logo
Europe's busiest cruise port Barcelona to scale back capacity

Europe's busiest cruise port Barcelona to scale back capacity

Time of India18-07-2025
Barcelona will cut cruise ship terminals from seven to five to control rising tourist numbers, following a 21% surge in cruise arrivals and a 20% jump in passengers in early 2025. The city aims to reduce overcrowding and pollution by consolidating terminals, prioritizing home-port cruises, and enabling ships to connect to the local power grid to cut emissions.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Barcelona is set to reduce the number of port terminals for cruise ships in the city's latest attempt to limit the number of tourist visits, as per a Reuters report.Spain's third-largest port will cut the number of terminals used by cruises to five from seven, with the aim of making the arrival of the ships 'more controlled and sustainable,' Barcelona's city council said in a statement Thursday.'For the first time ever, limits are being placed on cruise growth in the city,' Barcelona Mayor Jaume Collboni said in the statement. Barcelona recorded a 21% increase in cruise ship calls and a 20% rise in passengers to 1.2 million people in January-May this year from the same period in 2024, as per official data. That was a sharp acceleration following a 20% increase in passenger numbers from 2018 to 2024.There have been protests against tourism and debates about overcrowding in the Spanish city.The left-wing mayor told Reuters last year he was seeking a new deal with port authorities to reduce the number of one-day cruise calls, in an effort to avoid overcrowding at cultural landmarks such as the Sagrada Familia basilica.Under the new plan, three terminals will be combined into one. The port will prioritize cruise ships that use Barcelona as their home port for departures and arrivals and encourage tourists to stay longer and spend more in the city.The port said the refurbishment would facilitate connecting ships to the local electricity grid, reducing emissions.European Union regulations require maritime ports to have onshore power supply infrastructure in place by 2030 to cut carbon emissions. However, a recent study found that most ports across Europe are falling behind in meeting this target.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Nirmala Sitharaman Seemed Biased Against Me Since the Beginning': Former Finance Secretary
'Nirmala Sitharaman Seemed Biased Against Me Since the Beginning': Former Finance Secretary

The Wire

time24 minutes ago

  • The Wire

'Nirmala Sitharaman Seemed Biased Against Me Since the Beginning': Former Finance Secretary

Political Economy Former Finance Secretary Subhash Garg talks candidly about the inner workings of the finance ministry and reveals the details of his troubled working relationship with the Union finance minister. Former Finance Secretary Subhash Garg talks candidly about the inner workings of the finance ministry and reveals details of his troubled working relationship with Union finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman as well as his dissenting views on critical policy matters which had a deep impact on the political economy. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Tax dept probing Jane Street over possible tax treaty misuse: Report
Tax dept probing Jane Street over possible tax treaty misuse: Report

Business Standard

time24 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Tax dept probing Jane Street over possible tax treaty misuse: Report

India's tax authorities are investigating whether Jane Street violated tax laws by booking profits via its Singapore entities on its derivative trades in the Indian market, three sources briefed on the matter said. Searches at the US trading firm's India offices by the income tax department have been underway since last week, sources have said. A government source who was briefed on the matter later said that Jane Street staff were not cooperating. The tax authorities' enquiries follow a temporary ban by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), the market regulator, which publicly alleged that the firm manipulated stock indexes through its derivatives positions. Jane Street has denied the Sebi allegations, but has not made any public comments so far on the tax investigation. The firm did not respond to a Reuters request sent to its US headquarters for comment on Monday on the latest developments. India's income tax department did not respond to Reuters request for comment. Tax authorities are investigating whether Jane Street violated the General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) by using the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and Singapore to evade taxes on large profits it made on Indian derivative trades, all three sources said. The sources declined to be named because they were not authorised to speak to the media. The DTAA is designed to prevent residents from being taxed twice, while the GAAR gives a country the power to deny a particular tax benefit if it is being used solely for tax avoidance. The Indian tax authorities are looking into whether Jane Street booked larger profits on its derivatives positions in the Indian market via its Singapore entities as a way to reduce the tax burden, all three sources briefed on the matter added. Sebi's July 4 ban order showed that Jane Street made more than $4 billion trading in India from January 2023 to May 2025. Jane Street's two India entities - JSI Investments and JSI2 Investments - made a profit of 39.35 billion Indian rupees ($448.23 million), Jane Street Singapore made a profit of 256 billion rupees ($2.92 billion) and its Hong Kong entity, Jane Street Asia Trading, made a profit of 69.30 billion Indian rupees ($789.39 million), the order showed. If the tax department's probe shows the tax rules have been breached, Jane Street could be issued with a tax demand, the third source said. Tax authorities are trying to access Jane Street's accounts, which are maintained overseas, they added. The second source said Sebi had provided the tax department with the profit and loss details of four Jane Street group entities the regulator had named in its orders. Sebi did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

India's tax department investigating Jane Street over possible tax treaty misuse, sources say
India's tax department investigating Jane Street over possible tax treaty misuse, sources say

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

India's tax department investigating Jane Street over possible tax treaty misuse, sources say

Synopsis Indian tax authorities are investigating Jane Street for potential tax violations related to derivative trades. The probe centers on whether the firm used its Singapore entities to evade taxes, leveraging the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. This follows a SEBI ban alleging market manipulation. TIL Creatives India's tax authorities are investigating whether Jane Street violated tax laws by booking profits via its Singapore entities on its derivative trades in the Indian market, three sources briefed on the matter said. Searches at the U.S. trading firm's India offices by the income tax department have been underway since last week, sources have said. A government source who was briefed on the matter later said that Jane Street staff were not cooperating. The tax authorities' enquiries follow a temporary ban by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), the market regulator, which publicly alleged that the firm manipulated stock indexes through its derivatives positions. Jane Street has denied the SEBI allegations, but has not made any public comments so far on the tax investigation. The firm did not respond to a Reuters request sent to its U.S. headquarters for comment on Monday on the latest developments. India's income tax department did not respond to Reuters request for comment. Tax authorities are investigating whether Jane Street violated the General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) by using the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and Singapore to evade taxes on large profits it made on Indian derivative trades, all three sources said. The sources declined to be named because they were not authorised to speak to the media. The DTAA is designed to prevent residents from being taxed twice, while the GAAR gives a country the power to deny a particular tax benefit if it is being used solely for tax avoidance. The Indian tax authorities are looking into whether Jane Street booked larger profits on its derivatives positions in the Indian market via its Singapore entities as a way to reduce the tax burden, all three sources briefed on the matter added. SEBI's July 4 ban order showed that Jane Street made more than $4 billion trading in India from January 2023 to May 2025. Jane Street's two India entities - JSI Investments and JSI2 Investments - made a profit of 39.35 billion Indian rupees ($448.23 million), Jane Street Singapore made a profit of 256 billion rupees ($2.92 billion) and its Hong Kong entity, Jane Street Asia Trading, made a profit of 69.30 billion Indian rupees ($789.39 million), the order showed. If the tax department's probe shows the tax rules have been breached, Jane Street could be issued with a tax demand, the third source said. Tax authorities are trying to access Jane Street's accounts, which are maintained overseas, they added. The second source said SEBI had provided the tax department with the profit and loss details of four Jane Street group entities the regulator had named in its orders. SEBI did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store