This hidden Android feature was a lifesaver when my home internet died — here's how it works
One of the worst first-world problems we can face is being cut off from the internet. I'm not talking about being deprived of social media, or the ability to send memes to our friends, though that is a part of it. The internet has infiltrated every aspect of our lives, and lack of access means a lot of modern conveniences we take for granted are worthless — even if you're connected to the same local network.
I know this for a fact, because my internet has been cut off for over a week at this point. While I was able to tether a few of my devices so I could continue to work without issue, the lack of stable home Wi-Fi meant a bunch of my devices were completely cut off. Until I realized that the best Android phones have a hidden feature that could help get everything up and running — all while using my existing wireless network.
How many of you knew about Ethernet tethering, let alone used it?
While I won't bother you with the whole story, the basic issue with my home internet appears to be with the cable providing internet to my home. Specifically, that it needs to be replaced.
My house is wired to a hub roughly 300 feet down the street, with the primary internet cables splitting off to all the other homes with the same ISP. Apparently my issue is with that connective cable, and the only solution is a total replacement — which is no small task when you're talking about something under concrete, dirt and asphalt.
As of last week, my ISP estimated that it wouldn't be able to complete that job until June 19 — over two weeks after the problem was originally reported. Which is less than ideal.
While I can tether a few devices to my phone, and finally eat into my 300GB monthly allowance, it wasn't going to last two weeks. Not unless I was super conservative with my data consumption. On top of that, it would leave almost all my connected devices without a wireless connection. Even if I could connect them all to my hotspot at once, it would mean reconfiguring all the wireless settings to connect them to a brand new network. If I'm totally honest, that would take up the better part of a day.
Thankfully there was a solution.. All I had to do was plug a phone into my home network, and share its mobile connection via ethernet. The aptly-named Ethernet Tethering feature.
Ethernet tethering first debuted in Android 11, back in 2020. The name is perfectly literal, and it means you can plug your Android phone into any Ethernet port, and share the phone's internet connection. For all those times where wireless and USB tethering either aren't practical or straight-up impossible.
My ISP's router is absolutely terrible. Which is no surprise for anyone that has used those kinds of devices before (and a reason to get one of the best cable modems instead). But I can't get rid of it, because my connection needs a modem and third party options won't work. Not easily anyway. So I have everything running from an old Wi-Fi 5 Orbi system that hooks into the modem via ethernet.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with the Orbi system right now, and all my devices were still happily still connected to it. But since it wasn't getting internet from the modem, their functionality was limited. Wo while my Eufy video doorbell would still save video my hard drive, or activate the chime, I wasn't able to connect to it from my phone.
Armed with an unlimited data eSIM, a Google Pixel 8a and an old USB-C hub, I was able to get the whole house back online in no time at all. There were a couple of hurdles, but nothing too serious, and now my house is back to normal.
While there are plenty of USB-C to Ethernet adapters out there, few of them have some kind of power input as well. If you need a multi-purpose USB-C hub, you can't really go wrong with Anker. This isn't the hub I used, but I do use Anker hubs elsewhere with far fewer problems than unbranded rivals.
This 6-in-1 option comes with ethernet and a USB-C Power Delivery port, plus the added bonus of HDMI, 2x USB 3 ports and an extra USB-C data port.View Deal
Getting back online wasn't quite as simple as just plugging an Ethernet cable into my phone. You do have to turn Ethernet tethering on first, and it took me a minute to figure out I was trying to do it all wrong.
My first instinct was to head into the USB preferences menu and get Ethernet tethering going from there. This doesn't work, mainly because Android can't take control from the adapter itself. But even if it could, the only tethering option is USB — which probably wouldn't work.
If you ever find yourself in a similar predicament, you need to head to the Hotspot and tethering menu in the network settings. Ethernet tethering is right at the bottom, and will be available as soon as you plug an Ethernet cable into your phone.
The other big issue is that Ethernet tethering used a heck of a lot of power. To the point where the fully charged Pixel 8a died at some point before 7 a.m. So you need to make sure your adapter has at least one other USB-C charging port to keep everything running.
A sufficiently powerful wireless charger may work, assuming you're ok with the device running a little hotter than normal. Sadly the Pixel 8a is limited to 7.5W Qi charging, and this wasn't even close to suitable.
Android also has a habit of suspending the charging periodically, when it senses that the phone has been plugged in for too long. This is designed to protect the battery, and arguably a good thing. But it does mean I need to check on the phone periodically and make sure it's not suddenly on 12%.
Still, in the grand scheme of things, these are all very minor problems that are significantly less hassle than not having internet.
Without Ethernet tethering, I would not be having fun right now. In fact I probably would have caved and bought one of the best mobile hotspots and got online that way. But the fact I have spare phones, and whole drawers full of cables, meant I didn't actually have to wait for new hardware and a SIM card to arrive.
I'm just thankful that my home network is set up in such a way that I didn't need to change the wireless settings on all my smart devices for what should (hopefully) be a temporary switch. I could live with the internet being down for a day or two, but 2+ weeks is a little too much to go without proper access.
In case you're interested, I've used 325GB of data since I started using Ethernet tethering — which would have absolutely destroyed by ordinary data cap.
I've used the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) for a month and it solves my biggest issue with the Galaxy S25 Edge
Live Updates just arrived on Android 16 — but it's not quite finished yet
Nothing Phone 3 image leak shows us the back of the phone — and the Glyph Interface is missing
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Android Authority
an hour ago
- Android Authority
There's a better Nothing Phone 3 variant, and you can't buy it in the US
C. Scott Brown / Android Authority TL;DR Nothing has confirmed that the Indian version of the Nothing Phone 3 has a 5,500mAh battery. Other versions of the phone have a slightly smaller 5,150mAh battery. We're guessing that this discrepancy is related to EU regulations regarding the transport of batteries. The Nothing Phone 3 finally launched yesterday, and it looks like a well-rounded Android phone with a polarizing design. However, it turns out that one regional variant has a bigger battery. Nothing confirmed to Android Authority that the Indian version of the Nothing Phone 3 has a 5,500mAh battery. By contrast, other models (including the US variant) have a 5,150mAh battery. This confirmation comes after Nothing's Indian website listed a 5,150mAh battery, but the regional press release and Indian retail listings pointed to a 5,500mAh battery. In any event, a 5,150mAh battery is still a solid size in 2025 and should ensure respectable endurance. But we're keen to see how much more runtime can be squeezed out of the Indian variant. Nothing hasn't revealed a reason for this discrepancy, but we're guessing that this is related to European Union (EU) regulations regarding the transport of batteries. After all, Nothing wouldn't be the only brand to release a phone with a smaller battery in Europe. Xiaomi and OnePlus have also released phones with smaller batteries in the EU compared to China, India, or other global markets. These devices include the Xiaomi 15 Ultra, POCO F7, and OnePlus Nord CE 4 Lite. In fact, OnePlus previously explained why last year's Nord CE 4 Lite had a smaller battery in the EU: Due to applicable laws and regulations in certain European countries regarding the carriage of batteries, there are stringent requirements placed on the transportation and handling of battery cells with the watt-hour rating over 20Wh. As a result of the nominal voltage of our batteries being 3.88V, the OnePlus Nord CE 4 Lite will be equipped with a 5,110mAh battery in Europe, instead of the 5,500mAh battery available in other markets. OnePlus also noted in response to an Android Authority question that the restriction applies to a single battery cell rather than the entire package. This suggests that brands can still offer a large battery in the EU if they opt for a dual-cell design. In any event, we've asked Nothing why the Indian version of the Nothing Phone 3 has a higher battery capacity than other variants. We'll update our article as soon as the company responds to our query. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
The Verge
2 hours ago
- The Verge
Google Photos sees several app improvements
The Google Photos app has been updated to make it easier to navigate your gallery and view image information. Google says the photo view — the screen that appears when you open an image in Google Photos — has been redesigned to provide a 'simpler, more modern, and more intuitive UI' while adding a new light mode, glanceable photo details, and streamlined action menus. These changes are available now for iPhone users, and will be coming to the Google Photos app for Android 'soon,' according to Google. The update doesn't remove any of the previous functionality provided by the app, but some features may have been relocated. The biggest visual change is the introduction of light mode, which will automatically match the photo view background to match your device's system theme. Information is now also displayed at the top of each photograph that provides the date, time, and location where it was captured. Some pill-shaped 'badges' are sometimes located underneath those details that allow users to play or pause a Live or Motion photo, change the photo's category, save shared images, and manage storage. Several actions can now be found under the three-dot menu at the top right of the photo view, including About, Create, Cast, Save as, Download or Delete from device, and Google Lens. The latter was previously located on the photo view taskbar, and has now been replaced with an 'Add to' menu that allows users to archive photos, organize them into albums, or secure them in a locked folder. Lastly, photo stacks and bursts can now be managed via their own three-dot menu, which will appear beside whatever thumbnail is currently selected. Here you'll find options to change the top image, remove images, unstack, or select multiple photos to take bulk actions.
Android Authority
2 hours ago
- Android Authority
I tried Google Chrome's new bottom URL bar on Android, and it's a mess
Andy Walker / Android Authority Google Chrome on Android has finally caught up with the rest of civilization by bashing two rocks together to introduce a bottom URL bar. Users who have sought out the feature and found it on Firefox, Samsung Internet, and Microsoft Edge can now choose which address bar position they prefer on Google's browser: the traditional top of the screen or the more convenient bottom-edge placement. Don't get me wrong — while I am annoyed that Google took this long to implement the feature, I am thrilled that Chrome finally has it. It's a case of better late than never for those who use the browser, even if it comes so much later than its contemporaries. Delayed software that's good and works well is always superior to rushed wares that splutter and falter. However, despite taking nearly two years for this feature to debut on the stable channel, it still feels unfinished. After enabling the bottom bar and trawling the internet for a few hours, I've encountered several silly issues that should have been identified and corrected before the feature's official debut on Android. What do you think of Google Chrome for Android's bottom address bar? 0 votes It's great, and I love it. NaN % I'm glad it's available, but it needs some more work. NaN % It's terrible, and Google did a bad job. NaN % Getting started with Chrome's bottom URL bar Andy Walker / Android Authority First things first. To enable the bottom bar in Chrome, tap the three-dot menu icon, open Settings, then select Address bar. From here, tap Bottom. The address bar should now be positioned at the bottom of the screen. While that sounds great for fans of this feature, Chrome makes it more challenging to use than it really should be. The biggest benefit of a browser's bottom bar is its closer proximity to your thumb. With a top address bar, I often have to use my second hand, stretch my phone-holding hand, and risk dropping my phone — or reposition the device to tap it. However, with a bottom bar, this problem is largely solved. This whole scenario was less pronounced when handsets were smaller, but modern monster smartphones, whose screens regularly clear 6 inches in size, have changed the definition of useful UI. A bottom address bar makes it far easier to browse the web on devices with larger screens. If anything, app controls at the bottom of the screen have become the necessary norm rather than the exception. But, oddly enough, Chrome's bottom bar is only useful in theory. In practice, I'm not sure why Google even bothered. Has anyone at Google ever used a browser with a bottom bar? Andy Walker / Android Authority What went wrong with Chrome's bottom URL bar? Let's start with the new tab page. I enabled Chrome's bottom bar and opened the app. I didn't find an address bar as I expected at the bottom of the screen. Instead, the browser's stylized search bar is still positioned three-quarters up the top of the page. That defeats the point of this toggle, doesn't it? To add to the list of odd decisions, the profile icon, tabs icon, and three-dot menu buttons are also still located at the top of the screen. I used my second hand to tap the search bar, but this still doesn't move any controls to the bottom of the screen. In fact, the address bar now appears at the very top of the browser window. More annoyingly, Google's search suggestions are positioned beneath the URL bar and not above the keyboard. Only when I enter a URL and navigate to it does the address bar move to the bottom of the screen. Chrome completely misunderstands the benefits of moving the address bar to the bottom of the screen. So, everything is solved, right? Not quite. Tapping on the bar once again pushes it all the way up to the top of the screen, along with the suggestions and other useful search options that I'd like quick access to, such as voice search and Lens. How do other Android browsers handle bottom bar quirks? Well, as luck would have it, far better. Mozilla Firefox Microsoft Edge Samsung Internet Firefox keeps the bar above the keyboard when you tap on it, but suggestions are still pinned to the top of the screen. Tabs are also biased towards the top of the screen, although the home page layout is much better suited to one-handed use. keeps the bar above the keyboard when you tap on it, but suggestions are still pinned to the top of the screen. Tabs are also biased towards the top of the screen, although the home page layout is much better suited to one-handed use. Microsoft Edge , in contrast, positions almost everything at the bottom of the screen once that option is enabled. This includes user and sponsored shortcuts, suggestions, and image/voice search options. It's by far my favorite implementation of this feature. , in contrast, positions almost everything at the bottom of the screen once that option is enabled. This includes user and sponsored shortcuts, suggestions, and image/voice search options. It's by far my favorite implementation of this feature. Samsung Internet goes a step further and places several useful browser shortcuts below the address bar, including favorites, the home button, and its AI-fueled Browsing Assist icon. Chrome completely misunderstands the benefits of moving the address bar to the bottom of the screen. It's almost as if those who implemented it didn't consider why users prefer this option or why it's actually necessary. Chrome is still playing catch-up, even if Google fixes its UI issues Andy Walker / Android Authority I've been waiting for Chrome's bottom bar for ages. I even enabled it at some point last year when the flag became available (only for Google to disable it). I thought that was to refine the feature and related experiences that are affected by the change in the browser, but I was seemingly expecting too much. Even though Google has spent over 40 months polishing the bottom URL bar for its own operating system since its launch on iOS, it feels rushed and unfinished on the platform Google should prioritize. You know, Android? Perhaps the good news is that all the problems I've highlighted are fixable, but I don't trust that Google will address them. Perhaps the good news is that all the problems I've highlighted are fixable. We could have a version of Google Chrome that's as good as Microsoft Edge in a few patches. And, to be fair, some elements have been rethought. For instance, the Settings menu now appears at the bottom of the page, even if it remains far too long to be accessible with one hand. Even if Google proves me wrong, some other Chrome idiosyncrasies are plain difficult to ignore. The browser's stubborn approach to extensions, overall UI rigidity, and constant need to be logged in. For me, the bottom bar annoyances are the last nail in the coffin for Google's browser on my phone, at least as anything beyond an occasional portal into the company's products.
