Plea ‘unwarranted': Delhi HC declines to quash money laundering case against actress Jacqueline Fernandez
Justice Anish Dayal said it effectively amounted to 'asking the court to reach a conclusion' that she is innocent.
Dismissing the plea, the judge said, 'It is only through trial that the prosecution is to prove that the accused has committed the offence. At the stage of framing of charge, probative value of the material cannot be gone into and the material brought by the prosecution has to be accepted…'
The plea filed by Fernandez sought to quash an Enforcement Case Information Report or ECIR (ED complaint) in which she has been accused of money laundering along with alleged conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar based on an earlier offence lodged by the Special Cell, New Delhi.
The Delhi Police's Economic Offences Wing (EOW) had filed a charge sheet under various sections of the Indian Penal code (IPC) and sections 3 and 4 of Maharashtra Control Of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) against Sukesh and various other associates for extortion amounting to nearly Rs 200 crore.
The money trail had led to Fernandez who had received gifts from Sukesh's alleged proceeds of crime.
Fernandez claimed before the court that she herself was a victim of the modus operandi used by Sukesh and that other similarly placed victims have not been proceeded against under PMLA, alleging that the ED was adopting a 'pick-and-choose' policy against her.
She also argued that she is not an accused in the predicate offence, but a witness.
The judge said, 'The Court is being asked, on the basis of material on record, to effectively conclude that petitioner was innocent, devoid of any knowledge of Sukesh's criminal antecedents and was conclusively and effectively duped and misled…'
'The apprehension of petitioner that any evidence would be self-incriminating cannot lead to quashing of the ECIR as statutory and constitutional protections are already provided and will have to be assessed in that rubric. This alone cannot assist the petitioner and release her from the yoke of prosecution under ECIR,' the court noted.
Concluding that 'all aspects pleaded in the case put by petitioner…are subjective issues which require to be established through trial…', the court dismissed the plea saying, 'Conclusivity can only precipitate during the trial which is the filtration mechanism offered by the criminal justice process. Accepting these interpretations in favour of the petitioner at this stage would upend the process completely.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Girl turns hostile & no evidence: Gurgaon man accused of rape walks free
Gurgaon: A man accused of raping a 10-year-old girl in Nov 2022 walked free as the girl and other witnesses turned hostile. The medical report and forensic evidence did not support allegations of rape. While acquitting the accused, a city court observed that "A person is presumed to be innocent until guilt is proved against him beyond all reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish the guilt of the accused." A case was registered in Nov 2022 on the complaint of the minor's mother, alleging her daughter was sexually assaulted by the accused when they were out for work. In the complaint, the woman stated that the girl, along with her siblings, was returning home from the park when a man lured her by promising to give her a melon. 'The accused took her inside a room while her siblings were standing outside. You Can Also Check: Gurgaon AQI | Weather in Gurgaon | Bank Holidays in Gurgaon | Public Holidays in Gurgaon The man was arrested within days of the registration of the FIR, and a chargesheet was filed in Jan 2023 against the accused under section 6 (sexual assault) of the POCSO Act and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the IPC. However, during the trial, the mother of the victim changed her statement and said the minor was playing in the park when some unknown person misbehaved with her, and they ran away when she raised an alarm. She told the court that the man never committed any sexual act with the minor. The minor also changed her statement, as did the father of the minor. Sanjoy Mondal, a security guard at the park of Sector 17-A, said police had taken his signature on a blank paper, and he was not aware of any sexual assault. Manish Shandilya, counsel for the accused, said the accused never committed any sexual assault upon the victim. The allegations were in no way sustainable in court and were found to be vague during the trial. "The court rightly acquitted the accused, hence justice to the accused and his family, who suffered badly during the period of the case registration and trial," said Shandilya. Additional sessions judge of the fast-track special court under the POCSO Act, Gurgaon, Jasmine Sharma, in her order issued earlier this week, said the child victim, her parents, and Sanjay Mandal have not supported the prosecution version. All four witnesses in unison denied any offence by the accused and have stated that the accused never committed sexual assault upon the victim at any point in time. "An accused is presumed to be an innocent person unless and until guilt is proved against him beyond all the shadow of reasonable doubt," the court observed. "The prosecution has miserably failed to bring home the guilt of the accused," said the court and acquitted the accused of all the charges levelled against him.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Intention to ‘teach a lesson': HC commutes murder sentence of cops in custodial death
Raipur: In a custodial death case, the Chhattisgarh High Court has altered a murder case against four police personnel to a case of culpable homicide not amounting to murder with an observation that the intention of the police was to "teach a lesson" to the deceased and not necessarily to cause his death. With this observation, the high court has sentenced these four police personnel, including a station house officer (SHO), to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment in connection with the custodial death of one Satish Norge in Janjgir-Champa. The court altered the conviction from murder (Section 302 of the IPC) to culpable homicide not amounting to murder (Section 304 Part II of the IPC). A Division Bench comprising Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari and Justice Sanjay K Agrawal observed, "In light of the legal principles, to constitute culpable homicide, the act must be done with the intention to cause death, to cause bodily injury likely to result in death, or with the knowledge that it is likely to cause death. In this case, the accused —SHO, constables, and sainik— were aware that assaulting the deceased could result in death. Their intent was to punish him for creating a nuisance at the electric sub-section, which led to multiple injuries." Norge was taken into police custody on Sept 17, 2016, near the electric sub-station in Nariyara. Medical examination at 1.55 pm by Dr Rashmi Dahire at Community Health Centre, Pamgarh, confirmed he was intoxicated but had no injuries. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These 11 Everyday Foods Might Be the Key to Knee Pain Relief Undo He was arrested at the Mulmula police station at 2.35 pm. Around 3.15 pm, Norge's health deteriorated. He began vomiting and was taken back to Pamgarh hospital at 5 pm, where Dr Dahire declared him dead on arrival. The post-mortem report, conducted on Sept 18, 2016, by Dr K K Dahire and two other doctors, revealed 26 injuries on Norge's body. The cause of death was attributed to multiple contusion injuries, leading to liver rupture and cardio-respiratory arrest. '12 Incriminating Circumstances Identified' The trial court had identified 12 incriminating circumstances, concluding that Norge's death was homicidal. Key among these were the absence of injuries when he was taken into custody, the rapid deterioration of his health while in police custody, and the presence of numerous injuries found during the post-mortem. Witness testimonies supported the prosecution's case. The high court observed that police officials are uniquely positioned to explain circumstances surrounding a custodial death, and the absence of such explanation weighs heavily against them. The court referenced Supreme Court rulings in Shyamsunder Trivedi, Munshi Singh Gautam, and K H Shekarappa cases, which highlight the rarity of direct evidence in custodial torture cases and the onus on police to explain deaths in their custody. The court noted that the accused, being police officers, failed to explain the 26 injuries found on Norge's body, especially since he had no injuries when initially examined. This reinforced the conclusion that Norge died due to police torture. Partially Upholds Order By Trial Court While upholding the trial court's findings on the homicidal nature of death and the established incriminating circumstances, the high court determined that the intention of the police was to "teach a lesson," not necessarily to cause death. Thus, the offence fell under Section 304 Part II of the IPC, which deals with acts done with the knowledge that they are likely to cause death, but without the direct intention of causing death. 'No Evidence To Prove Offense Committed Knowing That Deceased Belonged To SC Community' The appeal filed by Usha Devi Norge, Satish Norge's widow, challenging the acquittal of Jitendra Singh Rajput under Sections 3(1)(j) and 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, was dismissed. The court found no admissible evidence to prove that the offence was committed with the knowledge that the deceased belonged to a Scheduled Caste community. HC directed that a certified copy of the judgment and the original record be sent to the concerned trial court and the superintendent of jail where the appellants are currently lodged.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Big Bite: Constable gets 5 years in jail for taking bribe, chewing evidence
Ahmedabad: In a case where forensic science played a decisive role despite an attempt to destroy physical evidence, a special court in Bhuj on Friday sentenced a suspended police constable to five years of rigorous imprisonment for accepting a bribe and attempting to destroy the evidence — currency notes — by chewing them. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The court found Mayursinh Sodha, then a constable at Vayor police station in West Kutch, guilty of demanding and accepting a Rs 4,000 bribe from a farmer in 2020 in exchange for not filing a case against him under the Prohibition Act. The case unfolded on July 21, 2020, after the farmer approached the Gujarat Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) and accused Sodha of demanding a bribe to let him off in connection with a case related to an illegal country liquor manufacturing unit. The ACB laid a trap and gave the complainant four currency notes laced with phenolphthalein powder — a chemical used to detect bribe acceptance. The notes were to be handed over to Sodha outside the police station. As soon as Sodha accepted the notes, the ACB team moved in to apprehend him. In a panic, Sodha stuffed the notes into his mouth and began chewing them in an apparent attempt to destroy the evidence. Despite his actions, ACB officials managed to retrieve the partially chewed currency notes and sent them to the Directorate of Forensic Science Laboratory (DFSL), Gandhinagar, for analysis. Forensic experts conducted chemical and DNA tests on the recovered notes, confirming the presence of phenolphthalein and establishing a DNA match with Sodha — thereby validating the bribery charge. Based on the investigation and forensic evidence, the ACB filed a chargesheet in the Bhuj court, which held Sodha guilty under multiple provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act (1988, as amended in 2018) and the Indian Penal Code. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He was sentenced to five years of rigorous imprisonment for bribery and misuse of official position, along with additional imprisonment and fines for attempting to destroy evidence. The court observed that despite being a public servant, Sodha not only demanded a bribe but also made a desperate attempt to eliminate proof. The judgment emphasised that such actions erode public trust in the police force and must be dealt with sternly. Sodha has also been fined Rs 10,500 and faces additional jail time if he fails to pay it.
