Teacher and SNA resign from Dublin school over alleged ‘harassment' by parents for wearing keffiyeh scarves
Two staff members at a primary school in
Dublin
resigned after claiming they were 'harassed and bullied' by parents for wearing keffiyeh scarves, T-shirts and a tattoo in support of
Palestine
.
The man and woman, a teacher and a special needs assistant (SNA), expressed disappointment with the school's handling of the issue, claiming a small group of parents were 'allowed to harass and bully with impunity'.
The pair said they handed in their resignation this month and are due to cease employment in August. They claimed they were asked to stop wearing keffiyeh scarves at work following complaints from parents who accused them of 'blatant anti-Semitism' and 'psychologically abusive behaviour'.
One parent also allegedly complained about a T-shirt worn by the SNA that, the parent said, bore a 'watermelon covering the full state of
Israel
' and about a tattoo on the male teacher's arm 'with the pre-1967 borders of my country, which is interpreted by many as a call for the annihilation of my people'.
READ MORE
In a complaint seen by The Irish Times, the parent claimed the SNA's T-shirt 'promotes the ethnic cleansing of Jews from Israel'.
The teacher said he had been wearing a keffiyeh to work since he began teaching at the school in September. Following initial complaints over the scarf, he claimed, he was told to remove it while on school premises in a decision made by the school's board of management.
Despite this, he said he continued to wear the keffiyeh and claimed his photo was subsequently taken on multiple occasions by a parent, which he described as 'extremely intimidating'.
'It's been so stressful and so deeply upsetting. We go home every day and we have a live-streamed genocide on our phones along with the fact that we were being harassed and bullied by this small group,' the teacher said.
The SNA claimed that on one occasion earlier this month, a parent confronted her over the clothing while another 'shouted' at her in an encounter she described as 'intimidating and distressing'.
'I just couldn't continue to work there,' she said, adding that she raised a grievance with the school, though is 'incredibly disappointed' by the response.
While saying staff should not be seen taking sides in times of war and conflict, she claimed, 'this isn't a war or a conflict, it's apartheid, genocide and ethnic cleansing, and if you're not taking a side, you have taken a side'.
Both say they exhausted 'every avenue' with the school in an attempt to resolve the issue, including calls for a dress code, which they say is not currently in place.
The issue was raised with Tánaiste Simon Harris in the Dáil on Thursday by People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy, who claimed the staff members were 'pressured by school management' not to wear the keffiyeh scarves.
'When Russia invaded Ukraine, schools organised shows of solidarity with Ukraine. But when it comes to Israel's genocidal war on Gaza, some teachers are being silenced, and their clothing choices are being policed,' he claimed.
In response, the Tánaiste said: 'There should always be a very high bar before you interfere with anybody's clothing', adding that he would discuss the matter with the Minister for Education.
In a statement, the school's board of management said it 'places the welfare and education of the children at the centre of all decisions'.
'As a diverse and equality-based school community, including children, families and staff from over 40 nationalities, the board is committed to ensuring that all actions taken are respectful, inclusive and welcoming to every child and family.
'The board will not be commenting on any individual staff matter, in line with its responsibilities as an employer,' it said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
42 minutes ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on trade and tax: the rules-based system is breaking down
As a small country, Ireland is best served by a stable international economic backdrop and a rules-based system governing areas such as trade and taxation. Unfortunately, the key institutions overseeing the international economic system are now under heavy pressure, as Donald Trump pursues his nationalistic economic agenda. The most recent demonstration of this came in recent days as the other G7 countries acceded to a US demand to rewrite a part of the global corporate tax deal that took years to put together under the aegis of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). The entire deal is now weakened and may even crumble completely. The issue for the US was a part of the agreement which would have allowed other countries, including Ireland, to collect top-up tax from American multinationals who were judged not to have paid the minimum rate of 15 per cent elsewhere. Washington saw this as an infringement of US tax sovereignty. The same issue lies behind new trade tensions between the US and Canada, What is notable is that the G7 countries agreed to unpick the agreement to meet the US demands, as was announced on social media by US treasury secretary, Scott Bessent. The other 140 plus countries who negotiated and signed the agreement are yet to be consulted. The big players are calling the shots. READ MORE In return, the US administration is asking Congress to withdraw a part of the new budget bill which would have given the US the power to levy punitive taxes on investors and companies from countries who were judged to be treating US firms unfairly. As in the field of trade, US threats are being met by significant concessions. The OECD's status as a mediator of the corporate tax deal has been undermined and the future of the whole agreement is now in serious doubt. In the same way, the World Trade Organisation looks on powerlessly as the rules of international trade are torn up. In this context, the suggestion last week from Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, that the EU investigates a new regime with a group of Asian countries who are part of a trade bloc – which the UK has also joined – was ill-judged to say the least. This new dominance by the big players and the tearing up of existing rules is worrying for Ireland. The previous government had hoped that by signing up to the OECD tax deal the controversy over the Irish system would be put to bed and there would be no further demands for change. Now this is all back in the melting pot. Meanwhile, Ireland has thrived under the rules-based trade system which brings certainty to those exporting from this country, whether multinationals or domestic businesses. Ireland needs to stick close to the EU to make it case and hope that Europe can find its voice on these issues more effectively than it has to date.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Nato's new defence spending commitment aims to reverse decades of military decline
In cash terms, The Hague Defence Commitment, as it's to be known, agreed last week , will add roughly $1 trillion a year to the common defence of the Nato military alliance, according to US president Donald Trump . But cash alone is never enough. As critical in military terms are the new capability targets the deal will activate, triggering increased cross-border standardisation, improved technical co-operation and more operational integration, aimed at readying the West for war with Russia within five years. On Trump's insistence, the European alliance members plus Canada agreed to increase their defence budgets from the current 2 per cent to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035 – 3.5 per cent on 'hard military spending' and another 1.5 per cent on related civil costs such as infrastructure and cybersecurity. That's why, as the 32 leaders who comprise Nato's decision-making North Atlantic Council were doing their best not to fall out with Trump over the spike in cost, behind the scenes the military planners who assess risk were calculating what strategic difference the extra trillion will make. READ MORE With military efficiency, a 10-page briefing, ' Future-proofing Nato's industrial capacity: how the decisions at the summit will strengthen the allied defence industry ', was circulated in the summit's closing hours, underpinning the imperative to reverse '60 years of progressive decline' in spending. Although the alliance was set up in 1949 as a post-second World War collective security network, it's worth remembering that with the end of the cold war, however, many of the allies switched their spending away from defence to modernising their societies, in what became known as 'the peace dividend'. [ Hostile actions 'are real and accelerating': is Russia already at war with the West? Opens in new window ] Consequently, faced with rapidly diminishing activity, defence companies on both sides of the Atlantic underwent a series of mergers and acquisitions, leading to consolidation in the defence sector. The 51 significant defence manufacturers that remained at the end of the cold war merged into 'the big five' – Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Dynamics, RTX and Northrop Grumman. Here, European multinationals such as Airbus and missile systems developer, MBDA, emerged. Everything changed, however, in February 2022 with Russia's 'full-scale and brutal invasion of Ukraine', which reminded the allies that 'although the Euro-Atlantic area is not at war, it is not at peace either'. The reality, maintains Germany's chief of defence, Gen Carsten Breuer, is that a full-scale attack on a Nato member is not as far-fetched as it may seem. Moscow, he says, has been producing at least 1,500 battle tanks a year, with a significant build-up of missiles, artillery shells and drones as well, not all of which are earmarked for the war in Ukraine . His assessment, shared by other military experts in the region, goes as far as to conclude that the 'most vulnerable' area for an attack would be the Suwalki Gap, a largely unpopulated corridor in northeast Poland where Poland meets Lithuania, Belarus and Russia. The military experts' briefings to their political leaders have been uncompromising. 'Individually, all of them understand the urgency of the threat that is approaching Nato', says Gen Breuer, who adds he believes Russia could attack by 2029. [ If Russia is indeed planning an attack against a Nato state, distance and neutrality will provide no defence Opens in new window ] Given that threat, Nato's new capability targets involve co-investment, co-development and co-production to make the alliance 'more lethal' as secretary general Mark Rutte put it. And that collaboration will by global – reaching far beyond its 32 member states. Nato's four Indo-Pacific partners – Australia, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea, known as the IP4 – will be critical to that 'enhanced co-operation'. So too will its partnership with the EU, where the political and cultural links are already close and often overlapping. The aim overall is achieving a 'new coherence' in dealing with a familiar enemy. [ The Irish Times view on international politics: law of the jungle taking hold Opens in new window ]
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Report on Coalition plan to restrict social housing for migrants dismissed by campaigners
Campaigners have dismissed a report about a Government plan to clamp down on the provision of social housing to migrants, saying it is an attempt to solve a problem 'that does not exist'. The Sunday Times reported this weekend that the Coalition wants to limit access to social housing to people with strong and long-term connections to the Republic, with restrictions also coming in for emergency homeless accommodation. Focus Ireland director of advocacy and research Mike Allen said previous legislative forays into this area had been 'exposed as a poorly drafted response to a problem that does not exist'. 'Nobody believed that social housing should be allocated to people with no right to live in Ireland, but the Government was unable to give any evidence that it was happening and needed complex legislation to stop it,' he said. READ MORE Sunday's report outlined that after extensive legal advice, the Coalition was preparing to revisit proposals first made in a law early last year, but which were later dropped. Citing plans due to go to Cabinet in the next fortnight, the report suggested Ministers would be told the law is needed to eliminate ambiguity over existing rules for non-Irish nationals who want to apply for social housing. It said similar rules were planned for accessing emergency accommodation, with local authorities not required to assess households unless they are legally and habitually resident in the State. Mr Allen said the proposals to restrict the capacity of local authorities to provide emergency shelter on a short-term humanitarian basis would result in more people being forced to sleep on the streets. He said there will be 'inevitable consequences' for people's health and for public areas if such a condition were imposed. The Opposition also criticised the proposals, with Sinn Féin housing spokesman Eoin Ó Broin calling it a 'deeply disingenuous and dangerous briefing'. He said it sought to shift blame for the housing and homelessness crises on to migrant communities. The Dublin Mid-West TD said residency rules are already applied to social housing applications and when accessing emergency accommodation. He said his understanding was that the mooted Bill intends to put existing practice into primary legislation. He accused Minister for Housing James Browne of 'wasting his officials' time drafting a Bill that is not needed'. In a reply to a recent parliamentary question put down by Mr Ó Broin, Mr Browne outlined the conditions applied by local authorities when determining a 'local connection' as part of a social housing application. These include having lived in the area for five years at any time, being employed in the area or within 15km of it, being in full-time education or receiving specialist medical care there, or having a relative living in the area for two years or longer.
