Major backlash over Nigel Farage tech vow - 'doesn't care if kids are exploited'
Nigel Farage faces a huge backlash after vowing to rip up protections to stop kids viewing dangerous material and porn.
The Reform leader confirmed his party would abolish the Online Safety Act - but admitted he has idea how to stop children accessing harmful content. A Labour source told The Mirror: " Nigel Farage has inexplicably chosen to side with those who peddle extreme pornography to children as young as five.
"He's unfussed with rape, incest and torture videos flooding back into Britain. And doesn't care if young people are exploited by horrific suicide forums."
The Reform chief was dismissed as "not serious" after the remarks, which also saw fellow Reform heavyweight Zia Yusuf brand the legislation "dystopian".
Mr Farage was unable to say how he would prevent tragedies like that of Molly Russell, who took her life after accessing sick content promoting suicide aged just 14. Andy Burrows, chief executive of Molly Rose Foundation, set up in her memory, said scrapping the Act would be "retrograde".
READ MORE: Nigel Farage rattled by Donald Trump question - 'am I wrong?'
And he said the public wants more protections, not less. Mr Burrows said: "Scrapping the Online Safety Act would be a retrograde move that would not only put children at greater risk but is out of step with the mood of the public.
"In fact, our polling shows that voters across the political spectrum want stronger online safety laws not weaker ones, and politicians on all sides would do well to listen to them."
He described the legislation as an "important building block" and said parents and grandparents support decisive action. Asked how he would protect youngsters like Molly, Mr Farage told journalists yesterday(MON): "Can I stand here and say that we have a perfect answer for you right now? No."
Earlier former Reform chairman Mr Yusuf had suggested that safety steps could be used by social media firms to "censor anti-government speech". Under changes that came into effect last week, age verification checks and changes to algorithms have been brought in.
But critics have warned young people have easily-accessible ways to work around it. The Government has pledged to keep measures under review to prevent kids accessing material on suicide, self-harm, eating disorders and pornography.
A Labour spokesperson said: 'Nigel Farage would scrap vital protections for young people online, and recklessly open the floodgates to kids being exposed to extreme digital content.
'Reform offers anger but no answers. They won't say what they would do instead to keep people safe."
Apple's app store shows more people are turning to virtual private networks (VPNs) to get around the new rules. These allow users to hide their real location.
Mr Yusuf said: "Sending all of these kids onto VPNs is a far worse situation, and sends them much closer to the dark web, where the real dangers lie."
And Mr Farage said he would have "more access to some of the best tech brains, not just in the country but in the world" and would "make a much better job of it".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
28 minutes ago
- The Sun
Labour's border chaos is fuelling public fury and fear as dangerous foreign offenders vanish into thin air
Labour's not smashing it IT is little more than a year since Labour came to power promising to smash the people-smuggling gangs. Instead they have smashed the economy — with inflation up, unemployment up and business confidence at a record low. The only significant growth is in the number of illegal migrants coming here in small boats. Already over 25,000 have arrived this year — a 50 per cent rise on the 2024 figure by this stage, which was shocking enough. That number is dwarfed by the UK's astonishing 700,000 population increase in just a year — almost entirely due to legal immigration — which itself is utterly unsustainable. The arrival of thousands of mostly undocumented illegal migrants is symptomatic of just how badly Britain has lost control of its borders. It's not just the millions of pounds it costs taxpayers every day to shower the migrants with handouts and put them up in hotels, nor the fact that so many of them find black market jobs. Most of the arrivals are young men of fighting age — yet the authorities seem to have little idea who they are, even if they end up in court. National emergency We discovered earlier this week that the number of foreign sex offenders and violent criminals in prison in England and Wales is at a record high, and that 40 per cent of people charged with sex attacks in the capital were foreign nationals. Now we learn foreign criminals are simply walking free mid-trial and disappearing under false names because of a dangerous 'disconnect' between prosecutors and immigration enforcement. It is little wonder that people — not least mothers — worry about migrant hotels on their doorsteps, or that protests are growing, or that polls show immigration is the number one issue concerning voters. So what is the Government doing about this national emergency? Reform UK's rising star Laila Cunningham It seems to have no plan, beyond a sketchy one-in-one-out deal with France and setting up a spy unit to track anyone on social media discussing anti-migrant sentiment or two-tier justice. While Britain continues to house soaring numbers of uninvited guests in four-star hotels, America has seen a massive drop in illegal border crossings because tough detention centres and deportations await those who do. President Donald Trump has shown the problem CAN be tackled, if only the political will exists. The Government, which ditched the Rwanda scheme — the only viable deterrent — as its first act in power, has shown precious little will so far. It's about time Sir Keir Starmer realised the urgency of the situation... and started taking tough action of his own. 1
The Sun
28 minutes ago
- The Sun
Labour's plan to recognise Palestine even if Hamas does not release hostages SLAMMED by families of captives
HOSTAGE families blasted Labour's plan to recognise Palestine — after being told failure to release loved-ones will not stop the move. At a Foreign Office meeting, the relatives of four British-linked captives were told the UK would press ahead with state recognition even if Hamas terrorists refuse to free any of the 50 it still holds. A statement issued by their lawyers Adam Rose and Adam Wagner KC said the conditions for recognising a Palestinian state would be assessed in late-September. But it added: 'It was made obvious to us at the meeting that, in deciding whether to go ahead with recognition, the release or otherwise of the hostages would play no part in those considerations.' They warned the UK's new position would not help 'and could even hurt' hostages. They said PM Sir Keir Starmer's plan 'appears to be to put pressure on the Israelis only to reach a deal'. It abandons efforts to press both sides, they add. Sir Keir outlined the route to recognising a Palestinian state this week. He was met with outrage by hostage families and concern from Jewish community leaders. Emily Damari, 29, who was held in Gaza and released in January, called it a 'moral failure'. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump vowed to 'get people fed' in Gaza after sending envoy Steve Witkoff to tour a US-backed aid site in Rafah. Hamas agrees to release 10 hostages as terror group issues ceasefire red lines after Trump pressured Israel to end war 1
Times
40 minutes ago
- Times
Whitehall will not be improved by recruiting based on social class
The usually wise-headed Pat McFadden would be advised to rethink his proposals TAYFUN SALCI/ALAMY G eorge Orwell declared eight decades ago that 'England is the most class-ridden country under the sun'. It is a reputation that the nation has tried, with some success, to shed — especially when it comes to its institutions. In modern times the civil service has been seen as the embodiment of British fairness: an institution to which one is admitted, and rises up through, on merit. It may be biased towards the well-educated, but fairness has long been at the core of its recruitment model. Yet the Starmer government has proposed to do away with that classless model. Pat McFadden, the usually wise-headed Cabinet Office minister, hopes to diversify the social makeup of the civil service by restricting internships to those from working-class backgrounds. Under his proposals, a form of elitism in reverse, Whitehall's main internship scheme will be open only to those from 'lower socio-economic backgrounds', defined by what the applicant's parents' jobs were when he or she was aged 14. These internships are important as the gateway to coveted places on the civil service 'fast stream' graduate programme. In this day and age, parental occupation is a bizarre criterion. Having tied itself in knots over its definition of 'working people' Labour is now threatening to do the same with 'working class'. • Civil service internships will be only for working class Mr McFadden's proposals are a disheartening departure from the guiding principle of the Northcote–Trevelyan reforms of 1854, which created the modern Whitehall. The aim was simple: to ensure that 'the best and energetic rise to the top' while 'the dull and inefficient remain at the bottom'. In place of the old boy network came exams, training and transparent selection. Mr McFadden's regressive proposal is unlikely to succeed. It is based on the assumption that working-class candidates will fail unless the system is rigged in their favour. The fact that some 56 per cent of Britons self-define as 'working class' points to the emptiness of the exercise. At what point does someone stop being working class? Is it, say, when a postman becomes a manager? Would a child of a teacher, a respected but hardly elite profession, be excluded? The scheme also assumes that class is a permanent condition, and family background a fixed identity. Countless youngsters who do not neatly qualify as either 'privileged' or 'deprived' will be written off. Mr McFadden's wizard wheeze risks interviews for internships becoming re-enactments of Monty Python's Four Yorkshiremen sketch, a race to the social bottom in which candidates will seek to outdo each other with tales of hardship. Just as Sir Keir Starmer is at pains to remind us he is the son of a toolmaker, so too will interns be at pains to burnish their proletarian credentials. Hailing from the proverbial cardboard box or septic tank offers little indication of administrative ability. The real problem is that talent is spread equally but opportunity is not. For many bright young people, housing and childcare are unaffordable, limiting their horizons. Mr McFadden would do better to tackle these structural issues. It should be perfectly possible to create a recruitment system that is rigorous yet fair. In law and finance firms have experimented successfully with name-blind or school-blind recruitment. These systems test the individual, not the bloodline. Once class is established as a selection criterion and merit becomes secondary, trust in public institutions will inevitably erode.
