TECNO Gears up to Launch POVA 7 Series with Bold New Delta Interface on July 4, Exclusively on Flipkart
About TECNO
TECNO is an innovative, AI-driven technology brand with a presence in over 70 markets across five continents. Committed to transforming the digital experience in global emerging markets, TECNO relentlessly pursues the perfect integration of contemporary aesthetic design with the latest technologies and artificial intelligence. Today, TECNO offers a comprehensive ecosystem of AI-powered products, including smartphones, smart wearables, laptops, tablets, smart gaming devices, the HiOS operating system, and smart home products. Guided by its brand essence of 'Stop At Nothing,' TECNO continues to pioneer the adoption of cutting-edge technologies and AI-driven experiences for forward-looking individuals, inspiring them to never stop pursuing their best selves and brightest futures.
For more information, please visit TECNO's official site: www.tecno-mobile.com.
Submit your press release
Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with Business Wire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same.
Ahmedabad Plane Crash
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
a day ago
- Politico
5 questions for Rep. Ro Khanna
With help from Aaron Mak Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) has been one of the more nuanced Democratic critics of the tech sector during President Donald Trump's second administration. Khanna, whose district covers Silicon Valley, continues to talk up the promise of the sector even as he criticizes tech luminaries like Elon Musk and David Sacks, who he's known for years, for cozying up (before, in Musk's case, a very public breakup) to the president. Musk actually wrote a testimonial for a 2012 book by Khanna, who worked in the Commerce Department during the Obama administration at the time. Khanna speaks with us about how the government needs to think about bolstering career paths in a world dominated by artificial intelligence, and how the tech ecosystem is laden with companies using AI as a buzzword. The following has been edited for length and clarity. What's one underrated big idea? Biotechnology integration with AI has not gotten the attention it should. An AI's use in being able to discover new patterns with proteins and identify new possibilities for gene therapy and drugs is extraordinary, and there's a possibility for exponential advances in medicine over this next decade. What's a technology that you think is overhyped? There's a lot of business plans for startups now that have the word AI in them. It's almost like to get funding, you need to do something AI, and like the time of startups during the .com boom, many of those companies aren't making substantive contributions and will be weeded out. But there are a lot of companies doing substantive things with AI that will thrive. But, you know, it's become trendy to describe almost every company in Silicon Valley as an AI company. What could the government be doing regarding technology that it isn't? We need to make sure every kid in America has an understanding of AI and can use the tools of AI for their jobs. Whether someone is going to be a nurse, an electrician, a writer, a health care worker, they're going to need to use the basic AI tools and technology. Proficiency needs to be as common as reading and writing in our schools. We also need to think about what a job strategy looks like in AI, especially for young Americans. College graduates between the ages of 21 and 29 have a 15 percent unemployment rate. [We need to think] about what path there will be for young lawyers and young health care professionals, young college graduates with AI. The government needs to really think about the opportunities that are going to exist for those jobs and how to create them. What book most shaped your conception of the future? Right now, I'm reading 'Abundance,' about building more and building faster in America, and that outcome is a common aspiration that I think many Americans share. What has surprised you the most this year with regards to tech? The rapidness with which AI models are progressing. The rapidness with which they're being adopted in certain industries and the concern of jobs for, particularly young college graduates, and the concern about how we're going to address the economic prospects in a digital world. Moolenaar goes on offense After introducing a bill virtually banning federal use of AI linked to foreign adversaries earlier this week, House China Chair John Moolenaar is now urging the Trump administration to implement specific measures to constrain China's influence in the AI sector. In a Friday letter to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Moolenaar (R-Mich.) pushed eight recommendations for guardrails to strengthen the U.S.'s strategic position in its AI race with China. The recommendations include recruiting allies to keep China away from AI supply chains and implementing stricter security requirements for overseas data centers. Moolenaar has been mounting a campaign to promote an 'America First AI Policy,' which he describes in his letter as 'protect[ing] our lead in artificial intelligence and prevent[ing] the People's Republic of China (PRC) from co-opting the global AI ecosystem.' Moolenaar, in an interview with DFD earlier this month, stressed the importance of preventing chip smuggling and warned of China using AI for surveillance and propaganda. Scientific 'refugees' flee the U.S. The first cadre of American researchers are taking advantage of France's €15 million bid to recruit disaffected scientists. POLITICO Europe's Victor Goury-Laffont reported on Thursday that eight applicants are in the final stages of joining Aix-Marseille University's Safe Place for Science program in France, which will hire 20 U.S. academics who feel 'threatened in their research.' Nearly 300 people have applied. Many of the final applicants have not publicly disclosed their identities, but they include two researchers studying climate change and one studying judicial systems, as well as a biological anthropologist. Northern Illinois University history professor Brian Sandberg, one of the applicants whose research includes climate change during the Little Ice Age period from roughly the 16th to 19th centuries, told POLITICO, 'The entire system of research and the entire education in the United States is really under attack.' France and the European Union have started initiatives to attract U.S. academic talent as President Donald Trump has moved to cut billions of dollars in federal research funding across the country. In response to the administration's actions, Aix-Marseille University President Eric Berton and former French President François Hollande have called for the creation of a new 'scientific refugee' status that would extend immigration support to academics. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@ Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Trump Eyes Cuts to Top Spy Agency as He Sweeps Aside Iran Intel
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump is pressing ahead with plans to slash staff at the top US spy agency, determined to act at a time when he's openly challenged its director and rejected intelligence findings that contradict his public statements. Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown Sao Paulo Pushes Out Favela Residents, Drug Users to Revive Its City Center Trump has openly discussed dismantling the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, including when he nominated Tulsi Gabbard to lead it, according to people familiar with the situation, who asked not to be identified discussing private matters. He's floated the idea again more recently, they said. Trump and members of his cabinet also appear to be pushing Gabbard to the sideline to work with Central Intelligence Agency Director John Ratcliffe on intelligence matters instead, other people familiar with the matter said. The deliberations to cut ODNI were already in motion before Trump rejected Gabbard's assessment that Iran wasn't actively seeking a nuclear bomb and then clashed with the intelligence community this week over early findings that suggested his strike on the country's nuclear sites didn't fully destroy them. The White House denied Gabbard is being sidelined. 'President Trump has full confidence in his entire exceptional national security team,' White House spokesman Steven Cheung said. 'DNI Gabbard is an important member of the President's team and her work continues to serve him and this country well.' Gabbard has already reduced staff by about 25% and has been in discussions for months with Congress to map out deeper cuts, another one of the people said. The former Democratic Congresswoman won Senate backing for the job in February in part due to her pledges to slim down the organization. Many of those existing departures at ODNI were part of Elon Musk's cost-cutting efforts with staff opting into buyouts, two of the people said. The reduction includes both ODNI officers and detailees who will be returned to their home agencies. Officials from both parties concede that the ODNI has become too bloated over the years and that the agency often duplicates work carried out by the independent intelligence agencies it oversees. At Gabbard's confirmation hearing in January, Senator Tom Cotton, a Republican from Arkansas who leads the intelligence committee, said the agency's staff are 'measured in the thousands, when it should be measured in the dozens, maybe a few hundred.' On Friday, Cotton introduced legislation that would cap ODNI staff at 650. While exact staffing is classified, that's a third of the estimated 2,000 people it's believed to employ now. 'Created after the September 11th attacks, ODNI was intended to be a lean organization to align America's intelligence resources and authorities, not the overstaffed and bureaucratic behemoth that it is today, where coordinators coordinate with other coordinators,' Cotton said in a statement. Listen: Here's Why Iran's Unaccounted for Uranium Worries Experts In recent weeks, Trump has said Gabbard and the intelligence community were 'wrong' about the assessment that Iran wasn't seeking a nuclear weapon. She later said she and the president were on the same page, pointing to her previous comments that Iran's enriched uranium had reached unprecedented levels. Gabbard also didn't participate in an administration briefing to lawmakers on the Iran strikes this week, according to Senator Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat. A senior administration official declined to comment on why she didn't attend the Iran briefing but said the media was turning the issue into something it wasn't. That briefing came about after the White House slammed the leak of a preliminary report from the Defense Intelligence Agency that said strikes on Iran's nuclear facility may not have been as extensive as Trump claimed. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt posted on X Tuesday that the intelligence finding of limited impact was 'flat-out wrong.' The confrontation with the intelligence community has echoes of Trump's first term when his antagonistic comments were largely driven by the agencies' warnings that Russia meddled in the 2016 election in his favor. He accused the 'deep state' of being 'weaponized' against him and his allies. In 2018, he sided with Russian President Vladimir Putin over his own agencies' assessments of Moscow's election interference. Gabbard has had her own clashes with the intelligence community and has sought to root out 'politicization' by referring intelligence officers for prosecution over alleged leaks of classified information. Two top officials from the National Intelligence Council were reportedly fired in May after the release of a declassified memo that contradicted Trump's basis for deporting alleged Venezuelan gang members. 'The contentious relationship never went away,' Larry Pfeiffer, a former senior CIA officer now leading the Michael V. Hayden Center at George Mason University, said of Trump. 'He just does not fundamentally trust people in the intel community. He thinks they're out to get him.' Unlike with the National Security Council — which the White House dramatically shrank overnight in May — Trump could face challenges in unilaterally closing down ODNI which was created by Congress after intelligence failures following the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Jane Harman, a former Democratic congresswoman from California who helped lead the legislation that established ODNI in 2004, said she would welcome 'an intelligent effort' to reform the size of the staff, but warned that being able to coordinate across government was particularly important in the aftermath of Trump's strikes on Iran. 'We need the biggest lens we could have with different disciplines all working and coordinated together,' she said. 'Having a way to connect the dots is still valid.' America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.
Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
Business Leaders Called To Align Tech Decisions With Corporate Values
Signs point to an emerging, if informal, social contact on AI deployment. With the rapid rollout of AI, corporate leaders are increasingly being called to consider the proper alignment between technology strategies and organizational purposes and values. It's a call that speaks to an informal, yet important 'social license' between companies and their stakeholders on the use of technology, and its impact on labor, among other interests. And it's a call that's been reflected in recent comments from influential religious, legal and business leaders, including Pope Leo XIV, Amazon CEO Andrew Jassy, and Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz Founding Partner Martin Lipton. Attention to this informal social license arose from President Joseph Biden's 2023 Executive Order on the 'Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence.' This (now revoked) Executive Order identified eight specific principles on which AI development should be guided, including a commitment to supporting American workers and preventing 'harmful labor-force disruptions'. The National Association of Corporate Directors ('NACD') indirectly acknowledged the AI social license in its 2024 Blue Ribbon Commission Report, 'Technology Leadership in the Boardroom: Driving Trust and Value.' The Report called upon boards to 'move fast and be bold' with respect to AI deployment, while simultaneously acting as a 'guardrail to uphold organizational values and protect stakeholders' interests'. In a May 12, 2025, address to the College of Cardinals, Pope Leo spoke broadly about the social concerns with AI, focusing particularly on what he described as the challenges to the defense of human dignity, justice and labor that arise from 'developments in the field of artificial intelligence.' A recent article in The Wall Street Journal chronicled the long-running dialogue between the Vatican and Silicon Valley on the ethical implications of AI. Indeed, on June 17, Pope Leo delivered a written message to a two-day international conference in Rome focusing on AI, ethics and corporate governance. In his message, the Pope urged AI developers to evaluate its implications in the context of the 'integral development of the human person and society…taking into account the well-being of the human person not only materially, but also intellectually and spiritually…'. This 'alignment' concern was underscored by a recent post by the highly regarded Mr. Lipton, encouraging corporate boards to maintain their organizational values while pursuing value through AI. 'Boards should consider in a balanced manner the effect of technological adoptions on important constituencies, including employees and communities, as opposed to myopically seeking immediate expense-line efficiencies at any cost.' There certainly is little question that for many companies, generative AI is likely to have a disruptive impact on labor; that the efficiency gains expected from AI implementation could result in a reduced or dramatically altered workforce. The related question is the extent to which 'corporate values' should encompass a response to tech-driven labor disruption. Note in this regard the long-standing position of NACD is that a positive workforce culture is a significant corporate asset. A recent memo from Amazon CEO Andrew Jassy offers a positive example of how to address the strategy/values alignment challenge ‒ by being transparent with employees, well in advance, about the coming transformation and its impact on the workforce, and by offering practical suggestions on how employees can best prepare for it: Those who embrace this change, become conversant in AI, help us build and improve our AI capabilities internally and deliver for customers, will be well-positioned to have high impact and help us reinvent the company. As boards work with management to deploy AI, they should be in regular conversation on which valued-centered decisions the board must be informed, and on which such decisions they may be asked to decide, or merely advise. Such a dialogue is likely to enhance the reflection on corporate purposes and values within decisions regarding strategy and technology. Of course, that incorporation can come in many different ways and from many different directions; the Amazon example being one of them. There are no established guidelines on how leadership might approach the strategy/values alignment discussion. But there is a growing recognition that corporate values must be accommodated in some manner into the AI decision-making. Most likely, effective alignment will balance the inevitability of AI—driven workforce impact with initiatives that advance employee well-being and 'positively augment human work,' including initiatives that minimize job-displacement risks and maximize career opportunities related to AI. For as the NACD suggests, the ultimate AI deployment message to the board is that '[I]t's about what you can do, but also what you should do.'
