it all feels bleak. So it's a bit ironic to be writing an optimistic take on the economy, especially given the rough week stuck at home that I've just had. My view wouldn't have been so upbeat if I hadn't been woken from my sick bed on Friday morning by a text from investment bank HSBC's Australian head of communications. He was asking how far away I was from my scheduled meeting with their global chief economist, Janet Henry and and Australia-New Zealand chief economist Paul Bloxham. Oops ... I was a long way away. But they kindly let me Zoom in later, and I'm very glad I did. As anyone with Australian cousins will know, sometimes it's healthy to be slapped in the face with a slightly condescending, external view of the New Zealand condition. Bloxham told me his forecasts currently make him one of the gloomiest economists on Australian growth. However, he's one of the most positive on New Zealand growth. Last year, New Zealand had the single largest contraction of any economy in the developed world, Bloxham points out. That inevitably comes with a hangover. But if you believe in the fundamentals of the New Zealand economy, which he does, there is no reason to assume the cycle won't turn. 'I suspect why I'm a little bit more upbeat than others is I sit in Sydney and watch it from the outside and go: hey, you've got two big forces at work that are set to continue to lift growth and give you a recovery.' No prizes for guessing those two forces – falling interest rates and booming agricultural commodity prices. The money flowing into the rural economy must eventually flow through to the cities and lift growth, Bloxham says. It won't happen overnight, but it will happen (my words, not his). We've had a big downswing, which means we're due a pretty big upswing to get back to trend, he says. And we've got monetary policy and the terms of trade in place to drive that cyclical upswing. 'All cycles look different. We always ask the same question going through: oh, it's not quite happening as quickly as we thought. 'The question you ask yourself is: is that because it's not working? Is it that interest rates aren't going to have the same effect? That a positive-terms-of-trade shock won't have the same effect? Or are things just a bit different this time around?' Great question. And look, the sun's finally out and I think my head's clearing. Time to go for a walk and ponder it all. Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.

Government's secret pay equity overhaul bypassed public scrutiny
Government's secret pay equity overhaul bypassed public scrutiny

NZ Herald

time5 days ago

  • NZ Herald

Government's secret pay equity overhaul bypassed public scrutiny

It halted existing claims and raised the threshold for proving work had been historically undervalued to support a claim. Claims then had to start again under the new threshold. The bill halted existing claims and raised the threshold for proving undervalued work. Photo / Jason Dorday It was revealed in the Budget that the savings from tightening the regime amounted to about $12.8 billion over the next four years. The documents, released to RNZ under the Official Information Act, revealed ministerial meetings, including one involving the Prime Minister, were carefully managed, with instructions to withhold their proactive diary release under confidentiality provisions. One email from Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden's office instructed officials to manually remove digital access to cabinet papers, warning that leaving the default settings in place 'will give access to ministers but also SPSs [senior private secretaries] and some ministerial advisers. So you might want to remove that and we can add individual named ministers instead'. Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden's office kept details of pay equity changes under tight wraps. Photo / Mark Mitchell Another memo described how hard copies were hand-delivered to ministers' offices to avoid creating digital trails. 'If you really need a soft copy, I can email it through,' wrote an official from the office of van Velden. 'For context, I swear I'm not being weirdly difficult – this was the method of distribution that has been advised.' The strategy was internally referred to as 'Project Ten'. A comprehensive communications pack was prepared in advance, to be released only after the bill had been introduced and passed. 'We recommend that any announcements or statements about the proposed amendments must be made after the introduction of the bill,' one paper said. 'This is because there is a risk of a large increase in the number of claims being raised if information about the proposed changes is made public beforehand.' That advice was followed. The legislation stopped 33 active claims overnight, some of which had been under way for years, and implemented a stricter legal test for future ones. The documents make clear that fiscal concerns were central to the push – a key driver was to significantly reduce costs to the Crown. Officials stressed the need for the law to be passed in time for Budget 2025, reinforcing the cost-cutting motive. But, they acknowledged the truncated timeline meant there was no opportunity for public submissions on the bill, a process later criticised as 'particularly unusual and draconian'. Officials also conceded limited testing and analysis of the policy proposals because of the short timeframe, and raised concerns about unintended consequences arising once the bill has been passed. Despite the rushed process, the internal discussions reveal the Government was aware of the contentious nature of the changes. Officials noted the proposed transitional arrangements, which 'retrospectively remove and alter people's rights', were 'most likely to be contentious' and 'may engage the Human Rights Act and Bill of Rights Act'. It proceeded anyway. – RNZ

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store