Industry calls for innovation to revive textile sector
Ludhiana: The textile industry of Ludhiana, a city long hailed as the powerhouse of India's hosiery and knitwear sector, is facing an urgent need for reinvention amid rising global competition, bureaucratic red tape, and lack of govt support.
These concerns, alongside future opportunities, were the focus of an event organised by the Confederation of Indian Textile Industry (CITI) along with ITMA.
Titled "Challenges and opportunities in the Ludhiana textile industry," the event saw key industry leaders, experts, and association heads, including representatives from the Confederation of Indian Textile Industry (CITI), United Cycle and Parts Manufacturers Association (UCPMA), and the Knitwear Club.
Jagbir Singh Sokhi, president of the Ludhiana Sewing Machine Technology Park Association, said, "We are no longer those self-reliant Indians. We've become copycats, proud to own iPhones and imported brands, but where is the pride in our own innovations? Where is the spirit of 'vocal for local'?"
A recurring theme throughout the conference was the alarming lack of innovation. Sokhi pointed out how Punjab once led the world in sewing machine production, but in just two decades, Chinese brands like Zach have taken over 75% of the Indian market share.
"They've even handed over machines to local tailors, collecting only a share of their earnings. We are now OE (original equipment) manufacturers for foreign brands, but where is our own brand identity?" he asked.
Vinod Thapar, chairman of the Knitwear Club, emphasised challenges in attracting women to the workforce. A survey conducted jointly by UNIDO and the Knitwear Club years ago found that women excelled in the hosiery sector across countries like China, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka.
Yet, Ludhiana has only 10% female participation in the sector, leaving a 40% vacuum in workforce potential. Thapar also raised concerns about a lack of workplace infrastructure and facilities for women.
Avtar Singh Bhogal, senior vice-president of UCPMA, was blunt in his comparison of Indian and Chinese industrial environments. "While we are stuck in red tape just to buy land or get clearances, Chinese companies are already producing and exporting finished goods at the price it costs us to manufacture just the components."
He added that Indian bikes weigh 15 kg, while the demand in Europe is for 1.5 kg carbon fibre bikes, which India is ill-equipped to produce due to lack of infrastructure and technology.
Rajesh Bansal, another industry figure, focused on the environmental compliance costs that have hamstrung local manufacturers. "We face serious pollution concerns, but where are the subsidies for effluent treatment equipment? Processing of fibre and fabric manufacturing is lagging due to poor support," he said.
Chandrika Chatterjee, secretary general of CITI, provided some optimism by speaking about the PM MITRA scheme and the Free Trade Agreement with the UK. She emphasised the untapped potential for increasing Indo-UK textile trade, which currently stands at $10 billion but could expand by an additional $4–5 billion. "The world is looking beyond China and Bangladesh. India has a real opportunity here, if we can address the bottlenecks," she said.
Highlighting the urgency to foster innovation and startups in the sector, Suraj Dhawan of ITMA suggested organising hackathons to crowdsource fresh ideas and solutions for industry pain points.
Sidharth Khanna, chairman of NITMA, and other senior members pointed out the need for deeper collaboration between govt bodies and the private sector to overcome export barriers and technology gaps.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
32 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Civil servants in China are avoiding dining out: What's the reason?
Civil servants across China are avoiding dining out—even in private settings. The reason? A renewed push for Beijing's austerity campaign, due to which many officials are adopting a better safe than sorry approach to manage risk under local interpretations of central directives, according to a report by South China Morning Post. Chinese President Xi Jinping's long-running campaign against wasteful spending gained fresh momentum in March, with inspectors sent across ministries, regional governments and state-owned enterprises to ensure compliance with newly revised rules. These include bans on alcohol at work meals, luxurious dishes, and excessive office décor. What is Xi Jinping's austerity drive? Launched in 2012, Xi Jinping's austerity drive aims to curb corruption, extravagance and bureaucratic excess within the Communist Party. Initiated through the 'Eight-point Regulation', it targets lavish banquets, excessive travel, luxury offices and formalism, promoting frugality and discipline among officials. The campaign intended to restore public trust, consolidate Xi's authority, and ensure the Party's survival by improving its image and internal conduct. It also serves to identify loyal cadres and enforce political conformity. How much restriction is too much restriction? Although central directives do not ban all forms of socialising, the fear of being caught out by ever-changing interpretations has led to widespread self-censorship among officials. An official surnamed Luo from Sichuan province told South China Morning Post that a dine-out ban was announced in his department in early May. 'Eating out during this period is not good for you,' he said, citing his department head's warning. Luo described the development as a result of ceng ceng jia ma, a Mandarin phrase meaning 'adding extra layer upon layer of control'. It is widely understood in Chinese bureaucracy to describe the tendency of local authorities to excessively implement central policies, often to the point of overcorrection. The report cited another civil servant from Anhui province, who said her department had begun daily alcohol tests, coupled with post-lunch checks. 'It is just very intrusive and I don't know what the point of that is,' she told South China Morning Post. 'If I drank last night, you probably can't detect it by next morning.' One-size-fits-all response becomes the norm In Gansu province, an official surnamed Zhao said he had stopped dining out completely after being instructed to avoid 20 types of gatherings. 'This is too troublesome and too risky,' he told South China Morning Post. 'You never know what kind of dinner or entertainment will land you in trouble. The best way is just to turn down everything.' Zhao shared an example from a multiple-choice quiz issued by his disciplinary head. When asked what to do if a promoted superior's son is getting married, the 'correct' answer was to offer congratulations but not attend the banquet—an answer that contradicts longstanding cultural norms around red-envelope gifting. Luo, the Sichuan official, added that several colleagues received 'gentle reminders' from supervisors for simply eating hotpot together, despite splitting the bill. 'Our boss is trying to protect us,' Luo explained. 'If some whistle-blowers report them, they will have lots of explanation to do.' Pushback against excessive control Top authorities have begun to push back against the intensification of austerity measures at local levels. A June 17 report in the Communist Party mouthpiece People's Daily cautioned that banning banquets altogether violated the spirit of Xi's eight-point regulations on party conduct. The article stressed that the rules are meant to be applied with precision—like a 'scalpel'—but some local bodies were wielding them like a 'sledgehammer', imposing blanket bans and ignoring livelihoods. The country's food and drink industry, which generated over 5.5 trillion yuan ($775 billion) and more than 30 million jobs in 2024, was also highlighted as being at risk. Party chiefs Ma Xingrui of Xinjiang and Sun Shaocheng of Inner Mongolia echoed the message, urging officials to avoid ceng ceng jia ma and ensure the campaign is not enforced with a one-size-fits-all approach.
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
From Tatkal bookings for trains to ATM fees: Big changes coming in July 2025 - All you need to know
This is an AI-generated image, used for representational purposes only. The month of July 2025 is set to bring significant financial and service-related changes for Indian consumers, especially affecting train travellers and bank customers. These key shifts, from Aadhaar-based Tatkal ticket booking to new banking fees, could impact your daily transactions and travel plans. Here are the big changes applicable from the month of July: Aadhaar mandatory for online Tatkal bookings Starting July 1, Indian Railways will make Aadhaar authentication compulsory for booking Tatkal tickets online via the IRCTC website and mobile app. Travellers will need to link and verify their Aadhaar with their IRCTC profile to be eligible. A stricter Aadhaar-based OTP verification will come into effect from July 15 for all Tatkal tickets booked online. Additionally, authorised agents will be barred from booking Tatkal tickets during the first 30 minutes of the booking window. Even Tatkal tickets booked at PRS counters and through agents will require OTP verification from mid-July. Axis Bank revises ATM and account charges Axis Bank will implement revised charges across savings, NRI, and Trust accounts starting July 1. Customers exceeding their free transaction limits at Axis and non-Axis ATMs will now be charged Rs 23 per transaction, up from Rs 21. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Adidas Three Shorts With 60% Discount, Limited Stock Available Original Adidas Shop Now Undo This will apply to all financial transactions such as withdrawals and balance inquiries, beyond the free quota. Small Savings changes The government is set to announce the interest rates for small savings schemes, which will take effect during the quarter from July to September, reported ET. ICICI Bank to roll out new service fees ICICI Bank will also enforce a new set of service charges beginning July 1. According to ET, ATM users in metro cities will get three free transactions at non-ICICI ATMs, while non-metro customers will get five. Beyond these, Rs 23 will be charged for financial transactions and Rs 8.50 for non-financial ones. Other revisions include Rs 125 per international ATM withdrawal and updated fees for IMPS transfers. Cash transactions will be limited to three free branch/CRM uses a month, post which Rs 150 will be levied per transaction. With these sweeping changes across sectors, customers are advised to update their Aadhaar details, review their bank's updated charges, and complete necessary activations to avoid disruptions. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Need a machete, not a memo: NITI Aayog's Arvind Virmani on why MSME reform needs more than new laws
Arvind Virmani says that one of the roles of NITI Aayog is to get information that the ecosystem is completely unaware of and therefore not searching for. Arvind Virmani, Senior Economist and NITI Aayog Member, uses the analogy of a jungle to explain that the 'jungle of control' cannot beeliminated just by changing the laws for the MSME (micro, small and medium enterprise) sector. Although the governments have made efforts to reduce the time and cost of compliance, there is still a long journey ahead, he notes. In an exclusive interaction with ET Digital, Virmani talks about the crucial role of states, the advancement made by Southeast Asian countries, the future path for Indian MSMEs to become global champions, and more. Edited excerpts: Economic Times Digital (ET): The MSME sector in India plays a crucial role in the country's economic growth. Despite various government schemes, why do Indian MSMEs continue to face challenges in scaling their operations? Arvind Virmani (AV): There are two sub-segments in the SME segment. There are SMEs, which are basically 10 or more workers, and there are household and micro enterprises. We call them micro, but within them, the household part is much larger at 80-90%, which are just one-person terms of the issues that they face, one is basic infrastructure, which applies to both these two categories. The general point is that just the basic infrastructure in industrial areas is not up to the we think of urban development and cleanliness, we think of residential areas, but to get enterprises of high quality and functioning at the levels we expect, the basic infrastructure has to exist. They cannot be worrying about overflowing sewage pipes every other day if they are getting people from outside to buy things or getting an export order. The second is land use laws. For example, the conversion of agricultural land into industrial land: how will you get entrepreneurs in rural areas if that process is very difficult? The third is demand risk; a lot of small enterprises are single products, single buyer profiles. So, the risk is higher. So, when we say—why can't they get credit easily it is because they are riskier; due to their small scale, they are restricted. And finally, the critical one which is overlooked is the level of skills. The skill part has been neglected for decades, but I think it's getting more attention now, and one of my efforts has been to make sure the quality of that is improved. ET: A large portion of small businesses in India operate informally. Do you see the informality as a symptom of over-regulation, or is it more due to a lack of incentives to formalise?AV: So, this links us back to those two sub-segments: 10 or more workers versus 10 or less; so less than 10 is informal. So again, if laws, rules, and regulations are more complicated, procedures also reflect that. But efforts have been made to simplify the laws and rules, digitise the forms, and comply. But as I have asserted many times in the last several decades, the jungle of control, which was built up, just doesn't go away by changing the have to dig into every little thing. There's a whole structure that was built over 30 years of wrong policies, which is very hard to reverse. It's not just a matter of laws and rules; it's also how the whole system operates. So, with the analogy of a jungle, one has to go through every area and cut the jungle. And that's companies are more effective, and that is where the below 10 and more than 10 divide actually works; the compliances are lower for less than 10. That has the perverse effect of not wanting to grow. So, in that threshold, they just divide into two units. If they are going to go eleven, they will just divide up. In the longer term, this prevents you from attaining second type of cost primarily involves owner-managers, including SMEs, except for the highest, which we call the medium. They are owner-managers. So, their time is limited. If they spend more time on compliance, they will have less time for other things, including innovation, etc. So, there is a challenge, and the only way, and perhaps the best way, to do it is to reduce that time and other costs of has been the effort of the government, but it's a long road. And it also has to stretch it down to the states. Every state has to do its bit because much of this appliance actually happens at the ground level, at the local level, actually. That is the state's purview. ET: What steps is NITI Aayog considering to facilitate the transition from informal to formal structures for micro and small enterprises? AV: It is one of the roles of NITI Aayog to get information that the ecosystem is completely unaware of and therefore not searching for. So that is one, but also that applies to information to states and officials. One state may be doing better, but the other state is not aware of how it is done. Obviously, it depends on their own willingness and motivation as have independent states. So, supporting states and providing them with information is crucial. The other thing that we are doing is to build an index for investment. One of the initiatives that NITI is doing is to see how we can define the strengths and weaknesses of different states in attracting investment, infrastructure, and manufacturing. So that index is now in phase two and will be completed in the coming months. Once that index is ready, a state that is not doing well will have a roadmap to follow. They have a chance then to improve and, therefore, attract more investment and role of states is 100% integral. The ease of doing business, or what used to be called 'Inspector Raj', occurs at the local level, with those inspectors being responsible to the state government, not to the central government. So, clearly the role of the states is critical in attracting FDI in producing and exporting quality goods. To be in the international market, you must produce international-quality goods. ET: NITI Aayog's latest report on medium-sized enterprises highlights their vital contribution to India's GDP, particularly within the manufacturing sector. How can their potential be fully harnessed? AV: This is important because medium-sized enterprises are capable of advancing to the next level. That means the materials, equipment, tools, skill levels of those who run these things, knowledge and information of the owner manager—all that is of a certain quality. The medium-sized enterprises are the ones who are operating at a much higher quality and, in principle, have the potential to compete globally. For example, recently, we did a report at the NITI Aayog on hand tools. There were a whole bunch of hand tool manufacturers. They are in a whole different category. And those are the ones which will be this new medium sector. They have the capability to upgrade the quality chain because the gap is not so one would look at this medium sector in that context, that they are both labour-intensive and have the potential quality and competitiveness to compete are the ones who are capable of scaling. And then, of course, there is the 10 barrier, as well as the 100/300 worker barrier, among others. All these need to be simplified and made less onerous. ET: India's spending on R&D is among the lowest compared to its international counterparts. This is also applicable to medium enterprises. How can we bridge these gaps to foster the growth of MSMEs in general and medium units in particular? AV: The competitive system and export competitiveness are critical for R&D to happen. So, if there is too much protection in an industry, I would not expect anybody to do R&D. So, the first thing is, what is the incentive from their side to do R&D? Why do you do R&D? If you feel that a competitor is going to get something better, a product or a process, which will reduce the cost, and he'll be able to wipe you out. Or he'll produce a new product and get all the market away from you. So that is the basic driver of private sector R& issue is, what can the government do to facilitate it? This is indeed a controversial issue. I believe that we should bring back the R&D subsidy and give a focused subsidy to encourage it. I think it is still very important. Many countries across the world give incentives for R&D. We withdrew it because of a bad experience. I think we need to re-evaluate. ET: Many Asian countries have successfully scaled their SME sectors. What lessons can India learn from countries like Vietnam, Indonesia, or China? AV: This is a very important question. If you look at Southeast Asia in general, the big lesson is they went all out there to attract FDI. They laid out the red carpet for them to set up the supply chain. They didn't do this in one or two years; first they attracted the FDI, and when a large company with US supply chains came in, they rolled out the red carpet to help them build that supply is what has transformed them. That is what enabled them to surpass our per capita income. So, all the Southeast Asian countries who did that and did it successfully now exhibit a much higher gap in per capita income than us. So the big lesson is—FDI and supply chains; if you can get them even now, when things are so bad, it's a different world. That will be a huge driver for the medium and small there are 100 companies engaged in this activity nationwide, that means we have representation in 28 states. If every state brings in one anchor investor, it will transform manufacturing in every state in the next 10 years. We are progressing towards Atmanirbhar Manufacturing. So that is the lesson, a very clear lesson. ET: India was unable to capitalise as much as it had hoped in the China-Plus-One strategy. How can there be a turnaround for India, especially with some inherent strengths, such as a large market and demographic dividend on its side? AV: It is not true that we have not benefited. India is in the top three or five gainers, as per some studies. Some studies show we are third; others show we are fifth. In simple terms, the US imports from China have gone down; they have gone up from other countries, including Taiwan and Vietnam, which is always mentioned. Clearly all these studies indicate that we are the third-largest the question is, how can we gain more?Given our size, we should be gaining 10 times what we are now. So, that is the real issue, and that is connected to what I said about FDI and supply chains. But what is the policy we are pursuing? The policy is having FTAs with countries that are the source of FDI and demand for manufacturers. That is what the supply chain is all about. So, the FTA with the UK is done; the UK is one of the largest importers of manufactured goods in the world. The US and the EU are the top two if you treat the EU as a single the FTAs are part of our strategy to achieve this comprehensive and much bigger shift in the next 5-10 years; [we should] not just be satisfied with being number three or five; we should be number one by a big stretch. India's 64 million MSMEs are vital to India's goals as an economic powerhouse. However they are often constrained by issues relating to scale, diversification and digital infrastructure. Elevating their stature and empowering such businesses is crucial, especially in the context of unpredictable global trade dynamics at play. In this interaction, Niti Aayog member and senior economist Arvind Virmani tells ET Digital how MSMEs can learn from international peers, the role of medium enterprises in unlocking growth and what needs to change for small businesses to become global champions of the future. Watch this video for more. ET: What should the MSME sector's strategy be in the backdrop of recent tariff and trade developments, and how can they safeguard themselves in light of such an unpredictable economic landscape?AV: So, as we know, the tariff was suspended. And based on all the information that came in the next couple of weeks—a month or so after that—a lot of US companies were desperately looking for Indian suppliers of the same products. So, I think the opportunity is much greater than the threat. So, in engineering goods, in household items, and in many others, there were reports, textiles, and many other things; they were looking for suppliers in India. So, I think the advice is very clear. MSMEs should be out there. This is the time. Look for buyers. They are looking. Find them. The MSMEs who feel they want to expand—this is an opportunity. ET: What is your vision for Indian MSMEs over the next decade, and what must change for them to become global champions? AV: The spirit of the MSME sector is very clear. One is that we must not think only of the current situation that there is x demand and we will meet that demand; we must think of the future where we want to be and build for the future. Second is that the future means we are going to be Viksit. So, you must build for a Viksit quality. We cannot be satisfied with where we are today. If I am producing something which is 30% inferior to, say, a German or Japanese product in machinery, a machinery manufacturer must think that in five years, we must be at that quality, and they have to start doing that now. That applies to MSMEs. That applies to start-ups. The vision is that start-ups will drive this push for higher quality, the frontier of the MSME sector. They are going to be the new MSMEs. And they are the ones who will transform productivity and growth. And which is why so much emphasis has been placed on start-up infrastructure, funding, the fund of funds, etc. It's just a matter of connecting them to the that is the vision, actually. That is the future.
