Construction underway for Youngstown parks and playgrounds projects
The old Bortz Field on the city's west side is one of 18 projects that are now underway or in the planning stages all around the city. There's work being done at Crandall Park on the north side as well as Homestead and Pemberton Parks on the south side.
'We're going to have the new batting cages over there, also infield turf and all brand new lighting,' said Youngstown Parks and Recreation Director Clement Franklin.
The city is investing more than $10 million into its parks and playgrounds this spring and summer, with nearly $6 million of that coming from Youngstown's share of federal American Rescue Plan funds.
'There were some add-ons from each council. There were some specialized pieces that we added, and then we had some private investments as well,' said Youngstown Mayor Tito Brown.
The improvements include new playground equipment as well as picnic tables and grills to replace what, in many cases, had been worn out or broken. There will also be new landscaping and sidewalks as well as lighting and security cameras.
Brown said without the availability of the ARP funds, many of the upgrades would have taken years to install as funding became available.
'I'm excited to see what the new parks will look like, and the citizens in the neighborhood can enjoy them,' Brown said.
Some city parks where nothing is taking place now could see improvements if there is money left over from other projects.
Brown says residents will be able to start using the new facilities this summer, and most of the work should be completed this fall.
While it was too cold to swim for many, the mayor on Monday was also taking his annual ceremonial first dive at the Northside Pool on Belmont Avenue. As a former lifeguard there many years ago, he had a message to remind residents about water safety this summer.
'Before we open the pool, I want to make sure I give them a spiel, make sure they know how to swim. Their parents should know how to swim. If not, let Parks and Rec help them learn water safety and swimming,' Brown said.
The Northside Pool is also getting a new concession stand this summer that should be open by mid-June. It'll also be getting some improvements to the front entrance to the pool building and the bath house changing area. Weather permitting, the pool will be open through Sept. 1.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
a day ago
Anti-slavery document from 1847 reveals American Baptists' commitment to abolition
GROTON, Mass. -- Jennifer Cromack was combing through the American Baptist archive when she uncovered a slim box among some 18th and 19th century journals. Opening it, she found a scroll in pristine condition. A closer look revealed the 5-foot-long (1.5-meter-long) document was a handwritten declaration titled 'A Resolution and Protest Against Slavery," signed by 116 New England ministers in Boston and adopted March 2, 1847. Until its discovery in May at the archives in Groton, Massachusetts, American Baptist officials worried the anti-slavery document had been lost forever after fruitless searches at Harvard and Brown universities and other locations. A copy was last seen in a 1902 history book. 'I was just amazed and excited,' Cromack, a retired teacher who volunteers at the archive, said. 'We made a find that really says something to the people of the state and the people in the country. ... It speaks of their commitment to keeping people safe and out of situations that they should not be in." The document offers a glimpse into an emerging debate over slavery in the 18th century in the Northeast. The document was signed 14 years before the start of the Civil War as a growing number of religious leaders were starting to speak out against slavery. The document also shines a spotlight on a critical moment in the history of the Baptist church. It was signed two years after the issue of slavery prompted southern Baptists to split from northern Baptists and form the Southern Baptist Convention, the nation's largest Protestant denomination. The split in 1845 followed a ruling by the American Baptist Foreign Mission Society prohibiting slave owners from becoming missionaries. The northern Baptists eventually became American Baptist Churches USA. 'It comes from such a critical era in American history, you know, right prior to the Civil War,' said Rev. Mary Day Hamel, the executive minister of the American Baptist Churches of Massachusetts. 'It was a unique moment in history when Baptists in Massachusetts stepped up and took a strong position and stood for justice in the shaping of this country,' she said. 'That's become part of our heritage to this day, to be people who stand for justice, for American Baptists to embrace diversity.' Deborah Bingham Van Broekhoven, the executive director emerita of the American Baptist Historical Society, said many Americans at the time, especially in the North, were 'undecided' about slavery and weren't sure how to respond or were worried about speaking out. 'They thought it was a southern problem, and they had no business getting involved in what they saw as the state's rights,' Van Broekhoven said. 'Most Baptists, prior to this, would have refrained from this kind of protest. This is a very good example of them going out on a limb and trying to be diplomatic.' The document shows ministers had hoped 'some reformatory movement' led by those involved in slavery would make their action 'unnecessary,' but that they felt compelled to act after they 'witnessed with painful surprise, a growing disposition to justify, extend and perpetuate their iniquitous system.' 'Under these circumstances we can no longer be silent,' the document states. 'We owe something to the oppressed as well as to the oppressor, and justice demands the fulfillment of that obligation. Truth and Humanity and Public Virtue, have claims upon us which we cannot dishonor.' The document explains why the ministers 'disapprove and abhor the system of American slavery.' 'With such a system we can have no sympathy,' the document states. 'After a careful observation of its character and effects and making every deduction with the largest charity can require, we are constrained to regard it as an outrage upon the rights and happiness of our fellow men, for which there is no valid justification or apology.' Rev. Diane Badger, the administrator of the American Baptist Church of Massachusetts who oversees the archive, teamed up with Rev. John Odams of the First Baptist Church in Boston to identify what she called the 'Holy Grail' of abolitionist-era Baptist documents. Her great-grandfather was an American Baptist minister. Since its discovery, Badger has put all the ministers' names on a spreadsheet along with the names of the churches where they served. Among them was Nathaniel Colver, of Tremont Temple in Boston, one of the first integrated churches in the country, now known as Tremont Temple Baptist Church. Another was Baron Stow, who belonged to the state's anti-slavery society. Badger also is working to estimate the value of the document, which is intact with no stains or damage, and is making plans to ensure it is protected. A digital copy could eventually be shared with some of Massachusetts' 230 American Baptist churches. 'It's been kind of an interesting journey and it's one that's still unfolding,' Badger said. 'The questions that always come to me, OK, I know who signed it but who didn't? I can go through my list, through my database and find who was working where on that and why didn't they sign that. So it's been very interesting to do the research.' Rev. Kenneth Young — whose predominantly Black Calvary Baptist Church in Haverhill, Massachusetts, was created by freed Blacks in 1871 — called the discovery inspiring. 'I thought it was awesome that we had over hundred signers to this, that they would project that freedom for our people is just,' Young said. 'It follows through on the line of the abolitionist movement and fighting for those who may not have had the strength to fight for themselves against a system of racism.'
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
No Time-Out For AI: Decoding Washington's Moratorium Flip
Closeup of the documents of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, a $1.9 trillion economic stimulus ... More package proposed by President Biden to speed up the recovery. In the frenetic activity leading up to a vote on the current administration's major bill, it seems Congress has rejected the idea of imposing a 10-year moratorium on states when it comes to regulating AI. On Tuesday, the Senate voted to take this part out of the so-called 'One Big, Beautiful Bill.' The vote was not close. It was reportedly 99-1, and done in an overnight session just days before an expected vote on the bill's adoption. Tech Industry Viewpoints Some in the tech community had argued for keeping the ban, saying that it would be difficult for tech companies to comply with different state requirements. Sam Altman of OpenAI, for one, talked about this kind of patchwork system as being a challenge. "(Those kinds of state laws) will slow us down at a time where I don't think it's in anyone's interest for us to slow down," Altman reportedly said, calling for a single federal framework, that is 'light touch.' However, apparently Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee helped lead an effort to get rid of the provision, partly on the grounds that if states don't regulate, and the federal government doesn't regulate, there won't be any regulation at all. "While I appreciate Chairman Cruz's efforts to find acceptable language that allows states to protect their citizens from the abuses of AI, the current language is not acceptable to those who need these protections the most," Blackburn said in a statement explaining her aversion to stop-gap compromise language from Cruz prior to jettisoning the idea. "This provision could allow Big Tech to continue to exploit kids, creators, and conservatives." The Big Bank Here's another detail to know about how the bill moved through Congress. The version of the AI regulation ban that was rejected by the Senate had already been changed to apply to a $500 million infrastructure fund – in other words, it wasn't an outright ban per se, but a move to tie funding to the states' decisions. Blackburn, for her part, cited kids' safety and protecting the personal data of entertainers, as mentioned above. But of course, there are other reasons to look carefully at the industry and try to make a AI safer for humans. It's interesting to know that while there wasn't a lot of public championing of regulation from tech heads, it wasn't that many years ago that figures like Elon Musk were noting the need for AI ethics research and social guidelines for AI in general. That seems like something we should still have as new technologies roll out in the blink of an eye. In that sense, the striking down of the regulation moratorium gives officials in all 50 states more ground to make an attempt – to protect people, to fine-tune systems, and to focus on AI safety and equity. State Initiatives So what are states planning? A lot, apparently. 'State lawmakers are considering a diverse array of AI legislation, with hundreds of bills introduced in 2025,' write a number of authors at Inside Privacy, a blog at Covington & Burling LLP. 'As described further in this blog post, many of these AI legislative proposals fall into several key categories.' They list: 'Although these categories represent just a subset of current AI legislative activity,' the authors note, 'they illustrate the major priorities of state legislatures and highlight new AI laws that may be on the horizon.' Here's more from the Council of State Governments. Look for a lot more of this to be coming our way. It might be complex, and hard to navigate in some ways, but most of us would probably agree this is something worth pursuing.
Time Magazine
2 days ago
- Time Magazine
Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Will Devastate Public Schools
This week, Republican lawmakers are attempting to pass a budget reconciliation bill that pays for unprecedented handouts to the wealthiest Americans on the backs of cuts to programs that benefit most people. Hidden in this budget package before the House is a national private school voucher program funded through tax breaks for the wealthy that threatens to dismantle our system of public schools. According to Senator Ted Cruz, school vouchers are "the Civil Rights Issue of the 21st century.' The Texas Republican argues that vouchers are key to providing educational opportunities for young people. On the contrary, expanding vouchers and eliminating public education will actively harm young people—especially Black, Latino, and Indigenous students. President Donald Trump's so-called 'Big, Beautiful Bill' currently includes a provision hidden in the tax code that offers an unprecedented 100% tax deduction for donations to third party organizations that hand out private school vouchers. The push to create a national private school voucher program is part of a long legacy of efforts to return to the separate and unequal educational landscape of the pre-civil rights era. Since the 1960s, white segregationists pushed for private school vouchers to avoid the desegregation mandates of Brown v. Board of Education and maintain a discriminatory and unequal system of education. We urge lawmakers to drop the private school voucher program from the spending bill and keep it out of the final budget package. We also call on lawmakers to pass legislation that fully funds public schools, such as the Keep Our Pact Act. If the lawmakers fail to do so, it will set us on a dangerous course back toward a pre-civil rights era reality, defined by deliberate racial segregation and extreme disparities in school funding and resourcing. This private school voucher plan to strip millions of children of their opportunity to access free public education directly mirrors Project 2025. The issue with such a policy is that private school vouchers subsidize wealthy families who can already pay for private school, while decimating public schools for everyone else by diverting resources away from public education. Opponents of free and accessible education argue that voucher programs give families more choice. In actuality, school vouchers go toward private schools that choose which children to enroll, reject, or kick out. Public schools cannot choose which students to provide an education to. By law, they cannot discriminate against students based on their gender, race, disability, religion, English fluency, or LGBTQ identity. But by design, private schools selectively allow admission to a small number of students. They also routinely deny students enrollment for other reasons like grades, behavioral record, and ability to pay. The latter of which is particularly significant because research suggests most families can't afford the gap between the voucher and the rest of tuition. Families who can't access elite private schools, whether because they are discriminated against or can't pay the difference in tuition, are often preyed upon by predatory schools that have popped up in states that passed vouchers in recent years. Horror stories abound of strip mall schools where no learning happens, where doors shutter mid-year, and where students don't have teachers. Meanwhile, public schools, which serve 90% of American students and 94% of students of color—are forced to do more with less. Students learn from outdated textbooks and old computers while overworked teachers are tasked with educating children who aren't getting the resources they need. A choice between a private school that can reject or discriminate against your child and an under-resourced public school is hardly a choice at all. The draconian cuts to public education caused by vouchers are even leading to a new wave of school closures, disproportionately impacting schools in Black and Brown neighborhoods, and forcing students to start over in unfamiliar environments, often traveling farther from home and adapting to new teachers and peers. When neighborhood schools close, Black and Brown communities lose community centers, polling places, access to services, and vital civic infrastructure, and in some cases lose their communities altogether. Grassroots organizers in Black and Brown communities across the U.S. are fighting back to save their public schools from closure. They have packed board meetings, lead school walk-outs, and even held hunger strikes. They are on the frontlines of local fights against voucher programs and to support and keep their public schools. The future of our public schools—schools that serve every child for free—are on the line. Instead of gutting our public schools, lawmakers should invest in them and restore the promise of equal education that the civil rights movement fought for.
