Foreign troops deploying to Ukraine not realistic – Zelensky's top aide
Podoliak made the statement in an interview with Polish radio station RMF just days after a number of European top officials gathered for an emergency meeting in Paris. Ahead of the event, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he was 'ready and willing' to put his nation's troops on the ground in Ukraine to help secure a peace deal.
Podoliak, however, stated that a deployment of foreign peacekeeping forces or soldiers 'do not seem very realistic scenarios for now.' Instead, he suggested that Europe should increase its defense spending and together with Kiev 'focus on the development of arms' and continue support 'in this way.'
The comments come after Russian and American officials met in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday to discuss future negotiations on settling the Ukraine crisis. US President Donald Trump has repeatedly voiced his intent to bring the conflict to a quick resolution.
Following the talks, Russia's top diplomat, Sergey Lavrov, stated that Moscow firmly rejects NATO troops being deployed to Ukraine. The Russian Foreign Ministry has consistently warned that Moscow views any European peacekeeping contingent in Ukraine as a provocative step that could further escalate the conflict.
Starmer is scheduled to visit Washington next week, where, according to The Telegraph, he will present Donald Trump with a plan to send 30,000 European troops to Ukraine and will try to secure American protection for the deployment. Zelensky claimed in January that Ukraine may need 200,000 European soldiers to guarantee a peace deal.
Last week, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ruled out deploying American troops as part of potential security guarantees to Kiev.
According to Politico, Brussels is preparing a military aid package of at least €6 billion ($6.2 billion) for Kiev, which would include 1.5 million artillery shells and air defense systems. The package would be one of the EU's largest military aid injections since the start of Russia's military operation in 2022. It could be announced ahead of a visit by EU commissioners to Kiev on February 24.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
15 minutes ago
- Russia Today
US trade deal will fuel EU's ‘deindustrialization'
The new US-EU trade agreement threatens to accelerate 'deindustrialization' in Europe by redirecting investment to the US and increasing the bloc's dependency on American energy exports, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said. On Sunday, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump finalized a controversial deal that allowed the EU and US to avert a full-scale trade war. Under the deal, the US has reduced its proposed 30% tariffs to a flat 15% on most European exports. The EU has committed to purchasing $750 billion worth of US energy, primarily liquefied natural gas and nuclear fuel, and agreed to invest around $600 billion into US industries. The bloc has also undertaken to increase imports of US-made weapons. Speaking at the 'Territory of Meanings' forum on Monday, Lavrov described the arrangement as 'clearly leading to further deindustrialization of Europe and capital flight.' He added that rising energy prices and investment outflows will strike a 'very hard blow' to European industrial and agricultural sectors. According to Lavrov, von der Leyen was apparently 'boasting' about the EU's willingness to carry additional costs. 'People like Ursula von der Leyen literally take pride in this path: yes, we will be forced to spend more money, yes, we will probably have fewer resources to address social problems, but we are obliged to defeat Russia.' He stressed that the trade deal is 'obviously damaging for the Old Continent – it doesn't even need to be analyzed.' Lavrov's stance was echoed by several EU politicians and the business community. Marine Le Pen, a key figure in France's right-wing National Rally party, denounced the agreement as a 'political, economic, and moral fiasco' detrimental to the EU's sovereignty. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou concurred, calling it a 'dark day' for the EU. German business leaders also voiced alarm. Wolfgang Niedermark, a member of the executive board of the Federation of German Industries (BDI), said the EU had sent a 'fatal signal' by accepting high tariffs. 'Even a tariff rate of 15% will have immense negative effects on the export-oriented German industry,' he warned.
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
US-EU trade deal a ‘fiasco'
The new EU-US trade agreement is an economic and political 'fiasco' that undermines the bloc's sovereignty, veteran right-wing French politician Marine Le Pen has said. The agreement, finalized by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump on Sunday, averted a full-blown trade war between Washington and Brussels. Under its terms, the EU will commit to increased imports of US energy and military equipment, while the US reduces its proposed 30% tariffs to a flat 15% on most European exports. Le Pen, a key member of France's National Rally party, the largest opposition group in the National Assembly, condemned the deal, calling it 'a political, economic and moral fiasco' for the EU. 'Politically, because the European Union, with 27 member states, obtained worse conditions than the United Kingdom,' she said, referring to the fact that the UK agreed to 10% tariffs – which was widely regarded as a bad deal. Le Pen also accused Brussels of accepting unequal terms on exporting American gas and weapons that she claimed no patriotic French government would have agreed to. 'This is an outright surrender for French industry and for our energy and military sovereignty.' She added that the deal sacrifices the interests of French farmers to benefit Germany's automotive industry, pointing to 'clauses forcing us to further open the single market to American agricultural products in exchange for reduced taxes on German automobile exports.' 'This globalization that denies and shatters sovereignty has been outdated for many years… The least that could be done is to acknowledge this stinging failure rather than asking the French, who will be its first victims, to rejoice in it.' Le Pen's criticism was echoed by former Belgian Prime Minister and MEP Guy Verhofstadt, who called the agreement 'scandalous' and 'a disaster,' which failed to secure any concessions from the American side. Trump described the agreement as 'probably the biggest deal ever reached in any capacity, trade or beyond trade.' Von der Leyen said the deal brings 'certainty in uncertain times,' adding that a 15% rate 'is the best we could get.'
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Trump ‘wiped the floor' with EU
The new trade agreement between the US and the EU is 'completely humiliating for the Europeans,' former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has said. The deal, announced on Sunday by US President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, includes a requirement for EU member states to increase imports of American energy and defense products. It also imposes a blanket 15% tariff on EU exports to the US – terms accepted by Brussels to avoid even steeper trade penalties. In a social media post on Monday, Medvedev, who serves as deputy chair of the Russian Security Council, claimed that the terms of the deal meant Trump had 'wiped the floor with Europe.' 'One can only feel sorry for ordinary Europeans,' Medvedev wrote. He asserted that where Trump is seeking economic benefits for American businesses, EU leaders are motivated by an ideological anti-Russian sentiment, as the deal further cements Brussels' intention to terminate all purchases of Russian oil and gas. The Trump administration has used tariffs as a tool to confront what it considers unfair trade practices and chronic deficits in trade with key partners. In the absence of a deal, EU products could have faced tariffs as high as 50%. Last week, Brussels prepared a list of US goods it was ready to hit with retaliatory duties if negotiations collapsed. Medvedev and other senior Russian officials have repeatedly portrayed EU leaders as politically weak and overly compliant with Washington's agenda, often at the expense of their own economic interests. Russia has been especially critical of the EU's break from Russian energy supplies, a move initiated as part of sanctions over the Ukraine conflict. Moscow contends that the resulting shift to more expensive US liquefied natural gas has contributed to the deindustrialization of major European economies.
