Transfer of judges: CB concerned about attributing malice to state functionaries
Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan, while addressing Munir A Malik, who appeared on behalf of five judges of the Islamabad High Court (IHC), said the ground of malice taken by him regarding transfer of judges is on the basis of a letter written by the IHC judges, wherein, interference by the officials of intelligence agencies in judicial function has been highlighted.
He said the IHC judges in that letter did not mention the name of president, prime minister, law minister, law secretary or any judge, adding their grievance was against the officials of agencies.
Judges' intra-court transfers: Justice Mazhar questions the role of CJP
A five-member SC Constitutional Bench, headed by Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, on Wednesday, heard the petitions of IHC five judges, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan, and Karachi and Lahore Bar Associations.
Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan stated that after the IHC judges' letter a Full Court meeting was held in Lahore High Court (LHC), and he was present in that meeting being judge of that High Court. He further said the LHC judges did not mention the interference by the intelligence agencies.
Justice Shahid also said that he has been a judge of the High Court for the last 13 years but not once any official of any agency approached him till date.
Munir in order to establish an element of malice in the transfer of judges cited the interviews of law minister and Senator Irfan Siddiqui given to a private TV channel. However, Justice Shahid told him that under the law the Court is not bound by any report of TV channels and print media.
During the proceeding, Munir again emphasised that the judges who were transferred from different High Courts to the IHC should take fresh oath. He said that Article 194 says; 'a judge before entering upon the office shall take oath.'
Justice Mazhar remarked that there is difference between Article 194 and Article 200, as the former deals with entering upon the office of a judge, while latter relates to transfer of a judge, adding in the instant matter the transfer is from one High Court to another.
He observed that if a transferee judge takes another oath then his seniority in his parent High Court would be disturbed.
Justice Naeem questioned whether the posts of three judges, transferred to the IHC, became vacant in their relevant High Courts. Justice Mazhar commented that once another oath is taken then the early position will abolish.
Munir argued that according to Islamabad High Court Act, 2010, the IHC comprises chief justice and 12 judges.
He said the Judicial Commission of Pakistan on 25-01-25 appointed two judges in IHC, and left three seats vacant. Thereafter, the president took upon himself to fill the vacant seat transferring judges from provincial High Courts to the IHC.
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar then said that the Attorney General for Pakistan would have to explain why the three seats were left vacant.
Munir argued that the IHC six judges in their letter, written to the Supreme Judicial Council, had expressed reservation over meddling by the intelligence agencies in judicial affairs. After that letter the IHC judges were harassed and maligned on social and electronic media. Dual nationality of a judge suddenly became a topic in the media, while another judge's law degree was questioned after three decades.
Justice Mazhar asked the counsel that the proceeding regarding the matter was initiated by the former chief justice and is still pending.
He said if those things are discussed then it would influence the case. He noted that the malice which is being attributed by the counsel is not against an individual, but the post of President.
Munir contended that the president had to apply his mind independently. Justice Mazhar responded that the power of the president under Article 200 of the constitution is subject to consent of the transferee judge, chief justice of relevant high courts, and the chief justice of Pakistan (CJP). He said the CJP before granting approval must have taken due care and was cognisant of all the development related to the transfer of judges. The case was adjourned until today (Thursday).
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Unjust police certificates stigmatise acquitted citizens: LHC
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) has recently observed that issuing a police character (PS) certificate reflecting a criminal history of an accused despite his acquittal by a court of law in an FIR violates the individual's constitutionally protected right. The court said such a practice not only violates the individual's protected right to human dignity but also imposes a lasting and unjust stigma upon a citizen who has been exonerated through due judicial process. The court said, once an accused has been acquitted by a competent court of law, he is to be considered, treated and regarded as innocent person under the law. Despite a conclusive acquittal of an accused any continuous reference or inclusion of the relevant FIR in official documents like police character certificate is unwarranted, the court observed. The court passed this order in a petition of Abdur Rehman Faryad challenging issuance of a PC certificate mentioning his name in the FIR despite his acquittal by a competent court of law. The court said the petitioner is entitled to a PC certificate that reflects his acquittal and the absence of any subsisting criminal liability. The court said the allegations levelled against the petitioner do not involve moral turpitude, nor do they relate to any offence against the State. The court said it would be legally unjustified to draw any adverse inference or attach any stigma to the petitioner merely based on the registration of an FIR. The court; therefore, directed the Home Secretary Punjab to ensure the issuance of a PC certificate in favour of the petitioner, which accurately reflects his present legal status. The said certificate shall exclude and omit any reference whatsoever to FIR registered at Police Station Nawan Kot, Lahore, in the light of the petitioner's lawful acquittal and the absence of any existing criminal liability, the court added. The court noted that law enforcement agencies have the administrative authority to maintain internal records of reported incidents, including FIRs, for various legitimate purposes. The court said the retention of such data, so long as it is confined to lawful administrative use and is not disclosed or misused in a manner prejudicial to the rights of the individual and cannot be construed as a violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution. The court; therefore, directed the office to transmit copy of the court order to the Inspector General of Police Punjab and the Chief Secretary Punjab, to ensure its strict implementation in light of the court's directions and observations. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Illegal recruitment case: IHC turns down post-arrest bail plea of PARC chief, director
ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC), Friday, turned down post-arrest bail petition of Pakistan Agriculture and Research Council (PARC) Chairman Dr Ghulam Muhammad Ali and Director Establishment Muhammad Akhlaq Malik in illegal recruitment case. A single bench of IHC comprising Justice Muhammad Asif announced the verdict which it had reserved earlier after hearing the arguments of lawyers, Jan Muhammad and Noman Paracha, who appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while Assistant Attorney General Shaista Tabassum represented the federation. The lawyer and legal adviser of the complainant, the Federal Ministry of National Food Security was also in attendance. During the hearing, the petitioner's lawyer said that a regular advertisement for recruitment in PARC was given; the chairman of the council had the authority to increase or decrease the posts of the recruitment. According to the law, he argued that it is an authority and cannot be called corruption or corrupt practice. He added that the 19 accused are named in the case and 17 are on interim bail, only two are arrested. The FIA investigator told the court that the chairman has the authority to increase the posts but he had to give an advertisement. They said the Ministry of Food Security has filed a complaint. They alleged that nepotism was used in recruitment, someone's daughter and someone's niece were recruited and the recruits themselves are giving statements that the entire process was based on malice. Justice Muhammad Asif said the Chairman of the Council was given the Star of Distinction, now a case has been registered against him. The investigation officer said that 'if he has received the Star of Distinction, it does not mean that he can do whatever he wants.' He informed the court that a gentleman also interviewed his daughter himself and got recruited, a person's son and daughter-in-law were also recruited, these are the people who are recognised. The petitioner's lawyer said the problem they have with the recruitment is that their people were not recruited. Justice Muhammad Asif inquired how many relatives have been recruited. The lawyer of the Ministry of Food Security said that 72 servants and relatives from Sahiwal and Sargodha were recruited and there is a statement of one person Shahbaz that he gave Rs25 lakh to the chairman to get the job. After the arguments were completed, the court reserved its decision on the post-arrest bail applications and now announced the same by dismissing the bail petitions. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
PTI to submit CCTV footage of police raids
Listen to article The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Wednesday allowed Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) to submit CCTV footage of alleged police raids as part of the official court record. The decision was made by Justice Khalid Ishaq while hearing a petition filed by senior PTI member Akmal Khan, who sought judicial intervention against what he termed illegal police actions targeting party supporters. In his petition, Khan requested the court to restrain police officials from conducting raids and harassing PTI workers and supporters involved in mobilizing for the party's August 5 protest. The petitioner named the Inspector General of Police Punjab, the CCPO Lahore, DIG Operations, and the Station House Officers (SHOs) of Shahdara and Ferozwala (District Sheikhupura) as respondents. He argued that the alleged police actions were in violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution. Read More: APC calls for abolishing SIFC, 26th Amendment, creating new 'Charter of Democracy' Citing constitutional protections, Khan submitted that every citizen has the right to move freely within Pakistan, reside in any part of the country, and assemble peacefully — subject to reasonable legal restrictions in the public interest. He further argued that citizens also have the right to form or join political parties unless such activities are declared prejudicial to national sovereignty or integrity by the federal government and later upheld by the Supreme Court. Justice Ishaq, while accepting PTI's request to include CCTV footage as evidence, noted that any material relevant to the alleged harassment and unlawful actions by police may assist the court in assessing the facts of the case. The court will continue proceedings after examining the submitted footage and hearing responses from the concerned police officials.
